Back in 1970, our grade 12 math teacher (who I detested) sashayed into the classroom wearing a red jumpsuit and a gold ascot. All the girls went “Oooooooooooo….”
Then he spun like a ballerina and said ” What do you think?”
“Kinda fruity” says I …. to the laughter and applause of the males in the room. I got kicked out of class and sent to the office.
“Why are you here? asked the Vice Principal. So I told him and he pissed himself laughing.
I am making $162/hour telecommuting. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $21 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it simply ,
How about this for “Co-ordination” ? “Facebook has been spying on the private messages and data of American users and reporting them to the FBI if they express anti-government or anti-authority sentiments — or question the 2020 election — according to sources within the Department of Justice.” NY Post
Textbook fascism
Just Like WHAT GERALD BUTTS Does. Recommending who should be removed directly to Twatter.
I thought the GOPe were going to remove Sec. 230 protections from these anti-constitutional quasi-governmental Social Media censorship Agencies? What happened to Mitch McConnell and Kevin McCarthy? Hello!? Where the hell are you?!
If they removed section 230 protections then censorship on social-media platforms would skyrocket. Is that what you want?
They would go bankrupt, for the crime of editorializing, like a publisher, instead of being a free platform, like the phone company, so either they would stop censoring or go under, you clown. Go get your 10th jab.
The owner of this blog has asked that comments be civil.
Up to you, of course.
Stunning riposte! : “Mommy, he was mean to me!!!”
What HiHo said … that’s what I “want” …
You realize that would affect this site as well if it were in the U.S.?
Ahh, threats, to one of the most free sites ever, because FB is in bed with the FBI.
You really are a piece of work, possibly an evil AI.
Facebook itself likely did nothing illegal. It’s the U.S. government which breached the law by encouraging Facebook to censor. The worst you could say about Facebook is that they didn’t have the courage to refuse to accommodate the requests.
This is likely why Cox is being candid here.
Colluding with the gov’t to violate the constitution is a crime.
Go get your 11th shot.
There is no crime called “collusion”. What specifically — from the U.S. criminal code — would you charge Cox with?
OK, conspiring then, you deceitful mofo who tries to hide crimes against millions for reasons of pure idiocy at best, ideological collusion at worst.
Extraordinarily dubious charge. I doubt there’s a prosecutor in the entire U.S. who would pursue it. Facebook was exercising their own individual right, which is freedom of the press.
“Facebook was exercising their own individual right, which is freedom of the press.”
Yep, because its more like a newspaper(the press) than a platform (the phone company) you dolt, and therefore not free of section 230.
You repeat yourself.
Now there’s a muddled reply.
No, Facebook is not a common carrier. Yes, Facebook is protected by Section 230. Yes, Facebook enjoys freedom of the press and freedom of speech on their own platform.
What’s your point?
Dick the butcher was and is right.
Facebook became a “state actor”….the Supreme Court has recognized a right to sue federal government actors for constitutional violations, even without a specific statute authorizing a lawsuit.
Correct. You can sue the federal government.
But Facebook itself? No.
Once the feds are found guilty, Zuck’s money is gone. Section 230 violations, etc.
Even if the feds are not found guilty of the crime we all know that they committed, that will only strengthen the resolve of many millions.
yup, you CAN sue fakebook
The best KillerMaromt can do know is try to obfuscate criminal and civil charges, as he has set the stage for, saying what is a crime and then who you may sue against. He is a talented liar.
Not for violation of 1st amendment rights you can’t. They have no obligation to enforce the 1st amendment as they are not the government.
Can I call it or what, folks?
What’s truly frightening is that they see nothing wrong with this.
The arrogance is monumental – we know what’s right for you.
Yup, eat your pablum, and be a good vegetable……. I got rid of facebook when they started censoring.
They are part of the problem but people can’t take the time to see it.
Courage ….. what a laugh.
Parse the grand lack of integrity from on high , then bring the law into discussion?
That’s urinating into the wind.
Sorry no excuse for companies big or small doing the governments dirty work.
It’s been awhile since I’ve seen political correctness put forward as a sign of intellectual purity.
If you don’t pay for the product, you are the product.
If you have a FB account, you are one of Zucks’, and by extension the left’s and FBI’s products.
Much the same can be said for people with Amazon Prime, Netflix or cable company accounts.
The best thing is how these folk get their panties in a knot if you buy a Chinese oscilloscope, or go for a cheap vacation in Cuba, it’s like they don’t care what happens here, but they like to virtue signal about what happens elsewhere. Canada, yay.
Fascists, that what you call it when the government colludes with wealthy corporations to control the people. Face Book should be wiped off the financial books for what they’ve done.
Rose, you are the coolest chick ever.
Like any land grab.. Land barons will appear and claim they own all the water to drive their smaller competition out of business.. Like any railroad expansion that decides what towns live or die.. So much room on the web, yet so very little has any value.. A mule and five acres of land for those willing to clear the land for the land barons..
Nothing new under the sun..
Love the way Josh Hawley, like a few handfuls of other Repubs, always know the answers before asking the questions and can pivot and enhance the first question with a deeper rabbit hole than the first.
Oh my lord, the wrong kind of graders.
Sorry about that Kate!
Here you go…
An Ontario teacher, teaching your kids…near you.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/ontario-male-high-school-teacher-wears-massive-fake-breasts
I know it’s way off topic, but apropos to jjfb:
Back in 1970, our grade 12 math teacher (who I detested) sashayed into the classroom wearing a red jumpsuit and a gold ascot. All the girls went “Oooooooooooo….”
Then he spun like a ballerina and said ” What do you think?”
“Kinda fruity” says I …. to the laughter and applause of the males in the room. I got kicked out of class and sent to the office.
“Why are you here? asked the Vice Principal. So I told him and he pissed himself laughing.
I am making $162/hour telecommuting. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $21 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it simply ,
COPY AND OPEN THIS SITE_________ http://www.salarybaar.com
How about this for “Co-ordination” ? “Facebook has been spying on the private messages and data of American users and reporting them to the FBI if they express anti-government or anti-authority sentiments — or question the 2020 election — according to sources within the Department of Justice.” NY Post
Textbook fascism
Just Like WHAT GERALD BUTTS Does. Recommending who should be removed directly to Twatter.
I thought the GOPe were going to remove Sec. 230 protections from these anti-constitutional quasi-governmental Social Media censorship Agencies? What happened to Mitch McConnell and Kevin McCarthy? Hello!? Where the hell are you?!
If they removed section 230 protections then censorship on social-media platforms would skyrocket. Is that what you want?
They would go bankrupt, for the crime of editorializing, like a publisher, instead of being a free platform, like the phone company, so either they would stop censoring or go under, you clown. Go get your 10th jab.
The owner of this blog has asked that comments be civil.
Up to you, of course.
Stunning riposte! : “Mommy, he was mean to me!!!”
What HiHo said … that’s what I “want” …
You realize that would affect this site as well if it were in the U.S.?
Ahh, threats, to one of the most free sites ever, because FB is in bed with the FBI.
You really are a piece of work, possibly an evil AI.
Facebook itself likely did nothing illegal. It’s the U.S. government which breached the law by encouraging Facebook to censor. The worst you could say about Facebook is that they didn’t have the courage to refuse to accommodate the requests.
This is likely why Cox is being candid here.
Colluding with the gov’t to violate the constitution is a crime.
Go get your 11th shot.
There is no crime called “collusion”. What specifically — from the U.S. criminal code — would you charge Cox with?
OK, conspiring then, you deceitful mofo who tries to hide crimes against millions for reasons of pure idiocy at best, ideological collusion at worst.
Extraordinarily dubious charge. I doubt there’s a prosecutor in the entire U.S. who would pursue it. Facebook was exercising their own individual right, which is freedom of the press.
“Facebook was exercising their own individual right, which is freedom of the press.”
Yep, because its more like a newspaper(the press) than a platform (the phone company) you dolt, and therefore not free of section 230.
You repeat yourself.
Now there’s a muddled reply.
No, Facebook is not a common carrier. Yes, Facebook is protected by Section 230. Yes, Facebook enjoys freedom of the press and freedom of speech on their own platform.
What’s your point?
Dick the butcher was and is right.
Facebook became a “state actor”….the Supreme Court has recognized a right to sue federal government actors for constitutional violations, even without a specific statute authorizing a lawsuit.
Correct. You can sue the federal government.
But Facebook itself? No.
Once the feds are found guilty, Zuck’s money is gone. Section 230 violations, etc.
Even if the feds are not found guilty of the crime we all know that they committed, that will only strengthen the resolve of many millions.
yup, you CAN sue fakebook
The best KillerMaromt can do know is try to obfuscate criminal and civil charges, as he has set the stage for, saying what is a crime and then who you may sue against. He is a talented liar.
Not for violation of 1st amendment rights you can’t. They have no obligation to enforce the 1st amendment as they are not the government.
Can I call it or what, folks?
What’s truly frightening is that they see nothing wrong with this.
The arrogance is monumental – we know what’s right for you.
Yup, eat your pablum, and be a good vegetable……. I got rid of facebook when they started censoring.
They are part of the problem but people can’t take the time to see it.
Courage ….. what a laugh.
Parse the grand lack of integrity from on high , then bring the law into discussion?
That’s urinating into the wind.
Sorry no excuse for companies big or small doing the governments dirty work.
It’s been awhile since I’ve seen political correctness put forward as a sign of intellectual purity.
If you don’t pay for the product, you are the product.
If you have a FB account, you are one of Zucks’, and by extension the left’s and FBI’s products.
Much the same can be said for people with Amazon Prime, Netflix or cable company accounts.
The best thing is how these folk get their panties in a knot if you buy a Chinese oscilloscope, or go for a cheap vacation in Cuba, it’s like they don’t care what happens here, but they like to virtue signal about what happens elsewhere. Canada, yay.
Fascists, that what you call it when the government colludes with wealthy corporations to control the people. Face Book should be wiped off the financial books for what they’ve done.
Rose, you are the coolest chick ever.
Like any land grab.. Land barons will appear and claim they own all the water to drive their smaller competition out of business.. Like any railroad expansion that decides what towns live or die.. So much room on the web, yet so very little has any value.. A mule and five acres of land for those willing to clear the land for the land barons..
Nothing new under the sun..
Love the way Josh Hawley, like a few handfuls of other Repubs, always know the answers before asking the questions and can pivot and enhance the first question with a deeper rabbit hole than the first.
bverwey