60 Replies to “Dear Leader’s Snitch Legislation”

    1. There are people behind bars TODAY for disagreeing with that fragile little far-left narcissist rich kid.

        1. Last years election threw a wrench into their plans otherwise it would be. Make no mistake though, by the end of the 30 day Emergency it and every other fascist bill will get rammed through.

    2. Does saying {a fringe minority of racists and misogynists who’s views are unacceptable} count as hate speech?

    3. Report the CBC and the msm everyday along with Trudeau and Jagmeat everyday BECOME UNGOVERNABLE CLOG UP THE SYSTEM.

  1. Basically anyone who does not vote liberal or agree with liberals will be accused of hate speech.

    I wish I was kidding.

  2. Why not? Since the plague is as good as over, Karens throughout the country will need to have something to do, right?

    1. “Members of a parliamentary committee set up to scrutinize the Emergencies Act will have to take an oath of secrecy, but will not be given access to highly classified material, says the government’s representative in the Senate.”

      Why bother having Senators if they are only expected to rubber stamp laws without knowing all the facts. Every call for the Emergencies Act can now be implemented without Senate oversight.

  3. I was salivating at the chance to click on the link and report Justin’s referral of me as a racist misogynist.

    I just had it out with my son’s high school VP about their daily QR code health check-in and now that I have him excused from that nonsense, I’m feeling a little like a tough guy.

  4. So start with reporting the MP honk honk, follow it up with reporting trudeau, and then fruit fly guy after his followers attacked the pipeline construction site, and ask when he’ll be arrested for “counselling to mischief”…

    1. I have a report.

      A blackface-wearing, Jew-hating racist who hates women has been inspiring brutality and murder.

      You can recognise him by his heavy jowls, blood shot eyes and hair plugs. He might be hiding under his bed at Harrington Lake.

  5. There’s been a lot of hate speech coming from the Liberal government and their lapdogs, the NDP and mainstream media.

    But that’s GOOD hate speech, as per Orwell’s instruction manual “1984”.

  6. I have been wondering why no one has taken blackfacedmessiah to the human rights tribunals over his depiction of the truckers as racist, misogynists’ etc. Wouldn’t this be an automatic twofer, by eliminating the power of the tribunals and opening eyes to dear leaders BS.

  7. Snitching on people is fine, as long as helps stop the flow of firearms to criminals in Toronto, right?

    1. Yes. I think it is ok to snitch if you are stopping transport of illegal fire arms. Thats different from a ” thought crime”, and an anticipated, but not yet expressed ” hate speech” is basically a thought crime.

      1. So you too think the Turd should be able to decide who does and does not get to have a firearm.

        Canadians, smart as a bag of gummy bears, and just as solid.

        1. I think it is reasonable to have some restrictions on fire arms. Notice I referred to “illegal” fire arms– not all fire arms. Violent gangs mostly deal in illegal fire arms, stopping a shipment of illegal guns if you happen to know about it would be fine in my view.

          1. “Illegal firearms” makes as much sense as “illegal shovels” or “illegal chainsaws.”
            The answer to gun crime is constitutional carry, or at the very least must issue permits, like in Vermont, Wyoming, Texas, Florida and others.
            You are basically saying “These jail bars, I approve of.”, and then act all surprised when you find yourself surrounded by jail bars.

          2. “I think it is reasonable to have some restrictions on fire arms.”

            Almost everyone does. You don’t allow unstable people to own them, for one.

            ” Notice I referred to “illegal” fire arms– not all fire arms. Violent gangs mostly deal in illegal fire arms, stopping a shipment of illegal guns if you happen to know about it would be fine in my view.”

            True, but that is NOT what Trudeau’s latest ‘gun control’ legislation is designed to do. He has carefully worded it to be aimed at “assault-style” weapons, which will fool almost anyone who knows nothing about firearms.

            You see, assault weapons (aka assault rifles) are *already* illegal in Canada…assault-STYLE weapons simply means weapons that merely LOOK LIKE bonafide assault weapons. In other words: scary LOOKING firearms. Trudeau knows full well that these weapons are not being used by criminals here…they are large, cumbersome and expensive. Handguns (illegally smuggled from the US, of course) are their weapon of choice, and the only effort the Liberals have made to control them has been to *reduce* minimum sentences for their illegal use!

            Once again: victimize and ostracize the legitimate gun owners while allowing the criminals free access to their weapons of choice. It’s the Liberal way.

  8. Canadas transitioning from a liberal democracy into a NAZI State thanks to the WEF Army inside the PMO and the LIberal cabinet… Klaus Schwab is running the country.

  9. “…or any other similar factor.”

    Would that be vax status? As in we could take advantage of this to protect the unvaxxed from hate speech by the coronaphobes?

    Hmmm…

  10. I saw a racist in blackface. I really hope they catch the bastard and stop him from giving Canada a bad name. LOCK HIM UP!

  11. Given the amount of hate speech that emanates from the PMO, it’s clear they haven’t thought this through. The AG is going to be kept very busy denying all the applocations brought against young Castreau.

  12. Remember, ‘hate speech’ must be of the approved kind and only goes one way. If you were to, for example, report somebody named J. Trudeau in Ottawa for slanderous comments calling people racists, Islamophobes, misogynists and Nazis, it would be you who would be reported to the authorities and find yourself in court.

  13. This is a great idea and could be applied to other areas of law enforcement. Police could set up special squads to root out likely perps. It could be called the Future Crime Prevention Squad.

  14. Funny how I used to think 1984 and Minority Report were just fascinating works of fiction suggesting what might happen in the most far-fetched dystopian scenarios. You know: thank God that could never happen here.

    How wrong, and how very naive I was.

    1. Minority Report became reality long ago, with things like banning the sale of raw milk and implementing DUI checkpoints.

  15. Our country is at a point that when the trees fall in our forests, this is not being reported, and were not for the 5th Estate, we would soon find ourselves in a desert and not know why and just die surprised in the withering sun.

    The individuals who make up the 4th Estate, aka legacy media, here and elsewhere, who were often the bastions of government accountability, who were responsible to their readers, the people, and not some political paymasters, that still carry still too much influence, that continue to support the establishment “narrative”; do so at what incalculable cost to themselves and the naive citizenry?

    Their integrity, their humanity, their souls are forever forfeit. Their country on an irreversible path. They know this deep down, yet they persist. They have become fanatically catatonic in their viewpoints.

    Why? Fear of getting cancelled by their peers? Losing their jobs and thus the ability to feed their families? Getting their bank accounts frozen? Fearing censorship by the State apparatus? All good, rationale reasons. But so short sighted as these are nothing against the long term needs of the many, their country.

  16. Hate speech seems to resemble hurt speech and that’s often just the truth.
    The truth hurts Leftys more than anything.

  17. Prosecuting possible future crimes as if they have occurred is the ultimate government absurdity. How can anyone now question the obvious repressive dictatorship Trudeau wishes to implement?

  18. “with the Attorney General’s consent” should ensure only non liberals are targeted.

    Bill C-36 states that “a person may, with the Attorney General’s consent, lay an information before a provincial court judge if the person fears on reasonable grounds that another person will commit (a) an offence under section 318 [advocating genocide] or subsection 319” [inciting or promoting hate, promoting hatred].

  19. How many of you protested when harper brought in C-51, even though it took him 3 tries, and at every attempt citizens made it clear they did NOT want that disgusting “spying on Canadians” legislation?

    Folks, it ain’t just the Libs and Dippers who are the problem here. ALL of the legacy parties have failed us badly, for decades.

    1. In honor of your moniker:

      I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It’s the only way to be sure.

  20. The amount of neighborhood “Karens” willing to take up a Stasi armband is staggering.
    Everyone knows a handfull.
    Ostracize them.
    And when you meet them “Why, Bless your heart”

  21. I hate child abusers, rapists, and a host of other thugs come get me Justine Stalin. It was only a matter of time before the liberals and NDP would bring taught crimes back and make hurt feelings a criminal offense. The left can’t debate the right, nor can they justify their fascism thus they make pointing out the facts as hate crimes.

  22. Last time I saw this legislation, it was called something different…something about ‘barbaric cultural practices’, wasn’t it?

  23. Several years ago I was fortunate enough to visit Budapest . One of the many memories I have is listening to a lady describe what life was like during the Soviet occupation and how her family had been so horribly torn apart . A tactic used was one family member ratting out another . She teared up as she told of an uncle who did exactly that with her family . My God I never thought Canada would ever stoop to such a low point . I could care less about myself but it is my family that I fear for .

  24. What is a Diversity Minister? And what is their role? Seriously, what is the point of this role? Do any other “serious” (rolls eyes) governments have a ‘Diversity Minister’?

Navigation