83 Replies to “The “Hesitant””

  1. Good read or no, you still have to wade through a lot of dumb.

    Vaccines are products. It makes as much sense to talk about the science behind the general concept for the purpose of selling a particular vaccine as it does to talk about the science behind the internal combustion engine when selling a Pinto. Just because you refuse to purchase the flaming wreck on the side of the road, you are not somehow “anti-car” or “car hesitant.”

    2. Jim…!!

      PURRFECT
      An awesome analogy…that I will USE..!!

      And what Ward said below…there is no Hesitancy on my part, I’m just not that into having a Bio
      Weapon shoved up my (_i_) thank you very kindly

    3. I have a couple of science degrees and one of the things I keep trying to impress upon people is that they shouldn’t get snowed by the “white coat effect”. Just because someone doesn’t have an advanced science education doesn’t mean they can’t evaluate things using common sense and have to “trust the experts”.

      Is CO2 really an existential threat? Then why are the people who say it is buying beachfront property, flying around the world on private jets, and turning a blind eye to China and India’s industrial effluents?

      Is COVID-19 really dangerous to everyone? Then where are all the bodies?

      Does the vaccine really work to protect us from COVID-19? Then why do we have to get boosters, and still wear masks? Why are vaccinated people still getting COVID and dying?

      People who have better things to do than get a biochemistry degree in their spare time can still have an informed opinion about these issues. It’s as simple as saying “if this is true, then that must necessarily follow”. If that isn’t true, there’s a good chance you’ve been lied to about this.

      1. The application of logic and reason to a problem set is a dying skill. And I get sick of the credentialist fallacy that keeps getting thrown around.

        1. An expert isn’t always right, even within their own fields, and especially outside their own.
        2. The “average person” isn’t always wrong, despite a lack of formal education in a given subject.
        3. You have to educate yourself to be able to know the difference.
        4. Education is an on-going process, subject to modification of prior knowledge.
        5. You are rarely the smartest person in the room, even if alone, so act with humility.

        Simple, right?

      2. I had a ‘back and forth’ with a columnist who wrote a hate speech column recently, about those of us who refuse the toxic jab.

        His response was exactly as you said, mocking me, “Oh my look here, a real scientist!”

        That’s the media today, tunnel vision and credentialed need only be referenced, and only then, those who are WITH the mob.

  2. Part 1 did not compel me to continue.
    I’m not hesitant about taking an experimental, unapproved drug for a disease that is 99.9% survivable for the majority of the healthy population, I outright refuse.

    Those that are unhealthy, infirm, or elderly could greatly mitigate the threat of the disease through very safe therapeutics. 85% reduction in hospitalizations.

    Instead we have governments demonizing and banning truly safe, proven solutions.

    Maybe he gets to it later on, but not addressing this immediately, is a big fail.

    1. Ward

      Boils down to this….

      1942: Arbeit Macht Frie
      2021: Impfstoff Macht Frie

      85% of the 8 Billion of us were most Likely 100% immune to this shit…but wholly UN-Immune to NAZI Propganda – Media Bullshit – Govt LIES.

      Education Fucking well matters people…as those in Loudon, VA are finding out – & you had better believe the IDENTICAL shit is going on here too.

    2. I did read to the end and it’s closing message was pretty good. Dr. Doidge made a strong case for how the mandates and crazed coercive efforts by the government, medical community and lay people are actually doing more harm to the pro-vaccine effort than anything that has ever come along to dissuade people from any vaccinations. He states that two decades of actual anti-vax rhetoric can’t compete with what is happening now to ruin the small amount of trust some of the public may have had with pharma, public health and the government.
      It was a balanced piece and it did take a bigger part of my day to read than I had counted on, but I finished it up between trick or treaters.

  3. A disappointing read. Still comes from the viewpoint of “unvaxxed have irrational feelings”.

    Sorry, my opposition is based on science, from all the previously mentioned Drs, brave individuals that have put their lives and reputations on the line to counter theBigPharma BigGov BigMedia propaganda and narrative.

    If one is reasonably healthy, without comorbidities, and supplements your diet as I’ve mentioned previously (Zelenko/Fleming protocols), Covid is just a brief, passing flu type illness at worst. Best of all, Natural Immunity.

    I’ve always trusted our medical system, have all previous vaxxes, and have taken additional vaxxes for foreign travel. So, with that said, it’s clear I’m not an “anti-vaxxer”. And, I’ve lost tremendous faith in our medical system, with its complete loss of investigative skills, and binding itself to official protocols, OR ELSE!

    I’m an anti-mRNA test subject.

      1. Sorry but that is what I got too. Vaccines are good. Everyone should have one. We understand people being bothered because we haven’t handled it well but overall if we just sit down and talk one to one and explain how wonderful vaccines are and be understanding and supportive, well then everyone will get one.

        Another dead giveaway to the idea this is just one more propaganda piece by a well meaning victim of the ideology is nowhere, not once, does he mention treatment with ivermectin or anything else.

        Well he may also be a pharmaceutical shill who got handsomely paid for it. Just read the bullshit coming out of our government about how to talk to the “vaccine hesitant” and get the shot in their arm. The manipulation tactic begins with listening carefully all the patient’s conspiracy theories no matter how totally nutso and idiotic they are and agreeing the patient has a reason for concern but always always always eventually pulling them back to accepting the vaccine AFTER you have “established a relationship” by pretending to hear them out and be sympathetic. This piece was written precisely according to the standard published way to manipulate people in order to overcome their unjustifable vaccine hesitancy.

        1. If you actually read the entire thing, he brings up several points in which big pharma got it wrong and puts politicians and all the big pharma companies on blast for their handling of everything, and from my reading, he understands why people are not wanting to get it and he doesn’t blame them at all. I think its a great read.

          1. Magos- I agree.
            Best to read online then you can click on the links.
            Like the author I have had the vaccine (3 of them) and definitely was coerced because of wanting to travel to visit my family.
            Having the covid saga told in his neutral style made this a mine of information.
            Definitely, “bookmarkable,” I feel.
            Thank you Francisco.

          3. I’ll give it a 4 out of 5.
            I take it that the target audience is the vaxed lemmings. So mentioning ivermectin and other verboten kill buttons wouldn’t be helpful.

  4. Funny how Trudeau is having a hell of a good party overseas unmasked, no social distance issues while in Trudeauland, his slaves labor to a different beat the he’s imposed.

    1. Turdeau is oblivious to what is going on around him and he DOESN’T want to know.
      He is a puppet, told what to do.
      He will be just as stoned out of his gourd the day the Hoi Polloi come for his head.

  5. I read the entirety of Part 1. Then in Parts 2, 3, & 4 I searched for “Natural Immunity”. My take on the author’s thesis is that smallpox left marks on a person’s body, which indicated they had been infected by smallpox, and obviously survived, so they were immune. Covid has no such markers so our overlords have no way of determining if a person has immunity.

    My reasons for taking the stance that I have to get a vaccine after getting Covid can be summed up as follows:
    – Biden & Harris are lifelong liars.
    – Fauci is a serial liar.
    – Rochelle Walensky is a serial liar.
    – CNN/MSNBC/ABC/CBS/PBS/NPR/CBC are consistent liars.
    – The big tech platforms are clearly censoring any opinions that don’t fit the official narratives of the above liars.
    – The VAERs database, which is supposed to accurately keep track of adverse reactions to vaccines has proven to be corrupt.
    – Every single hyper-pro-vaccine person I’ve conversed with knows little to nothing compared to all of the research I’ve done.
    – This past year I’ve done extensive traveling, spoke with literally thousands of people, many in close proximity, and I have not been sick once.

    All of this vaccine malarkey is not really about Covid, it’s about power and control. It’s about punishing those who stand up against those wanting to exert that power and control. This is why, every day, I am stronger with my stance against these tyrannical thugs.

    1. Natural immunity gets mentioned a number of times in the piece. When he talks about Sweden and Ethiopia are two examples.

    2. That’s the rabbit hole, my friend, that you see in the distance. The same rabbit hole many of us see, but cannot comprehend that it may be true, yet, led to those logical conclusions.

      Totalitarianism
      DePop

      We don’t want to believe, because we haven’t experienced it in our lifetimes. Yet, we now see governments acting in ways that fully support end goals that are beyond belief, yet no other conclusions make sense.
      If the “vaccines” truly worked as real vaccines work, then maybe.
      But, these same concoctions, are not vaccines. In fact, there is growing evidence they destroy the immune system, and boosters barely delay the inevitable.
      Governments and their minions double down on their faith in the shots, and their draconian policies. So, either they know of the growing side-effects (EVIL) or they don’t know (INCOMPETENT). Either way, its all about POWER.

    3. +++++/\ Robert.
      I too have spoken to many many folks, never once wearing a stupid mask, nor EVER using Sanitizer…all Total control BS, as is the Socialist Distancing.

      Those that are incapable of seeing this to be anything other than a Global Coup d’Etat, walk about with their entirety of sensing organs In complete shutdown mode…. Entirely buying the 20+ months of utter Bullshit thrust upon them with 50% wanting even more….

    4. I have started calling them “collaborators” and reminding them what happens to collaborators once the occupation forces get thrown out. I remind them that they have data and studies to back their position. I have just as much data and backing mine. It is what it is. Except one side simply uses monarchic fiat to declare their argument correct (we are dealing with a fuck of a lot of unknowns) while the other side is constantly doing more science and challenge.

      This is war. I am starting to talk like it.

      It has a very “sharpening” effect on the vacciNazis. They suddenly don’t look so confident when you remind them that collaborating with Nazis gets you on a list.

      I’m done being civil to these fucks.

      Collaborators must pay a steep price for their treachery.

      Spread the word.

  7. That’s kind of a naïve opinion in Part 1 by the author. That didn’t surprise me, because I find Jordan Peterson naïve as well. So it makes sense that he would be presenting this writer. The whole “Crystallization” protocol is contingent on factual numbers (hence, majority vs. minority). Well, there is the first problem. My evaluation is that the Minority (i.e. most vocal) is pushing the mandate…not the majority. I see more people in the streets of Australia protesting the draconian rules than I see politicians standing out there trying to convince. I tend to think the vast majority of the people who did rush out and get the “gene-based therapy” did so without so much as a thought as to any of the issues described in the article. We are talking about a significant number of people who will do anything the government tells them to do, and believe anything they say.

    And, Behavioral Immune System? Please…that’s absolute nonsense. It’s a “scientist” trying to define “common sense” in scientific terms. It’s borderline ridiculous. It is the equivalent of a battery operated back scratcher. Critical thinking defined as an innate behavioral mechanism is almost humorous in the concept. But, I can see how those who don’t practice critical thinking would need an explanation for their shortcomings. After all, what a great way to excuse racism. Who thinks that ancient tribes were more concerned about what diseases another tribe carried? Who is that naïve? Ok, now who thinks ancient tribes were more concerned about how many spears those other guys had? (eye roll) “Scientists” have too much free time on their hands.

    Here’s where this article truly fails, and how the naivete of both Doidge and Peterson are on display. They don’t understand that one side of the aisle cannot debate their positions (most of them) because a great many are absolutely self-oriented and unsupportable. So, they resort to censorship, ad hominem attacks and even equivocating verbal debate with physical battery if the other view challenges their own. THIS IS NOT…I REPEAT….NOT A REFLECTION OF CRYSTALLIZATION IN THAT A MAJORITY ACCEPTANCE TRIGGERS A SOLIDIFICATION OF FACT!!!! It is a vocal (very vocal) minority enforcing their views on everyone else. “You will address me by these pronouns.” “You will allow skirted mentally ill males in your female bathroom.” “You will hire this person because the melanin content of their skin is higher.” “You will be called a racist because you have the audacity to suggest that the employee be punctual.” You get the idea.

    Crystallization is a lark. Squeaky wheel gets the grease is more apt. Agenda driven misrepresentation is even more so. They don’t even address the underlying (and more important) basis for this “pandemic” in the first place. Control….power….money. They totally ignore (just like everyone else) natural immunity.

      1. Ok, I tried Chapter 2…then I saw the Alicia Patterson Foundation being used as a tool by Doidge to present the point that Scientists were hiding negative feedback on the gene-based therapy which led to a skepticism. That’s all fine and good…probably even true. But, anyone who would hinge their basic points on the Alicia Patterson Foundation fellow has a few screws loose. They define themselves as non-partisan. That’s a hoot. They might as well be the propaganda institute for anthropomorphic Climate Change.

        Not going to bother with Chapter 3.

      2. I read the whole thing. Nowhere did he say we should not get jabbed if we have natural immunity. He danced all around it with “maybe more studies” type answers.

        1. He’s writing an academic paper, and he’s not saying that the naturally immune SHOULD get vaccinated, he just doesn’t know

      3. You might address Orson’s excellent points. A behavioral immune system indeed! And what an not needing the shots if you had Covid. I wonder if the author actually talked to people who won get the shots about why they won’t. I do it.

  8. I read the first chapter and have dealt with both extreme positions.
    My son-in-law has nothing but contempt for anyone that took the jab. He was mad at my daughter who gave in to AHS to keep her job. He has not caught COVID but she did shortly after receiving the second jab.
    I myself have been cancelled and ostracised for not giving into the narrative. The instigator of this was on Farcebook bragging about getting the jab. He also breaks the rules when it is convenient for himself. Thus, we nicknamed him Hippo (for hypocrite).

    I don’t care if you are jabbed or not. I do not fear anyone either way. I get into trouble because I question everyone and everything.

    1. Me too, its my wife that is the mouse in the room, “you can’t say that. You can’t do that”

      Yes I can, who cares what they think. Must be a female thing, caring so much about what strangers and assholes think.

      1. I’m a female and I never say “You can’t say that”. In fact my dad would walk into a room full of my mother’s relatives and precede to say the most offensive outrages things that left them prostrate in anger-I found it funny.

        2. Your father sounds like my late father. Papa BADR was known for being an ornery cuss, but an ornery cuss who was honest, reliable, and did good work.

    2. If you read further you’ll see why there’s good reason to question everyone and everything.

      1. If you didn’t have a hunnert good reasons to question everyone and everything re: this Total Goat Fuck a year or more back you weren’t paying attention. Welcome to 2020.

      2. Francisco, I did not intend to criticize you in any way for posting this. Thank you, in fact, for doing so! I’ve forwarded it to many people.

  9. I read it all, and don’t agree when you preface a discussion using the term vaccine you lost me. It’s not a vaccine, it’s legal name is a biological delivery system. We have no idea what the long term ramifications of said experimental drug will be, never mind injecting up to four or five times into your body. I no longer trust the medical establishment, doctors, nurses or any organization that keeps lying that this is a vaccine it’s not. I don’t care if 99 percent of society gets it, I just don’t care but please don’t lecture my for refusing to be a lab rat for rich trillionare globalist.

    1. It doesn’t sound like you read it. Because not only does he agree with most of what you just said he does so in great detail.

      1. And then he ends it by saying get the shot anyway. The shit is good. This is classic well published how to manipulate people into accepting the vaccine as published by our government for health professionals to use.

        2. That’s it, Justin. You just saved me from making a comment… ooops… Looks like I’m making one anyway. Well then, while I’m here, I’ll just say that indeed, the author admitted near the end of Chapter 4 that he did take the vax. My take from this piece was that the trust that the general public had wrt public health had been violated. On that point, I think there’s solid agreement.

          The crux of the article, I think, was how can that trust damage can be addressed and possibly repaired, but the endpoint is that the author’s objective was to find a better way to convince us to get the jab. I was rather disappointed that, after spending 2 to 3 hours reading this, I come to realize only at the end that the author really didn’t have my best interest at heart. His intent was to suggest that I am indeed justified to mistrust public health, given what has transpired, but also to suggest alternative messaging, in order to convince me to take the jab.

          I am somewhat befuddled by this conclusion, and quite honestly, a little bit angry because I felt like I was deceived.

        3. He said he decided to get the jab because of his own health risk characteristics (age, weight, comorbidities). He didn’t advocate for it, in fact he questioned the sanity of jabbing healthy children when the risk of mortality was 4.6 times higher from the jab than from contracting Wuhan flu.

          The real issue is that the old, the fat, and those with compromised immune systems who are in favour of the mandates are essentially enabling the state to jabbing, interning, un-employing and terrorizing the young and healthy as human shields in the false hope that they will be saved from the realities of their own risk factors. To them, the jab offers “some” temporary lower risk of serious illness and mortality. To everyone else, the decision should be more nuanced. To those with natural immunity, there is no apparent need for any consideration of the jab.

          The article was a good synopsis.

  10. Ok, I tried Chapter 2…then I saw the Alicia Patterson Foundation being used as a tool by Doidge to present the point that Scientists were hiding negative feedback on the gene-based therapy which led to a skepticism. That’s all fine and good…probably even true. But, anyone who would hinge their basic points on the Alicia Patterson Foundation fellow has a few screws loose. They define themselves as non-partisan. That’s a hoot. They might as well be the propaganda institute for anthropomorphic Climate Change.

    Not going to bother with Chapter 3.

  11. The fact that the promotion of healthy life styles, effect alternative treatments, and self testing are being suppressed and denied by the government, the medial establishment, and the press tells me that this is not about health. The only explanation that makes sense is that this is a eugenics program. You judge a tree by the fruit it produces. Or actions speak louder that words. God bless you all.

  12. I read the whole thing carefully. All of it. Right to the bitter end.

    Government of Manitoba has published a set of guidelines about how to talk to the vaccine hesitant so you can manipulate them into accepting the vaccine. (Everyone should read this.) It begins with “establish a relationship” by listening and and acting all supportive and understanding of their concerns even if you think they are crazed lunatic conspiracy theories. Act like you care. Act like you agree on some points. Then once you got them thinking you are on their side, jab em quick before they can think too much.

    Once you get to the final chapter you can see that’s exactly what he is doing. Yes there are issues. I understand. We could have done better. BUT Jab is good. Go get the jab.

    Well done psychological manipulation piece. I wonder how much Pfizer paid him for that one?

    1. Even though he covers many positions of those who are on the side of caution in proceeding with the jab, the essence of his take on the Science itself as it is ballooning seems to be his summary of ZDoggMD :
      “He (ZDoggMD) addresses conflicting studies, bringing on some of the world’s finest epidemiologists and public health experts, and shows us the real world of physicians and scientists agreeing and disagreeing.”
      And what he appreciates about this isn’t that this leads ZDoggMD to help direct inquirers to a more accurate Scientific position, but that it helps some of them overcome their hesitancy. That’s just using the method of Science as another manipulative device, or in this case a Psychological tool . Along with pretty much everyone else he ends up avoiding getting into the weeds of the Science which should be the first step in establishing a risk benefit analysis. The Scientific method is pugilistic, majority and minority are irrelevant to its pursuit. As to the Institution of Science, that’s another story altogether.

  13. Its a remarkable history of the “pandemic,” and the only reason not to read it is if you are information averse.
    The information on Ethopia, in particular, highlights the horrible side effects of being a citizen of “Western” civilization and is information I’ve not seen elsewhere. Conclusions stated about how horribly ineffective a government bureaucracy is are sensibly identified, and of course, resonate with everyone’s experience. Want to do it wrong? Assign it to the government.

    Five thumbs up.

    1. roaddog – I did wonder of Ethiopia and Kenya, which he refers to, had lower rates because their populations might have had a history of regular use of Ivermectin?
      e.g. LC homes where residents treated with Ivermectin because of scabies outbreaks had lower covid infection rates than residents who were not treated for scabies.

      1. Not Ivermectin…
        But Hydroxychloroquine because ETHIOPIA has 75% of its land mass bering overrun/RIFE with MALARIA. and as such by extension, Im betting most of the population uses that cheap and effective drug on a daily basis.

  14. Interesting article but the authorities have already ruled out all approaches to “getting back to normal” except their officially approved one. Home treatments are forbidden, at the price to doctors of their livelihood and vocation. Natural immunity has been denied from the start – on the basis that it was an artificial creation, a NEW virus, and therefore there could be no natural immunity. Of course there was and anyone now who has had the virus is now, naturally, immune. Herd immunity will come naturally.

  15. As vaccines go, they don’t provide any of the features of vaccines, so they are (at best) a therapeutic, and to call them a vaccine misrepresents them.

    1. Another one

      “Devastating NBC Polling Highlights Collapse of Support for Biden and Democrat Party Overall – Also Majority of Public Do Not Support Vaccine Mandate

      October 31, 2021 | Sundance | 160 Comments

      The bad news is this is an NBC poll conducted by Mark Murray and Hart Research and Associates, they are notorious for manipulative media polling [Use Site Search Function for More]. The good news is this is an NBC/Mark Murray poll, meaning if this is the best Murray and Hart Research can come up with, the reality of the situation is exponentially worse.”

      More at

      https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/10/31/devastating-nbc-polling-highlights-collapse-of-support-for-biden-and-democrat-party-overall-also-majority-of-public-do-not-support-vaccine-mandate/

      1. Very good news about the non- support for vaccine mandates. Most Canadians do support these, primarily because they have not been told the truth about the experimental vaccines.

  17. My recommendation is not protests in the streets with the cops watching. The correct approach, ladies and gentlemen, is “reprisals”. No, not ambushing and assassinations. Those are for much later.

    Think more small scale. Every one of these Federal departments, every hospital, every police force, every airline, that has fired the unvaxxed, has multitudes of low level drones and bureaucrats working for them.

    Now the misery that these people have allowed to be spread to the unvaxxed, either directly, or standing by and letting it happen, every one of them has a name. And an address. And places they like to hang out. A golf course. A pub. Well, instead of “share the wealth”, how about “share the pain”?.

    How? you ask. Doxxing. Wait, before you get all hissy, listen up. By naming them and declaring them “traitors to their fellow countrymen” and “collaborators” you are switching the narrative, away from Covid, and toward something else. You are forcing them to do two things:

    1. Own THEIR privelege. They have elected to betray friends and colleagues and family for personal privelege. Make them own it, and let everyone know who some of these people are. Note, NOT the top echelons! You are targeting the cops, bankers, bureaucrats at lower level, who cannot afford private security. You will see why in a bit.

    2. You are putting THEM in a situation where perhaps THEIR house might be burned down in the middle of the night. Perhaps they might receive an unscheduled pepper-spraying and beating with a nightstick. If WE are to suffer loss of everything we have worked for, THEY should be made to pay a personal price too.

    Why am I outlining this strategy? Because absent reprisals at the lower levels, these scumbag tyrants have minions who fear nothing, amd will always do as commanded.

    As Solzhenitsyn pointed out, it wasn’t threats against Stalin that would have worked. It was threats against the juniors he hired to run his machine, that would have begun to undermine his ability to terrorise the populace, as orders began to simply be “stalled”, or only occasionally and incompletely followed, etc.

    By bringing the pain to those who would do the dirty work, you remind them there will be a cost to their betrayal.

    I suggest this is maybe why the cops in Melbourne suddenly stopped beating people in the ongoing protests….

    1. It will have zero impact against the ability of each member of the citizenry to be an investigative journalist team of one.

      BTW, I happen to have insider info of one of your Provincial Health Units up in the Trudeauian Empire of Canaduh: Of the entire (8-person) “analytics team” they hired last summer … only ONE has a math/stats/computational background. And that person is consistently overruled by senior team members who have degrees in law, english, public health, …

      This person has given up trying to sort them out on the finer points of Bayesian stats, data integrity, stochastic dependence, multi-stage conditioning, stochastic processes … This is on the analytics team. The “Provincial Covid dashboard” is basically horseshit.

      But not for ANY public health authority. You Canucks should demand a Parliamentary Inquiry into this.

      1. WHICH ONE….????

        If you’re in the states…their long arm cannot and will not reach you. Id love to know BDSM..??

        1. Saskatchewan for starters (their health data analytics is a fuckin’ joke). I’d check BC as well. Nobody decent goes into health analytics! It’s what we in the business call a “boob job” … sorry.

          Like I said, this ends when these fucks back off and leave us alone. Otherwise, war shall be the remedy our enemies have chosen. And I plan to have us all (all of us) give it to them good and hard.

          Make collaborators pay again!

    2. I think it is bad when governments are so powerful and self-interested that they think it ethical to force people to accept government policies. Shouldn’t it be the other way around, where governments accept policies decided by people.

      This is why Trudeau can merrily chirp about how his government has been given a mandate to fight global warming. He barely scraped through again.

  19. OK…I need to take a break from reading this…stopped at the begining of Chapter 4

    Overall a decent enough article…(And I was TOTALLY unaware that Google gave $$$$ to Peter Daszak for GoF research..!!)
    The polt thickens eh..??

    However I find it incredible that this Dr seemingly has no knowledge of What Dr David Martin Exposed Near 9 months ago, that the VERY FIRST SarsCov VAX was created as far back as 1999..?? That said vax contained all the same – main participating elements as CominRaty does today. That during testing of said Vax all the animals died….quite an omission in that paper if ya ask me. Nor does he say anything of FAUXI wishing to use said type of Vaxxine as a Vector for an HIV Vaccine he wanted to Create…!

    He continues to call these mRNA jabs “VACCINES” Yet in other paragraphs admits freely that “they (only), seem to Reduce Severe illness”..(uh, yea, thats what PFIZER themselves said…no.? ONLY designed to the REDUCE SEVERITY of said illness). Yet he continues to talk obliquely mind you, but arguably of vax IMMUNITY from this ShIt..?? I for one do not in any way, shape or form buy this supposed “IMMUNITY” at all…TOTAL BS.

    Immunity to me means a MIN of 10 years you’re good to go. (Tetanus for example)

    “…The population of Ethiopia is about 119 million— just over one-third of the United States. COVID vaccination rates are very low there: 2.7% have had at least one shot, 0.9% have had two. As of Sept. 28, 2021, the country recorded only 5,439 COVID deaths over the course of the entire pandemic. If the United States had such a death rate per capita, it would have lost just over 16,000 people, rather than over 700,00…” And yet this guy cant figure out why that is…???

    75% of Ethiopia’s total land mass is RIFE with malaria – it should not come as a great SURPRISE (Gomer Pyle style), That Hydroxychloroquine is used as a daily supplement for the entire population…??

    I Also begin to wonder if he has ever spoken with Dr. Judy Mikovits – she actually worked for AMERID on GoF and Viral Bio Weaponry and to me is proven 100% correct with her comments/Warnings from back in May 2020…Why else would certain parties in the US Govt try to damn near Eliminate her…physically..??

    Ok back to my regularly scheduled article…lol

    1. As an Aside, no mention whatsoever of: Fauci and Gates pressuring Lancet & the NEJournal of Med publishing 100% FRAUDULENT studies stating that HCQ. & IVM had zero efficacy against the Vid. (Later forced to retract…but the damage was done – tks to the MSM)

      No mention of the opposite either.

      His knowledge is to me, far less than what WE Here have discovered over the Past 20 months…far far from it.

      ….so Jordan Peterson, I suggest you do some some research instead of pushing papers confirming your own psychological biases.

      Suggest you Start with a conversation with Dr David Martin and his excellent deposition to Reiner Fuellmich… vis a vis US PATENT HISTORY, incl The Canadian aspect, then have a chat with Dr Ryan Cole & Dr Delores Cahill and if you can find her….one who actually worked for AMARID….Dr Judy Mikovits.

      Education / Knowledge is the key….
      Best rgds

    2. We need to stop. We are playing defense. We need to switch to offense! Think of the vacciNazis as collaborators. Take the war to them. Make them fight on ground that YOU choose. Demonise the vaxxed who fail to quit in solidarity with fired colleagues. They CHOSE money over their countrymen. That makes them collaborators and traitors.

      Make them pay a steep price. Hatred, vitriol, harassment. Denormalise the act of collaboration with these governments.

  20. I haven’t, yet, read the entire article, nor have I read all the comments hereabouts, so please excuse me if I’m repeating someone else’s observation……but this caught my eye: “But it also conveys that the government does not trust its citizens to make good decisions on their own”.

    This is self evident – look (for the most part) at who said citizens elected.

  22. Ha ha
    a quote;
    “As of a September 2019 Gallup poll, only a few months before the COVID-19 pandemic, Big Pharma was the least trusted of America’s 25 top industry sectors, No. 25 of 25. In the eyes of ordinary Americans, it had both the highest negatives and the lowest positives of all industries. At No. 24 was the federal government, and at No. 23 was the health care industry.”

    Man, if it wasn’t so serious
    https://sproutsschools.com/bonhoeffers-theory-of-stupidity/

  23. I agree with some in that I was slightly put off that the author even accepted the premise that we’re in a global pandemic in Part 1.

    But I’d encourage you to read on. As someone else mentioned, Parts 2 & 3 offer an excellent history of how the events have unfolded over the past 20 months and it’s a fair account.

    I haven’t yet read Part 4 but apparently – to much dismay – he ultimately ends up recommending the vaccine.

    It’s important to keep in mind the possibility that the author must include such a statement in order to keep his employment.

    And I ask that only that we keep that in mind when considering such an article. We have to speak in code now to avoid censorship. We need allies within.

    Read between the lines and let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

  24. I mentioned above that the target audience for this article is the vax lemmings. He’s trying to get them to open their locked down minds to understand the vaccine hesitant have valid reasoning.

    “In Canada the typical vaccine hesitant person is a 40-year-old woman who tends to vote Liberal.”

    That’s also Doidge’s general target audience for this treatise. My take from what he writes is that the Troika (big pharma, government and health care system) are not and should not be trusted; vax decision should be informed, voluntary and individual; and the only way out of this is going to be with lots of natural immunity (Sweden vs Israel).

    If I’m right on that, I wish him success. A couple of my siblings initiated a covid vax discussion as a favour to me to correct my erroneous beliefs. I thought they might be interested in examining their beliefs. Turns out now they’d rather just not talk to me.

  25. When it starts with Jordan Peterson … it’s hard to read the rest. I gave it a go, but when I got to part 3 that says, ‘In Canada the typical vaccine hesitant person is a 40-year-old woman who tends to vote Liberal’ … I quit reading.

    Does anybody know a single female Lib in the 40 yr old range who is not vaxxed? Total BS. It’s hard to read on, when nonsense is the predicate.

  26. I am not sure what is more bemusing; the fact the linked article seems to believe that the rejection of the vaccine actually relates to a variation of the Flight or Fight response, or that Francisco is trying so hard to defend it.

    (also – Hail Red Lobster! Clean your Room Up!)

    The reason many people reject the jab is that when you analyse it rationally it is at best a health risk and at worse it is Scary as Farce.

    Here in Oz they started with the word ‘SAFE’ in all the government ads. They drew attention to it. The Jab was SAFE.

    Then they stopped using that word.

    Then – in my home state at least – they started openly saying that the Jab wouldn’t prevent you from catching Fauci Flu, but it would mean you didn’t get it as bad.

    Wow… so rather than catching a virus that your own data actually shows is REALLY HARD TO CATCH (check the ratio of Tests to Cases in Australia – even when they are targeting hotspot areas they are not finding that many. Where are all the Super Spreaders we were promised? We were told a single person could infect everyone in the same room in a matter of minutes. This, now we have had time to look at what is actually happening, is simply NOT TRUE), and even if you do catch it you often need to be told you have it and if are actually honest with each other, is something you die WITH, not FROM.

    Also, unless you openly reject the findings of other ‘non white’ nations, treating Fauci is as easy as stealing from a horse.

    So, this is the premise. The Jab will protect you from Fauci Flu, not by actually preventing you from catching it, but by making it milder. This is now the dialogue for why the Jab is a ‘Good Thing(tm)’.

    Right…

    So, what are the risks?

    (and if you are not asking this question you probably should never work in positions of responsibility, cause your base mindset is already wrong)

    In the real world professionals are legally responsible for their actions. This is why the Engineering profession pays well. With Great Responsible comes Respectable Salary, just like they say in the Spiderman comics. Probably. From base level upwards you are expected to consider the risks of anything you are working on and attempt to remove those risks by better engineering. This is how we are expected to act as professionals every day. There is no “Oh… yeah…fatal blood clots… but only in rare cases, so don’t worry about it”. That doesn’t happen.

    Now you might say, ‘but rare cases!’ and the problem with this argument is that the Jab is not a stand alone process, it is a Risk Reduction for Fauci Flu. You are not taking it for giggles. Its entire function is related to reducing the adverse effects of COVID.

    So when the argument is to take the Jab cause it will help prevent you from dying from COVID you really don’t want to hear that you may now die from blood clots. This is adding a NEW RISK to the overall risk assessment and it is basic Safety Engineering to not add new risks. You are reducing risks So Far As Is Reasonably Practical. Reducing. Not adding.

    But! It is only in rare cases!

    Is it? Again I speak for my home country where the TGA publishes weekly reports on the Jab and side effects. They happily show that the amount of people reporting Adverse Events after the Jab is comparable to the total number of Cases in Australia. The numbers have changed back and forward over the past months and Cases is now back in front, but for periods this year the amount of people who had felt ill enough to report a post jab problem was greater than the total number of cases.

    Then we have the deaths. The TGA brush them off by saying if you jab enough people it is only logical that some of them will die from something unrelated in the same time period, so don’t worry. This is pretty much their actual excuse. People die all the time.

    There is an unanswered question here that is disturbing. If these people were not healthy then why were they being given the jab? “Hey, you probably only have weeks to live, maybe even days, but here, take this Jab cause we don’t want you catching the old Fauci Flu while you are on your death bed!” Yet this is clearly happening and despite the fact the Jab is not going to improve the quality of life for terminally ill people, they were being given it anyway.

    Do the medical people involved not consider this?

    OR… are they actually healthy people, with the implication that they are NOT randomly dying and the common factor of ‘a recent jab’ needs to be considered.

    After all, the death rate of people randomly dying after the jab is about 2.5 a day here in Oz since the jabs started. c.f. the average death rate of With Covid since March 2020 in Australia and you also get… about 2.5 a day.

    So 2.5 a day dying after the Jab? Nothing to worry about. People die all the time
    2.5 a day after being found to be infected with COVID? A national tragedy and health emergency. Hand in your Freedoms! Old people are DYING!!!

    The ‘Experts’ are playing with the numbers and telling us to trust the science. Any adverse affect is broken down into a case and treated in isolation. Blood clot deaths? About 1 in 3.5million from memory. So nothing to worry about. Okay, what about heart inflammation? Oh, that is only a couple of hundred and we have given out 30 million jabs. So nothing to worry about. Tis Rare. Trust the Science.

    Really? The TGA openly state that the chance of an Adverse Event is about 1 in 250 and that is just the reported numbers. When you consider the basic human nature to not make a fuss or to just Man Up and struggle through the discomfort it is extremely likely the true number is much higher. A separate website (ironically linked from the TGA) suggests the number of adverse events in Australia is actually about twenty five (25!!) times higher and of those 0.9% were concerned enough to see their GP and/or go to hospital emergency.

    This suggests the Jab will cause you to seek medical assistance at a rate of 1 in 250. This means that more people have been forced to seek assistance than the total people who have ever had COVID in Australia.

    BUT… not, it is all part of a primitive Flight or Fight reaction.

    (and no, I am not going to read the entire article. You open with claims Vax Fear is not rational and you have crashed at the first corner. Sorry Red Lobster)

  27. I’ll say it again.

    Sorry to replete myself.
    In Calif during the AIDs mess. I worked as a medic and had to deal with Dr. Fauci and his crazy rules/ideas.
    He made a total mess of it all, but bad info on how AIDs spread and making up the number of deaths (like even now) So far off the charts.
    How could you trust this fool?

    I sure don’t and he alone controls the info getting out.
    Would you?

  28. Very interesting article. Don’t agree with parts of it but definitely some useful information and ideas.
    I find some of the comments here quite humorous (I am 100% correct and anything that doesn’t posit all my ideas and theories as 100% correct is not worth my time!) but such is the state of discourse on both the left and the right these days, especially on this topic.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation