White Privilege

Motive “unclear”.

New York City police are looking for a dozen suspects in connection with a violent attack on a 26-year-old man who was beaten, cut with a sharp object and had his clothing removed.
 
A group of males and females assaulted the victim at about 11:30 a.m. Friday near Canal and Allen streets in Manhattan, city police said. The motive isn’t clear.
 
Police said Saturday that the attackers took the man’s cell phone and removed his pants, underwear and shoes. They also cut him with a sharp object. The suspects fled the scene in multiple vehicles, police said.

48 Replies to “White Privilege”

  1. Before I looked at the photo or video, I wondered if there was a racial difference between the perpetrators and the victim. Sad that my suspicions were confirmed correct.

    1. They were Domestic Terrorists. I am certain DHS is all over this case … and prosecutions will come immediately so as to WARN off any copycat crimes.

  2. Hard to say as the victims had a mask and hoodie covering much of his face. He MIGHT be asian or white. Either way, people wonder why blacks, especially in a group, are distrusted.

    1. Yes, I would walk to the other side of the street. Come to think of it … I will avoid those streets altogether.

      Ya think you saw white-flight in the 60’s and 70’s? Ya ain’t seen nothin yet. Meanwhile the Harris Admin. is eliminating Law and Order … eliminating the Federal Death Penalty, eliminating minimum maximum sentences for violent crime, and decriminalizing virtually the entire penal Code. Because white man’s laws no longer apply to black folk.

      1. Kenji

        Remember Jessie Jackson said words like yours too (Years ago)
        “Yes, I would walk to the other side of the street” when it came to black youths.

        Is that racist?

        1. I do not consider it “racist”. Rather it is a basic instinct of all (truly) woke human beings … to avoid danger … to not walk along the edge of a steep cliff.

          It’s not racist, because it is about “behavior” not skin color. I don’t cross to the other side of the street if it were a group of black school kids carrying school books, wearing school uniforms. It’s mostly about “body language” … and “numbers” (a squad of loud, belligerent youths). I have done well in life by trusting my instincts. My BASIC instincts.

          Is it “stereotyping”? Is it “profiling”? Hells YES it is! There is a reason we humans do those things … instinctively. It’s actually SUICIDAL to not do these things. Only leftist MO-rons stifle their inborn instinct for survival.

          1. Kenji, As a merchant sailor in my youth, I visited some very unsavory places on the planet. I agree completely that we have an innate basic instinct for survival. It has kept me in fair condition all my life. However, it’s also true there are many humans that seem to have lost that instinct, and some pay the price. Also, yes, it does seem that the majority are lefties. Trust in our fellow man, authorities, and our governments, should not be without suspicion.

          2. Yea, it’s like no one would cross the street if a gang of white Hells Angels were coming down a sidewalk.

  3. As is so often the case, the REAL story is not just the event, as tragic as that is.
    It is the inability/refusal of the Media and authorities to recognize the obvious.
    “The motive isn’t clear.”

    How can anyone over the age of 6 not see the obvious motive? Are we to pretend that these police and media hacks are being honest with themselves or us?
    Are they utterly brain dead, utterly indoctrinated, too afraid to speak the truth, or simply lying? Or just saying that the country can go to hell in a handbasket, victims’ lives destroyed, and so on, and as long as they have their media offices or police pensions, all is well?
    I know, I know…..all of the above……pick yer mix on any given day…..

  4. Have close family members who live just outside of NYC. Last visit to Canal street a month ago confirmed that the city is reverting to the conditions before Giuliani cleaned it up. Filthy and areas that are fast becoming unsafe once more. Another De Blasio accomplishment- Sarc on.

    1. New York City and the United States are in debt to Mayor Giuliani.

      The globalists will re-pay it by finding an excuse to throw him in prison and murder him there.

        1. Shut up you waste of skin. Fuuctards like you will get this blog shutdown for hate speech.
          The fuuctards, like you, on the left don’t need much of an excuse.
          Your racism isn’t wanted here so Fuck Off.

      1. Typical eloquent response from a BLM fellator.
        Black Lives Matter? Not racist.
        All Lives Matter? Racist
        Feral chimps attacking whitey? Not racist.
        Someone pointing out they are feral chimps? Racist.
        Ok then. This is why no sane person gives a f*** about the likes of you calling them racist anymore.

        1. I have to say, I have seen videos and their like dozens of times, and I am getting madder every time I see them. I can feel my BP rise. And I wish they would do that to a conceal carry person. But you know what would happen if the assaulted defended them self. They would Never get a fair trial.These vermin are a protected species now. And thanks for the defense. We must not be silenced. I had stronger words for those pukes, but we are restrained now… We need this group at gab.

        2. Hey, Colonista. You are another racist who can just fuck off. I am conservative and I don’t tolerate racism.
          You are just racist another sack of shit on these comment threads.
          So yeah you can fuck off too.

          1. Well Sporty, it might upset you, but Colonianista is right. How is it OK, or right for these BLM types to be “not” racist toward us, yet only we can be racist toward them for saying the same things about ourselves and about them? So I’m confused about the rules, could you explain please?

          2. “Racist fuck off. racist fuck off” someone needs to update your programing NPC. You’re no conservative and none cares about what you tolerate you pathetic hypocrite.

            The racists are the feral hood rats that lynched that guy, and so are you for diverting the attention from what they have done.

          3. Had this been a band of rednecks lynching a black person would you be offended by the racist term “rednecks” or by the lynching (the fact that rednecks don’t do it is a separate matter)?

        3. Shooting galleries in Chicago. Not racist.
          White morons “protesting” when not looting or bullying in the name of dead criminals who resisted arrest. Not racist.
          Pointing out “unarmed blacks killed by police” is dwarfed by orders of magnitude by inner city black murders. Racist.

          1. Imagine the public outrage, followed by burning, looting and murder that would occur had the races been reversed. Except that scenario does not happen much.

  5. Joe Biden’s call for unity is a sham

    The Left cannot overcome division when it remains obsessed with identity politics
    Nick Timothy
    24 January 2021 • 9:00pm

    It is fast becoming a political maxim that the more society talks about diversity, the less tolerant it becomes of difference. And the more our leaders talk about unity, the less they seem capable of bringing it about.

    In his inaugural speech last week, Joe Biden promised to unite his country. But read his words closely, and examine his first actions as president, and you will see confusion, contradiction and dogma that is likely to lead only to further division.

    Of course, absolute unity is impossible to achieve in any political system. Autocratic regimes intimidate and bully their citizens into conformity with the ideologies of their leaders, and try to present an image of a united people to the outside world. But the whole point of liberal democracy is that it is supposed to tolerate difference and disagreement.

    For liberal democracies are built on the premise that human values and interests are unavoidably and perpetually in conflict with one another. The solution to these conflicts is not to grant total victory to one side or another, but to accept a system of government and civil society that allows pluralism to flourish within a common culture and single legal framework.

    Precisely how this works differs from country to country. But experience teaches us that we need free and fair elections and checks and balances to protect minorities from a tyranny of the majority. We need national and local institutions to help us to mediate our differences. We need a common culture and shared identity to allow us to recognise familiarity in strangers and trust one another. And we need a sense of solidarity that means we can come together in response to collective challenges, such as wars, recessions and disease.

    Our tolerance for difference should allow us all to unite in the ways that are necessary for a common life, and our unity in this respect should allow us to remain committed to pluralism, tolerance and moderation. This is something Mr Biden seemed to acknowledge in his speech, when he said “disagreement must not lead to disunion”.

    But the president soon ran into trouble. He was asking “every American to join me in this cause”, he said, “to fight the common foes we face”. But in listing these foes – “anger, resentment, hatred, extremism, lawlessness, violence” – he was partial. While he condemned the mob that attacked the Capitol building, there was no such condemnation for the Black Lives Matter riots last summer. While some felt anger and resentment that must be fought, others, he said, were simply demanding “justice for all”. (See video below)

    The foes that Biden did treat as common enemies for all Americans were “disease, joblessness, hopelessness”. But solutions to these problems have been conspicuous by their absence. The economic pain behind the feeling of hopelessness in many states and communities is still neglected. The pleasure with which Democrats refer to the prosperity of their voters, compared to those of the Republicans, is telling for what was once the party of the working class.

    And on cultural issues, Mr Biden’s was an invitation to unite, but on his terms only. Republican voters should “hear me out as we move forward”, he said. “If you still disagree, so be it. That’s democracy. That’s America.” This is a strange definition of democracy, but an even stranger way of trying to bring the country together.

    Already, Mr Biden has signed an executive order liberalising immigration laws and paving the way for illegal immigrants to gain citizenship. He has signed another asserting that transgender students should be free to use changing rooms and participate in school sports in accordance with the gender they choose. He has promised to address “overlapping forms of discrimination”, and highlighted in particular the struggles of black transgender Americans.

    And even with his programme of economic relief for firms affected by Covid, the president has promised that his “priority will be Black-, Latino-, Asian- and Native American-owned small businesses [and] women-owned businesses”.

    Calling for unity while prioritising some identity groups and excluding others might seem discordant, but militant identity politics is now central to the beliefs of the modern Left. In his inauguration speech, Biden made no reference to equality, but instead promised to address “growing inequity”.

    The pursuit of equity is very different to the pursuit of equality. The equity now sought by the Left is between different identity groups, and in particular groups defined by race, sexuality and gender. The critical theories that lie behind this political fashion claim that privilege and power are determined by exploitative hierarchies kept in place by institutions and discourse that oppress disadvantaged groups.

    Tackling specific acts of racial discrimination, or confronting long-lasting racial disparities, is therefore insufficient for proponents of these arguments. As Mr Biden asserted in another executive order, the problem is “systemic racism”. The theory of systemic racism, or “structural racism”, as Sir Keir Starmer prefers to call it in Britain, alleges that minorities suffer cumulative and chronic disadvantage, and that this disadvantage is caused by society as a whole systematically discriminating against them and in favour of white people.

    Inevitably, the policies that follow critical theories are discriminatory towards white people, men, heterosexuals or anybody else supposedly complicit in systemic discrimination. They ignore our individuality, defining us only in terms of our race, gender and sexuality. They ignore and play down the significance of class and geography. And they are unavoidably destructive to the traditions and institutions that sustain our shared identities and the feelings of trust and solidarity they make possible.

    This is why the modern Left – in Britain as well as America – cannot hope to overcome division. They, as much as the nativist and populist Right they so despise, are often the very source of the discord. For blaming people on the basis of their own immutable characteristics for the misfortunes of others, for discriminating today to compensate for the discrimination of yesterday, for attacking the traditions and institutions that many hold dear, for policing thought, word and deed with such vindictiveness and zeal, the Left cannot be the unifiers they claim to be. And that will remain the case until they finally ditch their divisive dogma.

    1. An excellent treatise clipe, unfortunately, it makes sense, and states the truth and the facts. It therefore will be discounted. I did enjoy reading it though. Thanks.

      1. Bill Gairdner’s book, “The Great Divide, Why Liberals and Conservatives Will Never Ever Agree,” goes through, in excruciating detail, the polarization that statists collectivists rely on to stay in power, so promote, to avoid debate on substantive issues and why they can never admit error, grounded as they are in Marxism.

        Only naive fools believe the Trump is a racist narrative is an aberration owing to his personality, and hasn’t or won’t been used against any Republican. It’s their go to slur.

        DeMarxist ideas of unity are capitulation to their insane ideas, and unity is somehow dividing half the nation into good people and “fine people,” who are racists, their accusers obsessed with race themselves.

        Summary: statists don’t care what voters think after an election, even less than they care during the election.

        They know they call lie and obfuscate and they’ll get away with it, with a simple “racist” slur against “cuckservatives.”

  6. If he tried to defend himself (fought back), he’d be looking at a year in jail.
    It will be catch-n-release for these yutes.
    Congrats, boyz, watcha gonna do when all da whites leave?
    “White Deserts”

    1. Or avoid areas that are clearly the sovereign territory of a rival tribal group … I mean that IS the law of the jungle, and WAS the organizinng princiole for about 5,000 years of history. We are reverting to natural self-segregation again, as the only viable means of survival in the new jungle. Pretty sad, if you ask me.

      Say hello to Private, armed, gated, fortified communities again. They were called “castles”.

  7. “On violent crime, homicides have also risen both for the month and the year. November saw 28 people murdered in the five boroughs, five more than were killed last November. So far in 2020, there has been a +38.4% increase (422 v. 305) in the number of victims murdered in New York City compared to last year.”

    “Whatever the challenge, our NYPD officers have shown innovation and determination to get the job done this year,” said Police Commissioner Dermot Shea. “Our work to reimagine the kind of policing New Yorkers deserve is always evolving, in line with our agency’s best traditions to reflect the needs of everyone in our city.”

    https://www1.nyc.gov/site/nypd/news/p1204d/nypd-citywide-crime-statistics-november-2020
    ————————————————————————————————————————————–
    L- N.Y.C. the largest investment capital market in the world, but in the digital era that can
    be moved to any U.S. city with an international airport, and a business friendly, low crime
    mayor. Many of the wealthy moved out of N.Y.C. during 2020, when the rioters attacked the
    ritzy retail and high end living quarters. N.Y.C. can switch to a non-colonial name e.i.B.L.M.

    I’m waiting for the gangs to finally work their way up to attacking the UN headquarters and
    mugging/car jacking the diplomats… then the gangsta shootouts will outdraw Cable TV-crime
    dramas.

    1. Just remember Larry.

      They foolish libs in NY. Voted for this loon.
      Hope they enjoy it, and the nightmare that comes with it!

  8. “Tricia” explains it all, although you have to read it like an adult, it is the “back story” that has the payload.
    https://www.newyorker.com/culture/personal-history/my-great-grandfather-the-nigerian-slave-trader

    I don’t know what it was called, but the Nigerian tribes had a “debtor’s prison” system of care by assigned families. Anyone destitute, “lost their freedom” and was assigned to a successful family/clan/whatever. Some were desititute due to bad luck, floods, tribal raids, locusts, etc. These generally accepted their lot and would often become “part of the family”. Then there were those to dim, distractable, anti-social, hostile to succeed on their own and who continued to be defective and useless, a burden on the caring family. Then the Euroipeans showed up and “Tricia’s” Great Grand Daddy made a good living selling off the defective burden. A minor portion of those who were sold into “slavery” were “kidnapped”, most often by other tribal groups such as the Ashante (Akan) people of what is now Ghana, or the Mandinka who fled the failing Mali “Empire” west to the Iviry Coast, Liberia, and Maurewtania. Most of those “transferred” to the Europeans in exchange for brightly colored fabric, steel implements, and, especially, rum were the defectives who were useless on their own and a burden to their caretakers. Nigeria cleared their defective population which is the population that made it to North America. Those cdouldn’t make it in Nigeria, and after liberation could only make cities into ghettoes. In our metro area there are several Black “communities” with ridiculously low levels of violent crime. It isn’t intelligence (IQ). Smart and not so smart, those with jobs, businesses and even professions were able to form “communities”. The product that “Trisha’s Great Grandfather moved were able to only produce savasge ghettoes full of “F__k You!” and violent savages. I have no great experience but from what I have experienced, Black Africans who benefitted from some education, seem to do OK in the U.S. and the U.K. They probably will not produce an Albert Einstein, but the vast majority of jobs don’t require a huge IQ. A$$hole$ need not apply.

    Chicago (south), Detroit, Baltimore, Newark, Philadelphia, Camden, parts of Los Angeles are what happens when the defectives are allowed to roam free. “Racism” or the “history of slavery” have nothing to do with the chaos, except for usually over-looked selection process that led the founding population to be “transferred” into slavery in return for a jug of rum. Nigeria got rid of their trash. We got ghettoes.

    Quarantine (in prison) used to control the side effects of that “transfer”. Now the Social Justice true-believers think that, by socialist magic, this the current descendants of the defective population are going to change into a bunch of “normies” who will take and hold a job to keep the Commissars in the prosperous style of life their Mommy and Daddy got them used to. The Bolsheviks tried that. Defectives breed defectives who don’t even make good gulag guards.

    As long asa we provide to “dependent chilluns”, daddy will squirt and run, and the offspring will make new ghettoes. They sold defectives, the slavers bought defectives, we are paying to breed defectives, and the defectives are beating, robbing, raping, and killing ’cause it is either our fault (Whitey) or the fault of Trisha’s Great Grandfather They can’t learn, can’t work, can’t cooperate. They are just resentful of everyone and everything. That’s why they were dumped on us. Maybe we can send them to Canada.

    1. Mike- there’s no scientific evidence that a ‘defective produces a defective’ [and that’s an ambiguous term], nor that a genius produces a genius. The scientific reality is: the Bell Curve, which is, that the ‘norm’ or average, is dominant.

      1. Buy and breed a truck load of chihuahuas and don’t expect to get any “useful” Huskies or cheerful labradors. You get Chihuahuas.

        You can make Chihuahuas by selecting small, energtic, and crazy for generations but the traits breed true. In humans, the dark skin “don’t mean nuthin'”. Buy defective, there is going to be a lot of defective.

        Hire an immigrant African, and more than likely, you get a human. Hire a descendant of a defective and, more than likely, you get a defective.

        “Rwegression to the mean”, so after many generations in an “out bred” population, you might get more “normies”, but in the mean time, plan on spending a l;ot on police, razor wire and prisons. The Brits cleared their debtors’ prisons and created Australia; Nigeria cleared their defectives selectively and we got Detroit.

        Chihuahuas are much good at anything but making noise and chasing squirrels They are not even useful as a terrier. You can’t “educate” Chihuahua out of them. Same with Nigerian defectives. The Chinese have created a mix that makes them effective and successful. Maybe not “creative” but “effective”. Nigeria dumped its non-productive, hostile, defectives.

        In our area, we have “poor” (economically) neighborhoods and we have “ghettoes” with predetory violent crime. Guess the origins. In “Five Points”, the Irish were as violent as they had to be. They now live mostly in the “‘burbs” and have normal jobs. Now the “crime maps” indicate the Nigerian dense populations with markers for dead bodies; generation after generation.

        A “traditional” black community begins on the next street. Tain’t nuthin’. I watched the Nigerian invasion convert the downtown, where my late wife and I worked, turn into a violent, un-productive wasteland.

        The worrisome thing is “assortative mating”. The “Normies” with dark skin don’t much mix with the “defectives” downtown, so we may be creating stable (permanent) sub-populations.

        By the way, “defective”, is intentionally ambiguous to avoid the simple, but “loaded” alternatives. “Defective” has nothing to do with “race” except for the historical reality of Nigeria being the place ands the people who “transferred” their burden of defectives to the Europeans. The “Bell Curve” refers to intelligence (IQ). I don’t care if my neighbor can do calculus. We just imported the “left” end of the useful, hostile, violent, distractable curve. We call the place they made and where they live a “ghetto”. The dark-skinned normies who can hold a job and interact with others, move out to the ‘burbs and towns where they live like normal people. Ain’t race, and ain’t IQ either, defective catches the quality that is the core feature.

    1. You got “Liberals”. Who’d notice a bit more “Liberalism”. If anyone did, they’d be too nice to mention it. Maybe some island off the coast or a township near Saskatoon…….

      Yeah, I know. My name is on a list at the border…..

  9. “Cut with a sharp object”

    Not a knife, not a weapon, not a shiv.
    Nope none of the above, because only the inherently violent such as a roving bands practicing brigandage like insurrectionist right wing extremists and duck hunters carry weapons.

  10. Funny how piracy is accepted in those dark city places, but there are no plans to curb it. Yet, when it affects the rich and connected, it’s stamped out. It almost seems like it’s deliberate, just to keep the normies fearful and under control. I must be misinformed.

Navigation