Shaping the News to Destroy the Orange Man

14 Replies to “Shaping the News to Destroy the Orange Man”

1. Millions may die in the United States alone, millions more will lose their livelihoods and trillions of dollars will be lost to the bioweapon dubbed the “novel coronavirus.”

   All because the Chinese communists, and their allies on Wall Street, the corporate media and the Deep States of the western world, refused to recognize the sovereign right of the people of the United States to choose a leader that refused to kowtow to the Red Emperor.

   Beijing deliberately released a plague for which they planned to blame Donald Trump and help replace him with the senile Joe Biden. The Deep State, the media and Wall Street have played their parts to perfection. The virus has been allowed to spread unchecked throughout the United States and the western world in the name of free trade and diversity.

   A work of evil genius.

   And it will all be in vain.

   Donald Trump will win the 2020 election handily. It turns out the American people are not so easily bullied into doing their enemies’ bidding.

   1. “Beijing deliberately released a plague for which they planned to blame Donald Trump”

      And all you lack is any proof whatsoever.

      1. Which ironically doesn’t necessarily eliminate the possibility of the premise. Sometimes the “evidence” is inherent in the outcome itself.

2. It is not coincidental that the Slave States on the Left Coast were the first to be infected and WASH State has the most deaths in Nursing Homes… The Slave States protect the Undocumented workers because they are cheap labor & engage in the Drug & Sex trade….

   Most PLL think of Hispanic Undocumented workers, but is obvious that these slave states have Chinese workers in Nursing Homes and they travel regularly back to China

   The ex-Governor of California regularly demanded Sex from his Maid because she was undocumented, The MO of a plantation slave Owner…. Democrats are Klan members who will never change, it is their Slaves who change….

   Time for the execution of the Klan

   JMHO

3. I can destroy myself just fine thank you!

   1. OK Fuuctard

4. We have to understand that many people will be infected,” Ms. Merkel said. “The consensus among experts is that 60 to 70 percent of the population will be infected as long as this remains the situation.”
   Ms. Merkel’s estimates were probably a worst-case scenario, though not wildly out of line with those of experts outside Germany.

   But her warning provided a stark contrast to the crimped pronouncements of many other world leaders, among them President Trump, who has mostly played down the contagion. “The risk to the American people remains very low,” he said recently.

   Mr. Trump has staged photo-ops with scientists at the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but with this crisis, as with others, he has seemed to pride himself on following his own advice.
   “I like this stuff, I really get it,” Mr. Trump said at the C.D.C. “People are surprised that I understand it. Every one of these doctors said, ‘How do you know so much about this?’ Maybe I have a natural ability. Maybe I should have done that instead of running for president.”

   Ms. Merkel, by contrast, did in fact spend time studying science before becoming a politician: she is a trained physicist. [NYT}

   To keep up:
   https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

   1. “Ms. Merkel, by contrast, did in fact spend time studying science before becoming a politician” DiZZY

      Well she failed Science and resorted to the probability schemes of the delusional….. She has no idea what the
      German Bock Head society will suffer.. Given that Germans blindly follow orders it is likely they will have Less infection than Canada……It’s one of those society things fool…. The Chinese in BC (Canada) are not underclass Undocumented workers and have better habits, thus less likely to carry the Virus…..

      JMHO

   2. You misspelled communist dizzy.
      Trained communist.

   3. dizzy

      obviously , you did not watch the video above

      the number of infected in China is going DOWN not up

      only about .00005 of chinese people got infected

      .00005 is very very far from 70 % of the population

      in Italy it is .0002 of the population that is infected

      note that we are talking about infected not dead from the virus

      .00005 in China and .0002 in Italy

      very very far from the 70 % of Merkel that you think is right

      1. But but butbut but but but … “experts” … “pro-ject” !!!!!!! Aiiiiieeeeeee!!!!!!! We’re all gonna diiiiiieeeeeee … by scarred lungs suffocating us !!!! Ohhhhhhhh mammmmmaaaaaa

      2. I’ll just save this and we will see. Incidentally Merkel said “up to 70%” based on models that predict between 30 & 70 percent.

   4. I find it ironic that the Coronavirus is being SOLD with the same push-charts and push-graphs that chart some mythical what-if scenario. Not to mention exaggerated Y-axes designed to create a REALLY FRIGHTENING “hockystick” blade of infection. Yep. THE exact same tactic used by the Global Warmists.

      And don’t get me started on all the maps with countries colored BRIGHT RED!!!!

5. Experts and the Will of the People: Society, Populism and Science
   Harry Collins, Robert Evans, Darrin Durant, Martin Weinel

   The rise of populism in the West has led to attacks on the legitimacy of scientific expertise in political decision making. This book explores the differences between populism and pluralist democracy and their relationship with science. Pluralist democracy is characterised by respect for minority choices and a system of checks and balances that prevents power being concentrated in one group, while populism treats minorities as traitorous so as to concentrate power in the government. The book argues that scientific expertise – and science more generally — should be understood as one of the checks and balances in pluralist democracies. It defends science as ‘craftwork with integrity’ and shows how its crucial role in democratic societies can be rethought and that it must be publicly explained. This book will be of value to scholars and practitioners working across STS as well as to anyone interested in decoding the populist agenda against science.