Just a theory, but Tulsi Gabbard may have drifted far outside of the official Leftist narrative and now needs to be destroyed. Let’s see.
Just a theory, but Tulsi Gabbard may have drifted far outside of the official Leftist narrative and now needs to be destroyed. Let’s see.
They had a Beat Up Bernie segment in the debate Tuesday night too. To each of the other debaters, “Tell us why Bernie Sanders is…” CNN obeyed the directives of its DNC masters.
I thought Tulsi got in a few good shots on Kamala Harris, and she never mentioned the words Willie Brown, mistress, or fellatio.
For me, Andrew Yang is the most interesting candidate. I am reading his book — The War on Normal People. He has a vision for the future and understands the issues that must be addressed, particularly disappearing jobs. Having said that, I think these “debates” are nothing but entertainment. The Democratic Party will again hijack the process and put in whoever they choose using super delegates. And that person will be a puppet of the deep state — unless Trump manages to destroy the deep state before it destroys him.
Interesting.
It looks like the establishment is split between Biden and Harris as the “one” and are arguing among themselves as to who deserves their turn now.
As with most establishment choices they can only win the nomination by having “insurance”.
But I digress.
There is also a similar bun fight among the extreme left that are not going to take well to being told who that one is.
My point is that the establishment is taking that pathway to victory they used to shoehorn Her way to the nomination.
Half the establishment thinks all they need is name recognition, the other believes they need someone that gets the most checkboxes filled in, but also is willing to knife their opponents in the back (even one’s in her own party …. just like Hillary would).
They have learned nothing.
As to the subject of this thread.
Yes, Gabbard has transgressed against the candidate that has the support of at least half of the establishment (I stress this is only a supposition and not fact, I’m going on past observation of the machinations of the DNC).
The point is that she has demonstrated that she will attack her opponents by deconstructing some of the liberal narrative, this cannot be allowed to pass.
My guess is that a leak about infidelity will surface very soon.
Don’t forget, Kamasutra has a large contingent of HRC advisors on her payroll, hence the “establishment” desire to keep this trash in the race.
It also explains her constant flip flopping, ala Hitlery.
Tulsi scored points taking down K, leaving her essentially weak and tepid, without response. Still, Tulsi is an also-ran, but at least she doesn’t scare from being on Fox, unlike her fellow leftists. She does come across as rational, but, she is nonetheless a DeMarxist.
I still think this race could end up with Pocahontas or Buttplug, if Biden falls off the cliff (likely in an anyone but Joe lobby). K will be seen as a say anything, empty ambitious beyotch, which she is. Bernie is just a nut, so who’s left for the proggies? A lying fake Indian, or the well spoken over his head, gay churchy lecturer? Whatever, TRUMP takes on all comers.
They’ve been trying to destroy her from day one. Look at stories from when she announced. And she has sued google over suppressing her after first debate.
From where I sit, the Democrats appear to be in self-destruct mode.
Now say “Two-Term Trump” 10 times very quickly!
Gillibrand: As President, the First thing I’ll do if elected is ‘Clorox the Oval Office’
********************************************************************
The Clown wants to encourage Global Warming.
Climate Scientists have proved beyond any doubts,
Bleaching is associated with increased seawater temperature and is widely agreed as the cause of the massive destruction of coral reefs in many parts of the world.
Al Gore is rolling over on his massage table.
Sounds like she’s gonna finish what was started by Juzzie Smallett. I’m surprised she didn’t slip on a RED ball cap and hoist up a miniature noose.
All joking aside … I was really screaming at my TV when I heard that line come spittling out of her mouth.
Dana Loesch made an interesting post debate observation when she said that she noticed that Gabbord was very aggressive toward Harris, but didn’t say a word about Biden on a night where it was open season on him for everyone else. She suggested that perhaps Biden and Gabbord have established an agreement where she runs interference for him and focuses on Harris and in exchange, she will be chosen as the other half of the Biden ticket should he win the primaries.
That sounds very plausible.
The biggest supporting argument is that other contention that out of a field of 20 Biden is the “front runner”(tm) but is polling low 20’s.
That leaves a LOT of room for the AnyoneButJoe candidate, whoever that might be. And, the way that Joe is stumbling and fumbling along, is a likely scenario.
His age really shows, he’s not sharp, all the time. That’s a requirement if any of these Marxists want to take on the Very Stable Genius.
The democrats were 100% sure that if Trump was nominated Hillary would win in a landslide. I don’t think it’s a good idea to assume that just because all of these candidates are duds that Trump will win. Elections are crazy things. Trudeau won on Syrian refugees, barbaric cultural practices help line and if you can believe it “tax cuts for the middle class”. People actually believed a Liberal would lower their taxes!!!! Anyway anything is possible.
“People actually believed a Liberal would lower their taxes!!!!”
indeed they did.
for a planck moment. which is a decimal point, 44 zeroes to the right of the decimal,, then a 5, measured in seconds.
that is, that’s the amount of time lieberals *actually* lowered taxes.
as far as the sheeple *believing* liebrals, well THAT is still in full force eh?
Not that I’d vote for her, even if I could, but Gabbard is the only one of these loons that I like.
Obama was a smooth talker too, don’t forget.
She’s still a DeMarxist, she might not be as radical, but she is firmly in that tent.
I don’t believe she is particularly a “smooth talker” or any of that but she is likable. Which is all I said.
She’s easy on the eyes, and wins that contest without any competition. Probably makes it easier to listen to her too, and she doesn’t go into histrionics either.
Still, a DeMarxist.
A side note that will surprise exactly nobody here… late last night I was looking for a bit of info on the debate, or maybe some highlights. I googled Democratic Debate Analysis. All I got was the CNN, MSNBC, NYT crowd. So I added Fox news to the search request….the largest of the group, right?
A blog came up from the previous debate, but again, no potentially conservative coverage of last night’s debate. Just the usual sycophants who will support leftist talking points. I believe Google deliberately hid whatever Fox may have said.
Musn’t allow any analysis to even be found, if it does not support the Narrative.
My fault for having Google on my tablet, I know. Free engines you folks would recommend?
https://duckduckgo.com/
They don’t track you.
DuckDuckGo works pretty well
Bing’s also surprisingly decent compared to Google.
For a real eye-opener, try http://www.millionshort.com. You can customize your search by having millionshort ignore the first hundred results, the first thousand, etc. Really helps when you’re looking for obscure stuff and all the top return slots have been bought and paid for by the SEO crowd.
Biden/Warren, my personal dream Dem ticket. Although if Hillary Clinton came back I’d cheer like hell for her on a Clinton/Warren ticket.
Only stuck on Warren because I think it’s high time a Native American won Prez or V-P in that benighted country.
“Native American” is those born within america, right? words have meanings.
or, are you suggesting that siberians who immigrated across the landbridge are native to the america’s (while excluding people who came in a boat)?
which is it?
do words have meanings -OR- do the feelings imposed by media propaganda of the week redefine the meaning of words?
so hard to have reasoned discussion when the meaning of words varies day by day…
edit:
“Native American” is those born within “the americas”, right? or just america? words have meanings.
Charles Curtis was Herbert Hoover’s VP. Charles Curtis was a full Kansa (or Kaw), born on a reservation.
Tulsi doesn’t seem like much of an asshole so how could she possibly be allowed to stay in the race?
It would be fun to see her rip the Racist Squad new ones the size of the Grand Canyon.
Delaney too, came across as sensible the night before, even warning the loons they are way over the line. Of course, Lieawatha makes no apologies for being an extremist nutbar. That’s the problem with the xtremists, they are PROUD of being way out there, and despite losing badly, they are PROUD of losing badly.
Think windmills……….jousting…….
How ignorant would one have to be to vote for any of the clowns on the democrat ticket, what are there now twenty and everyone of them is a fool.
those “fools” get paid millions in insider trading, graft, and kickbacks.
they take the money and provide the paid for service.
civilization destroying hookers. they don’t care, as long as they get paid.
the folks paying are the problem, yet never seem to get prosecuted. hmmm.
once there’s money on the table, some hooker will take the job. for the cash.
doesn’t matter how weird or outside the norm it is.
the hookers don’t care, as long as they get paid.
as the funding pushes them to extremes, so go the hookers, following that reward $$.
don’t blame the hookers.
follow the money.
Tulsi is the only adult on stage and the only one qualified to be President. Stark contrast to the puppets that occupy the other podiums. Harris will bring a reign of terror upon Americans. Her nightmare is the reality of the American Hollywood dream of the badass diversity woman cop.
Tulsi lost me for good when she said “Trump supports AQ,” a total misread of Iran/SA issue, and some other silly things.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/tulsi-gabbard-defends-debate-claim-that-trump-supports-al-qaeda-to-shannon-bream
That leaves zero in the field that have any resonance whatsoever with Joe & Mary Sixpack.
My guess is they’ll go with sleepy Joe and prove it’s possible for the Dems to field a lower energy candidate than Hillary Clinton.
She let her anti-military, isolationism slip. She is the darling of many INDEPENDENT anti-war (anti-stupid-pointless wars) voters. However, she really jumped the shark with that nonsensical comment equating a triangulated relationship with Saudi Arabia as supportive of Al Qaeda. That’s the ranting of a hardcore crazy Isolationist Libertarian
The sad part is she is a veteran with combat experience. Dems can warped any previously rational mind.
Perhaps she was dipping into her Hawaiian?
Saudi Arabia is probably the most dangerous supporter of Salafism/Wahhabism out there. They are absolutely progenitors of AQ and related jihadists.
Didn’t take long.
Twitter had made their choice and it isn’t Ms. Gabbard. https://twitter.com/jackposobiec/status/1156762836879773703?s=12
Tim Pool’s feed lists some tweets about her being hired by Russia or a friend of Syria.
At about the 1.5 time in his 3 hours show and forward for 20 minutes (so far..) Rush Limbaugh has been talking about the Tulsi Gabbart saga last night, mentioning that “some in the media” are saying the attack on Harris is being supported and pushed by “Russian bots” on Twitter … he enjoys just a bit of a chuckle here. Never get in the way of your enemy attacking each other. No doubt they’ll all aim at Gabbart now.
and Rush notes, that in Harris’ defense of the allegations, she doesn’t refute any of Gabbart’s assertions. She only sidesteps the entire mess in her past, saying how the rest of the country followed her lead in California.
*not a supporter of any of them, only seeing that Gabbart may be the least offensive of the lot. Which isn’t “support” at all or in any way. Well she’s kind of pretty too, and she did serve in the military, but I still disagree with every aspect of the Democrat’s world view.
The Democrat’s campaign is unfolding as we hoped.
President Donald J. Trump … 5 more years. I haven’t had a look at how Cruz or Pence will fare in the 2024 campaign.
I’m certain these two will figure prominently in the march to back to back double Republican Administrations.
Yup, it sure didn’t take long for Harris’ camp to give Gabbard the ‘Trump treatment’. The Dems were all warned against calling each other ‘racist’, so really, what other card does a modern liberal have to play but the Russia card?
Kamala Harris Campaign Blames Russia for Humiliation by Tulsi Gabbard
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/08/01/kamala-harris-campaign-claims-russians-are-behind-tulsi-gabbard-after-hawaii-democrat-lands-attack/
“Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA)’s campaign press secretary suggested Russia was behind Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) after she landed an effective blow on Harris’ record as a prosecutor during the Democrat debates on Wednesday night.”
https://thefederalistpapers.org/opinion/tomi-lahren-forced-apologize-tweet-mocking-kamala-harriss-sex-life?
“Fox News personality Tomi Lahren was forced to apologize for an ill-conceived tweet about Kamala Harris, a top-tier candidate for the Democratic nomination for president.
After last night’s Democratic debate, which saw Harris skewered by Tulsi Gabbard in the highlight of the night, Lahren took to Twitter to accuse the California Senator of sleeping her way to the top”
and, Willie Brown, who “helped” with Harris’ rise: “We still don’t have a candidate who can beat Donald Trump”
…
https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2019/08/01/tomi-lahren-apologizes-after-saying-kamala-harris-slept-her-way-top/?utm_term=.9d03d7503b5d
“Conservative TV personality Tomi Lahren kept up a steady thumb-beat of flame-throwing tweets throughout Wednesday night’s Democratic presidential debate, many of which succeeded in their intended goal of riling up readers. But one of her attempted zingers — this one aimed at Sen. Kamala D. Harris of California — was too much even for several of her colleagues at Fox News to stomach, and Lahren ultimately apologized for her words.
“Kamala did you fight for ideals or did you sleep your way to the top with Willie Brown?” Lahren tweeted, referring to Harris’s mid-1990s relationship with the former California Assembly speaker and eventual mayor of San Francisco.”
harris sounds a wee bit like CONservatists under harpoon harper.
dont think so? he wuz allllll gung ho disallowing time served whilst awaiting trial to be applied to any sentencing:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/scoc-ruling/article17929504/
why the blazes would he do THAT? getting cash from the ‘mercun prison guard lobby also? wtf?
and, ANYONE promoting the death sentence because there are inevitably *some* on death row who really really did it,
(a la charlie manson, bernardo, cliffie olsen)
conveniently forget it is mathematically very improbable you will get 100% accuracy with thousands of executions.
but naturally THEY are willing to sacrifice some innocents in order to slake the bloodlust and gain political power.
lOOks like harris is a textbook example of that.
Astute comment. Harper was hard for LAW N ORDUH which was one of several good reason to chuck him out. Watching his idiotic tuffgai on crime laws get piecemeal struck out by the courts gives me much pleasure.
Kam (Baby) Harris was/is for sale… Trump supported her, gave her 5K in 2011 & more…..When he needed help….
The person most objectional is the EAST Orange, NJ ( If you are white, you be dead) stalking Horse… Booker
Booker is the one who actually cares about civil liberties.
NBC is already there. Who do they blame? Russia.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/russia-s-propaganda-machine-discovers-2020-democratic-candidate-tulsi-gabbard-n964261
A typically inept headline. Tulsi is the one in the left’s official (and in this case correct) narrative regarding the ‘lock em up’ agenda and Harris is the one violating it.
Just nominate Biden already. He’s basically Kryptonite to Trump.