Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood. - "Michael E. Zilkowsky
The LPoC exists for the LPoC. If the optics of the arrest give them one extra vote, so be it.
to a liberal politician, a vote is a vote is a vote. legal or illegal it does not matter as long as the end result is a liberal majority. The average Canadian voter has the I.Q. of a gnat, good looks and pretty hair are more important than sound fiscal policies.
This is all for show, the Liberal cabal want to change this country into a socialist empire they can have control of. They must think we all feel off a turnip wagon…oh wait, we elected them and are about to do so again…they could be right. The Conservatives are their best friends, they are dissing the leader they chose, the media and Liberals are lapping it up.
Liz, the useless tit, scheep, is a product of the SCC (so called cons) bible thumping. I wrote my rep and all I got was an emotional spiel on how smart and good and nice the scheep was. All emotion, no substance. Typical thumper , just like libtards, response. Max is a well grounded, street smart, individual, that many of the tumpers did not like because of those very qualities. You can’t fight fire with fire and turn the other cheek at the same time.
I’d love to vote for Max but he will not win, the Liberals will be the beneficiaries of Conservative stupidity. We need to get rid of the present regime at all costs. This is no time to worry about Scheer’s personality or his religion, I worry more about keeping this country together as a cohesive society. The Liberals are tearing the fabric of this nation apart bit by bit.
I agree with you Liz. I like some of Max’s positions, but he is just going to split the vote. It’s how Nutley got voted into power in Alberta.
But we’ll find out this October. My prediction? Turdeau will win. 🙁 🙁
We might even expect them to find a way to airlift those from Mexico trying to get into the US. The Cabal under the name of Trudeau would welcome them as “irregulars” and they would enjoy all the guarantees under the Trudeau Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Anything goes, come one come all, that Trump is such a meanie.
Step 1) Cross the border Step 2) claim asylum = perfectly legal
Someday, we’ll recognize that human smugglers are heroes and that arresting them was as stupid as arresting drug dealers.
So do you suppprt unlimited immigration?
Yes. The only acceptable limits are keeping terrorists, spies, and true criminals out. And the dangerously infectious. Everybody else, get in!
Terriorists. Surely you mean freedom fighters?
Spies? Actually what harm do they really do?
True criminals? Aren’t they just irregular citizens?
Sarc off
The modern left would say anyone to the right of Lenin is a terrorist, or a spy, or a true criminal, as they are all guilty of anti-socialist behaviour.
“…terrorists, spies, and true criminals out. And the dangerously infectious.”
Yep, that pretty much sums up all of turd world.
The Liberals thought: “It worked for the Underground Railroad during the American Civil War, didn’t it?”
The fact remains is that Prinz Dummkopf, et. al., deliberately created a mess and they don’t know how to clean it up.
No country that shares a border with Canada is a warzone or persecutes people in a manner defined by the UN Refugee Convention. By definition, anyone who crosses the border into Canada (or the US, for that matter) cannot be a refugee.
That’s not how being a refugee works. You really have no idea what you’re talking about.
We don’t really know if they’re drug dealers, terrorists or what they are. Claiming asylum coming from the US is bogus and an insult to our closest ally. We are not smart or we would never be in the growing mess we are in with this government.
Perhaps you can fill in these blanks:
– how many people crossing illegally into Canada fit the accepted definition of refugee?
– how many refugees have better brands of luggage, clothing and cell phones than yourself?
– if they are, in fact, refugees, why did they not ask for asylum in the US, still the number destination of immigrants?
– how many illegal migrants are NOT taking up space in hotels, motels and homeless shelters?
– how many illegal migrants are doctors, engineers or skilled persons who require little to no re-training and have found gainful employment?
– how many people have acclimatised to Canada and refer to themselves solely as Canadian citizens?
– how many have refused to return to their former countries?
– how many have left Canada for employment, benefits or warfare in other countries?
– is a laissez-faire policy a sensible one when there is no employment, housing or education even for nationals?
That will be the day we truly become a turd world country.
Here is a monument to unme’s heroes: https://i1.wp.com/globetribune.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/rape-tree.jpg
Some day you’ll make sense; well maybe, the jury is still out on that one.
So entering a country through prescribed borders is the same as breaching soft points to get yourself or your “clients” in?
And of course all these people that sneak into the country immediately seek out authorities to make their “refugee” claim.
You can’t be that foolish. OTOH, as some dizzy fool said on Watters said last night, they’re “undocumented” so not criminals.
Hmm, perhaps an analogy may suffice (doubtful I know with confirmation bias supreme).
If you go to the bank and withdraw your funds through the teller or machine as the proper account holder, that is not illegal.
If you take the money by fraudulent or other means, like armed robbery for instance, that is illegal. Do you see the difference?
In both cases you entered the bank and you left with money. In DeMarxist bizarro world they’re the same. Power corrupts.
Are bank robbers only “undocumented withdrawers,” and therefore yours and the loony left’s latest “heroes” too?
More like useful global village idiots.
Bzzt. Illegal immigration isn’t ‘stealing’ or trespassing in the slightest. There is no crime.
Ha, it’s kinda like saying… ‘You are under arrest for smuggling drugs, however, the drugs are free to go’.
Liberal politicians feel free to lie at will because they absolutely own the public narrative in Canada at the moment. This MUST be addressed but oblivious Scheer continues to just piss into the CBC wind, soaking himself and all Conservatives in the process. Seeing Scheer with the media, the rare times they even allow him exposure, reminds me of someone stroking their pet tiger. Sure, the tiger acts all civil, even playfully friendly, until it’s instincts tell it to turn on him.
The CBC et al will eat him alive the moment their conservative-hating instincts tell them it’s time to.
Repeating myself AGAIN. It is NOT an illegal crossing if they are legit asylum/refugees. Canada, the USA and the UN all say so.
Maybe some of us will soon be seeking asylum in the US if this mess the Liberal crew continues to grow.
Liberals are bringing in people with no plan to take care of their needs, dumping them into municipalities, into hotels and any space they can find and feeding and clothing them. It isn’t fair to anyone concerned.
Ask Goodale if he has any plan for getting them jobs and contributing to the country and you’ll see his head bob out non answers.
The Dems in the US are just as crazy as the Turdeau Liberals here, but the Dems seem to be heading even further left of our NDP! e.g. Ocasio.
“Liberals are bringing in people with no plan to take care of their needs”
Good. They can take care of their own needs.
Sucking off welfare while residing in taxpayer funded hotel ain’t taking care of your needs, it is having someone else take care off your needs.
Where is that in writing?
Canadian law
Then tell Immigration Canada to change the sign that says its illegal.
You’re repeating yourself, like a broken record. Anyone who enters through a proper border point can claim asylum.
Their chances of success are near zero. So they enter illegally ie not through a proper border crossing point.
Border crashers can still apply for refugee status assuming they’re not a criminal otherwise.
But their weak case just got weaker. We all know (except you?) in the vast majority of cases, refugee claims are red herrings.
That’s why they don’t enter properly and only claim refugee status when caught. Anyone entering the US from the Mexico border is de facto not a refugee, maybe an economic migrant, and their refugee claim is almost certainly fraudulent.
Spare us your conflating legal immigration, human smuggling, drug running and refugees. We know the difference, thanks.
You keep conflating ‘improper’ entry as being automatically illegal. It just isn’t so, and even if it was who cares? What is this ‘crisis’ everyone keeps talking about with these immigrants? You’re turning blue from yelling about it but it’s still not a crisis.
You’re the only one turning blue and yelling. Turn a blind eye all you want, facts don’t change.
Spare us all your juvenile semantics around illegal and undocumented. You must think we’re Democrats.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWpU8sX10_4
We lost our Republican congressman due to a libertarian (Manchurian?) candidate who siphoned off just enough votes to give a mindless, socialist woman the seat. Her website doesn’t even mention “immigration” as an issue. The minister of Finance and myself have begun daily calls to her office to log resistance. We plan to show up at her town halls and make visible our disdain for her platform. There’s no doubt we’ll be escorted, at the least, away from her events, but we’re looking forward to it. I’m also going to take a closer look at the doings of the county GOP. It is something of a closed loop, folks who have been friends and neighbors since kindergarten, but they’re good people. I just want to see organized resistance from our side which is difficult. Conservatives have jobs.