11 Replies to “O, Sweet Saint Of San Andreas”

  1. Californication. What a shit hole! In the 60s and 70s, I had a series of injections to guard against typhus. I was going to the Middle East. So, the chickens, as it were, have come home to roost.

  2. well thank God there’s no typhus epidemic in Mexico or Central America….so it can’t be those poor little illegals fault

  3. Sending more folks to California cleans up other States welfare roles & they enjoy the declining values.. More Faster
    Offer free airline tickets to the homeless flat-liners, lots of SOROS funds for Mob gatherings. Free Drugs & parties YEP

    EU open borders attracts the lawless folks…..The Local females like it!

  4. And once again the end game for liberalism is law of the jungle.
    After WWII widespread forced use of DDT went a long way toward suppressing the spread of typhus. But since the progs have DDT on their “evil chemical” list, a proven, effective preventive measure is unavailable to them. Mother nature re-asserts herself.

    1. They always prefer pretending to manage problems to solving them. It’s far more profitable that way, and generates a lot more permanent jobs for their mistresses and rentboys.

      A lot more costly for the rest of us, but who cares about that?

  5. The last thing the professional “Homeless Advocates” want to do is ever solve the homeless problem.

    There is serious government and charity money to be made in publicizing and perpetuating homelessness. Millions of dollars are up for grabs. Last thing they want to do is end the gravy train.

    For the leaders, the money is damn good, the benefits are first rate, and they rarely get their hands dirty actually ministering to the homeless. They want to keep their phoney-baloney jobs! Harrumph! Harrumph!

    Good Lord, if they ever solve the problem, they might have to get a new cause, and all the good causes are already taken! They would have to start at the bottom again, at minimum wage, and actually interact with their “clients.”

    Typhus? Drugs? So what if a few hundred die from disease and drug abuse? There are plenty more poor souls to prey upon.

  6. This, of course, will hurt the tourist industry and the airlines.

    Who’d want to travel to some hellhole country overseas to experience the pestilences over there when one can stay at home and get them for free?

    But think of how that reduction in travel will affect the environment. There’ll be less carbon being dumped into the atmosphere because fewer people will be flying.

    1. “There’ll be less carbon being dumped into the atmosphere”
      But that is not a good thing. We need more CO2 dumped as we are low. We are only half way there. We need to reach 800 ppm.

Navigation