Via Lorrie Goldstein’s twitter.
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO
RE: Ezra Levant, Plaintiff
AND:
Robert P. J. Day, Defendant
BEFORE: Carole J. Brown, J.
COUNSEL: A. Irvin Schein, for the Responding Party/Plaintiff
Jeff G Saikaley, for the Moving Party/Defendant
HEARD: June 22nd and September 12th, 2017

[55] The matter is to proceed expeditiously to trial.
Encouraging news. I am thoroughly sick of every leftie and liberal trashing the Rebel, not to mention attacking people physically. Apparently not so bright sjw types aren’t aware the law applies to them.
“Ezra Levant is the principle”?
I’d take days off to sit on a jury for this…. (if it was a jury).
just sayin’
Robert Day (defendant) portrayed his Twitter feed as fact, not commentary.
The Plaintiff (Levant) must prove 1) his claim has merit, 2) the Defendant has no defence to the charges and 3) harm has or is likely to be caused by the Defendant’s actions.
[33] there are grounds to believe the claim has substantial merit (1)
[39] This was not expression on a matter of public interest, but personal attacks (3)
[41] His statements were motivated by malice (3)
[49] I find that there are grounds to believe that the defendant has advanced no valid defences. (2)
[55] The matter is to proceed expeditiously to trial [in other words (1), (2), (3) are satisfied]
It is looking grim for the Defence.
“Canadian Cynic” acquired some blogger fame ten years ago or so, when he blogged “f**k your tears” at the mother of a Canadian soldier killed in Afghanistan when she got some media coverage of her grief. I can’t be arsed to search up the details, he’s a nobody if ever there was one (although respected and admired on the internet by yer average Canadian lefty), but it would brighten my day if he got sued into greater poverty.
Robert Day is an a&&, he got his a&& handed to him, and he is going to get his a&& kicked again when the final judgement comes down against him years from now.
If ever there was a need for a public stockade with ample suppliers of rotten food & shi! this guy would be it (best to leave him in it until the final verdict).
Day has a long history of misogyny against any woman that’s off the far left reservation. Absolute vile scum of the earth.
Well, I will believe that the courts in Ontario are NOT just another ninth circuit when it see evidence that they have ever ruled against a socialist.
Isn’t the Ontario court the one who is slow rolling the gas plant case against Wynne, and is just waiting long enough for everyone to forget before they NEVER SEND A LIBERAL TO JAIL FOR ANYTHING EVER?
Wow, and this Day guy has the balls to call anyone else sleazy.
Hopefully Ezra gets to take this fellow to the cleaners.
Guys like Robert Defamation All Day Every Day are a dime a dozen. Check out the commentary at National Post.
SDA does a good job to keep thread bombing trash like that off the site.
While I don’t believe the Rebel was using the Fort Mac fundraising as a revenue generator, I’d be more than happy if they profit from from defamation suits against the ilk of Day. They should do another one.
I’m an old retired guy north of Toronto who would LOVE to sit in and observe that trial, and get a good look at that defendant, Robert Day. Anybody else care to join me?
Davers6
Better be careful how I word this: After reading the tweets in question, Mr. Day seems like a real dickhead. Looks like Ezra is going to win this one. Kind of an important case although it should already be established in law that you can’t tweet lies about someone with impunity.
“Fel@ti0tastic!!!”
This is why the Liberal left fights for Kangaroo courts and “Social Justic”e as they do with the Human Right Commission.
Liberal mental illness can’t win in a real Court of Law.
*
is it possible canadian cynic” has a problem
with ezra for some other reason?
*
I see Canadian Cynic (Robert Day) is mocking Goldstein on Twitter for reporting on this decision a month late.
Day, you’re ass — not Goldstein’s — is in the frying pan and you have nothing to gloat about.
*
…hmmm… it seems “the cynic” may…
have a very particular obsession.
*
And then there’s this gem:
Stephen Harper: Good little Jew boy
“the defence may still be defeated if the plaintiff establishes that the defendant was actuated by malice”
Considering that Day’s entire online “career”, such as it is, could be described as “actuated by malice”, I don’t think he’ll every win one of these lawsuits.
*
In fact, you’ve just gotta love how adroitly CC plays both sides
of the Nazi equation… like when he goes after Stephen Taylor
administrator of the Blogging Tories.
*
Over and over we are told that national socialism and socialism are not related and over and over people like Day prove otherwise with their own words.
labeling Jews as nazis, whining about the fact they clobber gaza and area when palestinian rockets fly into their homes. no shortage of antisemitism for the last 3,000 years.
I got a copy of the C-103 islamophobia thingy. yo mr local lieberal mop, why is it out of the umpteen religions islam is favoured with special mention? isnt THAT discrimination committed by GUBBAMINT????
This is just another case of Liberal “projection”. …
11:23 AM Holy Mother of God, what a beautiful scam. You really have to appreciate it for its pure and unadulterated sleaziness and opportunism.
It sounds like the mechanism by which the Clinton Foundation launders $Billions … Tax Free … and uses the proceeds to fund Robert Mugabe’s totalitarian Marxist wonderland. It sounds like accusing President Trump of Russian collusion, while lining HER pockets with Russian $$$$
Davers6-Please keep me in Mind if you do make the decision to be an Observer. Seems like it “will be a good day”. Mind you the The Defendant” will probably agree to a Fine & Costs.
This seems so far to be even handed and following Canada’s ever increasing opportunities for Attorneys to maintain costly Life-Styles. However the Ontario Courts will and can arrive at a determination The Plaintiff is not being co-operative enough to compromise and bring forward a “slap on the wrist”; —Wynne’s corrupt Staff buying-off of a Candidate–; and sharing of the costs by Mr. Levant when the Defendant is so much at Fault.
Fair? Nope.
is this DAY fella related to SeaDoo Day????
So Levant’s love of free speech ends when it becomes ‘defamation’. Another conservative hypocrite
Thanks for spelling out your definition of free speech.
That’s legalese for “Sir, you are truly f***ed, so let’s get this over with pronto.”
Yep, the key word is “malice.” That is VERY serious.
It doesn’t mean “Cynic hates Ezra” because, well, #obv.
Rather, legally, it means you “maliciously” KNEW what you wrote was false, and published it anyhow, for the express purpose of harming another’s reputation, income and so on.
Obviously, this “knew” bit can be rather hard to prove in court — we aren’t mind readers.
However, if it CAN be proved, through dated documents and sworn testimony about conversations, etc., you are in super dooper deep deep doo-doo in the eyes of the law.
For those complaining about “free speech,” please note that _falsely _ claiming that an individual embezzled money from a charity is indeed a crime, and continuing to do so even after the charity itself tells you it didn’t happen, is a crime, beside being just a sh*tty and astoundingly dumb thing to do.
*
kathy…
do you recall when the cynic accused you of being me?
“DOUBLE PLUS GOOD BONUS: In a delightful splash of irony, Blogging Tory
“Neo Conservative” (who is, in reality, Kathy Shaidle) writes the occasional
blog post involving the c@ntalicious John McCain but, curiously, seems
unfazed by McCain’s intemperance towards his wife.”
i forget whether or not this was before or after i got the threat to firebomb my house.
gotta love the lunatic left.
*
*
kathy…
do you recall when the cynic accused you of being me?
“DOUBLE PLUS GOOD BONUS: In a delightful splash of irony, Blogging Tory
“Neo Conservative” (who is, in reality, Kathy Shaidle) writes the occasional
blog post involving the c@ntalicious John McCain but, curiously, seems
unfazed by McCain’s intemperance towards his wife.”
i forget whether or not this was before or after i got the threat to firebomb my house.
gotta love the lunatic left.
*
As the saying goes “Liars go to hell” and in this case to trial.
OMG I didn’t know that — I try to ignore him and frankly had forgotten he existed until this lawsuit.
That’s just one of the “facts” that Cynic has “reported” over the years. I recall all the SDA posts from years back, fact-checking his laughable assertions, along with highlighting his statements about women etc.
Those who don’t think this matters need to know that Cynic is one of the most popular bloggers/tweeters read by the Ottawa Parliament Hill press corps.