Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
My popcorn bowl runeth over.
Yes and she is married to one.
good lord, you’d think she’d be smart enough to shut her pie hole on that one, but the self serving b*tch is just too butthurt because she lost.
Just elected?
Actually that election was the one where your husband was on the ticket.
Limbaugh will likely frame his entire week on this one.
There’s not a problem here – Bill never admitted sexual assault…
/sarc
Last night while browsing through the news on Yahoo I came across a similar account of Hillary’s interview with the BBC. It had at that time something like 14,000 comments. That’s a lot for an article on Yahoo. Curious about the reaction to her statements, I skimmed through maybe 200-300 of them, scrolling rapidly, reading only enough to get the gist of them. Why look at so many? I was looking for any comments which supported her. I could not find any. Not one, zero. No one had anything positive to say about her. The most common was trend was “just go away”.
Oh, and have I mentioned that there is not one day that goes by, not one, where I am not thankful Hillary Clinton was not elected POTUS. I do believe I have…..what a nasty corrupt person she is.
I am no lawyer (even a disbarred one), but in a purely legal sense President Trump never admitted anything of the kind. Bill Clinton’s legal team would have no difficulty running rings around her pathetic accusation. And she is being considered for a professorship at Columbia Law School? A satirist couldn’t keep up with this, no wonder an Ivy League education just isn’t what it used to be.
“A recently uncovered 1998 story in The Washington Post lists the powerful producer – now accused of sexual harassment and assault by numerous women – among several Hollywood heavyweights who gave the maximum $10,000 to Clinton’s legal defense fund.
The detail gives a fuller picture of the longstanding financial relationship between the former first family and one of their best West Coast fundraisers. That relationship has been under the microscope after Hillary Clinton came under criticism for waiting five days to condemn Weinstein.”
…
“In eventually saying she was “shocked and appalled” by the allegations against the producer, Clinton said in a CNN interview that she would donate Weinstein’s political contributions to charity, as other Democratic beneficiaries have done. Weinstein’s contributions to her various campaigns, as well as a political committee she used to support other Democrats and a joint fund with the DNC in 2016, total more than $46,000.
Hillary Clinton, though, moved to shift the focus during a BBC interview that aired Friday, bringing up allegations against President Trump – a move that inadvertently brought up her husband’s past.
WEINSTEIN TIES TO CLINTON, OBAMA RUN DEEP
“This kind of behavior cannot be tolerated anywhere, whether it’s in entertainment, politics,” Clinton said. “After all, we have someone admitting to being a sexual assaulter in the Oval Office.”
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/16/harvey-weinstein-helped-pay-bill-clintons-legal-bills-during-monica-era-washington-post-archive-reveals.html
Great find and well said. It is only the progressive media that still supports that serial liar.
Pinocchio is right.
“When Hillary was asked if Weinstein’s behavior was as bad as Bill’s, she said close but no cigar.” great comment from a poster
Trump needs to sue her for making that defamatory statement.
Those who live in glass houses… Hilary has been protective of two of America’s most infamous sexual abusers and then is so detached from reality that she actually tries to take the moral high ground with Trump. But then, she represents the people who repeatedly claimed to take the high road this past election while travelling in tunnels beneath the previously established low roads, doesn’t she?
No wonder the Democrats rallied behind her, she is the absolute Queen of Hypocrisy.
I saw the clip and nearly choked !
Reading this stuff you may find something missing that the interviewer on BBC ask the Clinton woman.
The question was about her Clinton husband and his sexual adventures with multiple unwilling women.
One wonders….. if Anne Gearan of Washington Post just possibly did not get to that point……not.
It would be interesting to know if Gearan omitted that part of the interview or Washington Post edited it out of the article.
In either case, another shade of fake news.
Hillary Clinton is very aware of all the realities of the scum that inhabits her pond.
The woman is so vile that when asked about her husbands criminal sex activities, she simply said that it was litigated, the interviewer simply rolled over and played dead.
You may note that when ever a republican or the president is interviewed by the mass media, they drill deep on question after another very often repeating rearranged questions many time hoping that the subject will trip or by a simple mistake will say something that will be loosely reinterpreted for the plebeians, so they will properly understand the drift.
It also seems that those that interview Clinton woman, they are scared stiff to follow with follow up questions, no drilling allowed.
And so the political scum lives on.
We can only imagine what it must be like to be Hillary. She is a psychopath for certain and a serial liar and those are her good qualities.
That she was utterly convinced that she was going to be the president is without question. She waited a long long time for this ‘second’ shot at it.
That there is nothing else is this disgusting woman’s life but the pursuit of money and power, she is losing both.
Can you imagine the suffering that she is enduring and with little time left to make anything out her life, she must be terribly distraught and totally stressed that it’s over and she just doesn’t want it to be over.
With that in mind, I suggest that we all rejoice that she is NOT president and that she IS suffering greatly and have a toast to Mr. Trump who is my all time hero for keeping that disgusting bitch from taking us all down the rabbit hole.
I still don’t understand how grabbing a pussy is sexual assault, if voluntary. Should I prepare myself for a life sentence for hundreds, no thousands, of similar crimes?
*
like mother… like daughter…
“The former first daughter hustled out a side door after the event,
evading a reporter as she rushed to her car surrounded by
aides and security.”
*
“Trump needs to sue her for making that defamatory statement.”
I would think he could sue the pants off her and win, still I doubt that he will. Imagine the outrage from liberal supporters and media were he to do so. Probably he will make do with a twitter comment or maybe ignore her. Its not as if she enhanced her reputation by the comment.
“Trump needs to sue her for making that defamatory statement.”
Nah. Far better to just ignore her.
It’s more than time to draw down the curtains and turn out the lights on The Clinton Show.
HA HA! Concerned, “choked” …. ya mean like Monica? JK. ☺
She’s as laffable as the NFL.
Hillary’s complete lack of LEGAL understanding is shocking. And yet … Swansea just named a Law Scool for HER! Shocking! http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-south-west-wales-41611316 WHAT is IT with all these leftist Universities? Don’t they have ANY pride or integrity anymore. Of course they don’t.
SHE has obviously FORGOTTEN all her Yale Law School lessons. Or is she just experiencing the onset of Dementia or Alzheimer’s ? Shameful Swansea University … Shameful.
What’s next ? I predict SHE will receive a Nobel Peace Prize for … her entire body of work … on behalf of; world peace, the children, AIDS patients, little Haitian girls, exposing Putin, Resisting Trump, Islamic relations, erasure of borders … I could go on … SHE is sooooooo “accomplished”
Hillary is delusional.
The people of Haiti know what Hillary is all about.
When it comes to the institutional left, they protect each other right up until there is a Weinstein moment. Perhaps while the Whores of Hollywood are finally coming out off the casting couch, some fresh ladies, women, or girls of Bubba’s past that haven’t been adequately hushed or murdered could come out. Hillary appropriately still appears to be the lead voice of the Evil Party and as such, a valuable asset to Trump’s political future and constant reminder of his success. Pure Evil, nothing less.
Actually, if Weinstein had gotten an Oscar within the last decade, they would still be protecting him. The current news cycle is simply that he can no longer make enough money to keep paying the Clinton’s their vig, so he is being disposed of. Weinstein is more trouble than he is worth now, where it used to be it was worth anything to protect him.
My view exactly. I do not want to hear from Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama ever again except for the obituary where we will raise a glass in celebration as we did the day when Pierre Trudeau died or Ted Bundy was executed.
I rue the day that I had ever heard the name of any of them and celebrate the day when they are gone.
May their works become ashes along with the memory of them. All that loved them were as evil and blind as they were.
Her dreams of dancing in the White House once more may never be realized even though she had practiced long and hard.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xE1mWuqO_iM
“I would think he could sue the pants off her”
I will have nightmares for weeks following the horrific vision that statement will engender.