Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
“His neighbours complained their crime increased because no one wanted to go to jail under Sheriff Arpaio”. Fred
UnMe you missed the point.. The neighbors were in California & NM. When the punks got released..they Split from AZ ASAP
The AZ Lawyers lost their clients when they left the State, no punk bragging rights go with pink shorts & Tents in the desert.
And you missed the point that actually matters, which is that Arpaio’s reign did not see crime decrease. And that doesn’t even include the crimes committed by Arpaio’s administration.
Arpaio’s job was to enforce existing law, the success of the enforcement in lowering the law breaking is irrelevant.
If the law is wrong then breaking it is on the heads of those who break it, not on those who enforce it.
Judges should not pretend they have the power to suspend legislation, their job it to decide if the law has been enforced as written, not to rule on the law as they wish it to be or not to be.
I don’t know which Leftist tear sheet of talking points you’re reading from … but those “charges” are all false. Just meant to demonize the good sheriff. Nobody was arrested because they were “brown” or “looked Mexican”. That was just a specious charge made by his opponents … completely unjustified. And his “spartan” prison accommodations never rose to “cruel and unusual punishment. Jail SHOULD be un-comffff-ter-ble for the punisheees. Ask any of his illegal Mexican clients if they’d rather be jailed in Mexico ? I believe they eat menudo sandwiches.
We are in counter-revolutionary times south of the border, but our own counter-revolution failed thanks to uncommitted leadership who threw away the chance they were given.
I’m not saying Trump is guaranteed to do much better, he seems to be slowly giving in to elements within his own power structure who are committed to stalling out the counter-revolution, making it more or less inevitable that further revolution will then follow when he’s out of time.
As for Sherriff Joe, he was one who stood up to the revolution and they made an example of him. Trump was right to overturn the politically motivated conviction. Now he should compensate the Portland bakers who are perhaps the most visible lawfare victims of the Obama years. As their misfortunes were in civil rather than criminal court, there is no conviction to overturn, but their lives were ruined by huge fines which made a mockery of their freedom of religion as guaranteed under the Constitution.
I would make a similar argument for persons known to me in Canada but we have no real constitution, just Soviet style laws that the unwary would interpret to be a constitution. They can mean whatever a judge says they mean, and we all know what the odds are there.
Well Gord, I am fully cognizant of that slippery slope, and how how fast liberal activist judges have been dragging us down it for decades. Maybe you should read more and try to be more informed? Your viewpoint is so silly I suspect you’re trolling.
I’ve seen that in the elderly ‘conservatives’ too – they still trust the media to some extent and when liberals accuse them of some misconduct – they flap and fumble and fall over themselves to deny it and then go along to get along while signaling their virtue for all they’re worth. Newsflash for ya Gord: there’s a cliff at the bottom of that slippery slope, and you and your liberals and cucks are headed straight for it
Yes but the intent was to punish, and that was done. The process is the punishment.
Gord;
A number of well thought out posts.
In defense of populism I suggest it gives voice to many who are impacted by modern politics and bureaucratic excesses. It often challenges those who want to set directions for how people live. Whether conservative or progressive. I see these efforts as a brake on those who initiate such top down changes. It them becomes the responsibility of those who initiate to defend their causes.
Populism has a role in the defense of democracy.
yes gorD”Oh, that’s punishing the judge, by righting the judges wrong action. You sound more and more like a libtard. The whole western world has a legal (court system problem) and fools like you think people should actually do nothing. You are an idiot, or should I a caring kristian
Well said and thank you. You are right about the counter-revolution having failed here in Canada. The progressives through the Laurentian Elite are firmly in control and will not make the mistake of giving it up again.
Wow! 59 comments in and NOT ONE has brought up the fact that the Sheriff was the only officer of the law who did a thorough investigation into Obama’s on line posted Birth Certificate that has been proved to be a total fraud. Joe confirmed it.
The court order to stop illegal immigrant profiling was a contrived move for revenge by Obama and his deep State minions. Period. A total abuse of power and Trump is 100% correct to pardon a non crime.
Now watch the MSM be totally silent on the facts above…CBC doesn’t even mention the detail that Apaio was checking for illegals, they only mention “Because he ignored a Federal court Judge”
BTW, After the Russian saga, North Korea standoff, Charlottesville, the Apaio “scandal” is the new “Impeach” flavor of the week…Until Hurricane Harvey eventually becomes Trump’s disaster.
Yawn!
Revolution?
What revolt?
We tried to Reform,using Roberts Rules of Committees and the existing structures of Democracy, a well established Kleptocracy.
Seems a lesson was learned, Reform may well be impossible via peaceful legal means,when those laws and regulations are made by the thieves who rule.
The taxpaying slave has no rights in Canada.
Human Rights Legislation Trumps all other law in Canada and that HR BS is whatever the Court wants it to be this week.
Revolt comes when you know you are FUBAR no matter what comes next.
The State generously allowing you to keep 1/3 of your return on your labour, while abusing you for; “Failing to save for your retirement”, is definitely a good start.
So we vote Never Done Paying or Liarball Party cause we have no option, progressive conservative = Liberal Party in my experience.
So fast crash or slow lingering death.. pick your poison.
Revolt is ugly, brutal and destructive, sane conservatives have no interest is such stupidity.
There will be revolt,only when there is nothing left to conserve..
Our current “leaders” seem to have us well on the way to that.
The header lance chose for this thread was “Hypocrisy”…. and appropriately so.
This would not even be on the MSM’s radar if the players involved were loyal Democrats.
Anyways, anyone else notice that the level of troll participation on any given thread at SDA seems to be in direct proportion to the amount of propaganda that the leftist media gave the topic? When one of our usual SDA trolls offers up an original thought, not just regurgitated media bigotry, maybe someone here would be kind enough to point it out.
Thanks.
“Judges should not pretend they have the power to suspend legislation, their job it to decide if the law has been enforced as written, not to rule on the law as they wish it to be or not to be.” OZ
True, but the full story is worse!
I am a taxpaying legal Voter of Maricopa County, AZ I voted for Sheriff Joe and have followed his problems with the legal Community. Yes! immigration Lawyers hate Joe because if he asks an illegal Alien their status and they claim to be American… They have a ZERO chance of future Citizenship..Same with voting questions
The State Courts tried to intimidate Joe & failed.. The Courts fined the County & State (Why do Courts think they have the power to SPEND Taxpayers Money) Could be they think punishing taxpayers will force me to vote against Joe….No didn’t work
Obama & the Ninth Circuit tried to charge Joe with criminal charges, but they failed to bring any legal Case (lots of allegations & fake news)… The Court decided they had the power to appoint themselves administrator of the Maricopa Sheriff Office, nullifying MY vote. The Judge issued an unlawful order & Joe “may” have followed the will of Maricopa County taxpayers like me..
Today NBC “Meet the Press” claimed Joe had “Chain Gangs” totally fake
He used prisoners to pickup trash on the Roads (they get paid) and the usual Unions complained, but Maricopa county does not have Chain-Gangs nor has any Court ruled they have (that is the only way a fact is determined)
The Sheriff Joe story has all the making of a civil war..Watch for the fear mongers & Lock them UP chants…be afraid..very afraid
“Nobody was arrested because they were “brown” or “looked Mexican”.
Yes they were. It is a fact. Joe’s folks profiled Americans and violated their 4A rights.
His prisons also violated the rights of Americans. People died IIRC. Joe and his thugs lied and mislead the people who wanted to check up on his over-crowded understaffed prisons.
“Populism has a role in the defense of democracy. ”
Populism is the stage where democracy turns into dictatorship ex Venezuela. There’s a very good reason certain people are ‘marginalized’: they are pig-ignorant and dangerous. Poor/uneducated people should not be allowed to vote.
Dogmatic acceptance of Political scapegoating ran rampant in the Nineteen Thirties. Especially in Germany – Japan – Italy- etc.
More than one hundred million people died because of your type of obtuseness Mr. Tulk
Please give your head a shake before the clogged arteries have you making comments which stubbornness will not let you move back from the obtuseness.
The best story about Arpaio? The one where his undercover deputies gave some 18yo mental case the idea to bomb Arpaio plus the money (over 2 grand) to buy the stuff needed to do it. Then they had the guy arrested live on TV and Arpaio was able to talk about how criminals were trying to assassinate him. That helped him win the next election. Only bad thing was when the case fell apart later and the county had to pay the patsy over a million dollars in restitution. One can see how such a man would be a hero to Trump. Trump being the guy who faked a medical condition to avoid ‘Nam.