21 Replies to “Reader Tips”

  3. Hitler Spotted in North Korea
    Adolph Hitler, feared leader of Germany’s Third Reich was spotted today at a North Korean Political Rally. Thought to have died in his Berlin bunker in 1945, Der Fuehrer seemed reasonably fit and alert at the pageant, despite being almost 130 years old. The ceremony’s purpose was to welcome children into the Korean Children’s Union, an elite organization for exceptional young people. Herr Hitler made no comments during the ceremony, and his current whereabouts are unknown.
    https://youtu.be/rDw7KYMHy7Y

  5. It must be spread all around the ME by now…Canada loves and wants more Muslim immigrants. The
    Trudeau government is supremely antagonistic, playing off Trump’s immigration policies.

  7. But it was a great diversion/excuse for Canada’s lapdog media to once again “spin positively” on leftardism and forget about Trudeau’s disastrous past weeks, wasn’t it?
    We need MORE voices calling out the elitist media for their dishonest, one-sided and ideological-drenched approach to EVERYTHING.

  8. PET’s Multiculturalism.
    …-
    “Toronto – CTV: Interfaith groups to form ‘rings of peace’ around mosques in Canada today”
    …-
    “Jihad Report
    Jan 28, 2017 –
    Feb 03, 2017
    Attacks 38
    Killed 151
    Injured 93
    Suicide Blasts 4
    Countries 16”
    http://thereligionofpeace.com/

  9. Line up surrender monkeys, the fight is over, we are all brothers in this Canada and plane loads will continue to stream in to join the happy family. What could possibly go wrong when free speech is no longer allowed? Will the Trudeau Charter be amended to prevent some being more equal than others as we cater to those deemed in need of special treatment?

  10. AGW Kills.
    …-
    “Dozens killed as extreme winter weather hits Afghanistan, Pakistan” (DW)
    …-
    “Congressman claims NOAA whistleblowers told him climate study was rushed
    NOAA denies the study was hurried for political reasons.”
    “Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) is back with more accusations against National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) climate scientists. The new claims came in the form of another letter sent to Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker on Wednesday.”
    https://arstechnica.com/science/2015/11/congressman-claims-noaa-whistleblowers-told-him-climate-study-was-rushed/

  12. When immigration affects the way we live how can it be good for the country? Why do we have to change to accommodate immigrants who choose to come here? Have they been told about our Multiculturalism policies,and their rights protected by the Charter will allow them to live as they did from where they came?
    Some have already tried it with so-called honour killings…that isn’t protected by the Charter but they may have thought it was.
    Crazy stuff all around and it’s going to continue.

  13. AGW RIP. Update.
    Att: President Donald Trump.
    …-
    “Former NOAA Scientist Confirms Colleagues Manipulated Climate Records
    Feb 5, 2017 Press Release”
    “WASHINGTON – U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space, and Technology members today responded to reports about the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) 2015 climate change study (“the Karl study”). According to Dr. John Bates, the recently retired principal scientist at NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center, the Karl study was used “to discredit the notion of a global warming hiatus and rush to time the publication of the paper to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy.”
    “Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas): “I thank Dr. John Bates for courageously stepping forward to tell the truth about NOAA’s senior officials playing fast and loose with the data in order to meet a politically predetermined conclusion. In the summer of 2015, whistleblowers alerted the Committee that the Karl study was rushed to publication before underlying data issues were resolved to help influence public debate about the so-called Clean Power Plan and upcoming Paris climate conference. Since then, the Committee has attempted to obtain information that would shed further light on these allegations, but was obstructed at every turn by the previous administration’s officials. I repeatedly asked, ‘What does NOAA have to hide?’
    “Now that Dr. Bates has confirmed that there were heated disagreements within NOAA about the quality and transparency of the data before publication, we know why NOAA fought transparency and oversight at every turn. Dr. Bates’ revelations and NOAA’s obstruction certainly lend credence to what I’ve expected all along – that the Karl study used flawed data, was rushed to publication in an effort to support the president’s climate change agenda, and ignored NOAA’s own standards for scientific study. The Committee thanks Dr. Bates, a Department of Commerce Gold Medal winner for creating and implementing a standard to produce and preserve climate data, for exposing the previous administration’s efforts to push their costly climate agenda at the expense of scientific integrity.”
    “Background
    In the summer of 2015, NOAA scientists published the Karl study, which retroactively altered historical climate change data and resulted in the elimination of a well-known climate phenomenon known as the “climate change hiatus.” The hiatus was a period between 1998 and 2013 during which the rate of global temperature growth slowed. This fact has always been a thorn in the side of climate change alarmists, as it became difficult to disprove the slowdown in warming.
    The Karl study refuted the hiatus and rewrote climate change history to claim that warming had in fact been occurring. The committee heard from scientists who raised concerns about the study’s methodologies, readiness, and politicization. In response, the committee conducted oversight and sent NOAA inquiries to investigate the circumstances surrounding the Karl study.
    Over the course of the committee’s oversight, NOAA refused to comply with the inquiries, baselessly arguing that Congress is not authorized to request communications from federal scientists. This culminated in the issuance of a congressional subpoena, with which NOAA also failed to comply. During the course of the investigation, the committee heard from whistleblowers who confirmed that, among other flaws in the study, it was rushed for publication to support President Obama’s climate change agenda.
    For a complete timeline of the Science Committee’s oversight of NOAA’s 2015 climate change study, click here.”
    https://science.house.gov/news/press-releases/former-noaa-scientist-confirms-colleagues-manipulated-climate-records

  14. When immigration affects the way we live how can it be good for the country? Why do we have to change to accommodate immigrants who choose to come here?
    When my parents and I came to Canada, the objective was to start a new life in a new country. We wanted to adopt Canadian ways and habits while maintaining many of the traditions from the old country.
    At no time did we demand that Canadian society change to suit us, though we were often baffled by how things were done here.

  16. The Cancer Industry.
    …-
    “The Merger of the Canadian Cancer Society and the Canadian Breast Cancer Society”
    “This merger was reported to be a result of decreasing donations…” (hullandhull)
    …-
    “Cancer Research Is Broken”
    “There’s a replication crisis in biomedicine—and no one even knows how deep it runs.”
    “The deeper problem is that much of cancer research in the lab—maybe even most of it—simply can’t be trusted. The data are corrupt. The findings are unstable. The science doesn’t work.”
    “Many science funders share Parker’s antsiness over all the waste of time and money. In February, the White House announced its plan to put $1 billion toward a similar objective—a “Cancer Moonshot” aimed at making research more techy and efficient. But recent studies of the research enterprise reveal a more confounding issue, and one that won’t be solved with bigger grants and increasingly disruptive attitudes. The deeper problem is that much of cancer research in the lab—maybe even most of it—simply can’t be trusted. The data are corrupt. The findings are unstable. The science doesn’t work.”
    http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/future_tense/2016/04/biomedicine_facing_a_worse_replication_crisis_than_the_one_plaguing_psychology.html

  17. “When my parents and I came to Canada, the objective was to start a new life in a new country. We wanted to adopt Canadian ways and habits while maintaining many of the traditions from the old country.
    At no time did we demand that Canadian society change to suit us, though we were often baffled by how things were done here.”
    The same with my family except it was my and my wife’s grandparents that came here with the same idea.

  18. AGW RIP.
    …-
    “Blast of winter smashes snowfall records in Abbotsford, Vancouver”
    “A new high was set at Vancouver’s airport Friday, when 12 centimetres fell, beating the record of 10.7 centimetres set in 1946.
    In Abbotsford, 20 centimetres fell Saturday, demolishing 1957’s tally of 7.6 centimetres.
    The City of Abbotsford said in a tweet that 38 centimetres of snow fell in the Fraser Valley community between Friday and Sunday morning, rivalling the 46 centimetres that fell in all of December.”
    http://www.metronews.ca/news/vancouver/2017/02/05/blast-of-winter-continues-to-dump-snow-across-southern-b-c.html

  19. AGW RIP.
    …-
    “Climate change whistleblower alleges NOAA manipulated data to hide global warming ‘pause’
    Former federal climatologist John Bates blasts 2015 NOAA study as other scientists defend its conclusions”
    “The climate change debate went nuclear Sunday over a whistleblower’s explosive allegation that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association manipulated data to advance a political agenda by hiding the global warming “pause.”
    In an article on the Climate Etc. blog, John Bates, who retired last year as principal scientist of the National Climatic Data Center, accused the lead author of the 2015 NOAA “pausebuster” report of trying to “discredit” the hiatus through “flagrant manipulation of scientific integrity guidelines and scientific publication standards.””
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/feb/5/climate-change-whistleblower-alleges-noaa-manipula/
    …-
    “NOAA and NASA Continue to Fake Climate Data”
    “NOAA shows the Earth red hot in December, with record heat in central Africa.
    The map above is fake. NOAA has almost no temperature data from Africa, and none from central Africa. They simply made up the record temperatures.”
    “Gavin Schmidt at NASA claims the imaginary NOAA data has been replicated by many other institutions.”
    “However, when Gavin is confronted about his obviously bogus temperature graphs, he defends by saying “it is not my data, I get it from NOAA.” In fact, all of the supposedly independent agencies get the lion’s share of their data from NOAA.”
    http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/31195/56/

  21. I must say you have hi quality content here. Your page can go
    viral. You need initial traffic only. How to get it?
    Search for: Etorofer’s strategies

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation