Solid science built this house of cards.

Unsettled Science 16 Comments

But the whole does not equal the value of the pieces. Kinda what we’ve been saying for a decade or more.

The paper discusses the phenomenal amount of adjustment that has been applied to the models in order to get them to produce what the scientists called an “anticipated acceptable range” of future warming. Among modelers, this is known as “tuning” an experiment in order to get a desired answer.

Climate religion has for too long relied on models guesstimating the known unknowns and hypothesizing unknown unknowns.
In the various mailing lists that make up the forums of debate in the computer world in order to express displeasure with anothers work we usually just write something like, “Your solution sucks because a,b,c.” Apparently the American Meteorological Society needs 45 pages to do the same thing. Abstract with a link to the preliminary draft PDF on that page.

16 Replies to “Solid science built this house of cards.”

  2. Why does it seem that the whole climate science religion issue and the effort to malign the incoming POTUS is so openly full of nothing but lies? Even Clapper phoned this evening and apologized to Trump. What the H is going on? Does the left feel so confident of victory that they have pulled pulled out all the stops in the climate change fraud? As far as the latest lies that Buzzfeed and CNN reported, Trump should ignore CNN for the full four years.

  6. Good thing Judith Curry bailed out of the swindle just in time, with all that lush pay and a pension, before the jig is up and the commoners show up with their torches and pitchforks.

  8. reality has never intruded on the CO2 debate, if it had we would not be paying a carbon tax.

  10. There are a hundred such videos as the one you offer.
    The one you offer is not a summary of Murry Salby’s work, which is ground breaking and unique.
    Salby’s work is so groundbreaking that he was to lecture in Germany, was fired from the university he was a professor at, and his return flight ticket was cancelled by the university which stranded him in Europe.
    The university then went on to confiscate all of his work and hide it away.(or maybe destroy it)
    The videos that I linked to above are well worth the time to watch.

  11. IF “Salby’s work is so groundbreaking” then why can’t you offer a paragraph summary in your own words?

  12. His work and equations aren’t my field, I couldn’t begin to summarize his findings.
    It is groundbreaking work and absolute proof that AGW is false.
    Salby’s proofs and equations are a threat to Gang Green.
    Why don’t you watch the videos and learn new things that few others know?
    There is literally nothing like Salby’s work out there.

  13. Why don’t you watch the video talk by Matt Ridley and learn new things that few others know? It’s obvious from your comments that you haven’t.
    Of course AGW is false and Ridley proves it conclusively in 40 minutes.

  14. There is literally nothing like Salby’s work out there
    From the mid 1980s, Salby conducted research out of University of Colorado Boulder. In 2005, the National Science Foundation opened an investigation into Salby’s federal funding arrangements and found that he had displayed “a pattern of deception [and] a lack of integrity” in his handling of federal grant money.[2] He resigned his position in Colorado in 2008 and became professor of climate risk at Macquarie University in Macquarie Park, New South Wales. In 2013 he was dismissed by the university on grounds of refusal to teach and misuse of university resources.
    On the other hand….
    Matt Ridley, is a British journalist, businessman and author of popular science books. Since 2013 Ridley has been a Conservative hereditary peer in the House of Lords.[5][6][7]
    Ridley is best known for his writings on science, the environment, and economics.[8] Ridley is the author of several books of popular science which have sold more than a million copies and have been translated into 30 languages.
    People can decide on credibility for themselves.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation