Another narrative goes up in flames.
Mississippi authorities have made an arrest in the burning of an African-American church spray-painted with the words, “Vote Trump.”
Mississippi Department of Public Safety spokesman Warren Strain says Andrew McClinton of Leland, Mississippi, who is African-American, is charged with first-degree arson of a place of worship.
Hate crime?
And yet another fake crime
POLICE: Michigan Student Made Up Anti-Muslim Hate Crime
There are still males on college campuses? They must stick out like sore thumbs.
Huh ? … and there were no lesbians involved ? Or feminists crying “rape”
So a black man sprays Vote Trump on a church used by black people and sets it ablaze. Is he aware that more black people voted for Trump than voted for Romney, maybe even some that attended that church?
This guy must be as sharp as Obama.
Well, well, well, I’ll be an Uncle Tom…..
The batteries in my “Crazy Meter” have now been drained.
Hillary won the state of California by 4.1 million votes but only won the total vote by 2.8 million. Therefore she lost the total vote in the other 49 states by 1.3 million (numbers from memory but roughly correct).
The reason they keep going back to the hoax crime, is that it clearly works. Or, as Clinton’s poll numbers show, they think it works. If they are correct, then there had to be a special penalty to wipe this crime out. If it doesn’t work, all we need to do is encourage them to double down; like they have with name calling.
You leave the extremists alone and they self-destruct.
It’s just too bad that in Alberta they will take down not only those that voted for them, they will take down the rest of the plebeians with them….not unlike Venezuela.
I’m having a hard time understanding your point. Do votes in California somehow matter less than votes elsewhere? I mean we know they do in terms of the actual electoral procedure, but I mean more in the general sense of their political relevance? Also, if we’re going to play around with numbers like that, if a mere 100,000 votes swung the other way in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, Clinton would be president. That seems like a more relevant way to balance out who’s more popular or how powerful Trump’s mandate–whatever that might mean–is.
Tim – it’s math and you’re a Marxist. Don’t even try. The popular vote was likely swung by illegal immigrants voting in California.
Robert of Ottawa >
“Hillary won the state of California by 4.1 million votes but only won the total vote by 2.8 million”.
If it mattered Trump should get a California recount, guaranteed the numbers would start to flip his way – especially if they disqualify illegals votes.
I’m not a Marxist. There is no evidence of massive voter fraud in California.
But you see my point. If we’re going to frig around with the numbers (subtracting California, if only whites voted, if only people under 39 voted) then let’s frig around with the 100,000 that made the difference in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan, right? That seems to be the more relevant fact. You see what I’m saying, right?
“If it mattered Trump should get a California recount, guaranteed the numbers would start to flip his way – especially if they disqualify illegals votes.”
SECRET BALLOT. How exactly are you going to pick the votes to disqualify?
Yeah you make a good point, of course that’s not how recounts work. Or inquiries into election fraud, for that matter. But that’s not the issue. The issue is with how you interpret the whole election. I mean is the implication that somehow the Clinton campaign arranged for all this voter fraud in California–a state she was pretty much guaranteed to win anyway? Why not engineer some swing states? Of course no one in this thread implied that Clinton somehow engineered California (others have elsewhere–I think Trump himself did, right?).
I think a better reasoning Tim is that if you colour the map of where the votes are, as in city by city, you will see a dramatic sketch of leftist air head centres like LA, SF, Seattle, NY and such. The reason the US has their voting system, unlike ours in Canada (first past the post in volume) is to defeat the purpose of one state (or today one city) swinging the election.
Opposite of what we have in Canada where it doesn’t matter what the rest of Canada wants, it is guarenteed by the central provinces, the have nots.
At leat in the US the balance is there. So right now the leftists are wanting a recount and uncovering things like dead folk and such. It doesn’t make the news apparently that this is true.
I remember we had the same in Edmonton where some people’s places who registered were parking lots.
YOu will always have errors and cheating, the trick is to keep those numbers to a managable amount, like 3-4%.