Bill’s Wife

17 Replies to “Bill’s Wife”

1. Does al right for “flat broke”……

2. Facts are not pertinent to the ‘progressive cause’.

3. Being taken up by the Mainstream/Lamestream Media in 3-2-1

4. If these youngsters judge a candidate’s ethical center by their net worth they may be interested to know the Clinton’s net worth is estimated to be around 2 billion (this includes the nebulous “Clinton Foundation” which is a tax free charity but is a defacto bank account) – I say “estimated” because they have never filed a honest tax return and have faced charges for this before – last year Bill made 80 million and Hillary 32 million (in office)
   Bear in mind neither of them had a dime to rub before they got into deep Dixie-Dem politics – what’s that tell ya.
   Oh, and Obama is worth more than Jimmy Carter who came from a wealthy southern Dem family.

5. ah yes, the profound ignorance of the liberal democrat voter. the same applies to Canada.

6. Are you referring to the hair apparent with the 500k car?

7. This is kind of like our own Fruit Fly doctor living in what, three or four houses, and telling us that we should go back to living in caves and eating grass.
   There is no hypocrite like a progressive (commie).
   A few of the brighter ones seem to be reevaluating their choice of candidate.
   And another thing, it is amazing and I’m sure nothing but good fortune that so many, including our own Little Guy From Shawinigan, become wealthy on a relatively low salary after a few terms in government.

8. Though I’m sure our Little Guy earned every cent honestly, in the USA, members of Congress are allowed “insider trading”.
   I watched an episode of “60 Minutes” on this very subjects afew years ago, and it became very apparent why members would fight so hard to retain their Seats. Not only do they have that nice,though modest salary and pension, but the opportunity to make millions off insider trading.
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gN7JlEx4xWQ
   The 60 Minutes episode featured a Washington Representative who had been trying for years to get a Bill through Congress prohibiting this practise, for which an ordinary citizen would go to prison, but it was defeated before it was ever tabled.
   After the 60 Minutes broadcast,they did bring in legislation, but with sufficient loopholes so the politicians could carry on as before.
   Money,it’s ALL about the money.

9. The pathetic thing is her wealth would affect their vote.

10. When she’s demagoguing Wall Street and the 1% — it should affect their vote.

11. According to some flippin’ poll here in Canadh a majority of us prefer Clinton for next POTUS. Question would that mean a Hillary or Billary in the Oval Office?

12. Goes to show how USELESS the MSM media is in NOT portraying anything of relevance whatsoever….on pretty much any subject.
    …as it does with Canadians…who seemingly would vote the HILDEBEAST in as PM of Canada if given the choice…
    Sad, so incredibly sad.

13. Equally sad that Marxist philosophy is so engrained in our voting public that anybody who may be (gasp!) successful is automatically viewed as evil, privileged, and the possessor of an unfair advantage which should exclude them from leadership. I mean, why would you want a successful business person involved with the economy of the country when you can have an activist who has never produced anything successful? This bias against success (apparently allowable only in sports and entertainment) is crippling any chance of consistent excellence, whether that be in our schools or in our politics.
    Having said that, the Clinton wealth is the result of milking other people’s wealth, not creating your own. So there is a delightful twist to their own stated philosophy (for others, not for them) working against them.
    But for me, the bigger problem is that so many equate success with moral decay, and failure with moral superiority. How many movies have portrayed the poor, righteous person bravely standing up to the evil corporation, or military, or whatever? This even applies to revisionist history and cultural relativism. White Judea-Christian European culture has been more successful than any other for the past 300 years, so they are portrayed as evil. Native cultures, Islam, Africa, and others have been far less successful using virtually any measuring stick – social, scientific, arts, etc. so they are all portrayed as somehow having been imbued with some vague moral superiority – they have not been failures, they have just been misunderstood or unfairly portrayed. Marxism, applied in this fashion, is attractive to individuals who wish to project the responsibility for their own shortcomings/mediocrity onto others.
    When being a true success (as opposed to a Clinton shyster) disqualifies you from leadership, democracy is hooped. I am glad it is going to bite Hillary (or it would, if the MSM would pay as much attention to her wealth as it does to the wealth of any conservative) but this bias against success is a far bigger issue than one failing candidacy.

14. Well said. Never forget the long term aim of the Marxists (progressives) is to tear down western liberal democracy.

15. No Kate, it should not effect their vote, their vote should be against $Hillary$ without that info, the twit brings nothing to the table. Fact is $Hillary$ should be so damaged as to the point she should not even be a candidate!!

16. Remember when the biggest news for days was Marko Rubios @ $80 thousand fishing boat? The reporting by the alleged media is so uneven that the LIV can’t make any sensible conclusion

17. What is also sad is the number who assume Sen. Rubio is rolling in money.