O, Sweet Saint Of San Andreas

9 Replies to “O, Sweet Saint Of San Andreas”

1. Well then, ALL MEN SHOULD THEN BE JAILED…as if overcrowding in prisons weren’t already a problem.
   Then men will only be let out for good behavior and date night parole!
   I’m sure all the women will be delighted to pick up the slack, to keep the economy going, while all the menfolk are gainfully resting in the crowbar hotel.
   Cheers
   Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
   1st Saint Nicolaas Army
   Army Group ‘True North’

2. You get what you vote for. If I was on one of those nutbar Californicated campuses, I would be lying on the ground screaming rape and murder at the first broad that even looked at me. See how far that would go. Had a good mentor who told me to keep it in my pants until I was 18. Looks like now it’s keep it in until 30 with college broads, and do not even look at them! It would be so nice to see all college/uni guys screaming rape when a female even glanced at them. Then maybe the sensible fems would wake up and start yelling down the fem-Nazis. Oh wait. The sensible ones would be doing that now. Never mind.

3. I see a major business opportunity here – Green friendly buses hauling horny students to the brothels of Nevada and Tijuana. Who’s in?

4. Ah, the rancid resurrection of “all heterosexual sex is rape” Andrea Dworkin!
   It’s almost time to nuke California from orbit and start all over again.
   There’s an old Al Franken joke. Franken is told by a feminist that all heterosexual sex is rape. He ponders this notion. Thinking back over all the feminists he has known, there was only one who believed all heterosexual sex was rape—and he’d been married to her for 27 years.

5. Of course, this being California, all lesbians , homosexuals and pedophiles will be exempt as they are minorities. At least they used to be.

6. It is all curiously Victorian. At the University of Toronto around 1900, men and women were strictly separated; and it was a serious infraction if one even spoke to the other.
   I have been told by those here in Newfoundland who were involved in supervising student teachers that in some of the outports the crudest of views was taken of contact of the sexes, and if a man and a woman were alone together for more than the briefest time, sexual intercourse was deemed to have taken place, and the woman at least was ruined.
   It seems to me that the new law is straightforward, and clearcut in its implications – no heterosexual sex among students.

7. Stupid enviroemntalists in California ruining the state the same state that is the home to a major eco-freak group of jerks THE SIERRA CLUB and a eqiualy stupid govenor and the usial hollywood minded treee huggers/granola munchers traveling to their dumb award shows in their 11 MPG limos TREE HUGGERS GO AWAY

8. I wonder if the insistence on express verbal consent at every juncture applies to married couples. I suppose it does. I’ve seen nothing saying otherwise.
   Which would make every married man guilty of sexual assault. Married couples have their own non-verbal methods of communication.
   Now for most, this would be provide the reductio ad absurdum to bring down California’s laws for sexual assault on campus. Political fanatics, however, are impervious to logic.

9. I have a penis therefor I am guilty, I guess. Mind you, I love women so does that make me a lesbian??? This transgendered/spirit/opia crap has me confused. I grew up with he and she with the odd variation thrown in on rare occasion. Now everyone has a cause or whatever. Fred Flintstone didn’t have this problem.