Long-term oscillations in rainfall extremes in a 268 year daily time series
These results suggest that, because long-term periodicities may likely be present elsewhere, in the absence of observational time series with length comparable to such periodicities (possibly exceeding one century), past observations cannot be considered to be representative of future extremes.
This will be used to wave away the pause and any other trend that belies the narrative of climate change. The consensus now has justification for saying their models must be wrong for more than a century before they need be discarded.
21 year cycle, suspiciously close to the sunspot reversal time of 22 years
Their predicting a wet winter for the Pacifi Northwest and i want to see all the enviromenralists and illegals run out
These authors will be burnt at the consensus stakes.
Rediscovering the obvious..We have insufficient data to establish any trends..
This was actually clearly stated by some of the (later) loudest alarmists, back in 1998.
But then with a lot of massaging, they found their precious.. signal.
Claiming 30 years of weather = climate was a huge red flag to most non climatologists.
And the trend the IPCC claims to see, what a farce, 0.7C from a signal error range of +/- 1C.
It is like the old acid heads who saw Jesus in the white noise when the Analogue TV channels went off air at midnight.
When the financial inquiries are held, there will be all kinds of excuses for the failure of our servants to have not stopped this hysterical scam, before huge amounts of public treasure were wasted and looted.
When your watchdogs are rabid, what you gonna do?
Yeah the high preists for Gaia and Gore want to list all those who reject this Global Warming poppycock as Heiretics