The New York Times journalist who published Darren Wilson’s home address wants police protection and has been calling the police nonstop, Gotnews.com has learned.
Julie Bosman “keeps calling the 020th District station complaining about people harassing and threatening her,” our source told us. She’s also “complaining about numerous food deliveries being sent to her residence.”
Chicago police department sources alerted Gotnews.com about the glaring double standard on Friday.
Cops are funny that way.
Gee, and I wonder what the response time is for her calls?
That b1tch you married, what’s his name? Oh yeah, KARMA.
This my friends is the difference between freedom of speech and the lack of freedom from criticism (which this woman obviously did not understand when she wrote the piece). Ain’t it grand.
She’s learning! I wonder if she will ever do that again.
Thanks for posting Kate. It’s always heartening to soul when Karma comes knocking at the door of a self-absorbed jerk.
The fake ‘food delivery’ orders tactic really bugs me, no small business needs that kind of abuse, no matter how noble the cause.
Bosman Bosman, nope, not one of us’n gypsies, not Pakistani, not Irish, would like to venture a guess as to what demographic she belongs to, butt then a few self righteous kristian hippocrits may just get their bible compliant pink panties all bunched up
and on another note, her old man works for that racist outfit, holder’s DOJ, who’da thunk!!!!
Oh yah, 70% of Obumble’s cabinet are from “that” demographic
” no small business needs that kind of abuse”
Very true, but nothing says “we know where you live too” better than a food delivery.
*
she’s freakin’ out about some fast food deliveries?
wonder how she’d feel if the new black panther party put a $5000 price on her head?
*
The GotNews site leads to another tidbit:
“There’s a white, rich dude running the black boycott capitalism movement known as United Blackout.
His name is Michael Latt and he is the marketing director of United Blackout.
‘Control how Black money is spent and you win the game,’ says United Blackout’s campaign video. And Latt seeks to deliver.”
http://gotnews.com/breaking-meet-rich-white-guy-running-black-boycott-capitalism-ferguson/
Your posting is clear as mud, NME666.
Snopes says no, the Times never published the address. Can anyone help out on this? I’d like to be sure because I have been receiving fabricated posts claiming false statements from right of center women, and snopes also said these were false. We must be truthful if we are to demand truth.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/wilsontimes.asp
She posted his address in a Tweet. Snopes is being disingenuous (again).
So did some Catholic priest do a drive by baptism on you this morning NME666? Your rabid hatred is clouding your judgement again.
*
it’s all culturally relative… right?
“Just another story you won’t see on CBC night after night for the next ten days.”
*
Here’s the article. The third last paragraph has the location of the home. Google maps shows it’s about two blocks long.
http://www.nytimes.com/news/ferguson/2014/11/24/quiet-wedding-for-darren-wilson-police-officer-in-ferguson-shooting/
Even though the next paragraph mentions that Wilson has “scarcely been seen there since Mr. Brown was killed” (something Snopes uses as an excuse), the NYT still felt it was relevant enough to add it to the article. What purpose does it serve in the article? The idiots at the NYT obviously don’t realize how this is dangerous for everyone on that block, regardless of whether Wilson still lives there or not.
I think it was more likely a Rabbi doing a drive-by bris.
That’s not really a debunking, Stuart.
Snope writes that “The Times coverage included the following text”:
If you go to Google Maps you’ll see that Manda Lane is a particular, short residential road in a suburb, not one of those contiguous miles-long streets that runs through a city or town. There’s functionally little difference between publishing the fact that Wilson and his wife own a home on Manda Lane and giving their numbered address.
Snopes says that “according to (the NYT), Wilson and Spradling vacated the premises shortly after the August 2014 shooting”, but that’s not what the NYT actually wrote, which was that Wilson and his wife “abruptly left their home” after the shooting (for how long? I abruptly left my home yesterday afternoon) and that they —
“Scarcely been there” – which the actual phrase published in the NYT – is obviously different than Snopes’ reworded phrase “vacated the premises”, especially to a revenge-minded SJW.
Here’s the kicker, for me: If it is the case that Wilson and his wife left the home and never went back, that arguably makes the publishing of the location worse, because it’s not unlikely that someone else who has no connection to the case, or to the violence and emotional incontinence that inevitably followed, lives there.
Why on earth would any news organization give even a clue as to the home address, or former home address, of a man that an unruly, stupid, emotionally incontinent mob wants to get their hands on? It beggars belief.
I have zero sympathy for the NYT or the reporter.
Cry me a riber. those NY Times reports deserve what they get. I published their addresses on my blog cuz what’s good for the Goose is good for the Gander.
The Last Tradition
There are lots of good cops, they’re just stifled by politics within the department. Once in a long time they get a chance to show how they really feel – this is one of those times.
…too bad she won’t follow Wilson’s example and resign.
I would really like to see her brought up on public endangerment and mischief charges for each person living on that street. She should have to pay damages for emotional suffering as well. Drain that skank’s bank account, then send her packing from her overpriced salary.
Nothing like setting the precedent of lightening the wallet a couple hundred pounds to make a point for other journalist to mind their manners!!!
I love that NYT reports “that Wilson has “scarcely been seen there since Mr. Brown was killed””.
First of all, how do they know? Are they staking the place out? Would you see the NYTimes Super Secret Stakeout Van parked in front if you drove by?
And really, if the “demonstrators” burn Wilson’s house down but he’s not home, does that make it ok?
I posted the bench’s picture at my blog. Because while addresses can change, faces are forever.
http://phantomsoapbox.blogspot.ca/2014/12/what-goes-around-comes-around.html
Not that I’m advocating anybody do anything bad to the woman. No no no! Because that would be wrong. Just that one of y’all might have an opportunity to not lift a finger some day, and it would be a shame to miss it.
“And really, if the “demonstrators” burn Wilson’s house down but he’s not home, does that make it ok?”
What if he doesn’t own the place anymore and someone else does? What if some lunatic “demonstrators” burn or shoot up the wrong house? Everyone on that block should be pissed, I know I would be.
Agreed, thanks. I now understand the address was tweeted by a NYTimes reporter as well.
I don’t understand. “Bosman” is an English name. So…???
He seems to be having a medication problem lately. Sees JOOOOOOS! behind every rock and fence post.
Is there pills for that?
I’m p1ssed about it and I don’t even live there. That’s why I posted her picture. People should become FAMOUS when they do this kind of sh1t.
Shunning is fabulously effective at controlling bad behavior. I’d like to see her experience some shunning for a while. Maybe make her think twice next time.
David in Michigan please ignore NME666. As Beefaholic guessed NME had a circumcision performed on him and all he has to show for it is a scab on his azz. He’s froth at the mouth insane at times.
She’s also “complaining about numerous food deliveries being sent to her residence.”
Food deliveries? I’m a native of Chicago, and I can tell you that some folks are doing it wrong. It’s supposed to be deliveries of manure.
When she put this officer’s address out there – she clearly meant for him and his family to be harmed. Karma is a biatch – you really do reap what you …………. well – you know.