Pollspotting

11 Replies to “Pollspotting”

1. Remember to vote, then clear cache, then vote again. Repeat 500 times. Is there software that will do that automatically?

2. Heh, it’s an unimportant issue both from the 90 plus per cent opposition and the relatively few total number. If people truly felt strongly about global warming they’d be hitting these polls faster than whack-a-mole.

3. Kate, thanks for putting this up this morning and I was finally able to vote. For some reason, when I visit this site on a daily basis, sometimes when I vote on a poll question the vote is not recorded but a previous poll question comes up. And it is not because I try to vote more than once.

4. Jesus, Kate,do YOU know that the whole CANADIAN consrvatie WORLD revolves around SDA?
   And SDA is edited by a NON-BELIEVER!

5. “Heh, it’s an unimportant issue both from the 90 plus per cent opposition and the relatively few total number. If people truly felt strongly about global warming they’d be hitting these polls faster than whack-a-mole.”
   Indeed.
   Patiently ignore these marches just as we did all the One-Percenter nonsense.
   The weather (ha!) is changing, it’s getting colder and these self-obsessed ideologues will be driven back into Starbucks for the winter.

6. Carbob Pollution is a home goal, just like the odious 10-10 rubbish.
   For obviously if one believes in “carbon pollution” one must act on strength of their convictions.
   So all the carbon compounds need removed from their diet and life?
   Those organic carbon compounds should be chemically or surgically removed from their bodies?
   And of course the true believer must now practise a:carbon free” lifestyle. That should clean out the gene pool in 10 to 20 days.
   How long can a starving fanatic last? After Chief Fish Stew we need to spell out what a real hunger strike does to the human body. Rather than a CBC Hunger Strike.
   The insanity of a carbon based life form obsessing about carbon “pollution” is indeed Post Normal Science.
   If fact its post rational though as well.
   I hope it feels good.

7. Global warming has just undergone another name change by UN types. It’s no longer ‘climate change’ it’s no known as ‘climate disruption.”

8. 95.5%. Has a poll ever gone so terribly horribly wrong?

9. I’m all for G.C.D as it reflects the current state of this scam.
   Glibbering Climb Down, Oh look the Team IPVV ™ has “rediscovered natural cycles, the ocean and sun and other such “insignificant climate drivers”.

10. Heading towards the magic 97%.

11. I think you are mistaken about this poll going wrong, much less ‘disastrously, outrageously’ wrong. I see nothing at all wrong with the results so far:)