I have no idea about the overall validity of the case behind this pissing contest, but the margin calculations are junk, clearly not comparable to the industry data shown and therefore don’t advance the cause.
It easy to have a sky-high profit margin when you don’t have any input costs. Publishers have to actually -make- the stuff they sell, whereas the CSA is selling permission to display the CSA logo on a product.
Given that they don’t seem to be doing any real research before they give permission, that gets to be a pretty low cost business model. CSA doesn’t even pay for the stickers, the customer does all that.
Nice racket they got going there. Shame if something might… happen to it.
The modular home industry was screwed over by the CSA – the details are in an earlier post. It amounted to CSA selling counterfeit stickers, and the home builders taking the hit.
Maybe the CSA is part of the Liberal rent-a-troll program.
Has the mob hijacked the standards rackets?
I have no idea about the overall validity of the case behind this pissing contest, but the margin calculations are junk, clearly not comparable to the industry data shown and therefore don’t advance the cause.
It easy to have a sky-high profit margin when you don’t have any input costs. Publishers have to actually -make- the stuff they sell, whereas the CSA is selling permission to display the CSA logo on a product.
Given that they don’t seem to be doing any real research before they give permission, that gets to be a pretty low cost business model. CSA doesn’t even pay for the stickers, the customer does all that.
Nice racket they got going there. Shame if something might… happen to it.
The modular home industry was screwed over by the CSA – the details are in an earlier post. It amounted to CSA selling counterfeit stickers, and the home builders taking the hit.
Maybe the CSA is part of the Liberal rent-a-troll program.