Operation Empty Chair

14 Replies to “Operation Empty Chair”

1. Any bets as to who is announced as #1 loser tomorrow?

2. So many to choose Rocky:
   A&E, BHO, and Ontario for starters.
   Pretty sure American Interest has never heard of L’il Trudeau.

3. Putin OWNES Obamba!

4. I don’t think Putin has any leanings toward Communism, but there is no question he is a leader, as opposed to FooFoo Obismal.

5. For biggest losers, I’m guessing that Netanyahu, Obama and Denmark’s Prime Minister, Helle Thorning Schmidt lost the most power last year.

6. Obviously Obama should get the first five positions – a mega-loser. And Binyamin
   Netanyahu has gone from hero to ditherer, though he seems to be resolute enough
   in the attacks on Hezbollah assets in Syria.
   I am a little perplexed by the inclusion of Helle Thorning Schmidt on the list,
   Dystopian, and would be interested if you would elaborate. She had a big
   success in arousing B. Obama’s interest, something Michelle O. can’t do. My
   thought is that she must be a very hot lady!
   Try 1 for Captcha. It’s mostly clear but the scorings are confusing.

7. Not unlike most diversities, Obama covets undiversified, chromatically-challenged women, especially blondes. Hue, not hotness, is the determining factor. Witness the pix of him tonguing Pelosi, for instance. As his status in the ‘hood rose, Schmidt’s status amongst the civilized, plummeted.

8. Don’t tell that to Reggie Love… Oblabla’s “bodyman”.

9. Canada should be on this list of winners only because of some fiscal responsibility. How did the Muslim country of UK get there. No way.

10. Obviously Obama is the biggest winner, he just knocked over all the chess pieces and is busy crapping all over the board.

11. Seeing #6 on that list globally warms my heart…

12. Since Global warming sceptics were winners I would guess the IPCC would be in the first 5 losers. If they have any credibility left at all it’s only because the media can’t admit they’ve been wrong all these years.

13. Climate skeptics don’t have the money, the media firepower or the government backing that climate activists can muster, but they have a secret weapon that more than evens the odds: inertia.
    Yes, and not to forget the climate history of the planet and the empirical evidence of the past decade that made all the alarmist projections invalid.
    I consider the change in public attitude more of a triumph of reality over agenda driven propaganda.

14. Indeed. I do like to think that truth is working its way to the surface, but it certainly helps that the idea of
    beggaring oneself for what even the fanatics concede is a distant, limited, and uncertain goal is a powerful
    disincentive for all but the fanatics.