A meteorologist who has covered weather for the Wall Street Journal tweeted that he has decided not to have children in order to leave a lighter carbon footprint, and is considering having a vasectomy.
After which , I would suggest one thin mint wafer. Because this is the world we’re now living in.
Um, he may want to reconsider and simply foreswear off sex.
I see EBD also posted on this. Two for the price of one!
Kate, see EBD 5 threads down.
Related: thought it was safe to listen to classical music on CBC2.
Not so.
After a Scriabin piano sonata the host mentioned that the composer meant to portray a world being burned up, that the composer was obsessed with the notion that a build up of heat would cause the world to burn.
The host then explained to us what amazing foresight Scriabin had what with today’s climate change and global warming.
As one commenter said on EBD’s thread, now that’s power: despite the 15 year hiatus the agenda survives.
I think a massive campaign of free vasectomies and tubal ligations for moonbats is an excellent idea. Furthermore, we can introduce this carbophobic group to the joys of hypoxia and its attendant reductions in their carbon footprints. While small population reductions are possible with autoerotic hypoxic practices, a widespread advertising campaign could stress the pleasurable aspects of dyadic erotic hypoxia to help reduce peoples carbon footprints even faster.
Might be a great time to capitalize on their carbon fetish to offer them overpriced stainless steel airtight coffins in which their carbon footprint, handprint and assprint will be forever sequestered thus preventing the oceans rise and saving the polar bears from drowning. For a mere $25,000 they can be buried in this casket guaranteed against everything except ice ages.
To seem genuine in the eyes of the carbophobic moonbats, it will be necessary for any individual seeking to make money off this group of moonbats to live in a mansion whose electrical consumption is greater than that of some of the smaller countries in Africa, fly endlessly around the world spreading the word of the need to reduce ones carbon footprint before its too late, and ingest enough calories to achieve a girth impressive enough to convince moonbats to skip meals “for the sake of the planet”. PT Barnum nailed it and it’s just a matter of making use of the enormous supply of suckers to strike it rich.
Vacsectomies?Tubals? Screw that.They cost bucks and produce CO2 using energy. Suicide if you really care. Hypocrites.
Cant we just grind them up and put them in the same holes Redford wants for the industrial sequestering ?. Moonbats would probably pay for the honor as long as presented with typical government honesty in advertisement. We could still sell tickets if we make the journey palatable. Like human ashes going into space…… sleep in the arms of Gaia kinda thing….reserved only for those that have made a lifetime commitment to save the planet…or something down that line. A sure seller.
AAAAaaaaahh, deja vous all over again!!
Oh, they’ll gas now about their carbon footprint and the necessity of defying God’s command to be fruitful.
I look forward to hearing the little hypocrites explain why other people’s children ought to pay the bill for putting off their date with a well-deserved eternal damnation for the—what? 55 years the jackasses might take to die if all the arts of medicine are thrown at them without thought of the cost. Long before then there’ll be little but Christian charity preventing most of the long-suffering children of liberals who spent their posterity’s inheritance several times over from dispatching their good-for-nothing parents to hell and being done with it. What chance does those gobshites think they’ll have in a world like that?
May the Lord have mercy on them, because I can’t guarantee their nephews and nieces will.
Noticed this gem about halfway through the Daily Mail article, discussing the increase in “certainty” in the IPCC report:
‘At 90 percent it means there is a 10 percent probability that it’s not entirely correct,’ said Chris Field, Carnegie Institution scientist who is a leader in the IPCC but wasn’t involved in the report released Friday.
‘And now that’s 5 per cent. So it’s a doubling of our confidence. That’s actually a consequential change in our level of understanding.’
Holy Cripes – according to this “scientist” who is “a leader in the IPCC”, going up from 90 to 95 is a “doubling of our confidence”.
It boggles the mind…
The stupid, it just burns.
I think this is just the ticket for both John & Las. Think of the gratitude of Mother Earth to you both.
Is a vasectomy really necessary for a man who obviously has no b@lls?
The “meteorologist” should off himself. The sooner the better. He is unstable and is likely to hurt someone other than himself.
At times like this the government should provide counsellors to suggest suicide.
No doubt about it, the human race has to go….sheesh, is this guy not certifiable?
The logical position for these fools.
I’m thinking he should go for gender re-assignment.
If necessary, one more round trip flight would be justifiable.
Did the drama queen really cry?
Probably not, eh? She speaks in metaphors I believe.
Did anyone read far enough into the Tely’s article to see the picture of cooling towers at some unnamed nuclear plant?
There are clouds of water vapour above the towers, resulting from the moisture in the warmer air rising from the towers meeting the colder ambient air, and condensing. The tag line beneath the photo reads “The report said global warming was due to human activity, particularly the CO2 emissions resulting from the burning of coal, oil and gas”. These clouds of water vapour are not CO2, and they don’t result from the burning of anything.
Just another example of the MSM using every propaganda trick in the book to promote a lie.
If our founders were to see what we have become, they would have “off thenselves”
We have become world of cry babies.
It sounds to me like this flake is already a little light in the loafers.