We’ll have to pass it to find out what’s in it, Part II.
Given the state of the US economy, scandals, employment and trust issues, you would think that some politicians would not allow themselves to be bought.
We’ll have to pass it to find out what’s in it, Part II.
Given the state of the US economy, scandals, employment and trust issues, you would think that some politicians would not allow themselves to be bought.
“you would think that some politicians would not allow themselves to be bought”
You forgot the /sarc,lance.
I’m okay with some buyouts as long as the bill is good. As long as E-verify is in or could be in that bill, it is not good and must be destroyed.
Clueless – Top 9486 ways Obama Press Secretary Jay Carney won’t answer a question:
http://www.commoncts.blogspot.com/2013/06/clueless-top-9486-ways-jay-carney-wont.html
LAS….any bill that needs buyouts is inherently bad.If it was for the common good,and not padding somebody’s pocket,would you have to “sell” it?
Dems want to give illegals government payments as soon as the bill is passed? Unbelievable. Wonder what that will do to the US fed budget.
Most politicians are lawyers. Does any thing need be said more?
The ones that aren’t. Are there for money or prestige.
“you would think that some politicians would not allow themselves to be bought”
Hasn’t personally cost them anything so far.
If it was for the common good,and not padding somebody’s pocket,would you have to “sell” it?
Yes. That is the way of the politic. And your statement makes no sense. Would ending the NEP be bad if it required some money handed out? Of course not. One must look at the whole.
So if you had to stop living off the public tit,would you be whole? Doubt it.(Oh darn.Channeling LAS the union twit,again. Oh wait.That was the dog turd my buddy forgot to hide)
And sorry Kate,lance ,and all.Will stop feeding the commie troll.