It was a swing and a miss for the Occupy movement planning to protest at the Monsanto Research Centre northeast of Saskatoon on Saturday night. […]
Activist and key Occupy Saskatoon organizer and owner of alternative bookstore Turning the Tide Peter Garden explained what happened.
“I got a call about noon [Saturday], saying that the people from Regina weren’t showing up,” he said.
“Apparently there wasn’t enough people, and they had a car that broke down.”
Of course, none of that stopped CKOM radio from reading their anti-Monsanto propaganda on the air.

The there’s the issue of volunteer GMO seeds contaminating neighbors fields. Presto you owe Monsanto money.
Or is there more to it?
ep, If you deliberately use the GMO trait without paying Monsanto, they can sue you. If you don’t make use of the trait (i.e. use glyphosate on the crop) you don’t pay. That applies whether it’s the neighbour’s seeds blowing in or seed you bought from Monsanto. An example would be a late spring frost that kills newly emerged plants, but before glyphosate has been applied for weed control.
Well folks,north of 60 only takes part in adult discussions,hmmm,lets see,he grew up on a farm that was’nt profitable.The family must have moved to northern Sask.,or were Okies and moved to Caalifornia,or relied on their profitable neighbors for handouts and used clothing.Maybe thats why he’s not a farmer,the farm was.nt profitable and they lost it for unpaid taxes.I KNOW that if it was profitable and someone stayed on the farm,that someone would be using glysophate
I could care less what other people put in their bodies, smoke, drink, heroin, or rat poison. It’s yours to abuse as you wish….I choose to eat what I hunt, fish or grow myself. I buy organic when I can, …, black coffee is my vice. But that’s just me; I’m no enviro weenie, or supporting the “protesters” simply raising a point.
Exactly the point I was making as well. Smart people know that the best retirement investment you can make is staying healthy. If you want the chemical cuisine that industrial agriculture brings then go for it; enjoy your cancer since you’ve got a 3 out of 5 chance of getting it with an industrial diet.
spike: not fair. N-60 I’ve been spraying crops since 16 when after an afternoon I was as wet as the crop. The sprays we use kill plants that we don’t want not people. That would not make senses,has we couldn’t sell our crops to dead people. Did you notice people are living longer today.
a@c >
He he, your story reminds me of many years ago starting my oilfield career. I was sent into the mud shack on a drilling rig to relieve the derrick man mixing mud in a hopper. I had been packing in bags of chemical for him for week’s prior, so time to move up a little. He was absolutely coated in brown, yellow dust wearing a crusty old pair of goggles to see through the chemical fog. I asked him for a dust mask, and he just laughed telling me how he’s been “doin it for years an it ain’t affected him none” though his near toothless yap and icicles of chemical dust hanging off his moustache.
I couldn’t explain in writing the ridiculous dumb ass hillbilly way he looked, but I still belly laugh at the thought.
Needless to say I procured a mask and moved on faster than expected in that part of the career faze. Thanks for the memory 🙂
a@c >
PS: No insult intended, was genuinly just a funny old memory that flooded back with your story.
The people who are living longer today were born, raised, and spent most of their lives in an environment with relatively few food additives and chemicals. The ones who are dying from a variety of cancers were exposed to long term workplace chemicals or self-induced chemical exposure like smoking. Many studies are concluding that kids today are likely to have shorter life spans than their parents.
North of 60 That’s because of lack of exercise and eating junk food.
a@c; The comment that I made to north of 60 was fair.He is uninformed about glysophate.The reason that Monsanto is such a bad company is that its not european.All the German and French chemical companies make chemicals for genetically modified crops.Their chemicals are expensive to make,glysophate isnt.The ONLY reason that they can compete is because of the use agreements.The $15 an acre pays for developing new plants by Monsanto.The Germans and French get their govts.to pay for doing the same.
It would be an error to assume that anyone is uninformed about glyphosate, since the information is freely available.
Glyphosate Herbicide is rated least dangerous in comparison to other herbicides and pesticides. Laboratory toxicology studies suggest other ingredients combined with glyphosate may have greater toxicity than glyphosate alone. Certain surfactants used in some glyphosate formulations have higher toxicity to fish and invertebrates. Glyphosate is one of the pesticides that pose the greatest danger to amphibians. Fish and aquatic invertebrates are more sensitive to it than terrestrial organisms. Statistics from the California Environmental Protection Agency’s Pesticide Illness Surveillance Program indicate glyphosate-related incidents are one of the highest reported of all pesticides. On two occasions, the United States EPA has caught scientists deliberately falsifying test results at research laboratories hired by Monsanto to study glyphosate
The best way to deal with the “Occupy” folks is to report nothing that they do. If they have no platform, they will eventually fade away.