Once again our major media choose not the see the, er, elephant in the room

Two days ago:

Multiculturalism and mullahs: The British prime minister gets it

‘State multiculturalism’ has failed – Cameron [with video]


I wonder how much detailed coverage Mr Cameron…will get in the Canadian media…

The answer today: almost none (the Vancouver Sun did carry an AFP story–in their “Life” section and I suspect it was online only; the Toronto Star had a Reuters story, again I bet online only). Now why might that be? Your thoughts?
Update: Lowell Green of CFRA Ottawa did most of his show today on Mr Cameron’s speech, with extensive audio clips. You can listen live to the re-broadcast tonight at 8 pm ET (thanks to MadMacs of Bytown in “Comments”) or hear the show here at Feb. 7.
Upperdate: A nice analysis from Publius, with a glance back to Enoch Powell (and complete video of Mr Cameron’s speech):

Please, Go Back to Where You Came From

The shock of the 9/11 and 7/7 attacks began a slow questioning of this intellectual straitjacket. David Cameron’s about face on multiculturalism – he was actually attacking the somewhat more nebulous concept of “extremism’ – is belated recognition that Powell’s concerns were not wholly unwarranted. Cameron was also correct to stress cultural values as defining Britishness, rather than some trivial custom or symbol. This is something which Powell actually missed, or perhaps took for granted. Britishness is really an idea. A crude racial nationalism could never have held together the British union for so long, or built a vast and polyglot Empire. These were universal values, if often expressed in Anglo-Saxon terms.
The real victims of multiculturalism are not the old stock British (or Canadians, or Americans), but the immigrants themselves. There are few worse tortures imaginable, at least for decent and aspiring men and women, to escape from the primitive hell of much of the Third World, to reach a free and civilized land, only to be confronted with the nightmare you left. A nightmare made all the worse because officialdom regards these throwbacks not with horror, but with sympathy and support. A century ago the British were civilizing the world, today they are helping to de-civilized themselves. That is what Enoch Powell feared, and what belatedly David Cameron has realized.
Update: Multiculturalism and its discontents:
Gurmukh Singh
It need not be added that if Mr Singh’s name was Mr Jones – or Powell – he’d be denounced as a bigot. He’ll probably be denounced as an Uncle Tom, in short order, by members of his own group. That he is stating the blindingly obvious to anyone who has attended these events, is beside the point. The pieties must be defended…

29 Replies to “Once again our major media choose not the see the, er, elephant in the room”

  1. I believe the Vancouver Sun had the article in the newspaper as well as on line. Way at the back, though. Not on the front page where it should have been.

  2. That might be because our progressives need the politically correct weapon of multi-culti to create silos so that they can set up voting banks and return the Natural Governing Party to office much like the National Congress Party does in India.
    For example Ruby Dhalla learned how to do this and now wants to give pensions almost immediately to the Grannies who immigrate to her riding. In short, it’s about corruption.
    This is what Librano$ multiculti is all about “Bill C-428 introduced by MP Ruby Dhalla of the Brampton riding and seconded by Bob Rae, June 18, 2009 proposes to amend the Old Age Security (OAS) Act to reduce the residence requirement for entitlement from 10 years to 3 years.”

  3. Not that the media EVER would have reported anything that goes against their liberal / Liberal agenda, but since the worldwide ‘Mohammed Cartoon Riots’ they now have a ready-made excuse to never “offend” islam. Their lawyers and insurance people warn them not to p!$$ off weirdbeard muslim bomb throwers. The old “we’re just following orders” excuse strikes again. How convenient.

  4. Cameron is being brave, speaking what politicians are afraid to say.
    His comments are outside the PC narrative therefore untouchable.
    Like Phantom said ‘…functioning as designed.’

  5. Cameron’s Munich speech seems to be nothing more than a ‘Red Herring’. In other speeches he advocates that Muslims in Britain should given positions of authority within government and the Armed Forces in order to help their assimilation into British society. He seems to be trying to ride the Liberal fence.

  6. Print that article here and some whacko with a human rights grudge would see a $K-$Ching opportunity and fleece them for a big bag of money.

  7. Everyone but the politician’s admit Multiculturalism is bad for western nations, it’s pure poison to our culture but we can’t have the ethnic vote offended thus let’s waste millions giving grants to hyphenated-Canadian groups/organizations to ensure they never integrate into Canadian society.

  8. The main subject on Lowell Green’s program this morning on cfra.com Lowell played a key portion of Cameron’s speech to the MSC and noted that he himself covered this very topic in his book Mayday! Mayday! though his emphasis is on all immigrants and none in particular. Lowell also noted the absence of MSM coverage.
    Repeats tonight at 8pm eastern and also is available on podcast.

  9. Gunter has a column in todays National Post. Since you can’t get the paper version in Saskatchewan I don’t know if the NP is MSM any more.

  10. What Cameron correctly stated was that state multiculturalism has failed and does not work, so those who are what I call statist do not want to hear that the state should not be involved in yet another aspect of our lives. State multiculturalism, or official multiculturalism, is the problem. It spawns a bloated bureaucracy along with a huge industry feeding off it, or rather we tax payers. Remove the state or official status from multiculturalism and you remove the problem.

  11. Don’t ignore biodiversity (multiculturalism of species) as the left’s similar weapon. To equate all species as having equal value is not only to degrade man,(a boy is a dog is a rat) but to get rid of the ones that you don’t want. It’s no accident that the unavowed communist Gorbachov became the head of Green Cross of the World as soon as his beloved wall came down. Gore and the pols at the UN have at their heart using green lies and the energy weapon to weaken America. They haven’t propagandized for decades with this eco-worship stuff because they love little bunmny rabbits folks.

  12. Don’t ignore biodiversity (multiculturalism of species) as the left’s similar weapon. To equate all species as having equal value is not only to degrade man,(a boy is a dog is a rat) but to get rid of the ones that you don’t want. It’s no accident that the unavowed communist Gorbachov became the head of Green Cross of the World as soon as his beloved wall came down. Gore and the pols at the UN have at their heart using green lies and the energy weapon to weaken America. They haven’t propagandized for decades with this eco-worship stuff because they love little bunmny rabbits folks.

  13. Sometimes comedians are ahead of the crowd.
    Russell Peters suggests future humans will be “beige”. (mix brown, black, yellow, red, white)

  14. Russell Peters suggests future humans will be “beige”.
    Russel is being euphemistic; beige is definitely not the colour you get when you mix those others.

  15. I think everyone around the world knows that state multiculturalism is a failure. It’s the admitting it that is the problem. I suspect some would rather tuck into a bowl of wax than admit it.

  16. i’ll believe Cameron when i see and hear Muslim spokespeople freaking over their lost rent seeking entitlements…
    he could be blowing smoke..we shall see what we shall see….i can’t see a gutless pol like him having a Damascene moment…
    and remember Parliament can make ANY law it wishes….i therefore expect(notwithstanding Brussels)lots and lots and lots of deportations…otherwise he’s just shining us up…

  17. A failure for whom? Certainly not for the parasites, who are living exponentially better than they’re used to, and their enablers, all of whom do very well on the poor—in more ways than one—taxpayer.

  18. Kanuk MSM blackouts on certain breaking news items always reveal to us what dogmas the dominating power structure consider sacred.
    The black out on Climate Gate and the continuous unravelling of AGW junk science is an example. But I predict the Scions of Kanada’s social engineering will go to any length to protect their sacred mythos of multicult.
    Multicult is at the core of their public control systems. It justifies the greatest bureaucratic tyranny in the western world. There is nothing more dangerous than a social engineer with his manipulative dogmas exposed.

  19. According to a link I activated at the NP the city of Tarrana is studing how to make certain schools Sharia Law compliant, no I’m not kidding. They are also enacting A school that will house only poor kids, that story is being covered by The Toronto Sun. So to recap, in Multicultural Tarrana, they segregate blacks in their own schools, poor children will be learning with poor children only and the idiots want to make certain schools Sharia Law compliant, oh trust me our weaked kneed politicians aren’t going to touch multicultural policies with a ten foot pole because it would interfer with Ontario’s right to use children via the educational system as lab rats.

  20. Leftist Idiotarian Oxymoron:
    >>> “a democratic theocracy”.
    H/T From Tony*.
    “”Religion is an important part of our society, its voice should be heard, but I wouldn’t want to live in even a democratic theocracy,” the former prime minister said at the office of his Tony Blair Faith Foundation, which works to promote multifaith understanding.”
    “Treat Muslim Brotherhood with caution, Blair urges”
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2670095/posts
    …-
    * From Tony:
    “Download the Muslim Brotherhood Agenda
    Babylon’s Covert War ^ | 07 FEB 2011 | Exhibit”
    “This is the Muslim Brotherhood plans for Canada and the US:
    General Strategic Plans for North America”
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2669972/posts

  21. @john begley:
    Agreed – show me the money. It’s gonna take balls AND perseverance to knock these clowns off their perches.
    @powers that be: please please please sell the CBC!

  22. i’ll believe Cameron when i see and hear Muslim spokespeople freaking over their lost rent seeking entitlements…
    – john begley
    I said something along these lines on an earlier thread. I’ll believe him when folks like that arrogant islamo-fascist-bastard-imam Anjem Choudray, a lawyer by training, is taken off welfare, which he unabashedly admits to receiving as his due — jizya.
    Surely, this action would be extremely popular in the UK, wouldn’t it? Would it be that risky, politically, to at least do this: not actually subsidize people out to destroy you.
    I have zero faith in Cameron. I don’t give a sh1t what he speechifies about. I’ll be watching for some signal action. I expect NONE.
    And let’s not hear the the “minority government” dodge, please!

  23. // I wonder how much detailed coverage Mr Cameron…will get in the Canadian media… //
    He wasn’t mentioned in the Security Times 2011, German Times […] our special edition for the 47th Munich Security Conference [where he gave his speech] either.
    Rather India, Emissions, Internet security, Military/Political relations etc The big event was the nuclear weapons treaty signed at the conference.
    Doubtless, the british organ for Cameron’s policy strategy is on the case.

  24. Whenever an issue like this comes up, I always head for the CBC website to see what the lefties are saying. I am finding more and more that even they are tired of all this and want this so called multiculti brought to a halt. This is also true for one other issue – how the justice system is soft on Aboriginals. It would seem that no matter what end of the political spectrum you are on, everyone seems to want one law for everyone (none of this Sharia stupidity or healing circles if you are an Aboriginal) and no special treatment because you are a so called minority. It’s the politicians that keep the term “minority” in play so they can feed bones to those groups to get votes. The fact that no politician has seized on the fact that there is more hay to be made now from having only one set of laws (and no more special status given to these minority groups) tells me that they are so entrenched in the status quo and can’t see passed it. I don’t have much faith in Jason Kenney as he is trying to have his cake and eat it too. He talks and talks with the muslim groups in Ontario but has he cut off muslim immigration until these same groups demand that their own integrate. Of course not, in his view that would be cutting off his nose to spite his face. Ezra Levant and Sarah Palin have it right. Don’t rely on any politician to fix our country. They are having more influence outside the political arena than if they were in it as elected officials. Canadian Tea Party is what it will take to get the change we want.

  25. Kate, I hope you don’t mind if I paste in a comment from the previous thread on Mr. Cameron (replying to two-day old threads is not generally fruitful)
    from Alain:
    KevinB, I think you are misinterpreting some of the comments which are not optimistic concerning the situation. They are not anti-Cameron, for no matter what he tries to do to change course, it is almost impossible at this stage of the game, especially as a minority government. The UK is so far along on the road of national suicide that I fear it is too little and too late.
    While I appreciate what you’re saying, Alain, I think it’s appropriate that we view Cameron’s remarks in light of Ronnie Reagan’s 100th birthday rememberance. Being an old fogey who was actually sentient during the 70’s, I remember full well all the intelligentsia telling us the Soviet Union was a fact of life, that it was going to be there forever, and that the only strategy that made sense was detente and a “live and let live” approach. When Reagan ran for the nomination in 76, he said that Communism had to be defeated, a stance he maintained and repeated throughout his successful campaigns for the 80’s nomination and presidency.
    If you weren’t alive then, you can’t appreciate how big the backlash, the sneers, and the denigration were; it was positively Palin-esque. Reagan was routinely castigated as “senile”, a “washed up old actor”, “unintelligent”, “uninformed”, “disengaged”, “naive”, and of course, all the irrelevant and snarky references to “Bedtime for Bonzo”. Only marginally kinder were the pundits who said he was a nice man, but one who was living in the past, dreaming of Westerns, and winning one for the Gipper.
    But, as we learned, it only took one truly determined leader to turn the tide of history. Less than a dozen years after Reagan’s election, the Berlin Wall was history, and Eastern Europe was liberated, putting paid to all the liberal brainiacs who told us the Soviet Empire was invincible. It only takes one man.
    Now, Reagan had the advantages of an executive presidency, a landslide win, and an acquiescent Congress, whereas Cameron didn’t win a majority and operates within a Parliamentary system. But the fact remains: a truly determined leader leads, not follows, his people. I don’t know enough about Cameron to say whether he has the royal jelly or not, but I’m not prepared, on his latest remarks, to write him and Britain off, as so many seem prepared to do.

Navigation