Where the foxes caper unmolested, the government packs your school lunch and it’s “a cultural thing that’s come from back home.”
A LONDON woman has been warned that she is at risk of being murdered after a man had acid poured down his throat by a gang in an apparent “honour crime”.
The young married Muslim woman is alleged to have had an affair with the victim, a 24-year-old Danish Asian. He was stabbed twice in the back and beaten with bricks, before acid was poured all over him and forced down his throat.
He was blinded and his tongue destroyed in the attack, and he is on life support in hospital with burns to 90 per cent of his body. Seven people have since been arrested.
The woman and the victim both live in east London’s Asian community, and their relationship is believed to have angered her family by bringing dishonour upon them.
Posted by: Taylor Cutforth at July 26, 2009 9:47 PM>
“I wanted to draw attention to the issue he brought up with free school meals.”
Talk about going through life with blinders on………….Wow!
Dude – open your eyes and ears a little before you comment and accuse others of not knowing the material posted for discussion.
Sanctimonious ________!
For wording: This comment is not directly targeted at anyone person on here specifically.
I wasn’t defend Britain approach and results, smart guy, I was explaining that there is more to a policy concept then how it is poorly implemented and how that shouldn’t damn the policy concept itself into oblivion.
If any of you actually made an effort to read my comments and not just skim through and pick away at the parts you don’t like or understand you’d actually realize that I wasn’t advocating any sort of full out national/government program.
“By the way, it’s not surprising at all that a private contractor supplying school lunches, paid for by taxpayer dollars, would make a handsome profit.” ~ gordinkneehill
Thats not what I meant, your just choosing to perceive everything I suggested in the worst possible light even when I left the suggestions and concept rather open to interpretation and flexibility of thought.
The example I give in the youtube video was through private sponsors and NOT direct government intervention or implementation.
Unfortunately all you seem to care about is the blog posts main topic as if it won’t be discussed to death elsewhere on any number of other sites/forums/blogs/newsmedia clips the net.
Rather, I tried to point out an issue no one else talks about let alone dwells on.
I’m sorry your simple mind(s) couldn’t handle the discussion or insight into the issue I made mention of and that their are various solutions to it besides government only implementation.
So instead you flame and attempt to make petty personal “attacks”/blah blahing against my mentioning it.
Though I find I was obviously wrong to of brought it up in this way and on here of all places but when I saw the headline I couldn’t resist my zealousness and the opportunity to post about it somewhere and blurt it out.
Sorry such things is beyond the comprehension of some of the folks here. Eventually as they reread through my comments properly, and contain their initial knee-jerk reaction/frothing from the mouth to the slightest difference of opinion or perspective or policy preference that you don’t agree with 150% with.
Smarten up, and do us the favor of not speaking too loudly during the next election as I said since that’ll likely scare away some of the swing voters.
The term moderate may be a foreign concept to you but if you guys want to beat out radical islam you’ll want to keep the spectrum of political and humane refuge of people on our side of it.
When civility dies out on one side of the world it should be our personal responsibility to help revive it else where until it recovers.
Your fists don’t need to be made of ham so to speak.
Like the reaction I’ve been getting from my comments.
Your letting your prejudices and narrow thinking get the best of you… your forming/bordering yourself(s) into the wrong sorts of conservatism that lead to the wrong ends.
Fortunately the CPC won’t meet you on the path your diverting onto. Whether some of you are doing it sub-consciously or consciously.
In reply to: Knight 99 at July 27, 2009 2:09 PM.
I’m sorry, you think that because I brought up something else that I didn’t read or am completely oblivious to what the rest of the post said.
I had already read about it prior to seeing this blog or making my comments. It’s not like the issue of the acid attack will fly under the radar of everyones minds and even the very slow MSM that waits until such things are politically correct enough to address.
Many Many Many bloggers and what not will have they’re say or already have on the subject so relax one one person takes the time to talk about something else, it doesn’t mean they don’t care or give a damn, it just means that there is a full multitude of other issues that’ll scarcely talked about and may be of need of more mention and debate.
Hence my comments.
Tell me, Mr. Cutforth sir, have you read the little blue letters that appear just above the place where you put your name in the comment section?
“Before submitting, review the post to ensure your comment is on topic…”
Your voluminous comments so far are completely OFF topic, even the one you just wrote at 3:05pm. Perhaps you have difficulty with reading comprehension. Poor thing.
May I suggest Blogger? http://www.blogger.com/ You get to talk about what you want, when you want.
Additional benefit, I don’t have to scroll past two feet of your off-topic blather. Awesome!
Posted by: Taylor Cutforth>
“Hence my comments.”
You certainly do say “sorry” allot Taylor. But there never is an apology behind it. Do you not think that should be something you should look into perhaps?
Here is your award winning way of debating your argument by derailing the topic at hand then attempt to win over and influence people. Sometimes it’s good to look in the mirror of the mind.
“I like how some of you mindlessly shot it down………”
“Serves me right for posting on a fringe blog?”
“I forgot folks like you don’t get out of your own holes once in awhile.”
“……with your reactionary “crapping out the mouth”..”
“……try using that same brain of yours…..”
“I aheh, wouldn’t want to overwhelm some of you………”
“I’m sure some of you have blew enough fuzes………”
“I’m sorry your simple mind(s) couldn’t handle the discussion……….”
“So instead you flame and attempt to make petty personal “attacks”/…………..”
“Sorry such things is beyond the comprehension of some of the folks here.”
“……..contain their initial knee-jerk reaction/frothing from the mouth…………”
“Smarten up, and do us the favor of not speaking too loudly during the next election….”
“Your letting your prejudices and narrow thinking get the best of you.”
Your’re ridiculous and repetitive “sorry” or non-apologies, only highlight internal issues that do not beg for respect. So please do not go running from the playground crying that the other “stupid kids aren’t listening or playing fair”.
Knight, you -read- that stuff?
Man, you are made of STEEL! I scrolled after the first sentence. I have a low tolerance.
To: The Phantom at July 27, 2009 6:38 PM
It shows.
To: Knight 99 at July 27, 2009 3:59 PM
“Here is your award winning way of debating your argument by derailing the topic at hand then attempt to win over and influence people. Sometimes it’s good to look in the mirror of the mind.”
That was in reaction to everyone one else’s reactions.
They had already made up their minds without properly (or at all, or very selectively) reading what was said or provided by me.
Picking out my flaws in how I went about doing this doesn’t make the policy concepts mute. In fact, it entirely sidesteps everything and doing so while flaming me for it doesn’t seem like a very rational response. As for the sorry(s) I should of used some “” ‘s to separate the sarcastic ones from the real ones.
As for the playground comment I was throwing back what was thrown at me and was a lot less “personal” or direct about it in doing so.
All because I said something to them that was off topic from the main blog post, which happens all the time over the internet and blogs people need to make it into whatever just because they didn’t agree with what was said.
I didn’t even expect to have to say much more than my original post but I felt the staunch adverse reaction was unneeded/unwarranted and thought to address it since I found it odd.
I can’t just say whatever and move on given the vast ignorance some of you displayed for whoever to see.
But its alright, I’ll take the “stay on topic” “rabble rabble” as signs that much of what I said is beyond some of you. As I mentioned before. Don’t let it get anyones pants in a knot.
They could of disagreed without the knife throwing contest.
Whatever.
One last thing that I left out of one of the other comments..
“By the way, it’s not surprising at all that a private contractor supplying school lunches, paid for by taxpayer dollars, would make a handsome profit.” ~ gordinkneehill
It could be done without taxpayer money or government.
Had any of you read that from the links or saw from the video, you would of caught that.
My first post was talking about how else the brits could of done it while highlighting a small amount of the benefits, both immediate and long term.
No one had to get all heated over it in so staunchly.
What bothered me was not the flames themselves but the lack of knowledge and reasoning behind it.
Leftism is a mental disorder. That’s just in case anyone has forgotten that study.
You are correct, sasquatch. The article said they allegedly carried out “an affair”. Though extremely unlikely, it is possible that it wasn’t a sexual affair, especially in light of your statement that muslim women have hair on their cankles! Ughh!
Suckered by a verbose troll …………………
Everyone who responded to this “Taylor Cutforth” and enabled it’s hijack of the thread go to your room … stand in front of the mirror and smack yourself until you see the error that you made.
WOW, I’m a troll now? and a leftists?
In that case you guys are very selective in what you read from my comments. And my first post wasn’t negative or an attack on the blogger so I don’t get the troll comment.
As for the hi-jack I apologized for that.