Bin Laden Driver Was Not Read Miranda Rights!

Court told…

I hate to say I told you so, but this has been coming for three years — ever since the McCain amendment. Everybody pooh-poohed it because it sounds too absurd. Alien combatants having constitutional rights used to sound absurd too. So did al Qaeda having Geneva Convention rights. So did the U.S. courts entertaining lawsuits by the enemy against the officials Congress authorized to fight the war. It all sounds crazy … until it happens.

“Hamdan, a Yemeni father of two with a fourth-grade education” – It’s why we call them al-Reuters!

28 Replies to “Bin Laden Driver Was Not Read Miranda Rights!”

  1. Doesn’t the quote Civilizations die by suicide not murder just ring in your head when you hear stuff like this. The biggest enemy of our civilization lives amongst us, the left.
    Maybe Obama getting elected will waken the giant.

  2. The probable effect of all this litigious lefty handwringing over enemy prisoners is that the military will simply take far less prisoners.

  3. Move along. Let him go. But, make sure he’s committed to some leftoid’s neighborhood. Let them sing their praises, pat themselves on the back, and endure the result. Maybe even drop him off in SF.

  4. I think this is ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC!!! (Notice the three…count’em…three exclamation points).
    The “I told you so” reference rarely makes it way into politics because the “offenders” and “enablers” always set up their plausable deniability, or in Obama’s case…they just lie. But, this is an issue with teeth that can’t be overlooked due to its outright ridiculous nature. Soldiers on the battlefield reading “Miranda Rights” is like a Saturday Night Live skit lampooning “Cops.”
    I can just see Al-Ham Mohammad sitting outside a lean-to in a stained wife-beater slurring out something about not knowing the gosh darn gun was loaded while the body of his wife lays in front of him with 200 bullet holes.
    Here’s the problem…the pansie GOP won’t jump on this issue with two feet like they should. They’re going to have to be led. McCain is too inept to see this as a valid issue that he can twist in an open Democrat wound.

  5. So, when allied forces capture an al-Qaeda commander they read him his rights, and charge him with ‘Impersonating an Officer’?
    😉

  6. Western Canadian, you summarized it well in your first sentence.
    However, your second sentence fills me with horror. It’s akin to saying the nuclear attack on Hiroshima awakened the people of Hiroshima to the necessity of ending the war. An Obama Presidency would truly be catastrophic, and not just for the US.

  7. Sorry Dave you are reading something into that, that I don’t even see.
    I agree with your last sentence entirely but have a hell of a lot more confidence that your country could overcome any problems that would arise than we could. We had trudeau 30 years ago and are now for all intense and purpose a socialist state. If it weren’t for natural resources we would be no more than another third world loser.
    Obama is nothing more than a black trudeau, but I don’t think as bright and is a disaster waiting to happen. I still believe the American people are to smart to elect this all mouth silver tongued no brained idiot.

  8. Dave – catastrophic?
    About half of Americans support this idiot, including just about everyone that identifies themselves as “black” (whatever that is these days).
    The other half is so tepid in its condemnation of this puppet, that they might as well not even bother to vote.
    Now, I’ll admit American society is more willing to polarize than its Canadian counterpart, but unless you are willing to end the DC hypocrisy and specifically call out the idiots, thieves, liars, and selfish opportunistic b*stards for the cancer they are…
    …well, at best(?), the frog in the pot will slowly cook.
    So, perhaps a sudden increase in heat may be beneficial.

  9. Western Canadian, you write “I still believe the American people are to smart to elect this all mouth silver tongued no brained idiot.” I’m afraid you are wrong; they are not. Furthermore, although I share the commentators’ dislike and distrust of Obamamessiah, I’m afraid that it’s the Democrats’ turn to govern. Whatever you think of Iraq, Bush and congress have made a horrible hash of the American domestic scene. The real estate disaster could have been prevented, and there was no need to run the country into enormous debt. I repeat that I don’t like Obama either, but the Republicans deserve to lose, and they will…

  10. “I still believe the American people are to smart to elect this all mouth silver tongued no brained idiot.”
    On Jay Leno’s Jay Walking 2 nights ago, they could not even name the current President of the United States, nor the Vice President.

  11. Furthermore, McCain is a weak candidate who is not strong in important issues, such as border security against illegal immigration. I read recently that California spends $15billion a year on services for illegals, an amount roughly equal to its annual debt. If I were an American voter, which thank God I am not, illegal immigration would be close to the top of my issues, and McCain is soft and evasive on this. He’s a honest man, as Senators go (which isn’t saying much), and has served his country valiantly in a losing war, but that’s not enough to make him president, or at least not enough to allow him to overcome the appeal of the Messiah. Also, he’s too old, and unlike Reagan at 72, he looks and sounds it.

  12. “Bush and congress have made a horrible hash of the American domestic scene” – or at least that’s how the Media has portrayed and downplayed it, and they are totally in the tank for the Socialist/Fascist/NewWorldOrder Obama.
    And the real-estate disaster has been percolating since the Clinton era.

  13. the real estate disaster may have been percolating in Clinton’s presidency, but Bush has been pres for seven years and did nothing to stop it. Yes, the MSM are in the tank for Obama. I’m not saying I like him and that he’s a good guy. I’m saying a)that he’s going to win and b) the Republicans deserve to lose, that’s all

  14. billbc. since when is the pres of the u.s. responsible for mortgage financing. duh. when did the u.s. become a dictatorship?

  15. BillBC, old white guy is right. The President has no power over Wall St., investment firms, mortgage lenders, banks, even the Feds are a private entity. The President doesn’t get to set the discount rate. Get real. Economic cycles with their inherent excesses and busts happen.
    Bush did fail to veto spending bills when he should have and added more debt with the Medicare prescription entitlements and the ethanol sham just too name a few, but, the pigs at the trough in Congress of both parties are more to blame for the spending mess.
    McCain wasn’t my first choice, but, he’s better than the Empty Suit. What do you think Obama plus a Dem Congress would do to this country? Obama is economically illiterate. We can only hope to elect McCain and hold the spot until a better Republican shows up in four years. As important we conservatives need to take back Congress.
    And, yes, thanks to the partisan MSM’s unrelenting Obama spin and the dumbed down voters that reach age 18 with each election cycle it’s a scary thought, but, the creep may win. Obama articulates nothing of substance and McCain needs to articulate a simple but compelling agenda. He’d better hurry up.
    The Republicans have shot themselves in the foot this time.

  16. old white guy and penny…yes, you are right, Bush doesn’t control the mortgage rate. But nothing stops him from making public speeches to the effect that the real estate market is wildly speculative, and that he will use all his influence to rein in speculation, including using the majority in the House (which they once had) to do so, etc. It’s called “the bully pulpit.” The pres has lots of power and influence, should he choose to use it. Ditto Congress. Neither did anything, and they must take a lot of the blame for this…

  17. So basically then any president who fails to save the American people from themselves is a bad president.
    Care to name ONE who HAS …. ever???
    Anyway … what’s all this got to do with the bleeding hearts wanting to treat America’s enemies as if they were actual citizens??

  18. OMMAG, not at all. But any American president who sees a disaster of this sort looming and does nothing to warn the country about it is not a good president. Examples?: F.D. Roosevelt’s “arsenal of democracy” speech. Wilson’s warnings about intervening in World War I. Teddy Roosevelt’s speech about “malefactors of great wealth” when he attacked monopolies. How about Reagan and the “axis of evil?” There are many examples. Isn’t that what leadership is about? Warning? Advising? Cajoling? Actually leading?
    You are right though…it’s way off topic.

  19. Hey, he was told to put his hands in the air and surrender.
    Isn’t that good enough in a war?

  20. Hey, he was told to put his hands in the air and surrender.
    Isn’t that good enough in a war?

  21. billbc
    yer barking up the wrong tree
    the president is the leader of the country, not a GD baby sitter
    it’s the JOB of the money merchants to steer the finances in the lending market
    that disaster was brought on by both the lenders and the borrowers, learn to credit blame properly

  22. I guess I’m losing this one, but I’ll try once more: the Pres warns and talks about weapons of mass destruction, about the war on terror, about no child left behind, etc. etc. Why not about irresponsible and destructive lending practices? What’s the difference?

  23. I guess that (and Khadr’s affair) will teach our boys and girls in uniform to SHOOT THE TERRORISTS IN THE HEAD regardless, just to save our countries millions or billions of dollars and the trouble to hear the blabbering of the terrorists and their sympathizers in the courts.
    Just shoot them, boys and girls!

  24. “SHOOT THE TERRORISTS IN THE HEAD”
    Hey, that would make a great t-shirt.

  25. Bring all the Taliban “prisoners” to the Haven of Socialism, Toronto, where they can coddle them under the guidance of Jack and Olivia and His Worship, Davie Miller.
    They’d have to protect them from the thugs on the streets with guns as well.

  26. I guess if the troops have to read Miranda Rights to terrorists, they get to use jacketed hollow points and diesel therapy like cops do too?

Navigation