The suntan shop was situated just by the national football stadium in Oesterbro, a peaceful and affluent part of the Danish capital. The explosion completely destroyed the shop and the surrounding flats were also damaged. The police are putting the fact that no one was hurt down to sheer luck; two other bags were found in the area and have been destroyed. Two young men between the ages of 15 and 25 were seen running away from the crime scene; they were described as “foreign-looking” and are now wanted by the police.
[…]
Denmark, once acknowledged for her liberal stance and social egalitarianism, has over the last years become an increasingly polarised society where the differences between the Danish majority and migrants and especially Muslim migrants have been the dominant political agenda.
This was certainly the case back in 2005 when Jyllands Posten chose to print the 12 prophet cartoons. The following months the Danes had the dubious honour of being on the cover of magazines around the world and TV crews from CNN, BBC, and CBS visited Denmark to tell the story about the people behind the cartoons.
Back then, the debate about whether the cartoons were right or wrong split the nation in two. On one side were the idealists who defended the them on the grounds of speech. For them this was about making an important stance against what – in Denmark – is still perceived as “the threat” from Islam. Needless to say, the xenophobes joined this side of the argument. On the other side were the pragmatists – the internationalists, if you will. These included most liberals, including most broadsheet papers. The domestic debate was far from pretty, and the rightwing Danish People’s Party benefited enormously from the tense atmosphere. Two years later, many liberals and the liberal press seem to have joined the idealistic and confrontationalist boat.
In certain neighbourhoods the atmosphere is now so tense that I avoid going there when in Copenhagen. Far from the prophet cartoon crisis clearing the air like most good arguments, this argument only led to division. There are countless examples of qualified foreigners who can’t get a job in Denmark simply because of the sound of their surname. On the other hand, many young Muslim migrants have behaved like thugs, vandalising their neighbourhoods. The situation is clearly untenable; the question is: who’s got the remedy to solve it?
Who, indeed?
Pay attention kids.
We all know how those eeeeevil jooooos brought the wrath of the arab world down upon themselves. Serves ’em right, dontchya know…
So now the wrath of the arab world is coming down on the eeeeevil Danes. They published nasty political cartoons. Serves ’em right, dontchya know. Any day they will start shooting up bus loads of school kids and blowing up their own in suicide attacks on Danish pizzarias and restaurants. It will be just like Isreal all over again for them.
What will we do that lights their fuse? Kiss the old lady in public? Talk openly about the cartoons and the moslems that inspired them?
I am sure the usual liberal finger wagging fools will tell us that WE deserve the hate we get from moslems too.
The last paragraph in the article sums up the European mentality … cave in to Muslim demands.
” …But it is naive to believe that we can arrest or deport our way out of the problem. The Danes will have to adopt a political culture that is more accepting of people who don’t think and behave like us. Of course there must be limits to what we will accept, but so far neither our society nor our way of life is under threat.”
Support Denmark and sideline the Democrats .. kill two pigs with one stone.
I have sent a letters to my Danish friends and relatives to encourage their PM Rasmussen to set up a meeting with Harper to solve the Hans Island dispute by offering the US to move Gitmo to GitMo North.
This will help McCain get rid of the number one election issue on the minds of the New York Slimes and by sidelining that issue we will hopefully prevent Obama-nomics and the Hildebeest from coming to power and killing NAFTA.
Canada’s renowned Four Seasons will manage the accommodations on GitMo North and catering will be done by Demark with their renowned servings of Danish Bacon. The CBC, renowned for its animation on The National will set up a global cartoon challenge on GitMo North .. called MoToons at GitMo.
A new sequel will be developed: Little Mosque on the Arctic.
Once we get everybody settled in, we’ll change the name from GitMo to
Hans Christian Anderson
and the fun will begin.
Is it just me, or is allowing punks to run wild a failure of the Danish justice system? And welfare system. And education system. And immigration system.
Sow the wind, reap the whirlwind.
I blame the Quakers. We haven’t heard too much out of them.
a shorter Ikeborg — Bend over, close your eyes, and think of Denmark
If we or the Danes ever give in on the cartoon issue, ‘radical’ muslims will simply move on to the next item to riot and murder over. Just as, once they’ve dismantled the last of Israel, they will move on to other targets. Finishing off Lebanon won’t be far behind.
And the likes of the dhimmicrats, the kinsellouts and warmans will Cheer.
more of the same coming soon. too many liberal cowards in the world.
To consider that Islamic fascism doesn’t exist as a threat to the West, as this author suggests, when he puts ‘threat’ in quotes and suggests that people who feel this way are xenophobes, ignores the stated agenda of Islamic fascism and ignores the actual bombings in New York, London, Madrid, and so on.
Is the author going to claim that such bombings are the result only of ‘xenophobia’, ie, that it’s Our Fault. Not the fault of the bombers.
That’s the same refusal to face reality of the administration in Ontario, who, faced with mounting gun crimes, assert that ‘the cause’ is guns smuggled from the US. They ignore that it is Canadians who smuggle the guns, who use the guns, who commit the robberies and murders.
This same tactic of Blame Others can be found in a letter written by Ali Mallah of the Canadian Arab Foundation to the Toronto Star. (h/t Ezra Levant’s blog). Mallah wants to retain ‘Hate Crime Legislation’. But notice how he totally misinforms and obscures reality.
1) He informs us that hate speech laws are vital because without them, we will see ‘genocides as in Bosnia and Rwanda’ – which are ‘reminders of the ramifications of hate speech’.
Is the man insane? Does he seriously think that duct tape over everyone’s mouth would stop tribal systems of favoritism and tribal systems of hatred?
Furthermore, Section 13.1 of the HRAct, that section that flirts with the unknown, ie, which focuses only on speech that might, in the future but need not actually, but just might be ‘likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt’… Section 13.1 has NOTHING to do with the above noted actions of genocide.
Canada has criminal laws, actionable in Real Courts, under sections 318 and 319 against advocating genocide and public incitement of hatred that leads to violence.
Yet, Mallah is ignoring these existent criminal laws and actually misinforming that public that IF they reject the completely different Human Right Act Section 13.1 – THEN, there’d be no law against inciting genocide and violence. That’s either an ignorant or a completely malicious statement of his.
2) After setting up the fraud scenario by merging the Criminal Hate Speech Laws of 318, 319, with the completely different Human Rights Speech Laws, he then goes on to say that the hate speech laws are necessary to ‘protect the marginalized and multicultural communities of Canada’.
Notice the Hidden Assumption; that multiculturals ARE marginalized. Is that true? This phrase sets them up into a zone of victimhood; they are actively discriminated against and marginalized according to Mallah.
That’s another misinformation. Malicious as well? Or just ignorant?
On another point, is hate speech offensive only when it refers to ‘minorities’ and ‘the marginalized’? If I’m a member of a majority group, whatever that is, does this mean that I have to put up with speech that ‘is likely to expose me to hatred or contempt’? While if I’m a member of a minority, then – heck, I can run over to the HRC and file a complaint?
3) Mallah then moves on, continuing in his ignorance, by declaring that we ‘ought to be committed to Canada’s Charter of Rights’.
He’s got a point there. The Charter gives us a fundamental right – freedom of speech. The Human Rights Act, Section 13.1 takes this right away from us.
Doesn’t Mallah know that the HRAct is in direct contradiction to the Charter?
You know, the more this crap goes on in places like Denmark and Toronto the more it looks to me like Muslims as a group are pretty much bystanders.
You take a look at who’s making the most uproar in Hogtown, its PUNKS. All varieties. StatsCan just released another set of crime stats. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080220.wfirearms0220/BNStory/National/home They emphasize that overall, crime is at a thirty year low. No duh, because everybody is working. BUT, and this is the important part, “More young Canadians are using guns in assaults, robberies and homicides, even as Canada’s overall rate of violent crime involving firearms remained stable in 2006, Statistics Canada reports.”
“The rate of young people aged 12 to 17 accused of a firearm-related offence rose 32 per cent between 2002 and 2006, driven primarily by robberies, the Statscan study said. In 2006, 1,287 youths were accused of a violent offence involving a gun.”
Slimecouver was Numero Uno, followed by Wienerpeg, followed by Hogtown. Edmondumb gets the “Murder City” crown this time for most homicides.
Those cities all have different racial mixes. Big time. The thing to take home here is that this is a failure of government policy, not society (which hasn’t changed!) and not one particular group.
As in, not Jamaican gangs only, not the Russian mob only, not the Muslim radicals only, not the freakin’ mafia only (I live in Hamilton, the mafia is a problem in these parts).
The Federal government has almost no control of who or what comes into this country. We know this because the price of illegal handguns is going down, as witnessed by the reduction in age of the punks using them.
The immigration ministry has no control of who comes here, as shown by the fact that Jamaican gang bangers previously convicted, jailed and deported back to Jamaica are -regularly- re-arrested on the street in Toronto. I’m not picking on Jamaicans, I just happen to know that its true. Other groups are no doubt as bad. Romanian strippers/hookers, ferinstance.
Denmark and all of Europe have been begging for this since the 1970’s. You can’t import 5% of your population in 20 years, while at the same time gutting your justice system, and not expect trouble.
In a sense Western Society is to blame for a lot of the tensions in our countries, especially in western Europe but not for the reasons the would-be Jihadists would serve up. We seem to think we must have an ever expanding economy but Western males seem unwilling to support and nurture the necessary birthrate of at least 2.3 children per couple. Females seem unwilling to bear them. Both seem unwilling to make the career sacrifices necessary. Government and business seem totally unwilling to train our children to do the work that must be done. We would rather just import the trained labour from abroad , bring them here and then for a large part not let them do the job they were trained for. Also by making our Trudeaupean society were all new cultures, mores and values are considered as equal or better than those which built our nations we never even asked that newcomers fit in to what values we held dear. As previously stated we have sown the wind, and if we aren’t willing to have the courage to act we will reap the whirlwind!
I am left wondering where the media coverage is on this.
BBC, Telegraph, CNN, definitely are not saying much, if anything, about this.
Let’s play a little role reversal here and have a radical christian go and bomb a muslim burqa stand and see if that gets equivalent coverage.
Sir Winston Churchill
Those of us who are not ‘politically correct’ are not surprised. I thought you might like to read this prescient speech….. Unbelievable, but this speech below was written in 1899!
Sending the attached short speech from Winston Churchill, delivered by him in 1899 when he was a young soldier and journalist. It probably sets out the current views of many but expressed in the wonderful Churchillian turn of phrase and use of the English language, of which he was a past master. Sir Winston Churchill was, without doubt, one of the greatest leaders of the late 19th and 20th centuries. He was a brave young soldier, a brilliant journalist, an extraordinary politician and statesman, a great war leader and Prime Minister, to whom the Western world must be forever in his debt. He was a prophet in his own time; He died on 24 January 1965, at the grand old age of 90 and, after a lifetime of service to his country, was accorded a State funeral. …… HERE IS THE SPEECH:
‘How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome
Sir Winston Churchill; (The River War, first edition, Vol. II, pages 248-50) London:
One more reason for targetting Copenhagen?
Michael A. Ledeen, At the Scene of Reconciliation
I’m in Denmark this week as an observer at an Iraqi “reconciliation conference” that has brought nearly two dozen political and religious leaders to Copenhagen. It’s a fascinating group…
I think we should question whether immigration is/was carried out because of OUR requirement for ‘cheap labour’. Is this a valid reason for all immigration?
Are there other reasons for immigration?
First, we must, and I stress the word ‘must’ acknowledge that NO economy, other than the most primitive, is homogeneous. All economies capable of supporting large populations MUST be stratified in levels of expertise, levels of accountability, levels of knowledge required for the tasks.
A heart surgeon is not equivalent to a street sweeper within the economic structure of a society. Anyone, including the heart surgeon, can sweep the streets; but not everyone, including the street sweeper, can be a heart surgeon.
A complex economy, in addition, will have multiple levels of expertise required, multiple levels of work capacity required. Not everyone, we know, can be or wants to be, a heart surgeon. Some are quite comfortable as a clerk in a store – and we need them. We need street sweepers and so on.
Therefore, every economy except the most primitive, has hierarchical levels of value. Those filling the lower levels will be those with the least schooling or expertise. And those people are the ones most ready and willing to leave their ‘home country’. The heart surgeon in China, India, doesn’t need to leave. But the unskilled and uneducated won’t find any opportunities to advance in his ‘home country’.
Therefore, it is completely wrong to do the usual tactic of Blame Oneself by suggesting that the Evil West only has immigrants because the Evil West wants cheap labour. The immigrants don’t have the skills for anything else; they can’t get work in their home country..and so they come.
Why does the US have 12 million illegal Mexicans? Because Mexico doesn’t provide any jobs for them, and is offloading its poorest class on to the US taxpayer, who must pay the school, hospital, roads and etc to look after this extra population.
Why do so many Chinese want to Go To America? Because they want to Make Money.
The problem, in my view, with the West’s treatment of immigrants, is multiculturalism. that socialist, leftist perverse view that sees ‘everyone as identical and all beliefs and behaviour as identical and equal’. What did multiculturalism do? It set up the immigrants in isolate blocs, insisting that they, rather than assimilate, just ‘behave as they used to in the old country’. No change. It’s like taking Bangladesh space with you.
So, we get Little India, Little Italy, Little Iraq, Little China, Little Jamaica, Little Russia, ..etc.
And we get people who don’t assimilate, who don’t interact with others, and who, as isolate, become inbred and ingrown. Their ideologies become reified and ‘purified’ and rigid because they aren’t forced to face pragmatic reality. So, these enclaves, who talk only to and with themselves, little Echo Chambers, become unable to interact with others. They explode because, in a sense, they are trapped in cages. Of their own and our making.
Get rid of multiculturalism. Insist on integration. Don’t go to the New Country intending to simply set up the Old Country in the New.
BigFire: “I blame the Quakers…”
Pity they’re so silent. The Quakers may have an anwer to islamic extremism: internalize religion and experience god from within (at least according to Wiki’s description).
To add to Capt bobs excellent Churchill quote heres another (paraphrased) – “find the point of compromise between the fireman and the arsonist”.
Once we establish that I think that we will find the solution to radical islam and the West.
“this argument only led to division”
This is not an “argument”. It’s the outward expression of a fundamental difference in world view and in beliefs about the nature and extent of freedom.
Moreover, a portion of one side of this little “argument” will accept nothing less than unconditional surrender, on pain of death, preferably brought about by “dividing” an opponent from his noodle.
“The situation is clearly untenable; the question is: who’s got the remedy to solve it?”
Let’s take a closer look ath the situation to make sure we’re not getting sold a fugazi here.
According to statistics Denmark there are 5,447,084 in Denmark.
Men who has the first name ‘Mohammed’
2006:1259
2007:1273
A whopping increase of 14 Mohammeds. Searches for Muahmmed and Mohammed type surnames turn up even lower figures; you’re looking at a total of like 2,000 Mohammeds, maybe, in a population of 5.5 mil.
Denmark appears to have drastically reduced refugees acceptance and chain immigration sometime around 2002, and replaced it with work permits:
http://www.dst.dk/HomeUK/Statistics/focus_on/focus_on_show.aspx?sci=132
They appear to have taken in about 500 immigrants, total, among refugees and chain immigration, in the most recent year.
Overall, Denmark has about a third as many immigrants per capita as Canada:
Population by region, citizenship, ancestry and time (All Denmark, 2008)
Unit: Number
Total Danish Foreign
Immigrants 378665 124786 253879
Descendants 119297 81888 37409
Dane origin 4977829 4970627 7202
Total 5475791 5177301 298490
http://www.dst.dk/HomeUK/Statistics/focus_on/focus_on_show.aspx?sci=565
Another very detailed chart here, long story short is that Denmark drastically reduced non European immigration in 2002 or so:
http://www.dst.dk/HomeUK/Statistics/focus_on/focus_on_show.aspx?sci=1069
In 2006, only 55 per cent of the Danish families had at least one car.
All very fascinating. I don’t understand what people have against statistics; reality is often more interesting than the most intricately woven story.
phantom. muslims haven’t really started yet. the numbers are too low. wait until 5% of the population is muslim.
“The Charter gives us a fundamental right – freedom of speech.”
ET
The problem is, ET, the Charter begins with Sec. 1 which effectively allows all the following freedoms to be limited or denied. In that sense, I’m afraid human rights commissions work in lockstep with the Charter.
It’s one more reason why I think the Charter is such a fraud and why I can’t understand why so many liberals are so pleased about it.
I’m afraid Malla is on strong ground when he begins calling on the Charter; it’s tailor made for people like him, particularly since the SCC is eager to please groups with grievances.
This doesn’t mean i think the situation is hopeless, just one more hurdle which we have to deal with.
Where ever there are Muslims there is BIG trouble.
No Muslims, no BIG trouble.
Any questions?
dfsaf ,
My brother in law is a teacher in Denmark; his school was set fire to last week. Earlier he had to haul a kid of the Principal. Then they brought the dad in a few days later to discuss discipline of his son. Then the dad started choking the Principal and they had to haul the dad off, even the teachers unions are now debating the wisdom of multiculti .
You see males at 4 years old are taken away from the influence of their mother and consequently the fathers who are too busy sipping mint tea or on the prayer rug, do not discipline their sons.
My inlaws are mostly teachers, mostly left of Dippers and not given to hostile conservative comments about their rights versus the immigrants who came to their country from the mud huts of the back end of Turkey. But even my appeasing left wing friends and relatives over there have had enough. They are now saying “the only thing these immigrants know better than the Koran is the welfare act and we Danes are paying too big a price for that”.
Demographically.. read Steyn’s America Alone .. throughout Eurabia Islamic immigrants only range from 5 to 10 % of the population but they have lots of kids and the Northern Europeans are pretty much barren. Do the math.
nomdeblog,
You nailed it with the welfare comment.
The “moderate” muslims are those more interested in their kid’s university future and their retirement plan.
The non-moderate muslims have all the time in the world to plot ways of killing people because they’ve been on welfare since the day they either got here (if an immigrant) or left their parent’s home (if homegrown.)
Welfare reform will solve the problem. Welfare created it. The violent deadbeats would think twice about locating to your country if they have to get a job not consisting of inciting violence.
Immigrants should not be able to collect welfare or any other handouts. We should also make it much harder to collect and much less generous for the citizens we already have (whether muslim or not.) Time limits would also be helpful.
If we do this, the muslims won’t be a problem as the only people we’ll be attracting are people who want a better life for themselves.
Warwick,
There are man countries with Muslims who don’t have generous welfare distributions. They STILL HAVE BIG TROUBLE with the Muslims.
It is not the welfare that is the problem, although I agree it is an accommodating factor … It’s the Muslims that are the problem.
Let me repeat …
Where ever there are Muslims there is BIG trouble.
No Muslims, no BIG trouble.
I suggest everyone repeat those two lines until you understand them.
Any questions?
John West,
Agreed. But if we don’t give them free money, they won’t come here. The ones that to, won’t be a problem.
I bet if you closed the welfare loophole to deadbeats you’d see immigration of problem muslims and other groups fall dramatically.
Seriously though, there are hard-working muslims just like there are hard working people of other groups.
There are lots of people who are muslim in name only. I was baptised a catholic but haven’t been back since I was a kid. I’m sure there are lots of muslims in the same boat. They are the ones with jobs.
The fanatics plotting bombings and rapin women are the ones loafing around on welfare.
nomdesockpuppet: “My brother in law is a teacher in Denmark; his school was set fire to last week.”
Oh shut up with the self serving anecdotes for the love of God! Seriously, that’s a total left wing move, conjuring up an unverifiable bogeyman.
Are you a balding Toronto area Liberal lobbyist by chance?
Stop that! Stop it now!
It’s 2008, and heart tugging “stories” don’t play anymore. See Colby Cosh’s deliciously vicious dissection of the technique you and Bernie “Bernie” Farber love to engage in and don’t ever pull that crap again.
There are a total of 2,000 Mohammeds in a population of 5.mil in Denmark, and that is the bottom line, as opposed to a sockpuppet internet story.
Are you a balding Toronto area Liberal lobbyist by chance?
Speaking of which, where is Ted? I haven’t seen a post from him in quite some time – hope he’s OK.
This story doesn’t show up anywhere else in the news by the way, notice how search “bomb copenhagen” produces zero Google news search results pertaining to an actual bombing, save for this one:
news.google.ca/news?oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&client=firefox-a&um=1&tab=wn&hl=en&q=bomb+copenhagen&btnG=Search+News
Not saying it didn’t happen, but it is highly odd that only one person in the entire world is making this claim, though there are reports of the odd car-b-que and rock throwing at police:
afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5g1zaGznN4_AnmJKpg7cnFhHCpuxA
Still no actual “bomb” though, which is really odd. Gives new meaning to Google bomb, I suppose 😉
dsfasf , that’s it with the bully tactics, consider yourself shipped back. You either assimilate or leave, these are our rules not yours.
dfsafasfda
Bite me. Left wing moves generally start with “I demand you not speak” and regress from there to such arguments as “la la la I’m not listening to you!!!” and “You’re just a racist so I don’t have to address your point.”
And mohamed has about a dozen spellings and can be a last name as well as a first. Note also that there are more than one muslim name. Note also that not all muslims have muslim names.
Ever hear of John Walker Lindh?
You’re “statistics” are as sophomoric as your logic.
dfsafasfda
“Not saying it didn’t happen, but it is highly odd that only one person in the entire world is making this claim”
You ever think that your inability to find references might be because the first language in Denmark isn’t fricken English?
Here’s a story with a picture:
http://politiken.dk/indland/article474017.ece
And no, it isn’t in English. And search for Bomb and Demark, you’ll get better results.
Warwick,
I too would like to see the welfare gravy train ended. It is a evil that destroys the spirit of anyone who uses it for any length of time.
The passive Muslims as you stated, the one’s with jobs are not actually Muslim anymore, they have more or less assimilated. Eventually their kids will assimilate and live freely especially the girls.
In any case I think we are on the same page regarding our disgust for how our governments exacerbate the immigration and welfare systems with their idiotic ideas about … well … you know what.
Thanks Warwick, this is a good time to dump the UN and test a Coalition of the Willing to deal with bully trolls like dsfad who will soon not be able to hide behind Section 13.
christopher reeves – I agree with you about the fraudulent violation of our rights that is the Charter. It’s a travesty.
However, this guy Mallah wasn’t working only with the Charter. He was actually merging Articles 318 and 319 of the Criminal Code and saying they were part of the Human Rights Act (which is not a criminal code)!!! And then, declaring that IF you got rid of the HRAct, then, you’d get rid of the Hate Speech incitements to genocide and violence of the 318/319 Criminal Code! That’s totally false.
And, his insistence that ‘multiculturals’ are marginalized. Ridiculous. Also, his complete indifference to the real problem of Section 13.1, which is that it rejects actuality. It’s based on pure speculation.
How about a situation where X-person is indeed viewed with contempt. That’s because he’s a hostile, abusive jerk who is ignorant and arrogant, and … Now, is my contempt for him due to his acts, or is it due to the fact that he’s a member of a ‘designated minority’, and as such, his behaviour and beliefs are outside any analysis, critique, commentary???
dfas etc. Your posts are rants. Illogical.
Are you seriously suggesting that ONLY people named Mohammed commit violent acts against Danes? Prove it.
Are you seriously suggesting that ALL Muslim males are named ‘Mohammed’? Prove it.
Are you seriously suggesting that ONLY recent immigrants to Denmark commit violent acts? Prove it.
Are you seriously suggesting that the multicultural isolate enclaves do NOT breed ingrown terrorist ideologies? Prove it.
Now, go find some VALID and REAL data rather than the half-baked tidbits you’ve come up. Don’t you know that you must never, ever, come to a conclusion without a data base that includes all relevant variables?
Think, rather than rant.
Assuming Muslim youths set the bomb (and isn’t that a stretch?), I’m left wondering; what in the world have they against getting a good tan?
The charter is undemocratic. pierre the pig gave us this little gem because he knew that it was the only way to give the socialists a voice without a majority.
dfsafasfda said,
and it only took 19 “mohameds” a few minutes to kill 3000 innocent people on 9/11.
That is another statistic for you.
Let me try again…
dfsafasfda said,
“…A whopping increase of 14 Mohammeds. Searches for Muahmmed and Mohammed type surnames turn up even lower figures; you’re looking at a total of like 2,000 Mohammeds, maybe, in a population of 5.5 mil.”
And I am saying to you,
it only took 19 “mohameds” a few minutes to kill 3000 innocent people on 9/11.
That is another statistic for you.
We need to ask ourselves what we did wrong to make these poor disenfranchised youths lash out at the immoral Danish racist hate mongers! Sure they enjoy the benefits of Danish social services and infrastructure, but that obviously isn’t enough and the Danes need to do more obviously! If the Danes were smart they would build the world’s biggest mosque at the center of Copenhagen, they would all convert to Islam and replace their existing laws with Sharia law. All indigenous Danes should give 50% of their paychecks to the local Imam and should give 25% of their paychecks to the foreign born Muslims. All Danish women should submit to sexual favors demanded by them and all indigenous Danes should commit 80% of their after work time in servitude inside Muslim family’s state sponsored Mcmansions!
Then we would have peace and gratitude from the Muslims, for sure (we hope)! Wake up Europe!
This George gets it right !!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.byzantinesacredart.com/blog/2008/01/this-george-gets-it.html
Those muslims keep pushing the locals, and sooner or later they’re going to have more than they bargained for on their hands, and not even the EU will be able to stop it.
Oh come ON, people.
We ALL know it’s the Jews™ who did it.
They are sneaky and conniving and duplicitous and…um, why are you all looking at me like that?
What do you mean I’m an idiot?
I’ll have you know that the Jews…*POW* *THUD*
*some guy from the crowd walks away to cheers of everyone while he dusts off his knuckles*
Knight 99 – hilarious, good on you.
Still no actual “bomb” though, which is really odd. Gives new meaning to Google bomb, I suppose 😉
dfsafasfda – not to call you an outright birdbrain, but, could it be that googling the bomb story in English didn’t produce the right results:
http://politiken.dk/indland/article474017.ece
Seems like it is there for you in the language from where it happened.
John West – “I too would like to see the welfare gravy train ended”…too bad the Europeans in their socialistic enlightenment haven’t figured out that the dole is what draws these so many economic carpetbaggers from the Muslim world, not the secular freedom of western culture.
The last historic major wave of immigration into the US circa 1880-1910 that continued our country’s values of hard work and assimilation got no dole, just the promise of a fair deal if you made it on your own by hard work and good citizenship. Seems fair to me. I’m sure it was no different in Canada.
Muslims dissing the western culture of secularism with free speech at its core, challenging and burning down parts of Europe have their rent, food and health care paid for up front. Disrespecting the country that they are in has no risk for them.
We aren’t offering illegals any services beyond the the basics in emergency healthcare and schooling. I suspect we’d have all of Mexico living a better standard of living here if we were as naive as Europeans.
Still no bomb reports anywhere.
Kate: I don’t say this lightly, but you actually have less credibility than Kinsella or the MSM. You actually have a demonstrated record of laughable dishonesty that make Kinsella and the Canadian MSM look somewhat fair and honest in comparison. Seriously, I belive Toilet Man’s scribblings before I believe your daily fake genocide\bombing\etc story, and I’m a friggin conservative.
Whatever influenced you to “bait and switch” from being a pretty good blogger to posting ridiculously fake stories on a daily basis all of a sudden, I have to ask: are you sure its worth it?
fdsafsfdf
Hey idiot, read yesterday’s post from 12:29.
Here’s the story with a picture:
http://politiken.dk/indland/article474017.ece
You really are not that bright.
= Foot in mouth, how embarrassing!!!