Reader Tips

(link fixed) Usurping the left. My entry: Wheezy McFascistInstitute
Unsubsidized biofuels – a one day seminar hosted by the Frontier Center for Public Policy Info here.
Black Rod; “We thought we had seen the last of the Me-Me-Me School of Politics with the passing of Glen Murray. How wrong we were.”
The Islamic Congress of Canada’s Mohammed Elmasry is unhappy with Harper’s stance on the Palestinian elections. It’s a start!
The further left a province leans, the more spoiled ballots they turn in.
Requiem for a retiring Saskatchewan politician;

Good Luck Joanne, have fun with the four hours after business hours dealing with the paper work in this province. Also, better make it a store-front, not a home business, or you won’t qualify for your “lowest utilities” rebate. Oh, and don’t shop around for lowest prices for natural gas, because the Province won’t give you a provincial rebate on energy costs unless you do business with the Crown Corp.

Leave your own in the comments, or send a trackback.

42 Replies to “Reader Tips”

  1. Him wants to be Chair of the Multicultarist Committee of the >>> NEW >>
    Shocker:� McKenna might not run:Friends�
    January 27th, 2006
    This is a shocker. I have not decided who I�m going to support, but I think McKenna should run. He will bring a level of ideas and discussions to the table that can help rejuvinate the party. I have heard a lot of personal stories about McK from friends and I think he will be good for the Liberal party and Canada. >>>
    http://www.vijaysappani.com/myblog/

  2. North Korea is threatening nuclear war against America.
    Harper, as our new leader may have some of the world’s fastest training and awareness in global diplomacy.
    His calm and solid manner will be vital if this really boils up.
    TIZ

  3. Van Hauves Return to Family Farm
    Josh Pringle
    Saturday, January 28, 2006 12:16 AM
    A Navan family has come out of hiding and returned to their family farm.
    The Van Hauve family is facing deportation to Belgium.
    Immigration Officials ordered the family deported earlier this month after learning Michel Van Hauve had a 26-year-old shoplifting charge in his native country.
    Michel’s wife Suzy Myers says she doesn’t want Immigration officials to come to her home. Myers tells A-Channel News she wants officials to be fair and she wants justice.
    The Van Hauves say they have received the paperwork from Belgium that proves he is fit to stay in Canada.
    The Ontario Landowners Association has been protecting the family for the last two weeks.
    Immigration officials have given the Van Hauves a 60-day extension to complete visa applications and produce required documentation. >>>
    cfra.com

  4. This is soooo OT, but given all the thrashing about on the “Dangerous Time (Hamas)…” thread down below, I just hadda bring this up top here. Feel free to share. Speaking for myself, given this week’s litany of gloomy news from the ME, I needed a Big Smile, and this shure delivers!: –
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEQc2y3BR30
    turn up your speakers! 😀

  5. Das Boot meets the Captain Nemo, eh, Jules? >>
    AND NOT IN A CHEAP HORROR MOVIE: Giant Octopus attacks submarine!
    “I go full reverse and blast him with all these seabed particles,” said Wood, describing the attack shown in the video. “Finally, he lets go and disappears off into the gloom.
    There’s video.
    posted at 09:04 AM by Glenn Reynolds
    via instapundit
    http://www.rapp.org/url/?XYBJYVUZ

  6. “Immigration Officials ordered the family deported earlier this month after learning Michel Van Hauve had a 26-year-old shoplifting charge in his native country.”
    Hmmmm to bad he didn’t have ties to an Islamic terror group he could claim Canadian citizenship as a refugee.
    We cant have shop lifitng Belgies mucking up our nation’s farms.

  7. The Myth of Urban/Rural Dichotomy.
    Interesting take on this issue in the National Post today. It reads, in part,
    “In fact, in the countries’ 15 largest cities — including the big three metropolises — the Conservative vote was only a little less than three points behind the Liberals’. Greater Toronto is the most hostile area in the country to the Conservatives, yet even there they earned more than 420,000 votes. They may not have won any seats, but it is hardly true that they have no appreciable support.”

  8. Alow me to don my tinfoil hat for a moment.
    Did anyone see Harper’s ”terse” statement that the US ambassador should butt out of his plans to strengthen sovereignty in the north?
    To press went gaga over ”tensions” b/w Harper and Washington.
    To me, however, this sounds like a very clever stitch-up b/w Ottawa and the White House. Let Harper and Bush get testy over the north and it innoculates Harper against accusations of being a White House toady.
    Don’t get me wrong, I’d like to see Harper visit the WH every Sunday if he could — anything that ends our childish behaviour over the last decade is great. But part of me can’t help but wonder if the sovereignty ”dispute” is a very clever way to smoothe relations.

  9. From “Liberal campaign leaves a bitter aftertaste”, Jane Taber, Globe, Jan. 28:
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20060128/LIBERALS28/TPNational/Canada
    “…a senior adviser said…the adviser said…the senior adviser said…the worker said…the Liberal worker said…The Liberal worker said…the Liberal worker said…according to sources…one organizer said…The adviser will not talk…one veteran Liberal said…Some organizers say…one strategist says…Some organizers complained…Mr. Martin’s senior adviser said…Liberal strategists saw…the adviser said…Liberal strategists believe…the adviser said…Said the senior adviser [at last some good old Time-speak]…”
    Anonymous sources are used twenty times; indeed not one source is identified. How many separate sources are there anyway? This is not the work of a reporter; this is not the work of an analyst; this is not is not the work of a columnist.
    The Globe describes Giggles as “Senior Political Writer”. False advertising: she is a gossip columnist (“Hill Whispers”?). The mind boggles that the Globe continues to give her unsourced regurgitations of Liberal spin such prominence.
    God bless the busybody with the new government.
    Mark
    Ottawa

  10. Epitaph for Paul Martin, Jr., as written by Judge Gomery. Martin cancelled the Sponsorship AdScam heist as one of his first acts as PM; receiving/reading the Second Gomery will be one of the last of Martin’ official acts.
    Second Gomery Report due 01 Feb. 2006.
    Harper sworn in as Prime Minister 06 Feb. 2006.
    Gomery Reports: the “bookends” of Martin’s regime.
    Nemesis is a jealous lover. >>>
    Date Set. Apocalypse to Follow
    Just received the following news release from Rideau Hall:
    January 26, 2006
    OTTAWA � Her Excellency the Right Honourable Micha�lle Jean, Governor General of Canada, met with the Prime Minister designate, the Honourable Stephen Harper, this morning at 10:00 a.m. During the meeting, it was agreed that Mr. Harper would be sworn in as Canada�s 22nd Prime Minister, along with his Cabinet, on February 6, 2006.
    This is only a couple days after this guy finishes his work and releases a second report. The sponsorship program/scandal seems to be the bookends of the Martin Prime Ministership. He cancelled the program on his first day in office. He’ll get to read what he should have done on one of his last. History is a stern taskmistress it appears. >>
    http://www.michaelcrook.ca/ (Listed on Liblogs)

  11. Why can’t we be as flexible and imaginative?
    “Catalonia Nears Autonomy From Spain: Region’s Plan for Self-Rule Seen as Alternative to Full Independence”, Washington Post, Jan. 28
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/27/AR2006012701508.html?referrer=email
    Excerpts:

    ‘”The move for independence will grow if the Catalan statute is not approved,” said Pasqual Maragall, president of Catalonia, a region of about 7 million people centered around the cosmopolitan Mediterranean city of Barcelona…
    The autonomy bid has transfixed Spain ever since the Catalonian parliament voted overwhelmingly to become a “nation” — but still remain a part of the country — last September, and then forwarded the proposal to the Spanish parliament in Madrid…
    The proposal calls for Catalan to be the official and “preferential” language of Catalonia, alongside Castilian Spanish. It declares that Catalonia will be responsible for collecting all taxes levied in the region, have its own judiciary, and have the authority to change laws passed by the parliament in Madrid…’
    Mark
    Ottawa

  12. This is thought-provoking:
    “A coming Islamic reformation”, LA Times, Jan. 28:
    http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-aslan28jan28,0,6964410.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions
    Excerpts:

    ‘In 100 years, after the memory of 9/11 has receded and the war on terror is a somber chapter in our nation’s history, we may look back on Bin Laden not only as a murderous criminal but as one of the principal figures of an era that scholars are increasingly referring to as the Islamic reformation. Indeed, historians may one day place Bin Laden alongside 16th century Christian revolutionaries Thomas Muntzer, Hans Hut or even Martin Luther as a “reformation radical” who pushed the principle of religious individualism to terrifying limits…
    …there are certain similarities between the Christian and Islamic reformations that should not be dismissed, not least because they reflect universal conflicts found in nearly every religious tradition. Chief among these is the question of who has the authority to define faith: the individual or the institution?..
    …the authority of traditional clerical institutions over their Muslim communities has been eroding. After all, Muslims now have access through the Internet (an invention whose role in the Islamic reformation parallels that of the printing press in the Christian Reformation) to the religious opinions of myriad Islamic activists, academics, self-styled preachers, militants and cult leaders throughout the world who are, for better or worse, reshaping the faith.
    Not surprisingly, as religious authority passes from traditional institutions to individuals, there may arise those whose reinterpretation of religion will be fueled by extreme social and political agendas. It is in this context that Bin Laden’s militantly individualistic, anti-institutional movement harks back to some of the most infamous aspects of the Christian Reformation. Martin Luther, for example, in pursuit of theological dominance over his fellow Protestants, justified their massacre during the German Peasants’ Revolt in 1525…
    Like Luther, Bin Laden is concerned above all else with “purifying” his own religious community. Indeed, contrary to perception in the West, Bin Laden’s primary target is neither Christians nor Jews (both of whom he refers to as “the far enemy”), but rather those Muslims who do not share his puritanical view of Islam and who, as a consequence, make up the overwhelming majority of Al Qaeda’s victims.
    Bin Laden has also deliberately placed himself in direct opposition to the institutional authorities of his religion by repeatedly issuing fatwas and making judgments on Islamic law � things that, according to Islamic tradition, only a cleric affiliated with one of Islam’s recognized schools of law has the authority to do…’
    Mark
    Ottawa

  13. Boudria: Rat Packer, Librano$, one of J. Chretien’s henchmen,: see Gomery Report One for Boudria’s connections & more, eg, Boulay.
    Boudria, a small man, literally; smaller in mind & spirit; vindictive,cold-blooded, a Librano$. Good riddance.>>
    Landowners resist farmer�s deportation
    By Tom VanDusen – AgriNews Staff Writer
    Excerpt:
    Officials left after conducting a search. Normally, when deportees don�t show up as scheduled, a Canada-wide warrant is issued for their arrest.
    According to Hillier, Van Hauve got into trouble with Immigration because he worked as a labourer for Sarsfield area farmer Pierre Etter who famously dumped a dead cow on the front lawn of Glengarry-Prescott-Russell Liberal MP Don Boudria.
    Reported to have been deeply offended by the act, Boudria retired effective with the current federal election campaign.
    Etter readily admitted to the action as a protest against trying times facing area producers due to the BSE crisis. He was charged last spring with mischief and with failure to properly dispose of a dead animal carcass.
    Area landowners rallied, raising more than $2,000 towards Etter�s defense. He eventually pleaded guilty and paid a small fine.
    Van Hauve and family were served with a deportation order Dec. 29, with a 26-year-old conviction for shoplifting in Belgium cited as the main reason for not extending their stay.
    “For eight years,” Hillier said, “the Van Hauve family visas were rubber-stamped and approved. In August, 2005, the visas were revoked. Michael Van Hauve started work as a farm labourer for Pierre Etter in July, 2005.” >>> more
    http://www.rapp.org/url/?1UBNPUMQ

  14. I find it interesting the amount of spoiled ballots in Quebec.
    Didn’t they have this same “issue” during the Neverendum? Fake spoiled ballots that came out of that mess was whoever decides the X or checkmark was not exactly in the voter’s circle was considered spoiled.
    We had voting issues then, and wonder if it happened again? I remember posters saying it can’t happen because of signatures, initals, overseers and so on. I forgot to bring this up because hopefully it was a bad dream, but seeing the spoiled ballots again being high in Quebec…
    One has to wonder at the quacking noise, is it a duck?
    cheers
    tom

  15. Its not at all suprising to me that left leaning ridings produce more spoiled ballets than right leaning ones. It is we on the left who are the most disatisfied and frustrated with the choices on offer.
    I imagine a lot of people who divoted Liberal did so holding their noses not to endorse Martin but to check Harper.

  16. Mark, one thing I think that article lacks is perspective.
    Martin Luther didn’t kill any innocents or protest out of the religious circles or those in direct connection to Islam.
    To do the same, Bin Hatem would have attacked the 2001 Space Odyssey black slab in Mecca or at the most made a statement on El Spazza TV.
    cheers
    tom

  17. chip?

    Regarding this:

    Did anyone see Harper’s ”terse” statement that the US ambassador should butt out of his plans to strengthen sovereignty in the north? The press went gaga over ”tensions” b/w Harper and Washington. To me, however, this sounds like a very clever stitch-up b/w Ottawa and the White House. Let Harper and Bush get testy over the north and it innoculates Harper against accusations of being a White House toady.

    That’s exactly how this American sees it.

    Our Chattering Classes on TV may be having a fit of the Vapours over this, but I don’t have any problem with you folks exerting your sovereignty up there- hell, it’s your territory.

    More power to you.

    And yes, as I see it, it has the earmarks of “W, the poker player” all over it.

  18. Jose–‘I imagine a lot of people who divoted Liberal did so holding their noses not to endorse Martin but to check Harper’ In other words you didn’t want to vote for Martin but you believed his lies about Harper? That is a loser vote–how can you believe Martin’s rants re Harper and still not have him believable enough to earn your vote? Must have been silly season.

  19. It is amazing how many people were willing to take the word of a proven liar when making a decision whether or not to vote for him.

  20. Kate: “It is amazing how many people were willing to take the word of a proven liar when making a decision whether or not to vote for him”

    To be fair to the deceived masses:
    It’s called “moving out of the comfort zone”, or “the fear of change”.
    Otherwise it is called “just plain stupid”.
    Or realistically it is called
    “I want to make sure my pogey cheque still comes”
    cheers
    tom

  21. It’s also, I should vote for Harper, but I heard or read somewhere that the agenda is scary.
    I’ll vote for Martin just in case.
    Good thing the polling booth is private. Nobody has to know who the cowards are. TG

  22. Mark – re: Catalonia – the only problem is that the rest of Spain is up in arms about this and the Socialist govt is in a bit of a pickle over this – it owes Catalonia big-time for its election so it needs to push this through, but if it does, the other regions are going to really freak. This is what their army chief-of-staff was dismissed over early this month. Frankly, Quebec is quiet and non-demanding compared to this situation.
    Islam’s “reformation” – many Islamic scholars think Islam has gone through its “reformation”, mostly in the late 18th and in the 19th C., and that the result is an instensification toward the more radical parts of the Koran and strict interpretation of sharia, epitomized by the formation of groups like the Islamic Brotherhood and the more “militant” practice of the faith in areas like Muslim Indian states (including, pre-partition, Pakistan). This pre-dates the spread of Wahhabiism with Gulf oil money. Unfortunately, “reformation” does not denote a concentration or change in a more “modern” or “benign” direction.

  23. Unplug that qwerty; duct tape yo oracular cavity, or else…???
    The Dark Ages Redux, aka as shut-up ; blog while you still can. >>>
    Progressive Thinking
    Excerpt:
    Whole categories of discourse are now being outlawed in the West. At least two celebrities are fighting this trend, probably because they lead active lives of the mind. One of them is Mr. Bean.
    Blackadder star Rowan Atkinson has launched a comedians’ campaign against a government bill to outlaw inciting religious hatred. … Mr Atkinson told a meeting at the House of Commons on Monday night there are “quite a few sketches” he has performed which would come into conflict with the proposed law.
    He added: “To criticise a person for their race is manifestly irrational and ridiculous but to criticise their religion, that is a right. That is a freedom. The freedom to criticise ideas, any ideas – even if they are sincerely held beliefs – is one of the fundamental freedoms of society.”
    The other is Michael Crichton. At a speech entitled “Fear, Complexity, Environmental Management in the 21st Century” that he gave before Washington Center for Complexity and Public Policy, Crichton described one the major unrecognized dangers stalking the world: bad information. Crichton meticulously showed how grossly hysterical coverage of Chernobyl reactor incident, for example, caused deaths far more numerous than the incident itself. He went on to trace the history of public policy fads, Global Cooling, the predicted Y2K meltdown, the Population Bomb, Electromagnetic Fields and so on, and shows how we have nearly forgotten them in our rush to replace them with new ones. We live once again, in Carl Sagan’s phrase, in a demon-haunted world.
    Commentary
    It has been observed that Marxism was itself a religion. It had its martyrs, processions, ritual flagellations, paradises; and other things besides, though they went by other names: but chiefly it had its Inquisitions — the Great Purges, the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution — which consumed millions. It is ironic that the single greatest imperative of its ideological heirs is the urge to persecution. At heart political correctness is the rejection of the scientific method. Truth is measured by conformity to the unholy writ. What is the essential difference between these two reactions to blasphemy? >>> more
    http://www.fallbackbelmont.blogspot.com/

  24. Good lord, the Black Adder speaks out. Actually, he does have a point. It is one thing to speak and spread hatred and violence about a religion but to poke fun is the oldest form of humour, al be it crude.
    What’s next, banning Benny Hill because the transgendered crossdressing folks have a problem? Or possibly the Gay Lunberjack’s Union and Movement (GLUM)?

  25. Personally, I like “Chimpy McBushitler” – has more flow than other permutations.
    EPW

  26. Backhoe,
    I agree. While disputes over territory are all part of the Great Game, I sense this one has Harper and the White House exchanging a couple of sly winks.
    If true, it suggests our two countries are about to return to a mature and constructive relationship. One hopes anyway.

  27. There’s more to this than meets the eye. What it is, I don’t know. I am far too dense to absorb the entire play so quickly. But, it has deep roots. Remember, this deal goes back to the 70’s when Soviet missile subs used to routinely patrol Canadian Arctic waters. Trudeau’s Soviet sycophants would shrug, and the Canadian intelligentsia would proclaim American protestations as so much saber rattling connected to the idea that the Yanks just wanted to use the Northwest Passage to move Alaskan oil to market. Remember the “Manhattan”? The Manhattan was a deliberate CIA maneouver meant to stir some nationalism and shame the Canadian government into dealing with foreign incursions into our territorial waters. Bizarrely, the very people who were nonchalant at the thought of Soviet boomers with missiles aimed at Mississauga and Saaskatoon, were full of high dudgeon at a an empty American-American!-super tanker wandering around in the same area. I’m purely speculating, but I’d bet that Russian missile subs have been caught sneaking around up there again, and the Americans have pointed out to the PMSH, as they probably did PMPM, that fact, and that if we did not deal with it, they might be forced to sink one of those subs. Rash afterthought. Chinese sub? That makes the picture somewhat clearer. Oy vey! The mind boggles.

  28. Thomas Walkom of the Star (good grief) gets most of the issues right: “Harper’s Arctic stand makes for grand politics”, Jan, 29:
    http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1138404334055&call_pageid=968332188774&col=968350116467
    Excerpts:
    “…
    The United States, as well as Japan and the European Union, insist that the ice-choked passage, which winds through the archipelago of the Canadian Arctic to link the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, is an international waterway…
    …Harper has promised to build three icebreakers and station them at a brand-new, year-round naval base in Iqaluit on Baffin Island.
    He’s also promised to set up a system of underwater listening posts to detect foreign submarines and warships travelling through the Canadian Arctic…
    If his underwater sensors detect a U.S. submarine skulking along the coast of Ellesmere Island, would he have the Canadian Forces drop depth charges?..
    Unfortunately, for Canada, the U.S. has the better legal argument here. Other key maritime routes that pass through sovereign territory, such as Indonesia’s Strait of Sunda, are treated as international waterways. Why not the Northwest Passage?
    Perhaps even more important, though, are the simmering issues of resource ownership in the Arctic, as Canada, Denmark, Russia and the U.S. vie with one another for the right to exploit undersea oil and gas deposits.
    The hottest of these is a boundary dispute in the oil-rich Beaufort Sea of the Western Arctic that pits Canada against the U.S. Is Harper willing to go to the mat with George W. Bush over the Beaufort? Could he do so, even if he wished?
    Still, it’s all grand politics. Canadians � even those who have never travelled north of Bloor St. � maintain a sentimental attachment to the Arctic. Nothing gets the blood stirring more than the idea of nefarious Yankees trampling all over this particular national icon…”
    Comments: Icebreakers do not hunt subs. In any case Canada’s icebreakers are operated by the unarmed, civilian, Coast Guard. Do the Conservatives really plan to have the Navy operate a new type of ship with which it has no experience? Just imagine how long that will take.
    U.S., British, French and Russian subs have been operating in our Arctic waters for decades. Why the sudden upset?
    As Walkom points out, the issue of the Arctic waterways is not a Canada/U.S. issue; it is a Canada/rest the developed world issue.
    And the issue (as Walkom does not clearly point out), contrary to any number of media headlines, is not “Arctic sovereignty”–which implies the whole shebang including land. No one, other than the Danes at Hans Island, is disputing Canada’s sovereignty over land in the Arctic. It’s the maritime passages and boundaries, stupid.
    Mark
    Ottawa

  29. Maz2,
    I’m all with Mr. Bean’s (and others) efforts in opposing the religon gag rule. The whole idea is idiotic and odious and I hope it doesn’t become law.
    I don’t understand how you can put Mr. Crichton’s efforts in the same boat. Noone is proposing a law that would make criticing a certain scientific viewpoint illegal.
    You do have scientists critiscing global warming’s detractors. Remember we went through a similar (but hardly identical) tussle in the 1970s. There were plenty of scientists that were adamant that there was no link between smoking and cancer.
    A number of scientists working for the US government have gone public stating that they’ve been under pressure from administration officials to tone down or supress their findings and opinions on the global warming issue. If anything the political pressure to warp the scientific debate in North America is coming from the other direction.

  30. Mark,
    Catalonia is in a much different position than a region within Canada. If it seperates from Spain it will undoubtedly remain in the EU. So there’s no problem with borders, commerce, trade etc.
    The borders in North America however are a lot less porous than those in Europe. Seperation is likely to be a much bigger headache.
    And no offence to prospective seperatists here but the depth of regional feeling in Spain runs much deeper than it does here in Canada. Franco had some three hundred thousand spaniards executed after WW2. And the Catalans were among those to really get it in the neck.
    Spain is far more divided than Canada. Its only within the past fifty years that most dictionaries listed “espanol” (spanish person) as a word. During my youth I had plenty of aunts and uncles who would rail at me if I referred to them as espanol. And my family comes from Spain’s equivalent of Ontario.

  31. Jose, You didn’t state that in the 1970s the ‘tussel’ was over an expected Ice Age!! Silly Science is silly science!! Smoking and cancer are another ‘silly science’ issue – like McDonalds and fat – who gave the gument the RIGHT to tell you what to put in your mouth – ‘YOU pay the taxes, you call the tune’; unless you are too spineless to make your own decisions. Mr. Harper will give Canada a ‘presence’ in the Artic; something the Liberanos and Dippers don’t want – for some strange reason. Maybe the south fears the wealth of the North or maybe they are afraid of the intrepid people who live in the high artic, I do not know. I do know some Eskimo people and these people are not ‘push over’ types. They will never be ‘public pets’ as the Liberanos like to treat other Indian Nations’ people.
    I think Canada SHOULD patrol their own territory, I don’t know why anyone would be against it.

  32. Jose: The point of the current proposal is for Catalonia to remain within Spain–not separate–but with almost complete provincial autonomy.
    Mark
    Ottawa

  33. Jema54 – I read a lot of Scientific American and Popular Science back in the day. I can’t remember a grand public debate over an upcoming Ice Age. Maybe it was a big deal back then and we’ve all been tricked somehow into forgetting it by those scheming climatologists.
    When did the weatherman turn into the boogeyman?

  34. More for Jane Taber’s legion of fans…..
    Today on Question Period, she was asking Peter MacKay about the SSM vote and when MacKay gave the same answer we have heard for the past 2+ months, Jane’s response was “That’s news to me”.
    To see for yourself…..
    http://www.ctv.ca/news and click on the link to the video �CTV Question Period: Deputy Tory Leader MacKay�. Fast forward to the 15:24 mark.

  35. Riding of Lasalle-Emard is looking for a federal office also. Next, TO/GTA will want 50 offices; followed by all the other failed Liberals. Gag will be asking for a Senate app’t. next. G-G will want a raise in pay & new carpets. CBC will ask for 120 new antennae towers to blanket the blue Tory ridings. Echhh… It will never stop. Harper will say, No. >>>
    PEI Looks for Federal Voice in New Government
    Josh Pringle
    Sunday, January 29, 2006 8:38 PM
    Premier Pat Binns is calling on Stephen Harper to set up an office in Prime Edward Island
    All four seats on the island are held by Liberal MP’s.
    Binns made the suggestion to the Prime Minister-designate during a conversation last week.
    Binns said he is confident Harper will look after the needs of his province despite the Conservative shutout, but said the federal government still needs a presence on the Island.
    Binns also asked Harper to appoint a minister responsible for P.E.I. >>>>

  36. Sorry, but,….
    Librano$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and will cost you more $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
    Debt for years to come from Chretien/Martin Librano$ and Ad$Scamerr$$$$$$$$$$ …
    Excerpt:
    Conservatives could face a $1-billion legal penalty
    David Pugliese, CanWest News Service
    Published: Monday, January 30, 2006
    Cancelling the EH-101 contract was one of the first things Chretien did when he came to power in the fall of 1993. At the time his government paid more than $470 million in cancellation fees to scuttle the deal.
    But in 1998 the Chretien government was embarrassed when the EH-101 was once again selected by the Canadian Forces as the best chopper for its search-and-rescue operations. Fifteen of those helicopters were bought for that role. >>> http://www.rapp.org/url/?TAI8XJKU

Navigation