Librano Ralphie’s Fiscal Innovation

Well, congratulations to Ralph Goodale. In his few short months as finance minister, the innovation he has brought to the fiscal management of the Canadian treasury signal that, like the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Federal Budget is a “living document”.
After breaking new ground with the introduction of the Buzz Hargrove Paper Napkin Motel Room Amending Process, and giving the green light for nearly 6 billion in seed money for the new Department of Buying Off Ontario*, Ralph Goodale has created, with the approval of his Prime Minister, the “Government Of Canada Perpetual Liberal Re-Election Slush Fund.
Terence Corcoran in the National Post, explains;

Never Before has a Canadian government given itself such freewheeling fiscal elbow room. Certainly Don Drummond, former finance official and now chief economist at TD Financial, has never seen anything like it — a $4.5-billion slush fund that government can dip into at will. “For years government has wanted an instrument that would allow it to allocate spending without having to say what it’s for. This act will do it.”
Readers can check out this blank-cheque spending legislation below. Here’s how it works. Sometime in August, 2007, the federal government will check the final numbers from fiscal year 2005-6. If there’s more than a $2-billion surplus, that extra money above $2-billion can be spent. For example, if the surplus is $5-billion, the first $2-billion will be used to pay down debt, but the remaining $3-billion must be spent on the grab bag of unspecified areas. Same thing the following year.
As Don Drummond put it yesterday, this is the first time Ottawa has been able to “define the money before it defines the program.” The Layton list, sprawling over a dozen broad issues — environment, housing, transit, training programs, foreign aid, energy, education, aboriginal, tuition fees — is an open field. Not only are there no programs, Ottawa doesn’t even have a jurisdictional outlet for tuition fees, for example. (Oddly missing from the list is a $100-million union pension fund bailout, mentioned in earlier news leaks.)
Just to be doubly safe that the government’s ability to spend freely without parliamentary approval will be protected in future, Mr. Goodale threw in a clause giving the Cabinet power to “specify the particular purposes for which payments referred to in subsection (1) may be made and the amounts of those payments for the relevant fiscal year.”
In a brief news release, Mr. Goodale called all this “new investments” that build on the “fiscally responsible manner” Ottawa is spending money. Here’s how it works: Ottawa spends what it gets, when and how it wants, without parliamentary approval.

Librano Ralphie just taken the “lessons learned” through the experience gained in Sponsorship, and applied it to the federal budget. Simple? Simple.
Bruce Gottfred has more.

7 Replies to “Librano Ralphie’s Fiscal Innovation”

  1. You know I wake up in the morning realize I live in Canada and think well at least it can’t get worse, I can put off emmigrating for a little while.
    It always can get worse, a lot! How is that? Will it ever get better?
    And the people of Ontario will take their prozak, say that sounds nice lets vote for them again.
    I need to start a bank for liberal voters. Yes Mr Liberano, your balance does seem to be a few thousand dollars less than last month and there are no transactions to indicate where the money went. However don’t go to the Credit Union across the road they are scary.
    duh, ok I’ll keep voting Liberano.

  2. Surplus? Surplus??!?!! What is the government doing with a surplus? The government shouldn’t be collecting any more in tax revenue than it needs. Why are you not all screaming for a reduction in taxes?
    I grew up in Alberta (a million years ago) and cannot fathom the complacency Canadians have developed towards their government. Although it does make me even more grateful that I jumped ship and joined the other side!

  3. This is from the people who say we can never afford a tax cut.Yet they can afford a $4.5bil slush fund.

  4. Isn’t the whole problem with all of these scandals that the Liberals do not have enough checks and balances to keep them honest?
    If so (and we all know that it is so) then how is creating another unaccountable slush fund going to keep them less dishonest than they are now?
    For that matter, there are the “trust funds” with some 7 or so BILLION dollars in it that is beyond the authority of parliament and the AG.
    Why are the press (who spent years hounding Mulroney even after he left office) so uncurious about all these things? Why is there so little investigative journalism these days? Why are questions raised by the AG, opposition parties, the Blogs and others not deemed worthy of a follow-up by these supposed protectors of the truth, the defenders of the public’s right to know?
    I’m going to write a post on my own blog on this when I get the time.
    I swear to God that the press are an even bigger threat to our civilization than even the Liberals are because they are the enablers, the kingmakers (the first Duke of Warwick – nicknamed the Kingmaker during the English Wars of the Roses – is what I named my blog after.)
    http://warwicknews.blogspot.com/

Navigation