26 Replies to “Pedophile Lives Matter”

  1. Good for the Irish, there is still some sanity left. Antifa terrorists should be treated as such.

  2. It was very difficult to hear what the man was saying through all of that. The last thing he said was, “be careful to choose the hill to die on.”

    I think if it was fair for Antifa to destroy and steal the equipment that Andy Gno had in Portland, then it is fair to destroy that sound equipment.

  3. Pedophilia is the next one to be legalized, likely in Michelle Obama’s second term.

    1. Why wouldn’t it be? It’s only about “Love” … right? That’s what “the gays” said about their “marriage”. I am certain Pedophiles are simply wanting to “love” their prey. And will show that “love” in every manner imaginable. Who are YOU (or the State) to define or deny “love” … right?

      Or … gay “love” … was just a slogan, just a sales pitch. Because who can be against love, right?

      1. The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is poisonous and powerful. Much like male gays in the ’70s, it’s well or self employed, very intelligent men. They have a plan. I started thinking way back in the ’70s that the gays would become mainstreamed first, as they ultimately were. Living in San Francisco back then, you had to be there to believe the shenanigans.
        Next, it will probably be polygamy. That paves the way for the caliphate, forget the Mormons. Then, maybe NAMBLA. But, I’m thinking Islam conquers the world and gays and pedophiles go back underground. It will be interesting to watch, but not the movie I was expecting at this stage of the game. Wish I’d been born 50 years earlier. Honest to dog.

    2. Sad as it is to say, given recent trends and the bullshit that’s been mainstreamed, I have to agree it’s not too far off.

    1. Ireland and Scotland along with the UK drank the social justice kool-aid long ago. I was surprised to see this retaliation.

  4. Everything is falling in its place. Antifa protests anti pedophilia events, so they are against anti pedo’s, that makes them … . What a bunch of … bad people.

    Good to see that in Ireland there is some sanity left.

  5. Antifa was badly outnumbered, and they went after a mob of middle-aged Irish already predisposed to be angry due to the topic. They brought a sheet and a loudspeaker to a street fight. Look at how quickly the whole thing ended once people actually fought back.

  6. Next time they should stick shillelaghs up their Antifa arses and bugger em to hell.

  7. I’m in agreement with the attempt to legalize pedophilia as the next “Hill to die on”, I’m not at all religious, but there is real evil out there, and this just proves that Sodom & Gomorrah is almost completely rebuilt, and fully functioning again. Of course, not being religious means I don’t expect a God to destroy it either. There again, Western civilization is destroying itself anyway, and that evil work is almost completed!

    1. Civilizations do that. Read Glubb’s The Fate of Empires. It’s our time.

      I’m not saying give up. I say understand what’s going on in your time, and realise whether you are being called to build something new (pioneer), to maintain what was bequeathed to you (conserve) or to preserve seeds for the future (survive.)

  8. Good for the Irish here. Typically, it is the conservative street demonstrators who are outnumbered 10-15 to one. Here, in this rare case, the reverse is true.

    1. There is a reason we refer to the “Fighting Irish”.
      And I must confess that I took unseemly pleasure watching that swift justice. The wheels of regular justice may grind slowly, but apparently street justice has a turbo mode.

  9. Now if more Americans responded like that to ANTIFA there would be a lot less of them run around. Yes call police but then it takes time for police to arrive.

    1. In major blue cities, the police are in league with the Marxists and stand around and allow antifa to beat conservatives to the ground with bike locks, or rat pack small, gay Asian men and kick them repeatedly in the head. What are we supposed to do in the absence of the rule of law?
      To maintain some sanity through all this, I think of antifa vandalizing and burning private property of people who voted for Hillary, because that’s exactly what they did in all the major metros. Should we stand our ground in areas that have been lost for decades? I don’t see how to take them back.
      Where I live at least right now, I can wear a Sabo Trump shirt or even a MAGA hat without fear of physical retribution. There are Trump 2020 signs dotted everywhere and some streets with three and four Trump signs in a row. Down the coast about ten miles at a house where I’m trying to park my parents, I don’t put out Trump signs because they’ll get taken by one of the many and mindless potheads who inhabit the village.
      For now, I’ll support what we have here.

  10. I’m trying to figure out what Antifa were thinking. Are they for pedophilia? Or where they just trying to disrupt for the sake of disrupting?

    And why on earth did they think they were tougher than a crowd 50 times more than they were?

    1. Why is it always fat, white gals with tats? The two hit by the black guy on the freeway in Seattle. Same thing. There’s a thesis in there somewhere.

  11. They are just trying to disrupt for the sake of disrupting. They see all the fun happening in the U.S.A. and are jealous, they want to wreck stuff and get on the news, too.

  12. We should know by now, it never stops if you never say no. Just like how little kids learn to be brats.
    “What two consenting adults do in the privacy of our own bedroom is no one else’s business.” It sounded so right most people thought they could support that.
    But from that we got gay pride parades and drag queen library reading hours, surely not “behind lock doors in their own bedrooms.”
    And from that we get “trans” getting into girls’ locker rooms and women’s prisons, as well as competing in women’s events.
    And the next step obviously is legalizing pedophilia.
    And after that, what, let them do it in public? Incest? Throuples? And if they get all that, marriages between a man and a ewe, or a woman and a dog?
    If you keep giving, or worse yet, let them have the moral high ground to claim they are inclusive while you are denying them their civil rights, it will never end until they have complete licentiousness and breakdown of morals.
    We have to go way back and insist that marriage is between a man and a woman, as it has been for the entire history of civilization, anywhere. Then we don’t have to have special laws protecting those churches who refuse to perform a “marriage” between two people of the same sex. (Aside: I bet no civil authority would dare to sue any mosque for the refusal.) We can define civil union for those who find it advantageous to live together, sexually … or asexually. Two men for whatever reason. Two women for whatever reason. It can be a widowed mother and a son. It can be two widowed sisters. Why should the state be put in a position to sanctify a homosexual relationship, and charge two men with tax fraud if they “got married” for tax purposes but are not really having so-called “sex”? What did they say when all this got started? Wasn’t it “what two consenting adults do in the privacy of our own bedroom is no one else’s business” ? Shouldn’t that “what” include absolutely nothing at all? Ha!

Navigation