“Dear Judge Sullivan”

This is quite the thread. It may be pulled straight from the ass unmitigated BS, but — it’s still quite the thread.

Here is what set it off.

14 Replies to ““Dear Judge Sullivan””

  1. This, if you have any experience with the Sullivans of the world is typical. He’s protecting an enterprise. It’s his first order of business.

    1. Here’s the conclusion of the Thread which was cut off including this gem…

      **You hid it so well, you had a lot of help, but you definitely hid it well.
      Laundering money through dead people’s names, your “incident” at Howard University, at least she was over 18, the other incident at that party. I can see where your son’s get it. And on and on.**

      https://twitter.com/Johnheretohelp/status/1261480166905298952

    2. Yes, in fact this reads like a fine democratic resume, something that surely puts one ahead of the pack for selection to key positions.

      This list is specific, has many easily verifiable facts that any competent journalist could pick up and follow. Are there any left that will do so?

      The left should be careful, while both sides have their dirty players, the left has the true degenerates and they simply have not seen very many curious journalists running around digging things up while for years conservatives have their teenage fart years brought forth as reason for execution. There is very little new garbage that can be made up for the right, for the left however the pit of hideous secrets is very, very deep

  2. The long thread is (may be) fireworks that light the sky; but the “Here is what set it off” tweet and the transcript of Sullivan’s remarks is dynamite by itself.

    In any other court, that the prosecution could not produce the seminal document would be automatic dismissal of the charges AND a spanking for the prosecution counsel…

  3. Just like with the “Chief Justice”, there’s something going on in the background with this character. Roberts had statements and opinions right up until the day of the ruling on Obamacare that indicated he was in opposition to it all. Then, day of, an obviously hastily-written ruling that supported it all? Yeah, someone got to him over something.

    Sullivan got the message Obama sent with his “leaked” call, and then responded like one of Pavlov’s dogs. Obama said “perjury”, and the loyal little freak parroted “perjury”, which was never anything that Flynn was accused of.

    Flynn knows something or would do something that terrifies them all. What that might be, I’ve no idea, but the fact is, they’re pulling out all the stops to get at him and discredit him. There has to be a reason beyond mere dislike and a desire to screw Flynn, or the risk wouldn’t be worth it to anyone that was sane enough to to the risk/benefit equations.

    There’s something out there, something that Flynn knows or could do, that flatly terrifies a lot of people in the Obama camp. What the hell is it?

  4. All the way to election day,each festering sore shall see the light of day.
    By November 3rd it will be “Who you gonna’ believe?
    Us experts ate the Fake Newz Industry?
    Or these damn documents proving we are liars intent on sedition and treason.?
    Obama will look good in Orange and Hillary?
    She is a natural for an orange pantsuit,the new fashion for all trendy Liberals.
    Actually if enough Liberals are locked up at Guantanamo Bay,will it get its own representation in Congress?

  5. Yes, O’Butthole’s TREASON, was a change the narrative signal, as lying to the FBI had lost it’s steam!

  6. Wish I could say I was surprised, but in the last several years I have come to expect that this is how the back wings of government are run.

    I am really not sure what the remedy is, but there is far too much power concentrated in those that truly do rule over us. Most western civilizations are not run by a government “of and for the people”. We are slaves in their games.

  7. Prosecutor: Sorry Judge, We lost the murder weapon and the ballistic report, but you can trust us, we know that b******* did it.

    Defense Attorney: There is no evidence. This is a travesty.

    Judge: I rule that the defense has no evidence. The Defense admits they do not have the murder weapon or the ballistic report. I have no reason to doubt the unsupported word of those fine upstanding prosecutors. They have only lied to me three or four times before on this case.

    Besides, that B******* obviously did it!

  8. Here is the thread reader.

    https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1261480070683688967.html

    The accusations are explosive. There is also a lot of innuendo and naming of other unsavory characters and unsavory crimes. Too bad there isn’t a lot of firm, verifiable evidence like actual dates, names, locations, etc. Quite frankly, it sounds a lot like the more farcical and unhinged attacks against President Trump and Associate Justice Kavanaugh in the past.

    It would take real verifiable evidence like at least one or two police, fire, or medical reports, arrest records, recordings and the like to make me believe it. How about a photo of the problem art in his office? One item that is true?

  9. If any of this were true, there would be evidence. Show us some evidence.
    I think this is a send-up. Twitter is open to the teeming millions, including would-be wits and the mentally ill.

Navigation