I, Napoleon

The Tribunal finally caves to the pressure.

(Sorry, old paste code. fixed. I’ve removed the off topic comments to keep the thread clear.)

Keep clearing the minefield, folks.

45 Replies to “I, Napoleon”

  1. Wrong link, Kate.

    I take it that ladies are no longer required to wax balls if they belong to a “woman.” Yay. A tiny victory in a sea of fail.

      1. AS do I…Fabulous news.

        I would comment that in an independant WEST, HRC’s would not EXIST -PERIOD.

    1. INSANITY….so it seems in that Jurisdiction.
      Parental Rights do NOT Exist..?
      Wow….unreal and likely coming (or already here methinks), to Canada soon given this precedent.

      The Western Hemisphere is Fkd up Beyond all reason – Theres a reason.

    2. Poor kid actually think’s he’ll become a real girl. Activists have told him he can be a girl or a boy, his choice, so he believes them, doesn’t understand that he’ll be a eunuch. Guaranteed they didn’t tell him that. Massive lawsuit in his future.

      1. Kid by all accounts does NOT think that; the first thing he did when he went to visit his dad unsupervised was to dress as a boy.

  2. not the wrong thread, just the wrong society and people. those who fought and died for freedom did so in vain.

  3. Good news, but why did it take so long and why did the tribunal even consider it in the first place?

    1. Bingo. With a micro grain of common sense the file should never have been opened. That said, these tribunals are loathe to refuse any file, mainly because there aren’t nearly enough (if any) genuine cases of human rights abuses in modern Canadian society.

      These tribunals were meant for instances of HARD RACISM like say refusing to rent to a person of colour because of his colour.

      1. “HARD RACISM like say refusing to rent to a person of colour because of his colour.”

        Which should be perfectly legal due to actual human rights like property rights and freedom of association.

    2. Cycler

      Precisely…but then from an organization that declared Truth is no defense, not admissable and doesnt count..?
      WTF can ya expect..?

  4. Better late than never. Still, those dragged in front of the illegitimate kangaroo courts deserve compensation for the mere fact of being subjected to this Kafkaesque process. I am choosing my words carefully. They caved in on this one, expect them to comeback with vengeance, given the recent election they will extra empowered.

    1. Kafkaesque? More like Orwellian. (same thing?)

      Check out these bits from the decision. pun intended.
      In seeking the removal of hair from her scrotum

      Likewise, I accept that service providers advertising a “brazilian” wax are referring to the removal of genital hair from a person with a vulva.

      they intended to only provide their services to “women” – a term they define to mean persons with a vulva.

      First, a scrotum is different than a vulva – regardless of the gender of the person it is attached to.

      For example, a person who customarily waxes vulvas cannot discriminate amongst their clients with vulvas

      Canadian tax dollars at work.
      https://www.jccf.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/222_Yaniv_v_Various_Waxing_Salons_No_2_2019_BCHRT_222.pdf
      (link is not on Canlii yet.)

      1. Flipping catburgers … it gets worse:
        Ms. Yaniv then asked whether Ms. Benipal would provide the service while she was on her period, pressing her to agree to work around the string of a tampon. While I found her to be evasive on this issue, Ms. Yaniv acknowledged that she was not menstruating and would not have required Ms. Benipal to work around a tampon.

        1. And here is where the kangaroo court very clearly says that Yaniv was justified, overall.
          I accept that Ms. Yaniv is partly motivated by her desire to fight what she perceives as pervasive discrimination against transgender women in the beauty industry. In that sense, her motives do align with Code’s purposes of eradicating discrimination and providing victims of discrimination with a means of redress. Further, if not for this application, I would likely have concluded that at least one of Ms. Yaniv’s complaints about arm and leg waxing was justified.

          1. Unbelievably creepy. Thanks for donning the hazmat suit and exposing yourself to the other side of the looking glass. Does anyone know — what is the basis in law that gives ‘the waxers’ a defense? As I understand the human rights involved, anyone can be any gender they want, and the choice is wide, and it has nothing to do with your equipment. Does this exempt a group of practitioners because ‘the woman’ whose ‘presentation’ the ‘waxers’ are legally required to respect isn’t a biological woman? Can someone give us the legal logic involved in that?

        2. Yaniv is simply one Sick Perverted MoFo…with luck some Asian Driver will run him over on some busy Surrey Hiway.

          One can only hope…no.?

      2. Yaniv was not charged enough for costs at all. The victims and lawyers should have been paid well. The decision-maker also forgot about us, the public, and our costs for the kangaroo court. The award should have been upwards of several million, which are the actual costs.

        We desperately need to shut down these HRCs and people like Yaniv should be made to take cases to a real court.

  5. And how on earth is a professional sexual pervert supposed to cough up all that money? Oh, yeah……..$oro$.

  6. See, you horrid haters !
    This crazy, corrupted, quasi-judicial, money sucking gong show works !

  7. One of the reasons why we shouldn’t have these legalised vendetta systems in place is so that would-be molesters like Yaniv can’t get away with their wickedness.

  8. Small victory? Maybe. Lucky for the waxers in question, they were visible minorities and the plaintiff was an obnoxious sh** disturber. had the businesses been lily white we may very well have witnessed a different outcome.
    Reminds me of a case some years ago of a Toronto lesbian filing a human rights complaint against a Muslim barbershop for refusing her a haircut.
    I distinctly remember thinking…”Hmmmm…now this should be really interesting”. Well it wasn’t – both parties came to a so called “understanding” with the HRTO acting as mediator, both signed “confidentiality agreements” and the matter was resolved never to be heard from again. Yup, just like that.
    Funny how that works.

  9. This pervert was able to convince the Township of Langley to allow a topless swim session ,probably so “he” could oogle young kids.

    1. Definitely a “he”. Call it like it is. If he has the surgery he’ll become an “it”, although still a biological “he”. We call a steer or gelding “he”. He can never become a “she”.

  10. *
    anybody else getting tired of this
    50 shades of gay argle-bargle?

    i’m imagining the world wakes up
    one day, shakes its collective head
    and wonders what the freak that
    was all about.

    *

  11. Finally! A dog that wags it’s tail. In Canada’s Human Rights Tribunals that’s as rare as a Tasmanian Tiger sighting.

  12. That one person, one person on this planet is required to go through life with harry balls is a social justice disgrace. A harry balled individual in the wilderness humiliated and left for nothing. Oh the humanity, the affront to all that is holy and pure. Perhaps Justine can appoint him to a commission to study the long term issues associated with harry balls.

    1. Wax treatment on the scrotum. That must hurt. Too bad they didn’t carry out her wishes just to have the pleasure of inflicting a huge amount of pain. It would serve as a deterrent.

    1. Never. You find the most conservative people you can and appoint them. Let them tell the rent seekers that the free ride is over and any case they want to present has to have merit, and will require them to post a bond that is forfeit if the complaint is found to be in bad faith. Then let them make some good common sense rulings and the crying “progs” will find something else to cry about.

  13. They should have said sure drop your drawers then cauterized him with a hot branding iron. Dance freak dance.

  14. No need for pressure. The facts of the case do the job:

    // IN A SCATHING RULING B.C. Human Rights Tribunal member Devyn Cousineau found that Jessica Yaniv had been repeatedly deceptive, and had sought to target small businesses for financial gain “or to punish certain ethnic groups which she perceives as hostile to the rights of LGBTQ+ people.”
    The ruling involves seven cases that were consolidated into one … //
    https://globalnews.ca/news/6068486/transgender-woman-genital-waxing-discrimination-tribunal/

    ruling:
    https://www.jccf.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/222_Yaniv_v_Various_Waxing_Salons_No_2_2019_BCHRT_222.pdf

  15. “Our services are designed for internal genitalia. Should you choose to accept our services, note that we treat all women the same, with a hot max treatment that will cause permanent damage (up to and including loss of function) on non-internal genitalia. All women are equal here. If you demand a different treatment, then you are saying you are not a woman and are forfeiting your deposit with us.”

    or, alternately, “All women we treat have internal genitalia. If you do not have them now, my husband and his brothers will ensure you do before the end of the session.”

  16. I know of a waxer in Britain prepared to do the job for free, using the wax normally used for women. Apparently it is likely to damage thin skin, such as that in the scrotum.

  17. Barry, I read a brief analysis that said the shops refusal was upheld primarily because they proved they were only trained or experienced in waxing actual female bodies, not fake females like this delusional creature. It’s a very minor victory since the HRC still affirmed the idea that gender has nothing to do with biology. I wouldn’t be surprised to see waxing establishments required to train workers and serve both sexes in the interest of ‘human rights’

    1. Yeah, I noticed that too. Way too small……a mere token.

      60 pages of BS and over a year in the making. What nonsense. Don’t know Canadian laws but in the US this conclusion would support massive “pain & suffering” award.

  18. yeeeeeHAAAAAA !!!!!
    note the ‘Ms’ part.
    also note the award 2 grand EACH to the targets of ‘ms’ yanov.
    kinda ‘sends a message’ too eh?
    but ya, essentially only a moral victory. maybe the ones severely affected will use the 2 grand to resume their businesses.

Navigation