Not Waiting For The Asteroid

It’s almost as though the public stopped buying what they’re selling.

An “as I was just saying” update.

And this aged well.

Response of the day.

32 Replies to “Not Waiting For The Asteroid”

  1. I know a model they can use…..start telling the truth….whooo…hang on…that won’t work…

    1. If you’re going to ask them to use skill sets they don’t have, why not just tell them to become accountants?

  2. The role of the media was always to sell soap flakes and whatever ideology the local globalists were selling, not print the truth.

    Now that both soap flake manufacturers and globalists can pay for bots to hype their products on social media, nobody at all needs the MSM any more.

  3. Great.
    Except here in Canada where the government will subsidize these liars,just as long as their narrative serves the ruling party.

    Truly oblivious efeet elites,the taxpayer stops buying what the media guild is selling.
    The political solution,ban their competition and pay these losers to serve up heaping more of what no one buys anymore..
    I suppose it makes sense in the mutual admiration circles of media and parasite, naturally they will act surprised when we consider them to be one and the same.

    1. Trudeau’s buying off of the private sector clones of the CBC to ensure they parrot the institutional leftist narratives more like the CBC and “better” tow the LPC line will not bring them any more customers. In Canada we have the institutional left masquerading as media plus a handful of renegade journalists in Sun, NP, and talk radio with the only independent media being the Rebel, plus blogs. If you want watermelon journalism, the market is still over-saturated with lots of room for further cuts and closures. I’m looking forward to their well deserved and continuing decline.

  4. Even the news sites that I trust, I don’t. Breitbart in particular smothers their site in Fake News Ads and the most low-brow dishonest Click-bait. From the old ‘Remember this sex symbol? You won’t believe how he/she looks today!'(like no one has ever heard of aging), to intentionally false claims that a certain living celeb is dead. Not to mention the now 6 or so different managers specifically at my tiny local casino that want to show me the secret of success. Today, I got treated to one exclaiming that Don Cherry’s sidekick, Ron Maclean, had been convicted for 15 yrs for ‘whatever’ and subsequently fired. An outright lie that BB seemingly has no problem mingling in with it’s real headlines. How could I possibly not be left thinking… ‘So what other ‘ethics’ are BB willing to bend for a little cash in their pocket?’

    How am I to trust that a news source is respectable when it doesn’t seem to care that much of it’s ad revenue is based on sleaze and lies? For that matter, how am I to trust news outlets that release major stories with major typos…. sometimes IN THE HEADLINE ITSELF? Again, how am I to trust that these people performed due diligence in supplying me ALL the pertinent facts in a story when they apparently can’t even invest the required time to do the most basic of proof-reading? Daily, I come across an obvious typo or two from major news outlets that would make me cringe if I missed it on one of my posts.

    So, I continue to take my BB, Fox, Drudge, etc with a grain of salt…. which is still far better than the truckloads of salt required to try and digest the BS dished out by the likes of CNN, MSNBC, CBC, etc..

  5. The media industry’s current round of cuts and consolidation is accelerating. Sizable layoffs at Buzzfeed, Gannett and Verizon Media (home of AOL, Yahoo, HuffPost and others) were announced Wednesday, totaling over 1,000 jobs cut.

    They say that like it’s a bad thing?

    1. Exactly. Verizon took over Yahoo two years ago. Yahoo’s e-mail service, which was OK in the late 1990s, became horrible after Marissa Mayer took over as boss and it hasn’t improved even after she stepped down. All she ever accomplished while she was in charge was run that company into the ground.

  6. Perhaps these layoffs are by design,as it simplifies the narrative if just one person issues the “Talking Points of The Day”.
    Better to get rid of all who might confuse the narrative.

  7. …10 years of writing about gender politics (and a literal PhD in romantic comedies) under her belt, …

    No wonder she was laid off.

    1. By “belt”, we assume this he/she/it creature means a whalebone corset, commensurate with “gender studies” devoted to striking insights of what happens when beach trowel meets sandpail. (Hint: All castles, even those of squalid gender-bending nuisances, wash regularly away at 4:00 pm.)

      To carping crunch-birds such as this, “life” is a four-letter word.

    2. “Literally” laid off, you mean. A self-proclaimed “talented and lovely” journalist, literally laid off. She writes romantic comedy on Twitter. Imagine her grocery list!

    3. Maybe now she’ll have time to figure out what “literal” means. Ten years of writing sure didn’t help.

  8. The fact that this so-called “journalist” uses her “diverse” rolodex, experience in gender politics and PhD in romantic comedies, as positive selling points for her potential as a good, productive, rational employee, says it all right there.

    She is absolutely delusional if she thinks those negative liabilities, skill-sets and qualifications make her desirable in a competitive market-place. But then again, that seems to be the mindset of people of her background and experience.

  9. In the real world, 10 years of writing about gender politics (and a literal PhD in romantic comedies) under her belt qualifies her for….”Would you like fries with that?”

    1. Hey, Dirtman.

      Don’t forget to supersize that!

      Also, if you go on her link, she’s proud to have unionized during her time of employment.

      Just in case, you needed to know an additional reason for her layoff.

    2. Ten years of gender politics?

      Hire her or anyone like her, and expect a lawsuit. She will forever see everything through a filter of sexism, racism, and bigotry. Just as she was indoctrinated to do.

      1. In addition, she’ll likely turn out to be so obnoxious that nobody wants to work with her and nothing will get done while she’s on the payroll. It’ll cost her employer a pretty penny to get rid of her as she’ll file a wrongful dismissal suit if she gets the boot.

  10. Like so many talented and lovely journalists, I
    Wow, not much narcissism there, huh?
    What’s the song? “I’m so pretty…”.

  11. To improve her chances of finding a job that pays better than flipping burgers she should append the following sentence to her tweet:

    “Despite the above I’m a good lay.”

  12. Chloe Angyal’s feed has gone private. Guess she just needs some quiet time.
    And isn’t “Chloe Angyal” THE perfect porn actress name.

Navigation