53 Replies to “All Together Now”

    1. ha, you watched Corbett’s video about K. Chuck…numbered boiled eggs, bath drawn to exact temperature, shoelaces ironed….he sounds more like a queen than a king

      1. I suppose there’s a left-shoelace ironer and a right-shoelace ironer.

        It’s a 7-year apprenticeship before you’re allowed to iron a left-shoelace unassisted. If you want to do the right shoelace, that’ll be another 7-year apprenticeship.

        You don’t want to know how many years it takes before you’re qualified to wipe the Royal Bum.

        1. how many years it takes before you’re qualified to wipe the Royal Bum

          ah, the Groom of the Stool; a coveted and powerful royal appointment.

          And yes, it really does refer to that stool.

  1. The Queen, the only Monarch most in the UK ever knew, was about as good a Constitutional Monarch as could ever be hoped for. Now, with the crowning of King Doofus McJugEars, the subjects of the UK are about to find out why the citizens of the US rebelled.

    1. DB – Chuckie, you know, Diana Spencer’s ex-husband. My favorite Charles story was told right after Diana died from car-pole-tunnel syndrome. He was walking near his country estate and a neighbor said “morning!”. To which he replied, “No no, just walking the dog “.

  2. Is the rumour true, that Blackie bowed thinking they were talking about him?

    1. You’d think that this gathering would be such a high value targets with anyone with any REAL BAD weapons of mass destruction.
      Certainly would clean house for many countries who’ve been corrupted by hazardous economic policies inherent with terrible economic decisions including the former Queen buying into the going green scam.

      1. Why would any country target the attendees? They’re doing a splendid job of destroying their countries.

  3. 70 years since the previous coronation. The good news is “It won’t be 70 years until the next coronation”! Not a monarchist and would be very happy if Alberta became an independent republic. Yes Saskatchewan and northern BC can joing if they want. Ok maybe Manitoba too and if some of Northern Ontario and the NWT/Yukon….

    1. northern BC can join. Ok maybe Manitoba too and if some of Northern Ontario and the NWT/Yukon

      Now you’re talking…then we’d have access to Pacific, Hudson’s Bay, and access to Atlantic via a Great Lake. But we’d also be a larger land mass than the country we’d be leaving, so if you want to test just how “passive” the urban zombies of Montreal and Toronto are, I dare you to try it. They’d be begging the US to drop a couple nukes on some prairie cities!

      1. We’ll have to set the Lower Moonland adrift. Chinese anyhow, so couldn’t care less. We may have to abandon the odd pipeline but the better ports are further north.

        1. If we (AB & Sask. as I don’t care about the outlying areas mentioned above) have to abandon pipelines to the coast and hear the song of idiocy that “we’ll be landlocked” … then tier 2 Old Canada has lost easy access to the Pacific coast.
          Citizens here will be actively accosting trucks, trains, travellers though AB/Sask carrying anything from Old Canada’s colonial masters in China and headed towards Old Canada.

          90% of the imbeciles I argue with who advocate for AB/Sask. not being “allowed” to separate use their “best argument” first when they say, “you’ll be landlocked” and this always ends poorly for them.
          I doubt Quebec will be receiving their shitty Chinese made gear via the Pacific coast until they allow a pipeline to the Atlantic provinces as well. Unless they’re going to fly it over, good luck with that.

          AB/Sask. should be a republic, and rid of the foreign crown of inbreds forever. Liz 2 was ok, but the future looks like the inbreds have taken a turn…

          1. We’re on the same team, Marc. We have a wonderful opportunity to advance in about 3 weeks.
            Unless of course, the media gets their way and Wretched Wrach IA back in the driver’s seat.

          2. A 1 dollar per tonne tariff on trains passing through Alberta would kill the port of Vancouver.

    2. I understand your sentiments but wonder about our facsimile of property rights should the Crown be disavowed in Canada. Currently I have a deed and Crown Patent on my farm. Perhaps in a legal manner the Crown still ‘owns’ the land? GOD help us if the PM of Canada became the Sovereign of the Land. I must admit it is all very confusing. I miss Elizabeth Regina 2

      1. My great grandfather had the same thing on his land. Then the city of Edmonton wanted it, and apparently can override the signature of Queen Victoria. It is now Millwoods. Great grandpa got about 1% of the actual value of the land, ripped off for millions.

  4. I guess in a little while we’re going to see that climate change nutter’s mug on our money.

    1. Before Elizabeth’s death I started a little song. God Save the Queen, Save her from all ill, I never want to see Charles on my twenty dollar bill. Alas. Instead I moved the the US.

      1. He makes me want to upchuck! His mother stalked this day as long as she could.

    1. God might save it.
      Which God remains in doubt.
      Me?
      Ain’t going to lift a finger.
      Dear Charles has dug his own pit..
      Damn shame,according to my mother in law,this will end the longest running soap opera in British History.
      All that will be left is Coronation Street.
      This monarchial Farce is another boom to western Canada.
      The new country will also need a new currency.
      For digital banking steals freedom and cash,with that A-Holes face on it,will be problematic.

  5. JugEars will give the chattering class something to talk about for a day or two. They’ve been out of sorts lately, what their orders to not discuss Covid anymore, and the focus turning to climate doom, poor little addicts using “toxic street drugs” and whales whales whales.
    The chattering class of talking heads. Orwell warned us.

  6. No one in the U.S. cares about these inbred parasites called “royals”. Haven’t since 1776. Chucky is the just a particularly bad specimen, but Aunt Betty wasn’t any more useful…and don’t get me started on the camel herders calling themselves “royals” in the Middle East.

    1. No one in the U.S. cares about these inbred parasites called “royals”. Haven’t since 1776.

      If only that were true…

    2. Yeah, they’ve got more than enough inbred morons down there. Clinton’s, Bidens, etc.
      Could go on and on.

  7. The Brits crowned a tampon today … how the mighty have fallen. No wonder Britain is overrun with the Muslim horde.

  8. I have to admit, especially as a Yank, that I watched almost the whole thing. Yes, King Charles is a doofus, but you have to enjoy the video of the interior and exterior of Westminster, all the flags, all the pomp, the troops parading, the horses (right Kate?!?! 🙂 ) the flyby (pretty lame because of the low clouds), and Prince William and his beautiful family. Hopefully he won’t be such an embarrassment like his father when he becomes king.

  9. I am a monarchist because I think/believe that a constitutional monarchy is the best government going (and most government systems are fairly bad). I do hope/think that King Charles III will moderate his opinions and govern for all and that he has very good advisers and Prime Ministers (perhaps wishful thinking on my part).
    I DO find all the negative comments on this posting to be distressful. If you hate our government so much, then leave (as some of you have posted). Rebel News reports from northern France that over 91,000 illegal immigrants (that the British government knows about) have invaded the UK. On D-Day, there were 157,000 Allied forces involved with the landing. If the British system is so horrible, why do so many people want to come in to that country? I could say the same for Canada and our situation with the illegal immigration at Roxton Road and Emerson, Manitoba (at least I think that is the other crossing).
    Rather than comment negatively, why not do something positive for your neighborhood, your city, your province?
    God Save Our King!

    1. God save your King … just NOT THIS KING. It appears as though England has a long rich History of just that … eliminating defective Kings. Let’s hope God pulls the plug on this one … at least faster than the Bidinh plugs is getting pulled.

    2. Just to add a little history, both Charles I and Charles II were defeated in the English Civil Wars. Hopefully Charles III has learned something from his royal namesakes fate. King Charles (plural) plus authoritarian, elitist attitudes equal rebellion.

    3. Chuckles is a Schwab disciple. Lift your fingers a little, and review his nutty speeches about climate change, and the bugs he wants you to eat.

      Shut up SERF and follow your orders, while Chuckles and the elite remain unaffected and continue their caviar, jet-setting ways.

      By the way, how many Fauxci ouchies did you take? It’s showing.

    4. BM
      Are you an anti free speacher? Charles is an A$$hole of the worst kind, he deserves and needs the truth said about him, and yes I’d rather say it to his face.

  10. Not a big royal family fan… I’ve always considered it to be odd, I guess is the best way to say it.
    On the other hand – People in the 21st century still having a thing for tradition isn’t exactly the end of the world either.
    So there’s that.

  11. King Chuck and his apple doll faced lady friend should pay a visit to Ireland to receive the same warm welcome his late great uncle experienced decades ago. I hear the fishing is splendid this time of year.

    1. receive the same warm welcome his late great uncle experienced

      there have been persistent rumours over the years elements within American intelligence wanted to take him out and assisted with coordinates…he had long been considered a security risk. His influence over The Firm had been a concern. The Brits had been running boy-trafficking operations in Northern Ireland for decades. Chuckie’s uncle was a known pederast.

  12. “King Charles III will hold almost no power in Canada. Yet that is the point: it’s the very powerlessness of the monarch that matters.”

    – Christopher Dummitt

    A monarchical system does have the stellar advantage of keeping the political class in their place. You just know that in their hearts they all want to be “el Presidente del Mundo”.

    1. A monarchical system does have the stellar advantage of keeping the political class in their place

      I see. And just what is “their place” that they are kept in?

      Trudeau seems quite able to do whatever he wishes with no constraints or repercussions.

      Perhaps if there was a real, accountable, and independent head of state in Canada, then the head of government could be kept in check occasionally.

  13. God save the King. We fortunately do not have a President to look up to and admire.

  14. I did notice when the various heads of governments were entering the Abbey and when Trudeau walked by holding his wife’s hand that the CBC announcers did not utter a word or even point him out like they did for a few of the others.

    1. Trudeau walked by holding his wife’s hand

      They were merely exchanging long protein strings. If you can think of a simpler way….

Navigation