Heather Mac Donald on media dishonesty:
What do you do if you are the New York Times and 20 people show up to the white-supremacist rally that you had been breathlessly billing as further proof of the normalisation of hatred in the Donald Trump era? Expand the definition of “white supremacist” to cover a large portion of the American electorate and its representatives… It turns out that if you are for “immigration restrictions,” “ending affirmative action,” or “instituting trade protections,” you have been influenced by white nationalism and are embracing “policy issues the far right has promoted.”
“Actor supremacists” have several rallies every year, and “media supremacists” show up in droves to cover these events as if they were a good thing.
Liberals are so narrow minded if you could put their brain in the edge of a razor it would look like a pea rolling down a four lane highway
If all the Nazis had done was exterminate Europe’s Jews, and her Slavs for good measure, our masters would insist that our children venerate him as a hero. It was bombing the City of London that our masters didn’t appreciate. Hitler’s job was to kill his sponsors’ competition, not them.
All this is about, at the end of the day, is the desire of our masters to expropriate and murder anybody who poses a meaningful threat to their rule and who might one day hold them accountable for their greed and depravity. That in the end is every Christian and Jew.
Our masters believe that if they blot out the Name of God, everything will be permitted, and the only remaining limits on their depravity will be their twisted imagination.
If you can stomach it, go read The 120 Days of Sodom, describing in loving detail the rape and murder fantasies of a leftist described so graphically the Marquis de Sade proved an embarrassment even to the French revolutionaries. Compared to what our current master class would like to enjoy on a Saturday night, Sade’s opus is on a level with Mother Goose.
“It was bombing the City of London that our masters didn’t appreciate.”
It was 20 years after the war until the killing of Jews became mentioned and 40 years until it became dogma.
So you are claiming that it wasn’t until 1965 that the killing of Jews were mentioned? That’s a total lie.
Auschwitz’s camp commandant Rudolf Hoess, was arrested in 1946, convicted of murder and hanged at the camp. The Diary of Anne Frank was first published, in Dutch, in 1947. The English translation was published in 1952.
There is no question the Holocaust was horrendous, monstrous, inhuman, and any other adjective you can think of. However, it was not the only example of horrendous, monstrous, and inhuman actions perpetrated by one race against another before and during WWII. The fact that it happened was not because the whole world was engaged in anti-Semitic extermination and subsequent coverup, as you imply. It was a period of insanity when many such acts happened, and the Holocaust (with its own identifiable name) is much better known than other such mass murders, such as what the Japanese perpetrated against the Chinese, or the Russians perpetrated against the Kulaks, both Ukranian and Russian.
Nope, it wasn’t the Battle of Britain, it was breaking the deal with Stalin that upset the communists around the world.
When you have no argument to make, you call names. Like soy boy, or beta, or nazi.
There are no Nazis today but there are soy boys – a lot of soy boys.
Having watched CBC this morning it was obvious that they spin everything that questions Multi-Culture as an Racial (color) Crime
..Why? What are they hiding? Could it be that Muslims are been used to cloak indigenous goals…..The Indian money machine seems to be running non-stop…They want Canada to add Multi Culture Indigenous Languages ( Not just French & English) into law
The Indian reconciliation scam was an all Indian wish list by Indians for Indians.. It has zero responsibility for the 18th century Tribal culture that ignores the murder of Indian women & Children…Celebrates Louis Riel (An educated Metis) that murdered & rebelled against Canada.. He was hung for treason after a trial., It is the Indians that MUST perform reconciliation & correction
Canada needs a “Truth & Consequences” commission for ALL other Canadians that decides how to eliminate Indian Tribal culture,
abolishes The Indian Act… Crown lands transferred to CANADIANS….NO work! No Tax! No vote… The Queen may owe the “original” Indians something, but everything has a Sunset…overdue
JMHO
I doubt the “Indian money machine” wants to see the demographic transformation, guaranteed that it will fall apart badly when Canada is changed to a foreign and less tolerant culture.
“They want Canada to add Multi Culture Indigenous Languages ( Not just French & English) into law”.
———
I wish at least ONE politician would step up and state what a STUPID notion this is.
The purpose of a language is to communicate knowledge and ideas between people. Our planet has something in the range of seven billion inhabitants.
It follows that a language spoken by a billion people is pretty darned useful.
A language spoken by a million people… somewhat useful; a thousand people… of very limited use.
At the other extreme, a language spoken by zero or one person… utterly useless. A few dozen people… next to useless.
I am aware of only one Canadian employer willing to hire people unable to wrap their minds around such a simple and obvious concept — the CBC.
How about sharia law for first nations?
Do we wear brown shirts first? Or are we going straight to the black ones?
It depends if it’s spring or fall, assuming DeMarxists are not in power of course; in that case they’re rainbow coloured.
Tim Pool had an interesting take on how to treat the media.
An activist with a byline at The Daily Beast (Chelsea Clinton sits on the board) was doing that kind of slander, so he started describing her name every time as “, who attended the DC nazi rally”.
They are going to lose the ability to talk if every time we associate them with something negative or claim that they provide a platform for something negative.
If the NY Times doesn’t call you a Nazi and/or racist you aren’t doing your bit.
The DeMarxist mediocracy seems to think pandering to their own prejudices and lazy intellectualism is their only choice.
I disagree and can opine they certainly have other choices than an all out attack on Trump, followed by a retreat to the bully barricades when he has the temerity to treat them in kind while outflanking them.
“This month marks the two-year anniversary of one of the most important articles ever written on journalism. On Aug. 7, 2016, after Donald Trump formally secured the Republican nomination and the general election was underway, New York Times media columnist James Rutenberg began with a question:”
“If you’re a working journalist and you believe that Donald J. Trump is a demagogue playing to the nation’s worst racist and nationalistic tendencies, that he cozies up to anti-American dictators and that he would be dangerous with control of the United States nuclear codes, how the heck are you supposed to cover him?”
Don’t cover him, quit, find another career where analysis and rationality are not required, because you’re not a journalist, you’re a prejudiced hack who could never inform readers on any issue while addled by your irrational ideological indisposition.
“Which is how we arrived at the latest low moment in journalism. This one involved the more than 300 newspapers (including The Post) that followed The Boston Globe and, especially his accusation that they are “the enemy of the people.”
The high-minded among the media mob insisted they were joining together to protect the First Amendment and freedom of the press. In fact, the effort looked, smelled and felt like self-interest and rank partisanship masquerading as principle.”
That leads to another “suggestion:” your credibility might be enhanced if you didn’t redress your complaint of Trump criticism of the group speak biased Trump coverage by forming a biased group speak about Trump.
I have other, more colourful suggestions, but won’t share them.
https://nypost.com/2018/08/18/the-medias-hatred-of-trump-is-only-hurting-itself/
If you are for “immigration restriction”, you are only reaffirming border integrity which any sovereign nation should maintain, and almost all do.
If you want to “end affirmative action”, you want to actually end a practice based on race.
If you want to “institute trade protections”, you are protecting American jobs. I may quibble with specifics here, but not the intent.
If the NYT calls any of those actions racist, then that term has just lost all meanings You can be for all those actions and not think members of any race tare inferior because of the race. In fact, quite the opposite, you are actually racist if you are for affirmative action