I give these broads credit for one thing: Roosh (whose real name, they note, is Daryush Valizadeh) is quite possibly the brownest, most foreign-looking guy they’ve ever picked on.
I’d also bet that many of this petition’s female signatories defended swarthy Canadian liberal heartthrob, secular Muslim, and accused serial woman-basher Jian Ghomeshi for day after embarrassing day, and that they swoon over even-swarthier Canadian liberal heartthrob, convicted Muslim terrorist, and documented woman-hater Omar Khadr.
He couldn’t have paid for better publicity: Internet searches for Roosh V have never been higher, so if Canadian liberals were attempting to silence him or drive him into obscurity, well. Lame job guys.
so do you pronounce it Roosh five like Malcolm the tenth.
I don’t know about PUA as a sport, but I tell you what, there is a lot of insight into human behavior that would help regular guys in regular relationships in the PUA literature.
And let’s not forget that RooshV has SIX titles available on amazon.com.
Like I said, he’s an Enjoy-the-Decline Millennial catering to the beat-loser-males raised in the city through public education. Boooooooring!
The Streisand Effect. It’s real, and it’s awesome!
What little I have heard from this guy … I like him … he is telling the truth. And he is entertaining.
What has happened? I attempted to supply some daily temperature data
from June, July and August to date on the alleged animal die off in
Peru and and I have been cut off. Who is moderating this site?
These SJW morons would have likely protested Jonathon Swift for his “Modest Proposal” as being a cannibal. Humourless skanks, who feel the shiv striking a bit close to the greater truths that they keep fighting to ignore.
I must say that like the rest or the country, that I was shocked when Jian Ghomeshi was implicated in this scandal. Who in their right mind could ever have predicted that an Iranian would ever treat women badly?
I’m no expert on the so called progressives and feminist men with their inner demons and weaknesses, but if they feel that listening to this guy will turn them into violent sex criminals, maybe we should take their word for it.
Maybe all it takes is a word or two to turn a meek and mild ‘progressive’ into a wild eyed rapist.
The haters effed up big time.
But they are so ignorant and so demanding their voice be heard, they don’t even realize it.
Totally clueless and they should be so embarrassed they are being used.
The haters effed up big time.
But they are so ignorant and so demanding their voice be heard, they don’t even realize it.
Totally clueless and they should be so embarrassed they are being used.
What is Roosh and why do I care?
This Roosh guy sounds arrogant and narcissistic, frankly, and I have no use for him or his views on sexual assault. He has the right to be wrong.
Unfortunately, there was an article in the Globe and Mail today by someone who doesn’t necessarily think a person has the right to be wrong:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/we-have-better-tools-than-the-law-to-defy-hate-mongers/article25929457/
“Promoting the legalization of rape on private property is, to paraphrase the Criminal Code, willfully promoting hatred against an identifiable group, namely women. That much is obvious.”
Absolute nonsense. It’s not even 1 per cent of the way there.
But on the other hand –
“Reducing men as a group to such a crude caricature is so profoundly demeaning that it qualifies as hate speech.”
This joker is trying to expand the definition of “hate speech” beyond all rational bounds, to the point where practically any routine conversation might fall foul of it. The odd thing is that the rest of the article, on what other measures can be taken in preference to legal ones, is reasonably well thought out.
To admit of any exception to free speech rights on the grounds of “hate” is to surrender free speech rights to groups that redefine words all the time.
Here is how it works, we all agree to something based on one definition of a word. They then take that agreement as given and redefine some key word until, “surprise surprise” as Gomer used to say, they have more power.
The haters effed up big time.
But they are so ignorant and so demanding their voice be heard, they don’t even realize it.
Totally clueless and they should be so embarrassed they are being used.
Nailed it Tim!
YES, Tim nailed it!
Speech is binary: free or not free. Period (no offence Megyn).
Just as pregnancy is binary: you are or you aren’t.
As I was just saying to an old friend:
So is capitalism. It permits no hybridization.
Red capitalism … isn’t.
Crony capitalism … isn’t.
Democratic capitalism … isn’t.
Come to think of it: there really isn’t any capitalism is there?
And any term beginning with compassionate …. isn’t.
And diversity …. isn’t.