Beware the UN’s Copenhagen plot
[T]here are 181 pages that make up the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change dated September 15, 2009: a rough draft of what could be signed in Copenhagen. And yet, not one member of the media or political class has bothered to inform us about its contents as an important clue to what may happen in Copenhagen. The shame of that state of affairs started to trickle in last week.
Emails started arriving telling me about a speech given by Christopher Monckton, a former adviser to Margaret Thatcher, at Bethel University in St Paul, Minnesota, on October 14. Monckton talked about something that no one has talked about in the lead-up to Copenhagen: the text of the draft Copenhagen treaty.
[…]
So I read the draft treaty. The word government appears on page 18. Monckton says: “This is the first time I’ve ever seen any transnational treaty referring to a new body to be set up under that treaty as a government. But it’s the powers that are going to be given to this entirely unelected government that are so frightening.”
Monckton became aware of the extraordinary powers to be vested in this new world government only when a friend of his found an obscure UN website and hacked his way through several layers of complications before coming across a document that isn’t even called the draft treaty. It’s called a “note by the secretariat”. The moment he saw it, he went public and said: “Look, this is an outrage … they have kept the sheer scope of this treaty quiet.”
Monckton says the aim of this new government is to have power to directly intervene in the financial, economic, tax and environmental affairs of all the nations that sign the Copenhagen treaty.
You can hear Monckton speak to the ramifications of this treaty on Youtube.
Anthony Watts has highlighted other passages, among them;
17. [[Developed [and developing] countries] [Developed and developing country Parties] [All Parties] [shall] [should]:]
(a) Compensate for damage to the LDCs’ economy and also compensate for lost opportunities, resources, lives, land and dignity, as many will become environmental refugees;
(b) Africa, in the context of environmental justice, should be equitably compensated for environmental, social and economic losses arising from the implementation of response measures.
The full text of the Copenhagen Climate Change Treaty Draft (pdf) for your weekend reading pleasure.
You might call up your MP’s, and ask if they’ve read it.
Update – Youtube is up with Monckton on Glenn Beck today 6 part series
Glenn Beck. Two n’s.
“I never would have dreamed that Copenhagen could actually be the precursor for the prophetical One World Government”
Whether it passes this time or not.
The same countries that didn’t sign Kyoto are probably not going to sign this either but that doesn’t stop them from trying.
I learned recently that the “U.S. federal reserve” bank isn’t even under the U.S. government control. It operates separate from their government and is controlled by “unknown” bankers?
That’s not even legal under U.S. constitution.
The U.S. government and they’re “We the people” constitution is just a total sham then.
set you free, I watched that Glen Beck video that was very interesting. I particularly enjoyed the Lord Moncton’s grade 4 math equation showing how man made c02 in the environment is a non-issue in the first place.
Yes – read “Money & Wealth in the New Millennium” by Norm Franz
It explains this fact about the US Federal Reserve.
“Yes – read”, sorry I failed grade 6 through 8 English classes for a reason besides I have YouTube now.
My letter to the Prime Minister —
Dear Prime Minister Harper:
I urge you not to sign the climate treaty that will be moved for adoption at the UN climate conference in Copenhagen this December. This treaty is founded on junk science and, if implemented, will seriously damage the economies of Canada and the rest of the developed world.
Despite years of searching by tax-funded organizations world-wide no one has found a human influence on climate that can be distinguished from natural influences. The planet Earth has undergone dramatic climactic swings from hot to cold and back again without any human involvement. We don’t understand what triggers ice ages and we don’t understand what triggers the warm interglacial periods. Since we don’t understand why natural variations in climate occur, how can anyone say they know how humans are influencing climate? Absent evidence to the contrary, isn’t the most likely explanation for the warming that occurred in the last two decades of the 20th Century the most obvious one — natural climate variation? Further, if carbon dioxide is the catalyst for warmer temperatures, why has the earth cooled a bit in the last decade while CO2 levels have continued to rise?
The whole “scientific” foundation for the notion of human-caused global warming is the output of computer models. Since these models failed to predict the current global cooling, why does anyone give them credence?
Yet these flawed models are the foundation of the UN’s global warming agenda. And from that agenda has emerged an economic treaty for signing in Copenhagen. That treaty calls upon Canada and other developed countries to cripple their own economies with emissions cut-backs and then to hand over money as a “climate debt” (sin tax?) payment to third world countries. All of this transfer of wealth is to be overseen by a world government-type organization with the power to penalize countries for non-compliance.
This treaty is the solution to a non-existent problem and should be rejected for that reason alone. But beyond that, it represents a loss of sovereignty over our economy if we sign on to this wealth transfer scheme. Reject this treaty, Prime Minister. It is contrary to the best interests of Canada.
What JMD said !!!
The African cleptocracy is salivating at the thought of the wealth transfer. Imagine, they no longer have to be responsible in government to develop the wealth of their countries. All they have to do is maintain power and keep their people subjugated and in poverty to receive massive amounts of money which they can channel into their personal bank accounts.
What better way to justify this wealth transfer than to keep their people poor, starving, without education and without a polluting manufacturing base. No matter that in order to survive Africans turn their environment into a wasteland that further destroys the continent. This is reverse pollution and in stead of sympathy African governments should be held responsible. These thugs and criminals run the UN and to hand them control would be the most disastrous choice we could make.
T
I challenge you to actually download and read the excerpts that have been quoted, as to the ‘one world government’, etc.
It truly is the secession of sovereignty, to a foreign entity, based upon a nefarious, dubious, and some would, outright fraudulent policy of AGW.
It would truly bankrupt the US, which would drag Canada down the tube soon after.
Would that make you feel good that an African despot is being made more dangerous and ruthless, thanks to stolen funds from the US? That is the end of result of this flawed, dangerous, and deceptive ‘treaty’.
I hope Jim Prentice or one of his aides reads SDA.
Posted by: Mark Peters at October 30, 2009 12:30 PM
Why would that matter? Prentice is the one bringing in the Green Shift and carbon tax on Canadians.
He’s the progressive that wants the social justice part in there…