Good evening, welcome to the Wednesday (EBD) edition of Late Nite Radio. Normally we select songs that are obscure, or at least not very familiar, as opposed to mass-marketed ones. I’m going to make an exception tonight; in light of the protesters who keep showing up at G.W. Bush’s Canadian speaking engagements, this one’s just too appropriate to pass up.
Here it is, then: comedian Andy Samberg, portraying a one man army of righteous political dissent, works himself into a lather with a musical denunciation of the “system” entitled I Threw It On The Ground.
Feel free to throw down your Reader Tips in the comments.
I’ll kick this one off: the transcript of Mark Steyn’s eloquent testimony at the HOC Committee looking into Section 13 is now available.
Excerpt:
“The sole charge on which Marc Lemire was found guilty a month ago was for a post that appeared at his website, written by somebody else. That piece was read by a grand total of just eight people in the whole of Canada, which works out to 0.8 of a Canadian per province, or if you include territories, 0.6153 of a Canadian. And almost all those 0.6153s of a Canadian going to this website and reading this piece were Richard Warman and his fellow dress-up Nazis at the Human Rights Commission, salivating at the prospect of having found another witch to provide more bounty.
“In other words, no one in Canada saw this post. No one in Canada read it. Nothing could be less ‘likely to expose’ anyone to hatred or contempt than an unread post at an unread website. Yet Canadian taxpayers paid for Jennifer Lynch and the Nazi fetishists at the commission to investigate this unread bit of nothing for six years.”
School kid asks if the prez was born in Hawaii. Takes about two seconds to talk about Bo. OOh look at the puppy.
http://www.freedomslighthouse.com/2009/10/obama-asked-by-school-student-if-he-was.html
Things not going so well for hope and change:
http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/10/21/poll-obama-worst-decline-in-approval-since-wwii/
The return of James O’Keefe and Hannah Giles at biggovernment… lies lies lies, get ’em while they’re hot!
http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/21/acorn-video-prostitution-scandal-in-philadelphia-pa-part-i/
at the end of this video… the teaser, to be continued.
War in Pakistan. The Bang heard around the world.
Palistan: “state of war.”
“Rehman Malik, Pakistan’s interior minister, said that Pakistan was now in what he called a state of war.”
The state of war is within Islam. Taliban Jack LaytoNDP says, Muslims killing Muslims is not fair.
Stand back and watch/listen to O’Narcissist. Watch/listen to the UNOMoon.
…-
“Pakistan shuts all schools and universities after suicide bomb in Islamabad
Taliban declare entire country is a war zone
Following the attack, Rehman Malik, Pakistan’s interior minister, said that Pakistan was now in what he called a state of war.
As ground troops pressed their offensive in South Waziristan, police in cities went on heightened alert after attacks by al-Qaeda and Taliban extremists this month left 185 people dead. Their targets included elite police commando colleges in Lahore and the army’s own general headquarters in Rawalpindi.
An education ministry spokesman said 414 schools, colleges and universities run by the federal government had been shut down. The country’s elite schools, which operate on British or American systems, are regarded as at particular risk.
“All have been closed because of security threats received in recent days.
“We are taking precautionary measures. We cannot station police at every school. We hope principals and heads of institutions will make proper security arrangements,” he added.
Hussein’s warning of increased violence spread fear throughout Pakistan on Wednesday as fighting in South Waziristan intensified in and around the Taliban-held town of Kotkai, the hometown of Hussein and Hakimullah Mehsud, the leader of the Pakistani Taliban.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2367964/posts
Man named Mohammed – oddly enough! – tries to hijack plane with plastic airline knife and demands plane re-route to Jerusalem – yes, airport-less Jerusalem.
Via The Vicious Babushka
A Sudanese man used a plastic knife from the in-flight meal to threaten flight attendants after the plane left Turkish airspace and demanded that the flight be diverted to Jerusalem
. . .
The man told flight attendants he wanted to “liberate Jerusalem,” the police official said.
Ezra Levant is like a 50,000 watt laser beam honing in on section 13.
I read the whole transcript except for the identity theft part.
If Bush wants to come to Saskatoon and speak to people, that’s totally his right.
I mean, he hasn’t been arrested (in the last 20 years anyway) or been put on any No-Fly lists. So there really wasn’t anything stopping him. But it is pretty ridiculous that the Canadian tax-payer has to pick up the security tab on his visit. And even TCU Place had to partly subsidize the event. I actually doubt anybody made any money on the event, other than Bush. The people who planned this thing should be fired!
I’m certain that every responsible tax-payer across this country would rather have kept the security money, and had our wasteful civic, provincial, and federal governments just deduct the $100,000 in security expenses from Bush’s speaking fee, and give him whatever was left over.
I’m sure he would have come to town anyway, he’s a people person.
Considering the state of the economy and the current Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, and Canadian government deficits, giving back the $100,000 is the least Bush could do. Surely a welcome gesture for his kindred spirits in government. It seems like they could use every dollar they can find.
One reason for closing ALL SCHOOLS is that the islamic “schools” is where the Taliban (students) are trained.
You’ve got it backwards, J. The expense is not George Bush’s fault, it’s the fault of those who would harm him. He has a right to travel to Canada, and to speak, and we have a duty to protect him or anyone else from such mobs.
J
So are you saying when Clinton comes here he picks up his own tab for security expenses? Give the Bush thing a rest dude.
J- What’s even more ridiculous is having to expend all those $$ on security to surveille those ill-informed dickhead protesters- the majority of whom have never in their life had an original thought of their own. “I heard (saw,read) that GWB was evil, so of course it has to be true! Arrest him for war crimes, global warming, big oil”! They should be scrutinizing Fat Albert, Fruitfly, Obumhole. IDIOTS!
Philadelphia ACORN office Manager shown in outright lie about what happened when the two fake clients showed up.
Since the spam filter is killing me just go see
Stop the ACLU … www dot stoptheaclu dot com
>>> EBD: Well yes, everyone knows that if the mob had gotten their grubby, small hands on Bush they surely would have strung him up and torn him limb from limb and made some kinda voodoo dust out of his bones and insulted his mother.
But $100,000 for one afternoon’s protection?
Isn’t that excessive?
You’re right though, it might be fair for the government to subsidize the security a little bit. They should cover the first $10,000, which would be more than enough to protect any ordinary person like you or me. And then Bush, with his extraordinary demands and big successful payday, can pick up the balance. Fair?
And if he doesn’t want to fork out for the rest of the security, I think the $10k would have been plenty by itself. I’m sure he could get a half-dozen RCMP for that. Or a whole troop of hell’s angels, easy.
Why put it all on the middle-class tax-payer? That doesn’t sound like something Bush would do.
I’m sure Bill Clinton gets a similar level of security when he visits. Aren’t you going to whine about that too?
Endless enjoyment:
http://translationparty.com/
“But $100,000 for one afternoon’s protection?
Isn’t that excessive?”
Depends. Do you want him dead or alive?
>>> Agent Smith: Absolutely – As I was saying to EBD, Bush should pick up the security after his first $10,000, and Clinton should be treated the exact same way.
See, it would be a different story if Bush was still head of state. Governments have obligations to foreign heads of state.
But Clinton and Bush both are just businessmen today. Bush is a very successful businessmen. (Finally!) And to suggest that they can’t afford their own security is a pretty silly thing for you to say.
But, if they don’t want to pay it, and if the tax-payers shouldn’t have to pay it — doesn’t it make a whole lot more sense for the organizers of the event, and the people that they sold the tickets to, to pay it?
Should the Royals be made to pay their own security when they visit? Most I think would say no. George W., can be a royal pain at times, but it would be a terrible shame if we did nothing to stop him from being killed. Should the athletes have to pay $1 billion for 2 weeks security at the winter olypics?
So J … it’s every man for himself in your view?
I kind of like that POV.
But I doubt if you’d think so if you ever found yourself on the receiving end of death threats from every bunch of lunatics you might care to name.
I admit 100K for security is high but you can’t grab 2 or 3 and make horrible examples of them. Nor can you paint a line on the sidewalk and say if you cross the line you are sniper bait. Nope if you want to protect the protesters the taxpayer has got to do it. You aren’t protecting Mr.Bush, he has very well trained people with guns to do that.
“Nor can you paint a line on the sidewalk and say ‘if you cross the line you are sniper bait.'”
Verily.
Protecting a particular speaker who a particular constituency wants to silence: $100,000.
Defending the right to free speech: Priceless.
I went to the speech today. I have to say that The Decider did not disappoint. Answered a lot of questions I had, and those others gave me perspective. Definitely one of the more personable world leaders I’ve heard speak since Ronnie or Maggie. Brett Wilson was great too.
My one disappointment was with the protesters. I love them and their right to protest, but when you boiled it down their message was scattered and angry. Definite lack of organization showing. Signs ranging from anti-corporatism, Anti-Bush, Anti-Zionism, Anti Canada in Afghanistan, even Anti-McDonald’s. Something I like to refer to as “CAVE”, meaning Citizens Against Virtually Everything. Some of these people showing up just for the sake of being a part of something radical.
Whether I am right or wrong about that last point, you cannot deny that there were WAYYY more people there willing to pay $100 a seat to hear W. than there were people willing to protest him for free.
The Toronto Star column on Monday by Dow Marmur, rabbi emeritus at a Toronto temple, panned a touring display of cadavers, currently at the Ontario Science Centre, that result from a “plastination” procedure employed by one Dr. Gunther von Hagen. I should point out that I haven’t seen the exhibit and am not planning to do so.
Marmur: “What looks like education and health promotion to some is something more sinister to those who believe that God is the rightful owner of the human body and that the individual is only its custodian.”
The problem is that those of us who don’t believe in God are not willing to let those who do so pull rank and dictate to us by invoking mumbo-jumbo from mystic spirits in which we don’t believe. Attila and the Witch Doctor are two sides of the same counterfeit coin.
Marmur: “Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), the great German thinker … made the case for treating every human being as a subject and not an object, an end not a means. He argued that it wasn’t for us to use our bodies as we please, let alone for others to do it.”
This is contradictory nonsense. If a person can’t use his own body as he pleases and nobody else can either, then can anybody do anything? Are we allowed to eat to survive? That’s using one’s body as one pleases for starters.
Incidentally, trading with another person for mutual profit is technically using him as a “means” rather than an “end”. That, of course, is completely ethical.
The real kicker though is that without the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, there would have been no Nazis to murder six million Jews in the Holocaust. Kant to Hegel to Marx to Nietzsche, regrettably taken seriously by “intellectuals” of those days even though it was utter mysticism, was about all it took.
The rabbi has previously called for the suppression of free speech if it “offends” people. But once or twice he has used his column to support Israel. Israel is under threat from radical Muslims who, in conjunction with Marxist extreme left-wingers, want to destroy it. Without Immanuel Kant, Marxism could never have been written. And its influence on the Muslim Brotherhood would never have been felt.
With friends like this, Israel sure doesn’t need any more enemies.
No wonder Ayn Rand called Immanuel Kant “the most evil man in human history”.
Also in Monday’s Star:
“The $1 billion eHealth Ontario scandal that has rocked the provincial government may be a dress rehearsal for its larger counterpart at the federal level.”
“Canada Health Infoway Inc., which like its Ontario cousin is trying to convert medical records into electronic form, is facing a report from the federal auditor next moth. And the prognosis seems poor for the secretive agency. It has already swalowed $1.6 billion of federal money, before an additional $500 million was earmarked earlier this year under the economic stimulus program.”
“Created in 2001 as an independent non-profit agency, Infoway has been largely exempt from accountability restraints governing most other federal departments, including freedom-of-information and oversight by federal watchdogs.”
“[Infoway] was supposed to ensure 50 per cent of Canadians had electronic medical records by March 31, 2010 … Earlier this year, it acknowledged it had reached a level of only 17 per cent.”
Etc. etc.
I’m wondering if any of the 17% (or the 50%) include Ontario residents. In other words, do we have two duelling agencies trying to make our medical records electronic? If so, why the duplication? How much money was wasted on it?
Incidentally, a few days ago one or another of the papers reported an off-the-shelf solution that would have been much cheaper …
When government can take your money at gunpoint and doesn’t have to produce a “bottom line”, these kinds of travesties are inevitable.
“Sustainable living now includes “edible pets” to curb global warming
21 10 2009
In my opinion, this over the top idea isn’t sustainable at any level. On a personal note, my cat eats with a footprint more like a Volkswagen microbus. I think I’ll give “Minners” a can of doplhin safe tuna tonight, just for spite.”
“Save the planet: time to eat dog?”
http://wattsupwiththat.com/
PET Cemetery announcement:
“But is his national pride the real thing or is he, as his critics sneer, ‘just visiting’? Rachel Cooke finds out*”
…-
“Ignatieff gets his facts wrong in Arar case
`Canada sent Maher Arar … to Syria’ to be tortured, Liberal leader tells British newspaper in interview”
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/714019–ignatieff-gets-his-facts-wrong-in-arar-case
…-
Liberal Ignatieff said:
*”Canada sent Maher Arar [a Canadian engineer] to Syria, and a court found that he had been subjected to extraordinary rendition, that his claims [of torture] were true and that he had delivered no intelligence to anybody. It was a disgrace. So, we don’t do it. Ever. Period. Off the table. We don’t get other people to do our dirty work for us, and we don’t do dirty work ever.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/27/michael-ignatieff-interview-rachel-cooke
J: The reason, if it’s true, that President George Bush’s security costs are so high is because lefties are a rabid, nasty bunch. Conservatives may demonstrate but they usually do so in an orderly way without the nastiness. They also strew far less garbage.
Even though conservatives feel very negatively about Bill Clinton, they don’t tend to picket his speaking engagements, probably because they’ve got more constructive things to do and don’t want to waste their time. Lefties, OTOH, haven’t got anything better to do than give President Bush a rough time: Losers is a word that comes to mind.
nv53: “If a person can’t use his own body as he pleases and nobody else can either, then can anybody do anything?”
You obviously misunderstand Kant’s intention in saying this, nv53. Kant and the rabbi, and Christians, believe that each person is a steward of their body, not the owner (did each person, after all, create their own body?) and that to be cavalier about the use we put our bodies to is — may I use this word in post-Christian, secular humanist Canada? — sinful.
Being promiscuous with our bodies — and I don’t just mean sexually promiscuous — leads to a degradation of our human dignity. What’s “evil” about that?
Desecrating any human body just shouldn’t happen, whether it involves murder, abortion, genocide, or sporting dead human bodies in scientific displays for monetary gain.
Iffy: The Man from NUANCE: Let me be clear about that.
Iffy’s glass frying pan:
>>> See/hear the swearing/cursing/bitter Liberal Leader of the Opposition.
Iffy: “It’s not about Michael Ignatieff. It’s about this damn government,” he fumes.*”
Iffy: “what the hell’s happening?*”
“snarls Ignatieff.*”
…-
“* Nanos: Conservatives widen advantage over Grits
Tories 39.8, Grits 30.0, NDP 16.6, Bloc 8.9, Green 4.6
* Conservative lead in poll narrows
The lead enjoyed by the Conservative Party over the Liberals in a new poll of voting intentions narrowed slightly last week, although the Tories still enjoyed a substantial advantage. Tories 38.3, Grits 27.1, NDP 14.5.”
(nnw)
…-
But, wait:
Look at this:
>>> “Harper’s for a candid Calgary Herald interview, anxious to switch the channel after the weeks of public backlash and internal dissent stemming from the now-defunct decision to oppose the government at every election-triggering opportunity.(sic)*”
*”Ignatieff to let Tories stew in ‘frying pan’
By Don Martin, Canwest News Service”
http://www.calgaryherald.com/columnists/Ignatieff+Tories+stew+frying/2130588/story.html
Here’s a question for SDA-ers in the health community.
If there are 30+ million people in Canada, why would the government order 50 million doses of the vaccine (as I saw scrolling by on news headlines)?
I would have thought that one dose of vaccine per person should do the trick. Plus, I am guessing that half the population will refuse to get vaccinated anyway.
Is this another way of politicians “spreading the wealth” to their friends or am I misinformed on vaccination techniques?
Man named Mohammed – oddly enough! – charged as ringleader of group that defrauded insurance companies with fake automobile claims.
Mohammed Patel was the main driver in the scam in the north west of England over three years.
Twenty-four other men will be sentenced over the next two days for their their roles in staging car crashes and making fraudulent insurance claims.
The fraud was uncovered by nosy office workers in Cheshire who spotted Patel having repeated, almost identical, accidents on the roundabout outside their window.
the poll CBCpravda wont show you.
http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/POLNAT-S09-T393E.pdf
eeyore– I think I overheard in the docs office yesterday that its a two step shot.
I’ll probably get the shot because we have a daughter with a chronic disease but I think just hugging and kissing (and getting kissed by) my border collie-X a lot is just as effective. I mean, she never gets the flu!
Using Springsteen is merely barbarous, but playing the Meow Mix jingle is clearly a crime against humanity:
Joe Heim, Torture songs spur a protest most vocal
Was the theme to “Sesame Street” really played to torture prisoners held at Guantanamo and other detention camps? What about Don McLean’s “American Pie”? Or the Meow Mix jingle? Bruce Springsteen’s “Born in the U.S.A.”?
A high-profile coalition of artists — including the members of Pearl Jam, R.E.M. and the Roots — demanded Thursday that the government release the names of all the songs that were blasted since 2002 at prisoners for hours, even days, on end, to try to coerce cooperation or as a method of punishment…
So musicians are saying that listening to their music is torture or is it more of them demanding royalties for using their music?
Commenter:
“anti-fascist is usually their code for Muslims.”
…-
“BULLETIN — REPORT: HUNDREDS OF ANTI-FASCIST PROTESTERS BREAK INTO THE BBC(sic).”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2368425/posts
…-
CBC/PravdaNorth morphs to CNN.
“CBC revamps news flagships
Toronto Star”
David Hambling, Super Concrete in the U.S. Military, Iran… and the Pyramids?
Geopolymers are technically described as synthetic aluminosilicate materials, but they might be more easily described as super-cements or ceramics that do not need firing. A mug made of Geopolymer will bounce off a concrete floor…
Professor Davidovits was awarded the French Ordre National du Mérite, and is President of the Geopolymer Institute. His most remarkable claim is that the pyramids were built using re-agglomerated stone, a sort of geopolymer limestone concrete, rather than blocks of natural stone. This would explain many of the mysteries of pyramid construction. Handling barrels of liquid concrete and casting in place would be much easier than moving giant blocks of stone. Remarkably, recent X-ray and microscopic study of samples has supported the theory that the pyramids are made of artificial stone…
MSM pleads for “middle ground”.
Too late, too smart.
…-
“READY TO REVOLT: Oath Keepers pledges to prevent dictatorship in United States
Group asks police and military to lay down arms in response to orders deemed unlawful.
Depending on your perspective, the Oath Keepers are either strident defenders of liberty or dangerous peddlers of paranoia.
In the age of town halls, talk radio and tea parties, middle ground of opinion is hard to find.
Launched in March by Las Vegan Stewart Rhodes, Oath Keepers bills itself as a nonpartisan group of current and retired law enforcement and military personnel who vow to fulfill their oaths to the Constitution.
More specifically, the group’s members, which number in the thousands, pledge to disobey orders they deem unlawful, including directives to disarm the American people and to blockade American cities. By refusing the latter order, the Oath Keepers hope to prevent cities from becoming “giant concentration camps,” a scenario the 44-year-old Rhodes says he can envision happening in the coming years.
(Excerpt) Read more at lvrj.com”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2368352/posts
Latest Obama reaching across the aisle – saying Republicans “do what they’re told”, whereas Democrats think for themselves. Nice one, O.
Funniest comment in response (comments section):
In a 1940 movie “Ghost Breakers”, the following dialogue, :
Scientist, “It’s worse than horrible, because a zombie has no will of his own. You see them some times, walking around blindly with dead eyes, following orders, not knowing what they do, not caring.”
Bob Hope: “You mean, like Democrats?”
Bob Hope, a man way ahead of his time.
Facts? Facx? MSM Facts? Surreality play.
Visions of balloons dancing in their heads.
Hot. Twits with ruses.
…-
“Daring hoax exposes limits of instant journalism
WASHINGTON – You attend a press conference. The newsmaker speaks. You run a DNA test to confirm they are who they claim to be. And then you publish.
An absurd notion. But only marginally more absurd than the high comedy that played out at Washington’s National Press Club on Monday, a few floors above the Toronto Star’s Washington Bureau, when the U.S. Chamber of Commerce made big news that wasn’t.
Already in the news for its hard-lobbying opposition to U.S. climate-change legislation, the pro-business Chamber dropped reporters’ jaws with what appeared to be a turning-point announcement – that the organization now accepts that “without a stable climate, there will be no business.”
The dramatic reversal was conveyed instantly, led by the Reuters agency, and minutes later it was picked up by the New York Times and Washington Post Web sites.
But by the time Fox Business News jumped in with real-time analysis, the real U.S. Chamber of Commerce burst into the news conference, together with red-faced representatives of the National Press Club, to debunk the proceedings as a hoax.
Reporters’ heads swiveled back and forth from the possible interlopers at the podium to the possible interlopers who were calling them out, wondering who among them was legitimate. For a few minutes both sides stood their ground. Someone asked for a business card.
And finally the ruse was revealed – the man purportedly speaking on behalf of America’s largest business lobby was in fact Andy Bichlbaum of the anti-corporate pranksters known as the Yes Men, who had just pulled off their piece de resistance.
After previously impersonating the likes of Dow Chemical, Halliburton and the U.S. Government, the activists had punked their way into the very heart of mainstream American journalism, running a bogus presser in hall of fame studded with the portraits of everyone from Walter Cronkite to Edward R. Murrow.
The real Chamber is hopping mad, as you would expect, and the Press Club is cringingly embarrassed at how easily the acceptance of a $500 room rental fee exposed a major vulnerability to guerrilla-style activism. The rest of us received a cardinal lesson in the dangers of the tweet-first-ask-questions-later pace of modern news.”
http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/713670–potter-daring-hoax-exposes-limits-of-instant-journalism
…-
Breaking-Stephen Taylor
has just posted this little tidbit from Ontario’s Infrastructure Minister
George Smitherman dismisses federal Liberals on claims of Tory infrastructure skew
*a little birdie told me that George Smitherman, Ontario’s Infrastructure Minister just dismissed the federal Liberals claims that infrastructure dollars are disproportionately going to tory ridings in Ontario.
he told reporters:
“You can slice & dice the numbers any way you want” and he went on to emphasize that the programs are balanced.
citytv will have video up soon
Countdown to mass starvation in South Aftica begins, communism is reversed in Congo:
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=2130070
Todays Question Period should be very interesting if Stephen Taylor is correct & it looks like he is.
**City TV Toronto has just posted this
Toronto MP(Gerard Kennedy)claims Harper Government favours Tory ridings, Smitherman Disagrees.
No Vid yet
*from the comments
I did not get any of the Adscam money the Liberals distributed in Quebec, I also did not get any nice little consulting contracts the Liberals provincial counterparts were dishing out to the tune of a Million bucks a day
Albanian criminals in Canada, for those who are guessing what nationality Emrah Bulatci is.
http://www.nowpublic.com/crime/career-criminal-and-murder-suspect-emrah-bulatci
Will appreciate any information about Serbian criminals in Canada.
Bye Bye Miss American Pie
Chart of the day: the percentage of job losses that are permanent.
Michael Semple, “Talking Helmand”: The Political Officer’s Advice for Armies Campaigning in the Pashtun Heartland
Warning: 90 minutes long.
Stephen Taylor & City TV have posted the George Smitherman Scrum Where Smitherman say’s his Federal Liberal Cousins are wrong on their infrastructure accusations.
First of all, I read the TorStar today because I was in a school where this ra … paper is free in the staffroom. This holds true for all of the schools I teach in.
I thought on reading this article with the headline “Tories Get More Money and Projects,” NON-STORY.
Here’re the goods from the TorStar article with a photo of “poor” Liberal Bonnie Crombie:
“Winners” (of all the loot from the CPC):
Three CPCers: MPs Greg Rickford, Peter Baird, and Jeff Watson
Two Liberal$: MPs David McGuinty (hmmmm), Paul Szabo
“Losers”:
Two Liberal$: MPs Bonnie Crombie, Borys Wrzesnewsky
THREE CPCers: MPs Stephen Woodworth, Ed Holder, Peter Kent
Of course, there were in-between MPs, but GIVE ME A BREAK: Three losers are Conservative MPs.
This media-generated “story” is just crap, typical, lib-left fabricated twaddle. ‘Glad that Stephen Taylor is onto it.