Now bring us thereasonsshewon.
It would all be quite funny, if it weren’t so utterly pathetic.
23 Replies to “The People Who Predicted Clinton’s Loss In New Hampshire”
…”it would be all be….”
Are you speaking ‘Newf’ Kate?
heh heh!
Good Lord, the photo at the NY Times link looks as if Shrillary is belting out an opera or in a Shakespere play. Lady Macbeth?
Vote fraud in NH primaries?
Not only is there unacceptable variance between outcome and pre polling/exit polling but there is suspicious variance in hand ballot and machine balloting…plush there was one district that “forgot” to include all the ballots cast for a single candidate: http://tinyurl.com/233ot6 http://tinyurl.com/2ayfcr
Shaddup, Eskimo.
try busing in out of state people and you will get a discrepency
WLMR-
hanging chads? did the republicans send in bad ballots?
The media narrative uses the word “nanosecond”, so it’s gotta be right. It’s more important to be hip than accurate.
“It would all be quite funny, if it weren’t so utterly pathetic.”
Kate, I would love to see an independent pick that up as their campaign slogan.
Exactly…..
BTW – did anyone else notice the knob on ABC news report that the Margin for Clinton / Obama was 39% / 36% while the banner under his nose showed 39%/37%…? Talk about showing your inner desires!
“I’m Hillary Clinton. Vote for me, or I’ll cry.”
So much for feminism and women’s equality.
What? The woman doesn’t cry at her friend’s funeral, but gets all weepy when she is sucking in votes. There is no human side to Hillbilly, but the side she sits on.
That cartoon would be funny, but Tom Brokow said essentially the same thing on the David Letterman show last night. And he visibly wasn’t happy that people did vote as they wished, without following the MSM leadership and guidance given them.
It would all be quite funny, if it weren’t so utterly pathetic — and true!
Hahaha, and the Hillary Vote-Harvesting Machine stricks again. Let’s see if PIAPS can pull that off in Arizona and S. Carolina.
Myself wonders how much money was actually spent by these Presidential Candidates in Iowa and New Hampshire, a good guess would be in the $300 – $400 Million range.
,
Cal2:
“hanging chads? did the republicans send in bad ballots?”
No Cal , apparently they can’t count any better than Democrats…or be accurate in reporting counts.
There are now 2 NH districts being investigated for not reporting the ballots of a single candidate.
BTW It wasn’t just Thompson and Paul that got hosed in the ballot counting fraud….Obama got screwed by as much as 20 points if the discrepancies are accurate…but being part of this stage managed farce called primaries he’ll suck it back like a real establishment trooper and take what the Dem switch pullers hand out.
What ever you do don’t question the process…the sacred ballot process…no MSM pundit or wannabe candidate can do that without drawing more heat from the switch pullers.
The real story here is watching the MSM pimps do everything they can to avoid investigating the NH voting anomalies ( and there are enough for any candidate to demand recounts and charges) …like the presstitutes aren’t part of the show?
What evil magic we weave!
Have you noticed the MSNBC has attacked Fox Commentator “Major Garnet”? It must have been something he reported “On-Air” that had far reaching consequences for Hillary & all Democrats from the Past.
News of week:
Bush (Republican) goes to “Israel”. If a Past (democrat) LBJ had done the same we would live in a different world. How do you spell treason?
SEE: USS liberty, June 8th 1967
Might be helpful to note that without voter fraud in Chicago John Kennedy would never have been president. As it is, Nixon did not demand a recount… even He, the hated one, having more grace and sense than AlBore and his hordes of lawyers in the 2000 election in Florida.
If truth be told, it more than likely would be that Nixon actually won that election. He at the very least had the good grace not to tear the country into shreds whining about it like Gore did. The dems have been relying on illegal immigrants and voter fraud to get elected from time immemorial.. what’s such a surprise about it today??
Ypu bring up a valid point snow bunnie..ballot fraud has been part of the system for some time…however you gibve the losers too much credit…theyaren’t being “gracious” they are just doing what they are told…if anyone ever did make a real stink about the amount of ballot fraud that happens routinely, there would be a civil crisis in people holding the current stage managed process of democracy into wide public disrepute…and no candidate who wants their patronage and perks for playing along with the game the switch=pullers are running, wants to really expose the current system for what it is…this is political suicide if not physical suicide.
Sorry, folks, while the conspiracy theories may be fun, the truth is Hillary got her vote out; Obama didn’t. As I noted in another thread, Hillary inherited Bill’s machine – people who will phone, drive, and confirm their base has voted – while Obama has to create that from scratch.
Hasn’t anyone here worked on a political campaign? Don’t you realize how important it is to mobilize your supporters and get them to polls? It’s easy for people to say “I support so-and-so”; it’s another thing to get them off their butts and spend the time to vote for you. Hillary could do that; Obama couldn’t.
Occam’s razor, people. It’s much easier to believe better mobilization than widespread conspiracy. And, geez – my parents worked as scrutineers in a number of elections. Those are people from a party who oversee the vote counts, and ensure the counts are correct. There were always Liberal, PC, and NDP scrutineers at every poll my parents worked at. Do you think there were no scrutineers at the NH polls?
I Agree with WL Mackenzie, There’s definitely something rotten in the hen house with the primary elections so far especially in New Hampshire. The huge difference in polls and results for Hillary and Obama cannot be explained.
KevinB the main problems with fraud have been with the vote counting machines, that happen to easily add up the votes in the most convenient way possible as they are programmed to do, very easily hacked. Hence since a machine counted more than 81% of the votes there were no scrutineers for at least 81% of the ballots.
And Vote Counting Apparently wasn’t perfect either by Hand as in one place 31 ballots just didn’t get counted for one candidate in a small center (amounted to 10% of the vote). Sounds a bit fishy to me.
The difference between machine counted and human counted values for percentages of the vote is also curious. If I was a betting man, there is definitely fraud here!
Its funny, Michelle Malkin doesn’t give credence to the fraud aligations, and doesn’t think people should complain about those results. She writes alot of interesting articles, but now I am questioning her judgement. I know she’s no fan of Ron Paul but are you honest or not, if your not your just another liberal.
When there are this many irregularities they have no choice to recount by hand, or democracy becomes a sham. (That must have been why people were pushing for all computer votes, no inconvenient paper trail to catch fraudsters)
The counting of ballots back in 2000 with Al Gore was absolutely rediculous, They had recounted and he just wanted to keep recounting till he won,even trying to make votes, a totally different situation here! Any comparisons are laughable !!
…”it would be all be….”
Are you speaking ‘Newf’ Kate?
heh heh!
Good Lord, the photo at the NY Times link looks as if Shrillary is belting out an opera or in a Shakespere play. Lady Macbeth?
Vote fraud in NH primaries?
Not only is there unacceptable variance between outcome and pre polling/exit polling but there is suspicious variance in hand ballot and machine balloting…plush there was one district that “forgot” to include all the ballots cast for a single candidate:
http://tinyurl.com/233ot6
http://tinyurl.com/2ayfcr
Shaddup, Eskimo.
try busing in out of state people and you will get a discrepency
WLMR-
hanging chads? did the republicans send in bad ballots?
The media narrative uses the word “nanosecond”, so it’s gotta be right. It’s more important to be hip than accurate.
“It would all be quite funny, if it weren’t so utterly pathetic.”
Kate, I would love to see an independent pick that up as their campaign slogan.
Exactly…..
BTW – did anyone else notice the knob on ABC news report that the Margin for Clinton / Obama was 39% / 36% while the banner under his nose showed 39%/37%…? Talk about showing your inner desires!
“I’m Hillary Clinton. Vote for me, or I’ll cry.”
So much for feminism and women’s equality.
What? The woman doesn’t cry at her friend’s funeral, but gets all weepy when she is sucking in votes. There is no human side to Hillbilly, but the side she sits on.
That cartoon would be funny, but Tom Brokow said essentially the same thing on the David Letterman show last night. And he visibly wasn’t happy that people did vote as they wished, without following the MSM leadership and guidance given them.
It would all be quite funny, if it weren’t so utterly pathetic — and true!
Hahaha, and the Hillary Vote-Harvesting Machine stricks again. Let’s see if PIAPS can pull that off in Arizona and S. Carolina.
Myself wonders how much money was actually spent by these Presidential Candidates in Iowa and New Hampshire, a good guess would be in the $300 – $400 Million range.
,
Cal2:
“hanging chads? did the republicans send in bad ballots?”
No Cal , apparently they can’t count any better than Democrats…or be accurate in reporting counts.
There are now 2 NH districts being investigated for not reporting the ballots of a single candidate.
BTW It wasn’t just Thompson and Paul that got hosed in the ballot counting fraud….Obama got screwed by as much as 20 points if the discrepancies are accurate…but being part of this stage managed farce called primaries he’ll suck it back like a real establishment trooper and take what the Dem switch pullers hand out.
What ever you do don’t question the process…the sacred ballot process…no MSM pundit or wannabe candidate can do that without drawing more heat from the switch pullers.
The real story here is watching the MSM pimps do everything they can to avoid investigating the NH voting anomalies ( and there are enough for any candidate to demand recounts and charges) …like the presstitutes aren’t part of the show?
What evil magic we weave!
Have you noticed the MSNBC has attacked Fox Commentator “Major Garnet”? It must have been something he reported “On-Air” that had far reaching consequences for Hillary & all Democrats from the Past.
News of week:
Bush (Republican) goes to “Israel”. If a Past (democrat) LBJ had done the same we would live in a different world. How do you spell treason?
SEE: USS liberty, June 8th 1967
Might be helpful to note that without voter fraud in Chicago John Kennedy would never have been president. As it is, Nixon did not demand a recount… even He, the hated one, having more grace and sense than AlBore and his hordes of lawyers in the 2000 election in Florida.
If truth be told, it more than likely would be that Nixon actually won that election. He at the very least had the good grace not to tear the country into shreds whining about it like Gore did. The dems have been relying on illegal immigrants and voter fraud to get elected from time immemorial.. what’s such a surprise about it today??
Ypu bring up a valid point snow bunnie..ballot fraud has been part of the system for some time…however you gibve the losers too much credit…theyaren’t being “gracious” they are just doing what they are told…if anyone ever did make a real stink about the amount of ballot fraud that happens routinely, there would be a civil crisis in people holding the current stage managed process of democracy into wide public disrepute…and no candidate who wants their patronage and perks for playing along with the game the switch=pullers are running, wants to really expose the current system for what it is…this is political suicide if not physical suicide.
Sorry, folks, while the conspiracy theories may be fun, the truth is Hillary got her vote out; Obama didn’t. As I noted in another thread, Hillary inherited Bill’s machine – people who will phone, drive, and confirm their base has voted – while Obama has to create that from scratch.
Hasn’t anyone here worked on a political campaign? Don’t you realize how important it is to mobilize your supporters and get them to polls? It’s easy for people to say “I support so-and-so”; it’s another thing to get them off their butts and spend the time to vote for you. Hillary could do that; Obama couldn’t.
Occam’s razor, people. It’s much easier to believe better mobilization than widespread conspiracy. And, geez – my parents worked as scrutineers in a number of elections. Those are people from a party who oversee the vote counts, and ensure the counts are correct. There were always Liberal, PC, and NDP scrutineers at every poll my parents worked at. Do you think there were no scrutineers at the NH polls?
I Agree with WL Mackenzie, There’s definitely something rotten in the hen house with the primary elections so far especially in New Hampshire. The huge difference in polls and results for Hillary and Obama cannot be explained.
KevinB the main problems with fraud have been with the vote counting machines, that happen to easily add up the votes in the most convenient way possible as they are programmed to do, very easily hacked. Hence since a machine counted more than 81% of the votes there were no scrutineers for at least 81% of the ballots.
And Vote Counting Apparently wasn’t perfect either by Hand as in one place 31 ballots just didn’t get counted for one candidate in a small center (amounted to 10% of the vote). Sounds a bit fishy to me.
The difference between machine counted and human counted values for percentages of the vote is also curious. If I was a betting man, there is definitely fraud here!
Its funny, Michelle Malkin doesn’t give credence to the fraud aligations, and doesn’t think people should complain about those results. She writes alot of interesting articles, but now I am questioning her judgement. I know she’s no fan of Ron Paul but are you honest or not, if your not your just another liberal.
When there are this many irregularities they have no choice to recount by hand, or democracy becomes a sham. (That must have been why people were pushing for all computer votes, no inconvenient paper trail to catch fraudsters)
The counting of ballots back in 2000 with Al Gore was absolutely rediculous, They had recounted and he just wanted to keep recounting till he won,even trying to make votes, a totally different situation here! Any comparisons are laughable !!
This is an interesting Link. A must see regarding the vote
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=547_1199910913&p=1
Hillary is the wicked witch and TOM TOLES is VILE LIBERAL SCUM