Free Dominion

Moonbats 22 Comments

I won’t requote the whole sorry Canadian Human Rights Commission mess. Except for this;

• 0% of respondents have ever won a section 13 case before the tribunal.
• 100% of cases have Whites as respondents
• 98% of cases have poor or working class respondents
• 90.7% of respondents are not represented by lawyers
• So far, $80,500 has been awarded in fines and special compensation since May 9, 2003.
• 72.4% of complaints specifically identify “jews” as victims.
• 48.8% of all cases (Past and active) are by Richard Warman

Just go here for all the sordid details.

22 Replies to “Free Dominion”

  1. So, anyone can file a lawsuit against a domain, even if that domain has limited control over the posters?
    What the heck happened to freedom of speech? One guy brings forth close to 50% of the claims? Something stinks here.

  4. There are very few things which are so highly predictable in life as to almost constitute social axioms.
    One of these might be that men simply don’t understand women.
    The Riders almost always choke in the finals (sorry rider fans).
    Another is that people (like Richard Waman) who espouse (with almost a fanatical zeal) an ideology are almost always so dedicated to the cult of their own victimhood or righteousness (whether by proxy or not) that they simply can’t recognise their hypocrisy or have become deluded.
    This causes them to lose so much personal credibility that they inevitably have to resort to use, indeed abuse, of whatever tools are available to them in an effort to force people to believe them.
    In this case, it appears these tools are such things as human rights councils or social activist judges, neither of which are prepared or even capable of correcting these individuals without fearing that somehow it might leave a stain on their own record/credibility. Thus, the tools themselves (pun intended) lose touch with reality and have to resort to more and more dictatorial measures in order to retain, what they think, is respect in society at large. And so the cycle continues…
    While we make fun of the likes of Richard Warman, never ever forget that he and people like him are truly dangerous. Generally, once this state of hypocrisy and delusion has been attained, then there is no limit to whatver actions may be taken or words spoken to prove that the required victimhood or righteousness exists.
    Alas, I myself have be known to foster delusions of grandeur; fortunately, my wife smacks me down on a regular enough basis to correct that…

  5. Some AB politicians are doing their part in contributing to this nightmare which are the Human Rights Tribunals (federal and provincial). AB voters, generally, are asleep at the switch.
    A Calgary alderman was sitting as one of three AB Human Rights Panelists (southern) for the past three years – appointed by the Lt. Governor on recommendation of the cabinet minister i/c. This while at the same time being an alderman.
    Her three-year-term Human Rights position was just re-confirmed for another three years – no competition, simply a reappointment by a new minister i/c.
    This same alderman was just re-elected by acclamation to her alderman’s position so there you have it.
    Absolute and total conflict of interest but not seen as such either by the alderman or by two different AB cabinet ministers – one former and one current.
    Is our social fabric in big trouble? Of course it is, and it is going to get nothing but worse.
    These Humans Rights adjudicators (not judges) combined with the IRB adjudicators (basically lay people) are daily laying down legal precedents that are breaking down the social fabric of this country.
    Litigation Chill is in the air. People can (and seemingly do) bring forward most anything at little cost themselves but it can be very costly for those who have to defend a claim – particularly if it has to be done so through the courts.

  6. ” Dean Steacy is a top investigator for the CHRC, and here’s what he said about freedom of speech in an exchange with Barbara Kulaszka, a lawyer representing a website owner:
    MS KULASZKA: Mr. Steacy, you were talking before about context and how important it is when you do your investigation. What value do you give freedom of speech when you investigate one of these complaints?
    MR. STEACY: Freedom of speech is an American concept, so I don’t give it any value.
    MS KULASZKA: Okay. That was a clear answer.
    MR. STEACY: It’s not my job to give value to an American concept.”
    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57177

  7. HUH? Do we not have freedom of speech in Canada? I wonder if he would say the same thing about “separation of church and state” seen as how that is an American concept in their constitution.

  8. Warman is an ass and a professional provocateur…this time he is attempting to repress the freedom of internet opinion posting….if successful, this will set a deadly precedent for big brother control over internet opinion posting.
    It also makes a cite owner responsible for others opinion ( an unheard of legal premise).
    Personally I don’t think Warman has a pot to piss in on this frivilous assault…it will take a judge with pretty low self esteem to take Warman’s ass-hat antics seriously….but stay on top of it Kate…if they can do damage to FD they will come for the rest of you right of center bloggers….you just KNOW that left wing slanger and prejudice will never be questioned…just the right…and isn’t that what political cleansing is all about in the cyber age.
    Richard Warman has a net negative impact on our society with his feigned hypersensitivity to free opinion.

  9. cal – thanks for the link. That’s really quite astonishing, an open statement by someonen working for ‘human rights’ against a basic right of democracy, the right to free speech.
    It’s in our charter, section 2, “freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression’…
    Unfortunately for us, and enabling demagogues like Steacy to operate, the Charter also privileges group identity values over individual freedoms (15.2 and 27). That is, the Charter is inherently contradictory and rejects individual rights and freedoms.

  10. Richard Ball
    He is suing someone for saying he suppresses freedom of speech.
    Which is such bull it’s funny and pathetic,
    WL Mackenzie Redux
    this will set a deadly precedent for big brother control over internet opinion posting.
    Hence why I posted about him on my blog too, the first time he tried to nail FD! My second one is err pending…. Charge me too eh.
    Only if all bloggers post it are we safe.

  11. Charter of Rights
    2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
    a) freedom of conscience and religion; b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and d) freedom of association.

  12. In a nutshell, I’d put it thusly:
    The CHRC is an illegitimate fraud. It is unconstitutional and is used by the Left to silence, intimidate and persecute the less fortunate who refuse to submit to the Leftist ideology.
    The CHRC is but one of the many ways in which the Left takes away the rights of those who have a different point of view, one which is contrary to Leftist orthodoxy.
    The CHRC and all organizations like it which are similarly unconstitutional and fascist in nature must be abolished. After all, it’s our money that’s being spent by them to take away our rights… and even more of our money, should we be unlucky enough to be fined for exercising our rights.

  13. An immigrant moves to Saskatchewan. After a while, he just can’t ignore the people who are rude to him, so he sees a counselor. He tells the counselor, “Everywhere I go, I see people giving me the finger!”
    Have you seen an immigration lawyer? asks the counselor.
    No, only people who give me the finger.

  14. An immigrant moves to small town Saskatchewan. After a while, he just can’t ignore the people who are rude to him, so he sees a counselor. He tells the counselor, “Everywhere I go, I see people giving me the finger!”
    Have you seen an immigration lawyer? asks the counselor.
    “No, only people who give me the finger.”

  15. I just had a conversation with my son’s teacher who made the class to write an essay, including the words:
    …We do have a right to an opinion, but we don’t have a right to express our opinions in a negative form…
    also, it included a following stance:
    …We must ignore and walk away when someone says or DOES hurtful things to us…
    The poor boy did not have to write it, as he was not one of the troublemakers who caused this whole thing, but he felt so bad about her depriving everyone of freedom of speech and right to life and security of the person, that he wrote down the whole thing and brought it home for me to sign, just like the troublemakers.
    I wrote my comments on the essay and attached a copy of the Charter to it and sent back.
    When she called me at work to tell me how she was very well aware of the Charter freedoms etc, I almost saw her shivering on the other end of the line.
    Yes, she was a major in political studies and an honours student, but she had and still has a willful or unwilling disconnect between being aware of the Charter freedoms, and applying them to real life!!!
    The teachers can’t tell the students 50% or 80% of the truth, if they do inform the students of their rights, they can’t stop half way, otherwise they are creating socially disabled people.
    Guess that’s the intent…
    That’s where it all starts.

  17. I’ve asked this before:
    Can’t we get rid of kangaroo courts by simply faxing the complaint back to the HRC with the words F U, and just refusing to participate in the process?
    I’m not talking about this incident which is an actual lawsuit.
    I mean the previous complaint against Free Dominion.
    WHY do the people called before these courts show up and take them seriously? Will the cops show up at your door?
    I’ve found over 40+ years that telling jerks to go to hell has immediately sucked all the air out of the situation, let me get my way and then some, ANd earned me the respect of the initiator. Sometimes we’ve even ended up friends.

  19. There does seem to be an awful amount of evidence pointing to an extreme bias and abuse of process at CHRC. One individual – almost 50% of complaints!!!
    Perhaps a demand for a public inquiry into the CHRC would expose this corrupt den of snakes and lead to it’s abolishment.

  20. “By the way, notice how the Charter does not provide the freedom of privacy?
    Posted by: Aaron at October 18, 2007 4:23 PM ”
    Aaron…what do you expect? This piece of Marxist crap doesn’t even have property rights! Lenin would be proud.

  21. add to the blogosphere lexicon – warmanized – as in “I answered the door today and I was Warmanized”

  22. “Can’t we get rid of kangaroo courts by simply faxing the complaint back to the HRC with the words F U, and just refusing to participate in the process?”
    An unlikely piece of British legal history occurred in the case Arkell v. Pressdram. The plaintiff was the subject of an article relating to illicit payments, and for a change the magazine had ample evidence to back up the article. Arkell’s lawyers wrote a letter in which, unusually, they said: “Our client’s attitude to damages will depend on the nature of your reply”. The response consisted, in part, of the following: “We would be interested to know what your client’s attitude to damages would be if the nature of our reply were as follows : F*** off”. This caused a stir in certain quarters. In the years following, the magazine would use this case as a euphemism for an obscene reply: In subsequent cases, instead of using the obscenity, Private Eye (and others) would say something like “We refer you to the reply given in the case of Arkell v Pressdram”, or perhaps “His reply was similar to that given to the plaintiff in Arkell v. Pressdram “. Like “tired and emotional” this usage has spread far beyond the magazine.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Eye#Litigation

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation