15 Replies to “Funniest. Correction. Ever.”

  1. And today’s Star TV Listings for Toronto had a blurb about a documentary: Hitler’s Mountain. But I guess John Cleese was writing the copy as it twice mentioned Adolf “Hilter”, mein Dickie, old chum.

  2. And this is an important issue in the Arsehole Of The Nation?
    Do those fart suckers in Toronto care about real issues? It would be nice to see some intelligence come out of that city…just once…

  3. Judging by what comes out of his mouth and his general take on things, I would think he went to about grade six in a government union school just long enough to find out how ‘special he was’. Even Jay-Lo couldn’t put up with him for more than a few weeks.
    Like many of the Hollywood multi-millionaire dimwits, he just looks smart because sometimes he plays the roles of person who is smart.
    I would suggest that he played himself in the movie with ‘Good Will Hunting’ with Matt Damon.

  4. Breaking…..Stephane Dion never worked an honest day in his life….In other news Jack Layron is outraged at something or another….more as the BS develolps or degenerates…such as the case may be.
    Syncro

  6. Who is Ben Affleck again? Is he sort of in the mold of Alec Baldwin or Tom Cruise?
    Tom Cruise lost 150 Million$ for his employer by pushing some wild and crazy space tripping belief. They bounced him.
    I know these guys are important because they know Oprah and Doenly or O*donnel. Damn!
    Affleck, like insurance with a duck? I give up. = TG

  10. Yanni, why such a hard on for Affleck? If you had bothered to read his bio you would have learned that he and Damon, (mostly Damon) wrote Good Will Hunting. BTW it was Damon who attended Harvard.
    He (Affleck) may be a pretty boy but at least he’s done it on his own.
    The post isn’t about Affleck, it’s about the fact that the Star is such a shitty paper that it’s writers are too lazy or too stupid to bother using google or any other search engine to do even the simplest bit of background research.
    By the way since you brought up Jay-lo. I’m sure you must be aware that she insured her butt for 300 million, her bod for a billion and was busted along with her loser boyfriend (Puff diddy or whatever the loser is calling himself these days) for a shooting in a nightclub, the gun was stolen, BWTF it’s J-lo and The P man after all, and charges get dropped when money and high priced lawyers get involved. Actually given her record (j-lo’S) of failed relationships and mostly forgettable movies, I’m surprised she’s as popular as she is! Must be that cellulite laden butt. At least Affleck has the ability to laugh at himself or did you miss the SNL skit?.
    But it isn’t about Affleck or J-Lo, it’s about the Star, Tabloid Trash for the masses, (After all who cares if an actor has a university degree? Most people just want to be entertained).
    BTW I must confess to a bias here. I don’t own a single J-Lo movie although I do own several that have both Affleck and Damon staring. I don’t need my actors to be intellectuals, merely entertaining. Case in point, Sean Penn is actually quite a good actor, Thin Red Line, At Close Range, Fast Times at Ridgemont High, Colors, it’s just when he opens his mouth off the screen that I find him to be a simpleton.
    Same goes for Bono, Gibson, Fonda, Seagal and many, many more.

  11. Never mind this guy, show reverence and from now on address Oprah as DOCTOR. She received an honorary degree today, and said she will refer to herself as DR on her show. She has now reached Dr Phil’s level. Sorry, don’t watch either of them.

  12. mary T, I cancelled my satellite many moons ago. Entertainment is entertainment. I prefer fantasy, sock em rockem forgetaboutem. If I want philosophy I read Plato;-). Oprah is another opiate for the masses. Pity that so many think it’s gospel.

  13. “Do those fart suckers in Toronto care about real issues?”
    Having done business down there for many years I can say that there is a pervasive self-centered nature to the denizens that is almost genetic.
    They care deeply about issues but only those they presume to be their own..and only those which the local media select as important…they are very suggestive here and se thir local media as a gospel…when you hear political banter at get togthers or even professional events where people from all over the nation are in attendence, it is always coming from GTA people and it is usually a GTA-centric issue…I would say, judging by those I know their knowledge of the rest of the nation is very limited to what they read in their papers…but this is true of Montreal as well.
    I have some long time friends who live in GTA but as much as I love ’em they all display the same inward looking world view. When they look at national issues it is through a local filter.
    I can’t say if this is a matter of the GTA media reflecting the self-centered nature of the community or vise versa, but it is pretty annoying to folks in the rest of Ontario and in Canada… a lot of national policy comes from agendas the large number of GTA reps sent to the legislature and Ottawa.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation