“Who do you think would do a better job of protecting the environment?”

68 Replies to ““Who do you think would do a better job of protecting the environment?””

Conservatives 5361 votes (44 %)
Liberals 3081 votes (25 %)
NDP 2165 votes (18 %)
Other 1588 votes (13 %)

Someone should poll the citizens of Ca. and the Southwest about rapid global cooling. Talk about fate, this week proves there is a God and he’s mad.

Why would CTV shut down their polls when they’re obviously accomplishing the objective of suckering conservatives into visiting their site which drives up their traffic and allows them to charge higher advertising prices?
And how would you even begin to know that Trollbert?
That has got to be the most idiotic reasoning I have ever seen. Yes, it is all a big plan to lure Tory supporters to their site. That must be especially true for polls that Liberals win on.
Go back to sleep Robert. You dreamland of myblahg is waiting for you.

OT: Dion set to announce shadow cabinet, all reports so far show 1 female.
Hypocrite’s in Action

These leftwingers whining about the outcome of the poll are just as capable as anyone else in taking a two second poll.
If the results really mattered to them to the point that they are whining that “Tories are flooding it”, then they could easily counteract it with enough support, if they REALLY cared about this issue as much as they claim.
No, this is just another example of sore loser leftist whiners complaining that a poll didn’t go there way.

How about ending all the HOT AIR from the eco-wackos and having AL GORE and the rest of the eco-wackos do real work like building birdhouses,planting trees,picking up litter and keeping their mouths shut to cut down on all that HOT AIR

To anyone who thinks that this poll is meaningful: do you have any idea the lengths to which pollsters go to ensure that they obtain a random sample when gathering data? The first course that a person (so inclined) might take in probability and statistics would teach you that. The fact is that a poll like this one would probably be cited as a wonderful example of terrible methodology; students would be given the opportunity to point out the hilarious shortcomings. If you disagree with this, you have no appreciation of the pitfalls that need to be avoided in gathering data, and, I daresay, would be well advised not to convert tablespoons to cups without help.
Polls like this tell us for example that Raymi the Minx has a totally awesome blog, and that Rory Fitzpatrick is just a hair shy of belonging in the NHL All-Star game. Other curious results have also surfaced.

Looks like M. Dijon can’t cut the mustard.
Posted by: shaken at January 17, 2007 07:34 PM
But he does look like he can cut the cheese… every time he opens his mouth at some pre election campaign spot, something smells.

My dear Crabgrass. You chose your name wisely.

Kentucky Blue – Thanks, I think. I hope you mean that as a compliment, but without the benfit of facial expression, I’m uncertain…
By the way, I love Bluegrass. Why not go all the way with your moniker?

Crabgrass,
Oh, we all know that the methodology in these kind of polls are a joke. Our point is that liberals grasp at these types of polls as if they were gospel; providing they say exactly what it is that they want to say, while decrying the same methodology when it doesn’t work in their facour.
Also amusing is when the people who conduct these types polls are looking for a certain result and they get the exact opposite, which only aids us in poking fun at the obvious shortcoming of how their poll is conducted.

“Talk about fate, this week proves there is a God and he’s mad.”
Eh? More to the point, Mother Nature really doesn’t give a shit if you build your house on a floodplain or take your Honda Civic, with summer tires, out on the freeway in a blizzard. You’ve probably heard of the ‘Darwin Awards’?
If you had CA freezing weather in mind, you might also have noted that the orchardists have large fans permanently installed in their orchards; not the first or last instance of frost.
IF there WAS a G*d, I’m guessing he/she would be getting right cranky about being blamed for everything that isn’t perfect (according to some humans)…

OntarioLad, I don’t recall any recent cheerleading by the Libs over favourable online polls, but I may not have been paying attention.
Do you have any specific instances in mind?

Great comment’s Lycan Stark. Your a genious!!! Smack the leftys harder with your compelling rhetoric.

Who cares about GW?
If gang motivator / leaders like Muqtada al Sadr are not picked off, global warming will be the least of our worries. = TG

Great comment’s Lycan Stark. Your a genious!!! Smack the leftys harder with your compelling rhetoric.
Anything you say, you myblahg refugee.

Crabgrass,
You don’t have far to look. Go to any online poll sponsored by a Liberal or a left winger and when the results are in THEIR favour, they’ll love it. When its not in their favour, its because of “Conservative or rightwing trolls” that spam the site, or they remind the readers that “this is not a scientific poll.”
We have left-tards like Trollbert McClelland on myblahb try to explain his assinine reasoning for why the poll results aren’t to the liking of he and his ilk. You see, he explains that its all about “ad rates”. CTV is suckering Conservatives in coming over to vote because they want higher “ad rates”. LOL.
No, in this instanace, the poll results cannot possibly be because of what people believe about who would be better for the environment, its got to be about suckering Conservatives “ad rates”. Don’t you just hear the theme for the X-Files playing? However, the second it would be the other way, Trollbert the blogging milquetoast would undoubtedly be all over it.
But that is the typical hypocricy one would expect coming from left wingers.