There’s no pleasing some people.
The Conservatives have been accused of having a “hidden agenda” — a plan to do something bad once elected.
Pick your favourite cause — for or against — and there is someone out there who will tell you that the Conservatives plan to do exactly what you don’t want them to do.
Typically, that someone works for the Liberal Party. The “hidden agenda” scare did a lot to hurt the Conservatives in the 2004 election.
So this time around, the Conservatives are spending the opening weeks of the campaign putting it all on the table. Here’s what they promise to do. Some might like it, some won’t — but when you are looking at that ballot, you’ll know what to expect from the Conservatives.
This is better, right? The media is going to give the Conservatives credit for eliminating the “hidden agenda” problem so effectively, right?
Wrong.
I’ve said all along that Stephen Harper is damned if he does, and damned if he doesn’t. Given what he’s up against, with a media and business elite that doesn’t even pretend to hide the fact that they hate him, he’s actually doing not too badly. Damian Penny’s website has posted an Ipsos-Reid poll showing the Tories and Liberals neck and neck. However, I don’t think you’ll find that on the front page of any prominent newspapers.
Harper’s campaign seems a lot more professional and polished than last time. I really don’t think the Liberals expected this, and I sense that it’s confounding them. Maybe that old saying about generals who are always ready to fight the last war applies here.
The Liberal hidden agenda includes: Justice denied.
One man can stop the left liberal agenda, both the hidden agenda & the overt agenda.
One person, conservatives take note, can throw the left liberals off their spin. Speak out if you are a conservative; your lone voice must be heard. John Fearon is such a man. OTOH, the judge, will have been a Liberal appointee?>>>>
“Man files his own charges against pedophile”
…
n.
An adult who is sexually attracted to a child or children. (dictionary.com)>>
“John Fearon,from Toronto, says he was abused by Toft and is asking a judge to have him rearrested.”
National Post this day. More at:
http://www.rapp.org/url/?E328ZCOO
Edmonton Sun
Has anyone noticed that there is more reactionary contrived nationalist jingoism in the Globe since their hook up the (death)Star?
Read the crap they printed about the NRA…they actually accuse them of trying to fix this election….I saw it reported by the “crime” reporter in the Star and the article was echoed in the globe….Of course there were lots of condemning statements by Liberal politicians and America, US “gun culture”,NRA evil,Guns and gun owners were trotted out as the well worn strawman to be burned in a ritualistic frenzied cerimony by MSM Trudeaupian Druids….sheer alarmist demagoguery published as a diversion to off set a dead loss credibility/policy week for the lame-duck Martin campaign….in both publications with a new found singularity of viewpoint and camoflaged as “news”. The Globe is hitting a new low. It will only get more degenerate as the compaign wears on with the martin liberals fortunes dragging.
Nealenews.com has a story linked from McLean’s, talking about Harper being nailed again this time around.
http://www.macleans.ca/culture/media/article.jsp?content=20051213_117742_117742
On a similar vein… I was watching Jennifer Ward (She’s the lady who takes her glasses off and on more than “H” on CSI:Miami) on CTV Newsnet last night and it was incredible the gymnastics these people will do to paint Harper in a negative light.
She had some guy on speculating about nasty things that the Conservatives might say about the Liberals in the post-Christmas stage of the election.
These two went from speculation about what might happen… into a full discussion as though it had happened… literally doing a “tisk tisk” on Harper for a fictional event that they had just created. It was unreal.
Anyway, the McLean’s story that the press is out to get Harper is hardly a surprise to anyone who pays attention.
This will soothe your jangled nerves:
Still ironing out the wrinkles
>Mark Steyn – Monday,12 December 2005
>
>
>Well, they got away with it. Paul Martin wants to make it absolutely
>clear that he takes the Gomery report very very seriously, so he�s
>hiring 300 new federal auditors.
>
>Wow! Three hundred new auditors! Let Paul Martin be perfectly clear on
>this: this isn�t the old Liberal party culture of corruption, no sir.
>It�s the all-new Liberal party culture of corruption, now with full
>supporting cast!
>
>Granted, the sponsorship program that got him in this mess in the first
>place did, in fact, go through four separate federal audits, all of
>which �raised red flags.� Presumably, the red flags raised were those
>Sheila Copps� Maple Leafs, federally funded to the tune of $45 per and
>outsourced overseas to a company that neglected to attach any eyelets,
>sleeves or halyards, thus rendering them unflyable. So as soon as the
>red flags were raised they promptly fell down again, and life in the
>Liberapalooza sponsorship program continued as before.
>
>But who knows? Maybe if it had gone through not four but 54 or 104
>audits, at some point someone would have raised a red flag that stayed
>up, and the hordes of Grit wheeler-dealers would have said, �You know
>something? Auditor #102 is right. We need to cut this stuff out.�
>Maybe 300 new auditors aren�t enough. Maybe we need 3,000. There�s no
>way to know till the next scandal. But the prime minister�s willingness
>to hire 300 just for starters is a sign of how seriously committed he is
>to giving the appearance of doing something. And if half those 300 new
>auditors start putting in expense claims for four-figure lunches, we�ll
>make sure each auditor is personally audited by 300 new auditors all of
>his own. And if that�s still not enough we�ll hire a bunch of Quebec
>public relations firms to launch a campaign to attract more auditors.
>As many as it takes, even if it takes the entire adult population of la
>belle province.
>
>To get the flavour of the world the Liberals have made, consider this
>chipper press release from Scott Brison�s Public Works and Government
>Services Department outlining the scale of the �reforms�:
>
>�As part of this new approach, integrity provisions will be embedded in
>all contracts to provide a clear statement of the obligations currently
>set out in the Criminal Code, including prohibitions against paying,
>offering, demanding or accepting bribes or colluding with others to
>obtain a contract.�
>
>Who knew? As Messrs Martin and Brison see it, we had plenty of jolly
>useful laws against bribery and so forth, the only problem was we didn�t
>put a big enough sign up in the lobby. Now, when you enter the reception
>area, you�ll be greeted by a placard saying, �Travaux publics et
>services gouvernement aux Canada–PLEASE DO NOT OFFER A BRIBE AS A
>REFUSAL MAY OFFEND.� That should do the trick, shouldn�t it?
>
>Back in the Trudeaupian golden age, you may recall, the great man�s
>barnstorming transformation of Canada was momentarily halted by a storm
>about barns. It emerged that some overzealous officers of the Royal
>Canadian Mounted Police had burned down barns belonging to Quebec
>separatists. The press was briefly exercised over this, but M. Trudeau
>gave one of his famous shrugs and airily remarked that, if people were
>so upset by the Mounties burning down barns illegally, perhaps he�d make
>the burning of barns by the Mounties legal. As the great George Jonas
>commented:
>
>�It seemed not to occur to him that it isn�t wrong to burn down barns
>because it�s illegal, but it�s illegal to burn down barns because it�s
>wrong. Like other Statist politicians, Mr. Trudeau seemed to think his
>ability to set out for his country what is legal and illegal also
>entitled him to set out for his citizens what is right and wrong. He
>either didn�t see, or resented, that right and wrong are only reflected
>by the laws, not determined by them.�
>
>This is a distinction all but lost in the decayed Dominion�s political
>culture. Mr. Brison�s new guidelines are anxious to promote the idea
>that Adscam happened because the parties involved were not up to speed
>on what�s legal and illegal. That�s not the problem. It�s that they no
>longer know what�s right and wrong. I�d wager very few of the vast
>numbers of Liberal cronies, bagmen and wardheelers were unaware that
>what they were doing was against the law. And, if they were happy to
>break the existing laws, giving them three or four more laws to break
>and a couple dozen more regulations to ignore and 300 more audits to
>file in the basement is unlikely to change their basic approach to
>government. And why should it? In a one-party state, they are the law.
>They rule their fiefdoms: these are, in Alphonso Gagliano�s casually
>proprietorial phrase, �my crowns.�
>
>The language of the Westminster parliamentary tradition assumes
>integrity: �my right honourable friend,� �the honourable member� and, in
>the House of Lords, all that stuff about �the noble earl opposite.� The
>minute you can no longer assume it, the minute you have to have armies
>of �ethics commissioners� to put it all down in sub-clauses and
>appendices, the game is up. Queen Elizabeth I�s reign had the courtly
>intrigues of the Earl of Essex. Queen Elizabeth II�s has the kabuki
>�transparency� of 300 earls of ethics. When Liberal hacks drone on
>about �da Canadian values,� we should know what that boils down to: we
>now live in a political system where, when dealing with a minister of
>the Crown, one is obliged to sign a piece of paper undertaking not to
>offer a bribe to him or accept one therefrom.
>
>The Gomery process represents a rare example of strategic clarity from
>the famously �perfectly clear� Martin: by tarring the entire political
>culture, he preserved his own viability within it. I doubt anybody
>believes the official version–that the minister of finance was
>apparently unable to see beyond the end of his nose for an entire decade
>–but those few thousand voters in Ontario who
>decide federal elections have reacted not with �Boy, those politicians.
>We really need a change in Ottawa,� but with the traditional
>pseudo-cynicism of the eternal sucker: �Boy, those politicians.
>Everybody does it, eh?� And, if everybody does it, why change? The
>beauty of the Gomery report is that, while it may outline various
>breaches of this or that guideline or even law, the �meta-story,� as
>they say, is wholly favourable to the one-party state: as David Warren
>summed it up, �it confirms the Liberal Party pays for its friends.�
>
>Furthermore, from the point of view of those of us on the right, if the
>issue is Liberal corruption, we�re unlikely to benefit from any fallout.
>One notices in conversation with �progressive� friends that they now
>regard the Liberal party the same way they did the Soviet Union: nothing
>wrong with Communism, just a few wrinkles putting it into effect;
>nothing wrong with Liberal party values, just a few wrinkles in the
>Quebec branch of the promotions department. On that turf, no good will
>accrue to conservatives, as various NDP poll upticks here and there
>already indicate. Thus, the magnificent reduction of Canadian politics:
>the looming showdown in Vancouver Centre between Hedy Fry, the
>incendiary promoter of bogus Klan scares, and Svend Robinson, the
>light-fingered gay. Yes, yes, Svend, I know, that characterization is
>homokleptophobic, but you�ll have to win the election to get it made a
>new hate crime. A fantasist vs. a kleptocrat is almost too neat a
>pr�cis of the Canadian political scene, even if, for 100 per cent
>accuracy, the respective party labels should be reversed.
>
>In the end, people get the government they deserve–as we�ve seen on the
>news from Paris these last couple of weeks, and before that in the
>German election. My sense right now is the Grits are heading back to
>majority territory. C�mon, Ontario, prove me wrong.
I think the conservatives have been too hard on an open campaign platform. I and many of my fellow right of center friends would have seriously have considered not voting for Harper if he ran the campaign like last time. Canadians are angry at the mess on the floor. They know the Liberals created the mess but another blaming them without saying how he intends to clean up the mess would go nowhere. I believe their anger demands it cleaned up more than who did it. As well Canadians are so sick of negative news they are desperate for some positive policies. So far I give Harper high marks for his performance so far. Some of the women I work with who are only marginally political were asking me today which party was offering the 1200 directly to parents. I see this as a strong womens issue that the conservatives have been weak in the past. And you wouldn’t believe their reaction to Ken Dryden last night. Many have very angrily interpreted it as an attack on motherhood. I cant believe he screwed up so bad. Open platform = no hidden agenda and provides a hope for positive action. I know there is the danger of attack from media etc… but so far it appears the Liberals are on the defensive and badly managing it (Dryden for example)
Oh I forgot, SSM had to come out. Best right up front. Gives time to hammer his party is not for or against, just for a free vote as the way Martin did it was unconstitutional.
I am sick & tired of the fibs and everyone who as private citizens or corporations that want to perpetuate this cancer in our country. It is rotten right to the core and everyone knows it, but all those on the entitlement gravy train will support the fibs because it does them the most good.
Does it pay to be an honest hard working citizen anymore? Or do you have to be one of the good ol boys with tons of cash to get ahead. Corruption, lies, deception, are qualities that should not run this country anymore.
I feel like a Canadian with no hope for our future, I’m not even that old and I am about as jaded as it gets. Sorry for my rant, this election should be about who is going to do the best job for this country and it’s not. All the gravy trainer’s are standing in line to help those who are doling out our gravy.
How can a few of us make a difference?
That the media will not give Harper a fair hearing is obvious. Studies have shown that something like 85% of US MSM journalists vote Democrat. Is anyone aware of similar studies here in Canada? I have no doubt as to what they would show, but the figures would be interesting to have.
Mark F. Proudman
mfp@canadianreview.ca
I’ll borrow the following quotation from Iron Lady and use it in reference to George W. Bush and his treatment of prisoners:
�It seemed not to occur to him that it isn�t wrong to burn down barns because it�s illegal, but it�s illegal to burn down barns because it�s
wrong.”
Another chap who thinks the end justifies the means.
I was abosulety livid this morning, watching CPAC. It was hosted by Andrew Krystal, a moderator from Halifax, leaning so far to the left, he’s about to fall over. He has Scott Brison on as a quest and between them, I’m not sure who was doing the most sucking up. It was a total cop out, when a caller from Alberta called in and asked Brison, about the money stolen from honest, hard working tax payers by the Liberal Party. Krystals answer, “put down your crack pipe out there in the west and come back to reality”. Brison is so full of himself and the BS he cough’s up, it’s sickening. My evening prayer is, that both him and Belinda, get clobbered in the up coming election, by conservative canidates.
In the second half of the program, and after Brison left with all kinds of hugzzzz and kiss’s between him and Krystal, they had Peter MacKay on. To Peter’s credit, he did a excellent job of answering questions, both from the left leaning host and the callers in to the program. Krystal on the other hand, spun faster then a weather vain in a hurricane when Peter was on…(Typical Liberal).
The leftist MSM that is so fond of publishing polls that predict a Liberal win are cetainly not talking to the people that I meet on the street or for coffee. I think they’d be shocked to read a few of these blogs and asee what the honest hard working people are really saying.
Keep the posts coming everyone. They are my source of sanity these days, from the TV and news paper coverage of this election.
Krystal was canned from his job at 640 Toronto soon after doing a hatchet job on Harper in the last election.
I like to think the two events were related.
He spent a few months after that doing commercials and graveyard shift work on CFRB.
I was very happy to hear when he left the province altogether.
Hopefully his career continues as it has, so that people in the Outback of Australia will have the pleasure of listening to him next.
In the meantime, I’m sure he enjoyed kissing Bryson’s arse, and vice versa.
Andrew Krystal � The Krystal Nation � now there�s a guy.
I first heard of Krystal back when AM 640 was officially Mojo Radio. Krystal took issue with Mike Stafford � one of Toronto�s better radio guys, still on AM 640 in the same slot � referring to some ladies as Soccer Moms. Stafford, befuddled, said on air �Andrew Krystal? Who is Andrew Krystal?� and then did the smart thing and told him to piss off.
Curious as to just who this Krystal guy was, I tracked down his blog and discovered a cesspool of asinine left-wing �thought.� He had a small following of admirers, particularly some guy named �Mike in Scarborough.�
As mentioned above Krystal got canned from AM 640, no doubt because the owners found out that the Krystal Nation consistes of solely Krystal and his buddy Mike.
Needing work, Krystal secured the coveted Sunday midnight shift at CFRB. Michael Coren, broadcaster, CFRBer, and part-time righty, took pity on him and invited Krytal to take part in his TV show.
Well, what a mistake that was! Coren is normally a fairly gracious host, bending over especially for lefties, but Krystal pushed it too far from day 1. He said some of the most ridiculous things, and Coren was always in his face telling him as much.
Coren must have had enough because pretty soon Krystal was off the show and out of Toronto media completely.
When I heard that Krystal landed on his feet in Halifax, I took some satisfaction from that, although I pity the poor Haligonians.
But I�m sure the retrograde movement of his career is still on. I expect him to get a gig at some University radio station next.
Charles Adler has a great column in the Sun Media today…it is the Liberals that are scary and why!
I’ll tell you why Conservatives get accused of having a hidden agenda. It’s because people like me post that Harper should answer questions about the sort of the support and accolades he is getting from the American Right (http://jasoncherniak.blogspot.com/2005/12/harper-must-answer-for-us-support.html) but then Conservatives respond by saying “it’s not fair to ask us that”. Instead of avoiding the question, you have to accept that it is necessary to answer tough questions and take a stand that might lose you some votes. Until you do that, you will never get rid of the “hidden agenda”.
Mike, bless you, but I can’t take credit for the stuff posted. It’s Mark Steyn, and as much as I aspire to his particular brilliance, alas, I’m a mere mortal and incapable of such insight. But thanks. You gave me a lift. Saw some of the Krystal (Meth) and as soon as Ferret Face opened his mouth, I switched it off.
Here is the mindset of the left liberals: the use of the word “purge”, code for liquidate, murder, & etc. in re Ignatieff and the Liberal Party.****
“Let’s hope this element is purged from the Liberal Party after this election.”
simonpole.ca
Purge: search turns up some specimens:
Gendercide Watch: Stalin’s Purges
Stalin’s Purges. Summary. Under the dictatorship of Joseph Stalin, … Letter to
an imprisoned victim of Stalin’s Purges, cited by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, …
http://www.gendercide.org/case_stalin.html – 46k – Cached – Similar pages
Great Purges
Stalin now decided to purge the Red Army. Some historians believe that Stalin
… Stalin wanted to make sure that those who knew too much about the purges …
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/RUSpurge.htm – 58k – Cached – Similar pages
The Purge
Lenin and Dzerzhinskii, not Stalin, organized the first Soviet … Their execution
marked the beginning of all general purge of the army that was to …
mars.acnet.wnec.edu/~grempel/courses/ww2/lectures/ purge.html – 19k – Cached – Similar pages
Great Purge: Information From Answers.com
In 1968, Robert Conquest published The Great Terror: Stalin’s Purge of the Thirties.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s The Gulag Archipelago followed in 1973. …
http://www.answers.com/topic/great-purge – 68k –
Liberals Widen Lead
The shift in focus from the Advertising Scandal to issues such as daycare and healthcare seems to be playing to the Liberals favour.
Polling completed Tuesday December 6th indicates that the Liberals are now at 40% popular support followed by the Conservatives at 28%,the NDP at 17%, the BQ at 11% and the Green Party at 4%. Martin’s Performance Index Score increased 10 points on the day of his National Daycare announcement.
Polling December 4 to December 6, 2005 (Random Telephone Survey of 1,200 Canadians, MoE �2.9%, 19 times out of 20).
All values in parenthesis are changes from our November 13th national survey.
Canada Decided Voters
LIB – 40% (+6)
CP – 28% (NC)
NDP – 17% (-3)
BQ – 11% (-3)
GP – 4% (NC)
*18% of Canadians were undecided (+4)
In Quebec
BQ – 46% (-8)
LIB – 32% (+8)
CP – 10% (+1)
NDP – 8% (NC)
GP – 4% (NC)
Outside Quebec
LIB – 43% (+6)
CP – 33% (-2)
NDP – 20% (-5)
GP – 4% (NC)
Best PM
Martin – 29% (NC)
Unsure – 21% (+8)
Harper – 21% (-1)
None – 10% (-1)
Layton – 10% (-6)
Duceppe – 6% (-1)
Harris – 2% (-2)
Leadership Index (Daily composite of the Leaders’ Trust, Competence
and Vision)*
Martin – 86 (+10)
Harper – 47 (-10)
Layton – 37 (+2)
Duceppe – 24 (NC)
Harris – 12 (+1)
What is a so-called “hidden agenda”?
How can it be defined?
And does it really make any sense?
What critics of the Conservatives are saying is percisely this: “Show us what you say you aren’t hiding and when we see it, we’ll believe there’s no ‘hidden agenda.’ But if you fail to show us what it is you say you aren’t hiding, then we’ll believe it’s hidden.”
I mean, how nonsensical is that? It’s asking someone to prove a negative.
My definition of a “hidden agenda” is when a party says one thing and does another. Since Stephen Harper has not been given the chance to govern, it’s impossible to prove.
However, since the Liberals are a party that says one thing and does another – both the feds and the Ontario Libs, where I live – then it is them who meets the litmus test for having a hidden agenda.
Remember these polls are from liberano controlled companies.
The poll is from SES, which is the only one that called the last election right.
SES
Jason,
We get accused of “hidden agenda” because people like you (not a pejorative term , your words) determine we have one.
Because the Tor Star, Cerebrus, you and the screecher say it is so, does not make it so. When you ask legitimate questions on issues and not on Scott Reid talking points (ie. Do You Love Canada?), we will answer the questions.
When the CPC brings forth a platform point a day, the hidden agenda becomes somewhat moot.
The fact your side has brought forth nothing to date, that includes your so-called daycare plan, then should not look at your lack of agenda for the future rather than some made up issue.
Gee, the right-wing Republicans would like to see a right-of centre party win the Cdn election, Big News. Next you will tell there gambling in Ricks cafe Americain
It seems that a blog in the US is complaining about the same kind of left media bias in the US.
Media bias is the reason we can’t get the truth …
http://www.commonsensewonder.com/
I wonder if there might not be some kind of connection here far more insidious than Ralph Reed standing up in public and looking for support for Christian Consevative Ideas. At least he has the cajones to be upfront and public so all can view his actions.
I bring you,
The Twelve Days of CP-Christmas
Enjoy (and add your own carols to your own sites).
Here is a GREAT example of what this post is about.
Tories failing to make gains in Ontario, B.C. National Post
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=d516f0a0-f822-42da-92ef-4c084cccddb0
“Canada’s two biggest battlegrounds are proving treacherous for the Conservative party in the early days of the federal election. The Tories’ hopes of gaining ground in British Columbia and Ontario — where the Jan. 23 election is likely to be decided — have yet to be rewarded, according to a new public opinion poll.”
Now, to me this shows that both the NDP and the Tories are gaining on the Liberals. This shows that the Liberals, Tories and NDP are virtually tied in Ontario. But the Post had to spin it so it looked bad for Harper. And they didn’t even show the numbers for BC. But then the Post isn’t concerned about BC either is it? What a fraudulent article.
In the last election Ontario turned out like this:
Liberals – 75
Tories – 24
NDP – 7
If this poll is correct then it shows the following if the election were held today:
Liberals – 35
Tories – 35
NDP – 35
To me this points to at least a Conservative minority government with the Liberals and the NDP fighting it out for official Opposition status.
Why can’t the National Post just tell it like it is and stop spinning it in favour of the Liberals? I guess we all know the answer to that and this is the proof. What a farce.
Liberals want probe into alleged Tory back-out deal
The Liberals are demanding an investigation into allegations former Tory candidate Alan Ridell made a $50,000 deal with his party to back out and allow a star candidate to run.
$50,000
steve. This will go nowhere. But it looks like the beginning of the Liberals vaunted dirty tricks campaign. I bet we will see a ton of silly charges like this. And the media will pounce on each one.
If I were Ridell and was asked to back out after I’d spent $50,000 I’d want compensation too.
the louder spin is reality.
No, perception is reality. Just remember that Harper was the loudest for the past week.
Rope a dope strategy (Martin’s concealment)? No, hide a dope strategy (Martin’s numbers drop the more Canadians are exposed to him, his congenital dithering and crookedness shines right thorough). What to do if you’re the Lieberal campaign team? Hide him from the media, issue tons of press releases, have others make announcements and attacks, but keep the disaster in chief away from the places where his fellow travellers in the media can’t conceal his ineptitude (ie unscripted questions etc).
Rope a dope? Nope – hide a dope.
This concealment would be an issue if it was Harper hiding – all over the news, – with Martin’s friends in the media, it pretty much goes like this “nothing to see here – Martin’s not in hiding, its rope a dope – yeah, thast’s the ticket, rope a dope – by the way have you heard, Harper is scary / angry/ (insert whatever bullsh*t baffles the minds of dimwit Canadians)”
Pathetic. Canada’s press – with very few exceptions you have the intelligence of Belinda Stronach combined with the scruples of Scott Brison.
If Stronach hadn’t crossed the floor to save the Libs, what would her cabinet position have been worth to some long-time REAL Liberal MP? Red herring, I suspect. With all the candidates the Libs have parachuted into ridings, in return for senate or similar appointments, isn’t that the same as paying expenses or buying them off? CTV is about to release a poll showing TOries gaining in Ontario. Now it will begin to get dirty. But as Harper says, the Tories don’t have to look far. The facts on the Liberals speak for themselves. And as long as Layton continues to remind people that Stronach should be held accountabile next time she goes looking for a new party, as should any other MP, Liberal sleaze will continue to bubble and ooze like some toxic pond scum covering this great nation.
At first, I was finding all these polls discouraging, but I’ve come around…
Things on election day rarely fall the way one expects, or the way polls predict. The truth is, there are many people who’ve traditionally voted Liberal that are digusted with Martin and with the Liberals antics, but who for ideological reasons feel cannot support the Conservatives.
With polls like these, this group may decide that their vote won’t affect things all that much, and rather than do something distasteful, they’ll just stay home…
when is Belinder going to reveal the hidden agenda.
is it just me or do Belinder and Karla Homolka have the same hairdo????
one is a killer at a party and one is a party killer.
cool thing today we have both killer Karla and killer Khadr walking our streets free.
“I’ll tell you why Conservatives get accused of having a hidden agenda. It’s because people like me post that Harper should answer questions about the sort of the support and accolades he is getting from the American Right…”
Yes, it is EXACTLY because of “people like you.”
Please point us to the place in your blog where you discuss and condemn Liberal Premier – and serial liar – Dalton McGuinty’s use of image consultants from Bill Clinton’s campaign in the last Ontario provincial election.
That would help clear up any doubt that YOU have a “hidden agenda.”
The liberals have long denied, they had a hidden agenda when it came to the gun registry, but this morning with PMPM announcement, that all hand guns will be banned, it’s finally out of the bag. We in the west have always said, that “registration today, confiscation tomorrow” was always the liberals agenda. Now its coming to pass and for the possiblity of winning some seats in Toronto and southern Ontario.
Its obvious to me, that Martin has written off any chance of picking up seats in the west. Maybe some of his bum boys have been reading the blogs after all and decided he doesn’t need in one loney seat in Sask and two in Alberta, don’t equeal what he can again in Ontario.
His announcement that they would finally bring in stronger penalties, for crimes committed with guns, has been what legitmate gun owner have been advocating for years.Punish the criminal, not the legitmate gun owner. But he has gone way over the line with the total ban.
If the liberals are re-elected they’re ban on hand guns will be they’re first step to a total ban on all firearms in this country. Ironically, thats exsactly what the Natzi’s did in Germany, just before the second world war.
AdScam Martin & the Librano$$$$$$ are soft on crime/murder/violence & etc.
primetimecrime.com
Leo Knight’s website has the pic of the lady on the sidewalk. A horrible indictment of Canadian society. Is she your sister? Your mother? Your grandmother? Your aunt? Identify her, please. >>>> Would post here; but, no can do??????????????????
Wanted: AdScam Martin & the Librano$$$$: Soft on Crime. >>>>>>>
TORONTO – An elderly woman suffered a broken arm and jaw after she was thrown to the ground in a daytime mugging by three teen thugs yesterday. (Toronto Sun)
Trio hacked by machete in suspected drug deal
EDMONTON – City police suspect a drug deal gone bad was behind a vicious machete attack that left three people injured overnight. (Edmonton Journal)
Watch for Paul Martin to go to Edmonton now and announce a ban on machetes. – Leo
Volunteer’s murder shocks recreation centre
TORONTO – News that Rose McGroarty had been dismembered and her body scattered around Toronto shook the Parkdale Activity and Recreation Centre, where the woman volunteered her time. (CTV)
Fortunately, the sheeple have all the pollsters like Ipsco-Reid, Decima, et all- to tell us how the Glibs want us to think!?! (And they are paid by the taxpayers, to tell us!) How’s that for getting dipped in shit?
The liberals hidden agenda legalize murder and robbery after all they have done it in SAN FRANCISCO
Harper was asked a question on SSM and he answered it truthfully and forthrightly. The MSM immediately jumped on this “tactical error.” What happened to policy debates. Canadians need to accept the reality of government and stop seeing it as some sort of game. They need to wake up and decide for themselves, not through soundbytes, which party they should support. Liberals have backtracked on numerous policies (pistol banning, marrriage, tax cuts, GST, etc) and the Conservatives have a hidden agends. BTW I could care less what the NRA, Bill Clinton or Michael Moore think about our elections. Is Harper lobbying/speaking with the NRA? Is Paul Martin lobbying/speaking with Bill Clinton? Oops, sorry he is. Spare me the crap and hypocrisy.