Captains Quarters has several posts on the testimony coming out of both Gomery and the Commons accounts committee. I’d suggest you just head over and start at the top, though I’ll provide a few key exerpts as appetizer;
The Sponsorship Program bought advertising at ten hunting and fishing shows from Gaetan Mondou for $100,000, who discovered yesterday that the man who bought them, Luc Lemay, told the government that they had cost over $1.8 million. The difference disappeared into the pockets of Jacques Corriveau, longtime pal of Jean Chr�tien and a man who doesn’t even fish.
[…]
…the two inquiries now have started to air testimony that demonstrates Martin may well have participated in the same schemes as his former boss as well as parallel corruption supporting his chief of staff’s boyfriend.
It’s these developments that pushed the Liberals into the desperate move of blocking Harper from controlling Parliamentary business on Opposition Days as scheduled yesterday in order to gain time to recover …
And this, which should the opposition members should start trying to hammer home; that Martin’s delays have engineered the perpetrators a free “Get Out Of Jail Free” card by pushing the investigation past the absurdly brief 18 month statute of limitations.
Weston believes that much more promise may come from an independent financial audit from the same forensic accounting team that plumbed the depths of the Enron scandal. Insiders have told Weston that after going through the financial records of everyone involved in Adscam, including the front businesses and the subcontractors, the bagmen and the recipients of their cash, and of course the Liberal Party, they have a good idea who wound up with the lion’s share of the money.
They promise that the audit contains “pure political dynamite” — and that report will come to the Gomery Inquiry in the next few weeks. Canadians might even see some of the money returned, if it still exists in liquid form, but more likely will be tax-fraud charges that might survive the statute of limitations that prevent Adscammers from facing the consequences of their graft.
Well, they’ve been treating our money as though it was paper in their own political board game. I suppose we should have known there’d be a “Get Out Of Jail Free” card in the rules – after all, they wrote them.

Weston has another article out about how the great deficit-slayer Paul Martin will cut government spending. A typical scene from The Libranos….
Tue, April 19, 2005
Feds’ 10% solution ‘a disaster’
By Greg Weston — Sun Ottawa Bureau
http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/Columnists/Ottawa/Greg_Weston/2005/04/19/1003163.html
Gomery “Inquiry: Martin pal handled contracts”
Pal’s name : Claude Boulay.
While Martin was Finance Minister during Chretien’ thugocracy, of course.
PM PM, aka Mr. Denial, is in denial.
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2005/04/14/997245-cp.html
If the opposition parties are paying attention they’ll campaign on promises to remove the statute of limitations from this type of crime so that we can nail the bastards.
On second thought, that will never fly. There are still too many “Mulroney Conservatives” in the CPC who would be endangered by this.
Right on the button, Sean
Thank you Dear Katie for exposing this latest move on extending the Statute of Limitations, which I believe is a bomb shell in itself. It is past GALL and bordering on the Criminal to take advantage of their authority by implementing LAWS to cover their ASS.
Luckily Canadians are not of the “animal” nature that the Liberals have shown themselves to be to me, otherwise there could be some “funerals” in the making. No we will “bury” their reputations, which to them is worse than death.
Canamsteve ww 2 vet.
Maybe they will dodge criminal justice, but their legacy will be to have destroyed the LPC: I will remember this every time I have a ballot in my hand, for the rest of my days.
“…but their legacy will be to have destroyed the LPC”
Cocky, aren’t you? Just keep cutting heads off the Hydra and see what happens…