Lodestone

13 Replies to “Lodestone”

1. A legend in his own mind.
   His expression tells me he thinks he is important and doing something of great significance.

2. Indeed, a nobody.

   I’ve seen several posts that claim this dude was some high-poo-bah in DHS, and nothing could be farther from the truth. His position as “Chief of Staff” is little more than a glorified, albeit high-level, “Go-fer” job.

3. We’ll find out in months or years from now that the “leaker” who said Trump dissed the military as “suckers and losers”, was also some wet behind the ears punk, who has never met or been near Trump.

4. Wasn’t he in the movie “Waterboy”?

5. Never even met Trump so has no insights so just another unconnected spectator with no direct knowledge of anything.
   Maybe his book sale was going nowhere; that’s my speculation. Old news, nobody cared then or now, another politician.
   Also seems an obvious attempt to change the channel from Bobulinski. More resistance to truth from desperate Demedia.
   Taylor story has shelf life of nanoseconds, while Bobulinski revelations are hitting the mainstream, despite censorthip.
   He saw precisely zero. He sounds like another neo con faked-Lincoln loser. Pathetic comeback from DeMarxists.

   “Trump later tweeted, “Who is Miles Taylor? Said he was “anonymous”, but I don’t know him – never even heard of him. Just another @nytimes SCAM – he worked in conjunction with them. Also worked for Big Tech’s @Google. Now works for Fake News @CNN. They should fire, shame, and punish everybody associated with this FRAUD on the American people!”

   https://deadline.com/2020/10/miles-taylor-donald-trump-anonymous-1234605072/

6. Whoa whoa whoa people – STOP MOCKING THIS PATRIOT! This dude was the Deputy Assistant to the Chairman of the Inspector General Under-Secretary of the Department of Paperwork! He’s practically royalty! As Greta would say – HOW DARE YOU?!?!

7. Actually, the problem here is that NYT would publish this piece anonymously. Would they do the same for an anonymous Biden piece. . . or something positive about Trump coming from a similar nobody. Fine for the guy to have written it. It’s his opinion, but the Times is responsible for the deception and malicious slander.

   1. “Would they do the same for an anonymous Biden piece. . .”

      Would they do the same for an anonymous Biden piece??????? hell they’re not even publishing Hunter’s emails after the FBI and CIA say they’re legitimate, and a witness is testifying to them publicly!

8. does that eunuch bunk with vindman?:???

9. Pantlode.

10. A young man who has the gravitas and substance of flatulence. And like flatulence he will pass.

11. What are you talking about? The NYT never wrote such a story. There is no person who falsely claimed they were in the administration and completely fabricated a story. No. You’re mistaken. You’re a conspiracy theorist. And you lie.

12. We should be seeing this Dud on the Social.