Category: Military

Walking The Line

A reporter in Iraq follows the example of Sam Walton.

The Command Sergeant Major is the right-hand man of the top General in Iraq, the premiere Non-commissioned Officer for every Soldier, Marine, Airman and Naval enlisted person. This includes all Coalition members such as the Poles, the Estonians, Koreans, and all the rest. In other words, Mellinger is Alpha. His principle job is to walk the line, whether it be in combat in Mosul, or a ship in the Arabian Gulf. Because he walked the line, he was the man; and his first question to me was, “Who are you?”
My passport was already opened to the page-I did not yet have an ID card-and I handed it over to him, saying I am an author and wanted to go to Tikrit. I asked if he was headed that way. “You aren’t one of those journalists who will sit in a Baghdad hotel room and write about the war, are you?” It was as much accusation as question.
“Sergeant Major,” I said, “I didn’t come to Iraq to hang out in a hotel. I am trying to get to Tikrit.”
[…]
And so, he picked me up and we drove to Baghdad, and now we are headed to Kuwait. I’ve had six months to put a list of questions together. Some of his answers, along with my observations from “walking the line” with CSM Mellinger, will be included with subsequent posts. But for now, we are driving the roads of Iraq in a Humvee, and walking the line.

One to bookmark.

“Knaves grow rich and the good men are destroyed”

A letter to David Frum;

“I work with serving US soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq. These are, for the most part, wonderful human beings: bright, articulate, honest and possess a keen sense of morality, fair-play, and an unerring sense of honour and duty (one of my students was badly wounded in Iraq last year, but he’s right back at soldiering again).
“Then, I compare these soldiers to the alleged political leaders of Canada – and I find it embarrassing to the point that I feel like I am going to be ill. The lying, the cheating, the swindling, and the shear gutless heap of human immorality that has ensconced itself in the role of leadership enrages me and every other patriotic Canadian I know.

What’s For Dessert?

I expect PETA will soon be announcing they are sending costumed protestors to Iraq.

The warriors of Iraq’s new army excel at wearing balaclavas, eating raw cat and driving into battle at hair-raising speeds. The troops on the front line of the campaign to crush the country’s insurgency roared into action on the fringes of the “Sunni Triangle” recently in a convoy of pick-up trucks. The vehicles’ speedometers rarely dipped below 80mph. “We go fast, they not hit us. No need to be worried. Iraqi soldiers are very brave,” boasted Capt Haidar, although not brave enough himself to give anything other than his first name. “I am special forces,” he said. “To finish training we must catch a wild rabbit or cat with our hands, kill it with our hands and then eat it raw. I have eaten five cats. See how strong is the Iraqi soldier.”

More at Outside The Beltway.

“An Angry Party With Narrow Views”


Rookie Conservative MP Steven Fletcher
has apologized for an incident last weekend where he referred to Japanese soldiers from the Second World War as “Japs” and “bastards.”
Fletcher made the remarks last weekend at a veteran’s convention in Winnipeg.
His specific statement was: “The Japs were bastards.”
In his statement of apology on Saturday, Fletcher referred to his family’s personal experiences during the war, saying they had given him “a very emotional perspective” on that historical period.
His grandfather was a prisoner of war held by the Japanese, captured during the fall of Singapore.
“I allowed those emotions to colour my remarks,” he said. “I should have chosen more appropriate language, and will do so in the future. I apologize for any offence I may have caused, and retract my choice of words without reservation.”
But he also said this: “I stand by the fact that the Japanese were ruthless. If people want to challenge me on that, I look forward to it.”
Fletcher told The Canadian Press: “They used my grandfather’s friend for bayonet practice. They put my grandfather on a raft when he was ill to die. They shot people indiscriminately.
“In the context of the time, in World War II, they treated people in ways that were barbaric and disgusting, and it should never be forgotten, and it should never be allowed to happen again.”
During the 1940s, “Japs” was commonly used to describe Japanese people, but it is now considered to be an ethnic slur.
Fletcher’s role at the conference was to bring greetings from the federal government.
Hayden Kent, president of the Army, Navy and Air Force Veterans Unit 283, said the MP’s remarks caught the veterans off guard.
“I understand his feelings about what his grandfather went through, but that wasn’t the time or the place,” he said.
“If we’d had a person of Japanese descent on the convention floor, how would that person have felt? We have to forgive.”
Bev Oda, a Conservative MP and the first Japanese-Canadian elected to Parliament, was mildly critical of her colleague.
“We have a job certainly as members of Parliament to work against racism but we can do that without using the terminology of the day,” he said.
The Liberals said Fletcher’s outburst is yet more evidence that the Conservatives are an angry party led by people with narrow views.
But the NDP said Fletcher’s apology should end the matter.

 

 

 

 

 

Reluctantly, the American prisoners did as they were told, all 150 of them, crawling single file into the dark, poorly ventilated pits. Everyone but Stidham, whose stretcher was conveniently placed beside one of the trench entrances. If the planes came, his buddies would gather his limp form and tuck him into the shelter with everyone else.
They waited and waited but heard not a single American plane, let alone a hundred. They huddled in the stifling dankness of their collective body heat, sweat coursing down their bare chests. The air-raid bell continued to peal. A Navy signalman named C.C. Smith refused to go into his pit. Suddenly the Buzzard set upon him. He raised his saber high so that it gleamed in the midday sun, and with all his strength he brought it blade side down. Smith’s head was cleaved in two, the sword finally stopping midway down the neck.
Then, peeking out the ends of the trenches, the men saw several soldiers bursting into the compound. They were carrying five-gallon buckets filled with a liquid. The buckets sloshed messily as the soldiers walked. With a quick jerk of the hands, they flung the contents into the openings of the trenches. By the smell of it on their skin, the Americans instantly recognized what it was — high-octane aviation fuel from the airstrip. Before they could apprehend the full significance of it, other soldiers tossed in lighted bamboo torches. Within seconds the trenches exploded in flames, The men squirmed over each other and clawed at the dirt as they tried desperately to shirnk from the intense heat. They choked back the smoke and the fumes, their nostrils assailed by the smell of singed hair and roasting flesh. They were trapped like termites in their own sealed nest.
Only a few managed to free themselves. Dr.Carl Mango, from Pennsylvania, sprang from his hole, his clothes smoldering. His arms were outstretched as he peaded — “Show some reason, please God show reason” — but a machine gunner mowed him down.
Another prisoner crawled from his trench, wrested a rifle from the hands of a soldier, and shot him before receiving a mortal stab in the back. A number of men dashed toward the fence and tried to press through it but were quickly riddled with lead, leaving a row of corpses hung from the barbed stands like dried cuttlefish. A few men managed to slip through the razor ribbon and leap from the high cliff, but more soldiers were waiting on the beach to finish them off. Recognizing the futility of escape but wanting to wreak a parting vengeance, one burning prisoner emerged from his trench, wrapped his arms tightly around the first soldier he saw, and didn’t let go — a death embrace that succeeded in setting the surprised executioner on fire.
All the while, Lieutenant Sato scurried from trench to trench with saber drawn, loudly exhorting his men and occasionally punctuating his commands with a high, nervous laugh. At his order, another wave of troops approached the air-raid shelters, throwing grenades into the flaming entrances and raking them with gunfire. Some of the troops poked their rifle barrels through the entrances of the trenches and fired point-blank at the huddled forms within. James Stidham, the paralytic who had been watching all of this from his stretcher, quietly moaned in terror. A soldier stepped over to him and with a perfunctory glance fired two slugs into his face.”
From Ghost Soldiers– an account of the atrocity at Palawan, Dec.14, 1944.

Sanctuary

Bill is back.

Let’s speak to the Perennially Outraged as if they were the fully grown, post-pubescent children they pride themselves on being.
What is the obvious difference between an enemy Prisoner of War, and an Unlawful Combatant? Suppose two of them were standing in a line-up. What one glaringly obvious thing sets them apart?
That’s right! One is wearing a uniform, and the other isn’t.
And why do soldiers wear uniforms?

h/t

Canadian Shame Museum

I think I’m going to be sick.

One of the first images to confront visitors when they enter the new Canadian War Museum is not about war but about shame.
The painting of a dazed Kyle Brown, the only Canadian soldier imprisoned in the 1993 fatal torturing of Somali teenager Shidane Arone, is set on the portrait wall between a drowning sailor, a laughing war bride, a decorated war hero and a soldier with post-traumatic stress disorder.
Its prominence is a clue that this is a museum with a difference, one that doesn’t shy away from the painful, the shocking, the controversial. One that tells stories of ordinary people and turns heroism on its head.

No, the only legitimate history today is the Revisionist, Morally Relative History.
These people are pigs. Absolute pigs. I don’t think I’ve ever been as ashamed of my country as I am today.
Via Neale

Revisiting Friendly Fire: Night Vision Devices

A week or so ago I recieved an item in the mail with the following questions attached, and a link to a site called “Out Of The Dark”.
The writer also included a National Post item from April 16th, titled Friendly Fire’s Pain Endures”, about the incident that claimed 4 Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan. There was a hand written note that asked;

The photos in the paper are not the greatest, either. One can’t see any glowing, shining, light of any kind. So did the government forget to buy the right equipment again??

  • warrior “glolatce” [sp??]
  • IR chem lights
  • phoenix ir strobes
  • battle reference marking system
  • thermal identification panels
  • This is way over my head (and not within my time constraints to follow up) …. if nothing else, perhaps some of our military readers can help shed light on this question for a reader.

    They Just Can’t Help Themselves

    Just in case you were of the mistaken impression that the Liberals were hard at work restoring integrity to government…

    A power struggle with Defence Minister Bill Graham has provoked the military’s acting ombudsman to resign just weeks into her job. Barbara Finlay, who was appointed acting ombudsman by Graham when Andre Marin resigned April 1, stepped down last week.
    Spokeswoman Barbara Theobalds said Finlay quit after she received a letter from Graham April 14 confirming her appointment and asking that she forward sensitive complaints to the minister’s office.

    h/t

    Solid State Lasers Within Sight

    CBS;

    After 40 years of work, the Pentagon may have a solid-state laser in its arsenal within a decade, reports the Oakland Tribune.
    Compared to the chemical lasers now in use by America’s military, solid-state lasers would be compact and efficient – perhaps running off the engine of an Army Humvee or an Air Force F-16.
    Solid-state lasers would also be deadly. In a recent demonstration at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory – one of three sites of research on a solid-state laser – a test-fired laser emitted 400 pulses of light in two seconds, drilling through an inch of steel, the Tribune reported.
    Once fully developed, the Tribune reports, solid-state lasers could shoot down mortars and artillery shells, explode ordnance in enemy depots and even wipe out ballistic missiles 500 miles away. They would strike with incredible speed and could be retargeted instantly.
    Contrary to science fiction, the lasers will not be visible streams of light. Instead, targets will simply explode. Troops will not point and shoot lasers, because they will most likely have to react to dangers and targets moving too fast for a human response. Nor will lasers be holster- sized – the smallest to date is the size of a commercial jetliner.

    So, eh… how’s the work on them underwater candles diesel subs of ours going?

    Busting Their Ass

    Operation Iraqi Freedom meets South Park.
    kyle_iraq.gif
    Related: Insurgents Seeking Exit Strategy

    Sharif Ali Bin al-Hussein, who heads Iraq’s main monarchist movement and is in contact with guerrilla leaders, said many insurgents including former officials of the ruling Ba’ath party, army officers, and Islamists have been searching for a way to end their campaign against US troops and Iraqi government forces since the January 30 election.
    […]
    Unlike Mr Zarqawi’s followers, who are thought to be responsible for the big suicide bomb attacks on Iraqi civilian targets, the other Sunni insurgents are more likely to plant bombs and carry out ambushes against security forces and US troops active near their homes.
    Sharif Ali said the success of Iraq’s elections dealt the insurgents a demoralising blow, prompting them to consider the need to enter the political process.

    Armed Forces Spending: Thanks For Nothing

    It looks like defence analysts are beginning to catch up with blogosphere chatter on what the Liberal budget really promised them.
    You can’t really blame them for the initial euphoria. The Liberals have been draining money from the armed forces for so many years, simply getting nothing must have felt like a windfall.
    CNEWS

    The initial exultation over military spending promises in last month’s federal budget is giving way to sober second thought by some in the defence community.
    Upon closer scrutiny, the government’s promise of $12.8 billion in new spending over five years may not be all it’s cracked up to be, say observers.
    For at least the next three years, spending – adjusted for inflation – will still be well below peak levels in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

    And lest we forget – the military is to come up with $640 million in cost savings.

    One-time increases in defence spending over the next two years have been pegged at $500 million and $600 million, most of which is targeted specifically for infrastructure upgrades.
    But figures adjusted for inflation indicate this and next year’s budgets are only equivalent to or less than adjusted spending last year, when planes were grounded and ships tied up for lack of resources to operate them.
    A look at defence spending from 1986 to the present suggests the military is still far below the peak 1988-89 level of $16.1 billion adjusted to 2005 dollars.
    Keith MacDonald, a retired fighter pilot, told the Conference of Defence Associations recent annual meeting that the budget was “smoke and mirrors.”

    Faster, Lighter, Sooner

    The Belmont Club deciphers the transformation underway in the structure of the US military – a helpful read for those who like to include context in their understanding of day to day developments in US foreign policy.

    Rumsfeld’s response appears to be shaped by this reality. It is a search for systems, organizations and strategies which possess utility both against terrorism and rival states. In some cases a match will be easy to find. In others, most notably in the case of heavy divisions, manned aircraft and naval systems, there must be a trade- off between them. But implied within Rumsfeld’s reported plan is the startling aspect of time: it is above all a preemptive approach aimed at shaping the political and cultural battlefield in advance of actual hostilities involving American troops.
    Although the concept is described by the WSJ in the traditional terms of “helping allies battle internal threats” it is impossible to separate it from the notion of creating a more functional world, which is related to the ideas of reducing disconnectedness and spreading democracy. How and whether this concept evolves into doctrine will be a fascinating process to watch. One suspects that the ultimate price of the Western European vacation from history will have been the transformation of the United States into the foremost revolutionary force of the age.

    (A note to the peanut gallery – despite the frequency with which I discuss the US on this blog, I’m always open to including analysis and commentary on Canadian foreign policy. Please alert me when we get one.)

    Defenseless

    IN the Ottawa Sun Douglas Fisher minces few words.

    New thinking on defence? Ask yourself: What other nation doesn’t provide a separate chapter in its budget for defence? In our 400-page document this bold, new era for our forces got five, buried in a 25-page chapter entitled Meeting our Global Responsibilities. Our military was lumped in with — and symbolically followed — tsunami relief and other foreign aid.
    And then there is the language used. The budget speaks of “conflict situations” not wars. Our allies may be “fighting a war on terrorism” in Afghanistan but we are there to re-establish “peace and security.” If anything, this budget strengthens the notion that our military’s true role is to be an alternate delivery mechanism for foreign aid.
    The notion the military is receiving an immediate and desperately-needed infusion of cash is a joke. Fully $10.2 billion of the $12.8 billion “promised” won’t arrive until 2008-10, which is budgetary never-never land. The minority Liberal government is preening over a promise to deliver cash relief to the forces after its own re-election, and this with the proviso that only if the country is still posting enormous surpluses at that time. This is an empty, despicable boast, given the military’s plight.
    […]
    Perhaps most stunning of all in this budget is its lack of any new money over the next two years for new equipment.

    Laurie Hawn fleshes this out.

    We should also be aware of what is happening to our fighter force. For fifty years, we have had Canadian fighters patrolling our airspace, or sitting on alert to react to Soviet incursions or other air traffic situations. The focus changed on 9/11 from looking outward to also looking inward. Our ability to look anywhere has steadily eroded.
    We will soon be down to 80 operational CF-18s, the number that we can afford to upgrade. We are also critically short of fighter pilots, many having left in disillusionment. Flying time has been cut back to the point where we no longer train at low level and intensity of training has been reduced to preserve safety. Preserving safety under these circumstances also makes us ineffective. No matter how fast we can spin the earth, the new simulators we’re buying will never fly and nothing in the new budget addresses the erosion of our aerospace sovereignty.
    Most people probably don’t know that 433 Squadron in Bagotville will shut down this summer to make one larger 425 Squadron. It won’t be long before some bean counter or other non-warrior sees a source of further personnel cuts. Heck, if you’ve got 400 people, surely you can make it work with 375, or 350, or………… The same thing will happen in Cold Lake next summer, with the shutdown of 416 Squadron. That will leave Canada with two, count ’em, two operational fighter squadrons. Billy Bishop weeps!
    These shutdowns will free up a handful of positions to help start a new air warfare college. What’s the point of having a college about air warfare if you have no Air FORCE to apply it? I’m sure that the office equipment, pens and paper in Winnipeg will strike fear in the hearts of our enemies and respect in the hearts of our allies.

    Laurie – you need a blogroll. Your viewpoint deserves more readership, and that won’t happen if you move into the blogosphere proper. Outgoing linkage = incoming traffic.

    More On The Dither Slither


    05.02.27.OhCanada-X.gif

    Bob Tarantino skewers Linda McCuaig’s defense of the Dither slither away from BMD that
    “standing up to the American empire … will only improve our standing in a world increasingly alarmed by U.S. unilateralism”
    .

    This is one of those fascinating rationalizations that requires a complete suspension of any connection with reality in order for it to make sense. “Improve our standing in the world”? Who is she kidding? Does anyone honestly believe that anyone outside the US military establishment and the incestuous world of the Canadian media and political culture gives a flying hump about this issue? Who is getting fired up about this? Jack Layton. Newspaper editorialists. Some Canadian bloggers. That’s pretty much it. The issue was splashed across front pages for a day, and now it’ll likely fade away, never to be heard about again. Check Google News, and see if you can even find any non-Canadian, non-US media outlets reporting about the issue. I saw one mention in Australia, one in Borneo and one in India. That’s it. If the primary rationale for dodging participation in BMD is to get brownie points with “the world”, we’re gonna need to do a much better job of selling it.

    Joel Fleming weighs in on a similar remark later in the “opinion” column, (we can use scare quotes, too, Linda), that “Canada’s gutsy refusal to go along was the right move – and one that, incidentally, will win us higher standing in the world.

    Except “incidentally” isn’t really accurate, is it Linda? Why else would the title trumpet Canada’s newfound “respect”? International popularity was the primary factor in the decision, wasn’t it? This is what happens when you extend the Liberals trademark, poll-driven decision-making to foreign policy. Congratulations Canada – North Korea, Iran and Syria like us a lot more today.
    Though I’m not sure you could call it “respect.”

    To repeat something I’ve said earlier – Canada’s role in the world has been reduced to serving as a warning to the US.

    Goodale’s Military Spending

    In the event that you were convinced that Ralph Goodale announced major increases to military spending in the budget, allow Damian Brooks to disabuse you of that notion.

    Ralph Goodale’s big day has come and gone, and the final numbers for the military are out in the open: $500 million dollars more in the DND budget than last year.

    Of the 12.8 billion in increases “promised” in the budget, $11.7 B is 2 years in the future (beyond the likely mandate of this government) and 8 billion had already been announced.
    A reader writes;

    They took out $20 billion from the military over 10 years and $2 billion from the RCMP, CSIS and Customs and Immigration. So they took out $22 billion and are putting back $13 billion and they call that an increase??
    The RCMP, CSIS and Customs and Immigrations (CBSA today) need at least 5000 officers. How many have been hired with this $8 billion. When the government talks about border security, they are lumping in infrastructure such as bridges roads, warehouses which should be coming out of public works not security. When they talk about speeding traffic across the border, that’s what they are talking about, not increasing security manpower. Meanwhile the media sleep after being thrown a PR budget document to talk about for a couple of days.

    Navigation