Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
I imagine that number will be much higher this year as we’ve seen many dams burst such as China.
We have aged infrastructure that used to be built with quality materials…today, not so much.
I see many areas too where hurricanes keep blowing through the same areas…weakened infrastructure and poor reconstruction, cheaper materials.
The math is not completely correct, the reduction is 97.5%, not 99.75% (40 times higher risk 100 years ago).
But the general conclusion/observation still holds, of course.
The main driver I think is a strong economy driven by low cost energy that allows people to live in sturdy, heated and cooled homes.
Weather warning systems and the Internet are also huge. Part of the reason the Internet was invented by DARPA. Trigger warning for UnMe, it was not invented by Al Gore.
https://www.itpro.com/technology/34730/10-amazing-darpa-inventions
https://www.darpa.mil/
Yes, I’d like to expand on your first point a bit. I’ve tried to use that talking point with my neighbours. Rich societies can not only afford things like dependable electricity, coddling at-risk species (California Condor ring a bell with anyone?), clean water, non-poisonous food (sewer grease, anyone?) clean streets and many more, they expect them and work towards them.
Anyone who tries to deny mining permits in Canada or the US “because of their ecological impact” not only doesn’t know the standards that must be met, but also doesn’t know the natural range of conditions. Like pH 1 water flowing off a ridge with a porphyry deposit in it.
Instead, they double down on “we don’t need to be rich anymore, and we can maintain the standards.” Uh. No, one goes with the other.
More people means that there will be more deaths, eventually.