Sounds about Right:
While engaging in astonishing viciousness, vulgarity and violence toward Republicans, liberals accuse cheerful, law-abiding Tea Party activists of being violent racists.
Responding to these vile charges, conservative television pundits think it’s a great comeback to say:
“There is the fringe on both sides.”
Both sides? Really? How about: “That’s a complete lie”? Did that occur to you simpering morons as a possible reply to the slanderous claim that conservatives are fiery racists?
My reply would be something like it’s your story, you created it so I’ll let you make up the details. Be careful though, you may get hit with the truth. Not good for your career path.
Nobody does racism like a Progressive.
They love it, revel it in.
She’s got a very good point. I have always tried to be rational with these idiots. Now I just get right in their faces. A little flash of anger seems to make these folks back peddle quickly. It also helps if you’re better at name calling than they are.
Gord, you are exactly right, I have done that for several years now, it works and it shuts them up. 99% of them are a bunch of gutless little know nothings with no facts to back up their mindless banter. They roll over real quick when confronted.
I think you have to behave as the adult and treat them as the child. Therefore, you stand firm, and say: “How dare you talk to someone in such a manner. How dare you accuse another human being of…..” “You ought to be ashamed of yourself.”
That parental authority stuns them.
Simpering morons is about right. There is nothing like a “progressive” conservative to help the left/lib cause.
I don’t know if this has yet been posted here on SDA but this recent editorial by Pat Caddell and Doug Schoen is well worth reading: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/second-reading/spector-vision/todays-must-read-column/article1654160/
Both are longtime Democrats and see how incredibly dangerous the ploys of Obama and his minions are to America.
If the press were to portray the average Tea Partier (or pro-lifer) as an Everyman, they would be screwed. What could be wrong with a disgruntled voter, small businessman or housewife? Throw in allegations of racism and now the press can whip an unsuspecting public into a fury. It’s an old, crude tactic and Miss Coulter only repeated what has been occurring, which she is right to do.
teapartiers are “violent racists”?
That sort of defamation is dangerous — it can be code for an false excuse to use violence themselves against teapartiers “in self-defence”.
Don’t these people know the difference between a bunch of working class people in golf shirts and retirees in lawn chairs, and neo-Nazi skin heads in jackboots??!!!
ricardo asks, “Don’t these people know the difference between a bunch of working class people in golf shirts and retirees in lawn chairs, and neo-Nazi skin heads in jackboots??!!!”
Of course they do; it’s that they don’t care.
I have been watching a lot of Fox lately, and it
is remarkable how inept many conservatives are at
countering slanders. The worst are Republican
politicians, who are docile targets for any kind of leftist
attack. Of course the Fox anchors – Sean Hannity,
Bill O’Reilly, etc., don’t let anything get by
them; they should be used as models.
They think they can destroy the Tea Party movement by smearing them sans any actual evidence, heck the Libs are doing the self same thing here in Canada and we do not have a Tea Party movement.
I think for the first time in their leftarded lives they realise we’ve had enough of their loopy upside down logic and we are going to fight back. The so called Cons that finger wave and admonish those of us they deem to vocal,rude etc are partisan hacks in it for the power and the glory I don’t like them anymore than I like the racist’s self loathing hateful leftards.
I heard Pat Caddell talking about his article on Dennis Miller’s radio show and was so impressed. I didn’t think there were any more liberal Democrats like that left; he sounded like someone out of the 1950s or early 60s who’d woken up to discover his party had been taken over by aliens.
You tell’em Anne!! Let’s see some backbone!
How about they tune in for some lessons from Kate, Ezra and Mark…
I don’t argue with leftists anymore. It’s not like they’re going to provide a new argument; just more of the same good intentions.
I have no problem calling them names, ridiculing them, pushing buttons…we’re talking about bottom feeders who could end up causing a civil war, here.
I have not only been in their face for years,I am at their throat.
The lefties ,esp. the men, have to be asked,until answered,why they support a religion (Islam) that treats women and children as possessions. They have to be asked,repeatedly,if it is OK to diddle children if your religion allows it.
I do not back down,and I do not take anything less than a direct yes or no answer.They will squirm,insult,dodge,degrade,etc.,but if you have a thick skin and are persistent,they will fold.Then ask them why it took so long to get an answer. Do they have a tendency towards children?
I think ‘F- YOU!” followed by a boot to the head would be a decent answer too.
We need a Tea Party Song.
First chorus, I am liberal hear me roar freedom and Liberty I abhore, facism and tyrany are my vice now shut up NeoCons and be nice.
Add second chorus: Politeness and snivelity are a must, if you can’t debate with them you are turned to rust.
???????????????
Hahaha!! Ann Coulter?! Are you serious? The woman is a nut job and a moron…a bobbing head, a waste of space, a LOSER. And you criticize moronic made for TV liberal commentators? But Ann Coulter is the bees knees? Laughable.
BTJ: The woman is a nut job and a moron…a bobbing head, a waste of space, a LOSER.
There is SDA’s self-appointed voice of reason speaking. Amazing when someone REALLY pis*es you off, you too go over the edge.
A little blonde woman with a brain and an audience really twists your guts that much? She’ll be so glad. Whey don’t you tell her, and not us?
“A little blonde woman with a brain and an audience really twists your guts that much? ”
Yes, I’ll admit, Ann Coulter pushes me over the edge.
She’s smart, but she sure isn’t intelligent. She’s a NeoCon…a person who falls for anything, someone who can’t look to far past her own identity, a supporter of the collective..as long as it’s in her collective’s interests (the US). She lies and deceives, she regurgitates the US government’s ‘official’ version of foreign policy. She’s shallow, she analyses issues at such a superficial level that nothing can come from it.
Tell me you wouldn’t put Ann anywhere near the level of integrity and brilliance as Ayaan Hirsi?
Sometimes I think Kate should screen comments.
Some comments are a waste of her bandwidth.
.
.
.
BTJ, just for the sake of level headed intelligent discussion, if you have read Coulter’s piece , tell us how you have reached you conclusions.
I turn off the sound when she becomes too much to bear, which is more often than not.
Not being a man, her long, gorgeous legs bring only a rush of envy, but I bet they keep most men glued to the set.
Yeah gellen,you’re cool. Her words are trifle,but her legs,OMG,who cares.
You are a bit jealous?
Maybe your belt buckle and belly hide your true compassion? Maybe no one of either sex has looked at you,,, approvingly,,,for a while?
Hmmm,feeling a bit peckish,are you?
“I look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.”
~Martin Luther King, Jr.
Martin Luther King, Jr. was a lifelong Republican.
I’m certain that if he were alive today, he would be a Tea Partier.
MLK’s Niece, Dr. Alveda King to Stand With Glenn Beck at ‘Restore Honor’ Event in DC and Against Hate and Racism
http://tinyurl.com/3xjskx4
“just for the sake of level headed intelligent discussion, if you have read Coulter’s piece , tell us how you have reached you conclusions.”
Well first, I ‘ve seen enough of her to judge.
As to the article, it sounds like grade school drama, arguing about who said what, who did what, who insulted who, who’s a racist who’s not, immature and ridiculous insults.
It approaches the subject of poitical extremes at a shallow level of hearsay and bickering. She doesn’t come close to shedding any profound insight or analysis.
bj, if you have any evidence that the Tea Parties have been attended by racists by all means speak up. Otherwise, Anne Coulter’s argument stands. Tea Partiers have been accused of being Nazis by officials of the US government, and its a lie.
That you don’t like her isn’t relevant.
” if you have any evidence that the Tea Parties have been attended by racists by all means speak up”
Where did I make that claim? My comments were directed at author and the depth of her argument…which are both shallow and pointless. The fact is that both extreme ends of the political spectrum suffer from delusion and ignorance…and yes, racists (in that race is regarded as a value). Regarding the tea party, the ‘ObamaCare’ sign with a picture of a tribal man with Obama’s head super-imposed comes to mind.
My point is that the article is worthless, it doesn’t make any progress on the issue, it just sticks to childish ‘he said she said’ BS.
BTJ…like the typical leftard can only attack the individual..but not what they said.
Merely dismissing the article without taking on ANY of the points raised is gutless, and shows everyone you know nothing.
Of course..”My comments were directed at author and the depth of BTJ’s argument…which are both shallow and pointless.”..oh yeah….
“like the typical leftard can only attack the individual..but not what they said.”
Huh? I think you missed something in your hasty read.
“Merely dismissing the article without taking on ANY of the points raised is gutless, and shows everyone you know nothing.”
That was my point…there ARE no points to take on…the article is a childish rant about who said what…it serves no purpose, does not educate, does not approach the issue from anything but a superficial level.
“…it serves no purpose, does not educate, does not approach the issue from anything but a superficial level.”
BTJ
Brought to you by the same guy who posted:
“The solution must be holistic in that it seeks solutions to social, environmental, philosophical, economic, etc problems.
Socially, there is a great need for advances, we have made leaps and bounds technologically but socially we have hardly moved an inch. The stall to move past dependence on collectivist thinking is a major factor in this. Environmentally we need to be managing our resources much more closely, which requires a different economic approach. With the current model we are detached from the resources that support us, with money being the focus. The current model is essentially a huge and complex version of the trade and barter system that has been with us for hundreds, if not thousands of years. We can start by stopping the huge subsidies and advantages given to oil and gas. Our education system needs a complete rebuild so that creativity and human ingenuity are encouraged, rather than being stifled. It really takes much broader strategies than political legislature or a new trading scheme. We need to transcend into a higher level of human being.”
All put on your tinfoil hat and go: AaaUuuuuuMmmm!
“Brought to you by the same guy who posted:”
I’m not writing articles in the media for all to read am I? Nor did I make a superficial approach, I took a very general and vague approach because it’s an issue that can’t be summed up in one blog post. Ann wrote a whole article and couldn’t get past childish bickering over ‘who called who what’. If you can’t see the difference, then well, I pity you.