…
The Iranian leader said it was time for the world to respond.
“It is no longer acceptable that a small minority would dominate the politics, economy and culture of major parts of the world by its complicated networks, and establish a new form of slavery, and harm the reputation of other nations, even European nations and the U.S., to attain its racist ambitions,” he said…
The Daily Telegraph headline gets it right:
Britain walks out of Iran’s Ahmadinejad’s anti-Semitic speech at UN
But this is all the Toronto Star reports:
…firebrand Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad delivered a furious diatribe condemning capitalism and Israel. Canada and other nations stood up and walked out in protest…
Rather glaring omission, eh? More on the countries that walked out, not bad company for us:
…
Delegations from Argentina, Australia, Britain, Costa Rica, Denmark, France Germany, Hungary, Italy, New Zealand and the United States left the room…
…Canada had already said it would heed the boycott call…
And it looks like some Canadian journalist with an agenda rather jumped the gun:
…
Asked about why Canada would walk out when other Western nations are staying to hear Mr. Ahmadinejad, Mr. Harper said Canada makes its own decision on these matters…
The headline that, for some reason, we did not see:
Obama follows Harper’s lead
Update: in fact the Globe and Mail’s own story did get it right, good on them:
Canadian delegation leads walkout as Ahmadinejad speaks
…
In an attack on Jews around the world in last night’s speech, Mr. Ahmadinejad said…
Mark
Ottawa
A new low for the liberals- Iggy twisting this topic for his own means!
No doubt the Red Star got shivers up its’ leg from the speeches by Aminodab and the Gadfly.
That small minority rounds down to zero (0.002%) of the world’s population. Given that such a small number of people has managed to so thoroughly dominate the politics, economics and culture of the rest of us, I say it’s time to just give up and welcome and accept our not-so-new overlords. They’ve done a bang-up job so far and there’s no reason to think their amazing stewardship won’t continue.
Even better than walking out on Dinnerjacket would be walking out of the UN once and for all. Why it’s seen to be a good thing to hang out with thugs, crooks and dictators while pretending they have anything useful to say escapes me.
Bang on Mark
i watched CNN last night while the speach was going on They kept flashing “Canadians Walk Out”
then they started flashing “Low Level U.S. diplomats walk out”
Showing up for the speech and then walking out makes a strong statement for the support of the status quo at the UN when the UN shouldn’t be permitting the likes of Mr. Ahmadinejad, who just stole an election and is still brutalizing protesters over it, to give speeches in front of the General Assembly.
Not attending in the first place, as Canada and Israel did, is a protest against the too low standards of the UN itself as well as Mr. Ahmadinejad and Iran’s position.
Well Done PMSH. A Prime Minister with morals and the guts to show them. Not like the liarberal sychophant PMs who followed the orders of their boss, Chairman Mo.
The UN, despite laudable goals at its outset, has become nothing more than a mechanism for one world government, democracy hating, freedom hating, despotic dictators and their fellow travellers to try to wring more money and power from the world’s democracies. All the while, those same democracies foot the bill.
Now, if we could just get that walkout to be permanent.
P.S. I understand that PMSH was at a Timmy’s yesterday which caused the CBC to become apoplectic. Imagine that, a PM meeting with ordinary, everyday Canadians rather than listening to a ranting, lunatic, dictator
CBC CTV STAR and all: Even though you don’t get it, the majority of Canadian’s do. We understand why PM Harper did not go to the UN. Being with the people of his country was far more important than sitting in a room listening to a bunch of lunatics spew hate.
would the Canadian delegation leave were the lieberals in office? maybe. the new democraps? certainly not.
The Globe & Mail comments are a complete cesspool.
Chris in the Bridge – I wrote to the CBC ombudsman about the misleading story about Harper and Tim Horton’s broadcast on CBC radio. (I am pretty mad at them, even more than usual.)
There was no mention that Canada boycotted the speeches.
Grrrrrrrr
For those who may have missed it, here is our PM speaking about the Canadian walkout (from CTV last night).
Right on sir!
http://watch.ctv.ca/#clip216649
There is a short commercial first, then move the ‘time’ slider to 6 min 10 sec
Last words go to Liberal Ignatieff, that cunning linguist from O’s Harvard.
Quote from Liberal press release: “Actions speak louder than words, Mr. Harper.”*
Right on. Thank you.
The proof?
As your Ad$Cam leader said:
“Jean Chretien A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It’s a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it’s because it’s proven.”
Go home, Liberal Ignatieff.
*urlm.in/dbpv (lib.caca)
The UN has been co-opted by a fine set of assorted nuts, pushing the wrong agendas.
We don’t belong there anymore.
NP had this.
http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/story.html?id=2026172
The speech by PMSH is the most powerful element, tho. It must be seen
I’d feel much better about Canada’s dedication to national sovereignty and the democratic free world if the delegates who walked out on this despotic little wanker, continued walking right out of the UN – and refuse to return until all delegates from despotic nations are excluded from having any say in UN policy making.
> the new democraps? certainly not.
They would have clapped their hands till the blisters popped up.
This nonsense about PMSH not being at the UN, where the dolts in the Canadian media think he should have been, is complete and utter balderdash.
The reason the Prime Minister has Ministers in his Cabinet, is so that he can delegate governmental duties, in order to allow him to fulfill his. He can’t, nor should he, be all things to all people or in more than one place at a time.
Lawrence Cannon, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, was fulfilling his mandate by being at the UN with a delegation of Canadian officials. PMSH did not need to be there — in fact, he had other very important duties to perform here, and those duties happened to be at Tim Hortons.
What don’t the idiots in the MSM understand about this? Tempests in a teapot and mini-scandals concerning PMSH and the CPC have become the Canadian media’s stock-in-trade. Who will rid us of these meddlesome fools?
At least, as evidenced in the latest polls, increasing numbers of Canadians are recognizing the media’s duplicity in manipulating stories to make our Prime Minister look ineffectual. Despite their conniving, Canadians seem to be able to see through the crap.
Mark Steyn is filling in for Rush Limbaugh today; talking about the U.N. and Obama’s speech (9a.m. to 12 noon Pacific time)
http://www.kgmi.com or http://www.wabcradio.com
Enlightened Europeans get it wrong:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/for-the-sake-of-irans-reformers-at-least-lets-do-no-harm/article1299120/
Perhaps I’m reading too much into the Tim Hortons setting, but PMSH is very aware of the ‘photo-op’ dissing that goes on. I’m guessing it was very intentional to have the setting for his speech on Canadaian turf, and associated with a Canadian icon, a long way from New York.
And he is back in the US today.He could have stayed, but he didn’t. Another chess move.
The content of his speech did not require a UN podium.
MSM missed it,played the game,they lost.
The UN needs to be scrapped, or at least be fundamentally reformed.
E.g. countries in which the people are not allowed to vote in free elections must not be allowed to vote in UN setting. Obvious, really.
I’m so proud of our delegation walking out on that evil little man Ahmadinejad President of Iran. The only other suggestion I could have given them “throw a shoe at him”.
I’m so proud of our delegation walking out on that evil little man Ahmadinejad President of Iran. The only other suggestion I could have given them “throw a shoe at him”.
I am 70 tears old and have seen, something like 8 Prime Ministers come and go (starting with Louis St. Laurent). Not one of them I admired enough to want to shake his hand.
PM Harper is an exception, a truly great leader. I offer him my hand any time that he wishes to accept it.
delshilo, my condolences that you’re “70 tears old”! Has it been that difficult a row to hoe? 😉
Ahh, batb you brought a tear to my eyes.
delshilo: I think we should all send PM Harper an email to let him know how proud we are of him!
I am going to send one right now.
email address: pm@pm.gc.ca
Makes me proud of our Countrymen when our leaders show this level of moral indignation. Against a clear injustice if not plot to ghettoize Israel.
The more things change the same they are. Only the props change.
JMO
Mr.Harper continues to out maneuver the Lieberals and the lame stream media at the same time,one really has to be intellectually lazy to vote Liberal or swallow the crap the media spins out every day.
That’s the right stuff. An ignorant cockroach like dinnerjagoff deserves a lot worse, but the unitedneanderthals wont be seeing it in our lifetime.
Heard on the radio that jacketboys speech was used as a distraction from his murderous regime at home.
The other barbarian/leader Kadaffy will be landing in NFLD. shortly. Rumour has it that he will be greeted by Canadian dignitaries and given a less than warm welcome. Specifically,he will be told that welcoming the murderous scumbag behind the Lockerbie mass murder is just plain wrong. Now fuel up and get your ugly mug out of here. It just keeps on getting better. Can anyone imagine Paul Martin or the last few liberal leaders actually doing anything but bending over and swallowing our pride for this scum?
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Haaretz on Wednesday that he would not agree to a Palestinian demand that Israel accept the 1967 borders as a condition for renewing peace negotiations.Netanyahu also gave a condition of his own, saying Thursday that he would never drop his demand that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state.
“I told Abu Mazen [Abbas] I believe peace hinges first on his readiness to stand before his people and say, ‘We…are committed to recognizing Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people’,” Netanyahu said”I will not drop this subject and other important issues under any final peace agreement,”Netanyahu said.
“Netanyahu wants to impose his twisted logic on the entire world as well as the UN,” Hamas legislator Mushir al-Masri told Ynet Thursday, following the Israeli prime minister’s address before the UN General Assembly. Benjamin Netanyahu , he added, “Was seeking the UN’s support for his Zionist-terrorist agenda against the Palestinian people, in an attempt to cover up the massacre he has perpetrated.
Israel as a state was built on stolen Palestinian land and as a result of the … There are around six million Palestinian refugees and their descendents are … decency and morality are met, and after a referendum to decide on the name of …. West Bank Settler riot: what the media left out • International, Jewish claims of their 6 million Jewish died in holocaust from innocent Palestinian people who gave them shelter since 1904 “Palestine look for land in more land said in year 1947 and share of Jerusalem with Israel.”
==
Occupied by Israel: today
http://www.zionism-israel.com/map_of_israel_security_problem_distances.htm
======
The Second Aliyah of Jewish immigration was the most important and influential aliyah. It took place between 1904 and 1914, during which approximately 40,000 Jews immigrated into Ottoman Palestine, mostly from Russia and Poland[1], some from Yemen. Both the first and second waves of migrants were mainly Orthodox Jews.
===
British Mandate 1917–1948 include Palestine:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BritishMandatePalestine1920.png
====
1947:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UN_Partition_Plan_Palestine.png
==================================
1948:
http://www.palestinefacts.org/pf_1948to1967_land_1948.php
What determined Israel’s borders after the 1948 War of Independence?
====
Israel’s Pre-1967 Borders
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Peace/borders.html
http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Facts+About+Israel/Israel+in+Maps/Israel-s+Borders+on+the+Eve+of+the+6+Day+War+-+196.htm
—-
1993 Oslo Accords:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Is-wb-gs-gh_v3.png
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_Oslo_Peace_Accords_between_Palestinians_and_Israel
====
I think Iran may say if USA and all world cut and eliminate all nuclear weapon they join all countries as well follow their rules and
The Iranian leader, Ahmadinijad said that Israeli abused Palestinian and denied they have killed more than million Palestinian during their land in occupation in 1948 and take their land in 6 days war illegally while Palestinian helped Israeli before that time. If Israeli do not return land of state of Palestine before 1947 and more areas in share of Jerusalem with security of Palestinian in return Iranian denied holocaust too since Holocaust of killing 6 million Jewish died is not Muslim to pay cost of 6 million Palestine left their country in return of what happened in Germany in world war II. Both leaders are doing political civil war using emotional abuse against each others. The best to keep one country and have two state similar like Canadian to have two primer but one government to run that areas. today map is not fair for Palestine and not cover the land properly still this is up to Mr. Abbas prime minster of Paletine to come to solution for peace at the end.
====
Following the January 2006 election of the Hamas government, U.S. officials spoke of “hard coup” against the newly elected government and were determined to sow the seeds of civil war to oust the democratically-elected Hamas government. Over the 2006 and 2007, the United States supplied guns, ammunition and training to Palestinian Fatah activists to take on Hamas in the streets of Gaza and the West Bank in a U.S. effort that cost tens of millions of dollars. A large number of Fatah activists were trained and “graduated” from West Bank camps.From 15 January 2005 Mahmoud Abbas, has been the Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organisation since 11 November 2004 and became President of the Palestinian National Authority on 15 January 2005 on the Fatah
sep 25, 2005
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BarrierMay2005.png
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b5/We-map.png
look at 1994 and 1949 border line around palstine
====
Palestin in 2007:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:West_Bank_%26_Gaza_Map_2007_(Settlements).png
===============
Isreal district number: Districts of Israel: (1) Northern, (2) Haifa, (3) Center, (4) Tel Aviv, (5) Jerusalem, (6) Southern
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Israel_districts_numbered.png
===========
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Israel_Territories
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliyah
==============
Isreal occupied territories:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli-occupied_territories
===
Palestinian territories:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_territories
====
Israel:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel
===
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Peace/borders.html
http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Facts+About+Israel/Israel+in+Maps/Israel-s+Borders+on+the+Eve+of+the+6+Day+War+-+196.htm
====
Geography of Israel:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geography_of_Israel
Jerusalem :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerusalem
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golan_Heights
====
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilboa_Regional_Council
List of settlements;The following settlements belong to the Gilboa Regional Council:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Arbel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Hermon
settelment areas in Israel:
Kibbutzim(Beit Alfa ,Beit HaShita, Ein Harod (Ihud) .Ein Harod (Meuhad) ,Geva ,Heftziba ,Tel Yosef,Yizre’el) and Moshavim(Adirim ,Avital ,Barak ,Dvora ,Gadish ,Kfar Yehezkel ,Magen Shaul ,Meitav )and Communal settlements(,Gan Ner ,Gidona ,Merkaz Haver ,Merkaz Oman ,Merkaz Yael ,Moledet,Nir Yafeh )
Arab villages,(Muqeible ,Na’ura ,Sandala ,Tamra,Taibe) and
Former village,( Nurit)
How settlement built in Palstine state can get stop and map divided fairly by consider all in favor of both parties is big challengs among both.
Ahmadinejad offers US access to Iran’s nuclear scientists
DPA September 24th, 2009 NEW YORK – Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has offered the US and other Western powers access to scientists working in his country’s nuclear programme, according to a report by the Washington Post Thursday.
The offer – a confidence-building measure – was broached by Ahmadinejad while speaking with Post editors at the United Nations Wednesday.
He added that Iran would seek to buy enriched uranium from the US to use for medical purposes. A rejection, he was cited as saying, would only prove that Iran needed to enrich its own uranium.
“It is a humanitarian issue,” Ahmadinejad said. “I think this is a very solid proposal which gives a good opportunity for a start” to build trust between Tehran and Washington.
In a separate report from the Washington Times, former US weapons inspector David Albright confirmed that the US had provided Iran a medical reactor near Tehran prior to the Islamic revolution. He said that Iran for years has been unable to obtain uranium for this medical reactor
The discord over his appearance in New York came amid a heightened international effort to rein in Iran’s suspected nuclear weapon plans.
The US, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China – the so-called EU3 + 3 grouping that deals with Iran’s nuclear threat, issued a statement on Wednesday night saying it expected a “serious response” from Iran at the October 1 meeting, when the US will join direct joint talks with Iranians.
Hillary Clinton, the US Secretary of State, said it was a “powerful statement”.
“As a group we remain united in pressing Iran to comply with its international obligations,” she said. “We want to see a serious effort by Iran to discuss the nuclear issue which we are putting on the table.”
The Western powers in the group were encouraged by a suggestion from Dmitry Medvedev, the Russian president, that Moscow would be more prepared to accept impose sanctions.
Speaking after talks with President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the UN meeting, he said: “Sanctions rarely lead to productive results, but in some cases sanctions are inevitable.”
Mr Medvedev also urged the international community to send the right signals and incentives to Tehran, which has always insisted its nuclear development is purely for peaceful purposes.
Russia, which has strong trade links with Russia and has supplied materials for its nuclear energy programme, has stiffly resisted sanctions so far.
“We need to help Iran to [make] the right decisions,” he said.
Mr Obama meanwhile warned Iran that time was running out to open the doors of its nuclear programme to the rest of the world.
“Serious additional sanctions remain a possibility,” the president said, calling on Tehran to “seize the opportunity” at the talks with the permanent five UN Security Council members plus Germany.
New,and others. Israel was attacked in the 6 day war by 5 islamic countries and handed them their ass. They own the territories they took. If you want to go back and decide boundaries,let’s go back further.Go back,say,1400 years and the islamic people can keep all they had. This constant harping that one country stole anothers land seems to be only screeched by the Palestinians and their supporters. War is war,you don’t lose and then say,well I want my land back because even though I started it and then lost,I still want my land back and you are bullies. When was the last time an Islamic conqueror gave anything back. Grow up.
G-8: Iran has 3 months to stop uranium enrichment
By JOHN HEILPRIN (AP) – 5 hours ago
UNITED NATIONS — Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini said Thursday that the Group of Eight nations is giving Iran until the end of the year to commit to ending uranium enrichment and avoid new sanctions.
Frattini, whose nation holds the rotating chair of the club of wealthy nations known as the G-8, said the member’s foreign ministers agreed Wednesday night to give Iran more time.
“It seems to me a reasonable perspective. And after the end of December, I strongly hope we will have at that time practical moves from Iran,” Frattini said.
“That’s why together we decided while not excluding further measures, as even Russia apparently said, we have to give Iran a serious chance,” he said. “If we give a chance, let’s give a chance. Don’t, I would say, immediately put another option on the table. This would be counterproductive to the eyes of our counterpart. This is our strategy for the moment.”
The U.S. has only just won Russian agreement to consider new sanctions against Iran to add pressure on Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who insists Tehran’s nuclear program is designed only to generate electricity.
Frattini said that the informal agreement will be re-examined each month until the end of the year.
He said the G-8 could not let the Iranians believe the world’s economic powers are “relaxed” and willing to let Iran string them along.
“But we are to make it absolutely clear that our window of opportunity will not remain open indefinitely,” Frattini told a group of reporters on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly.
Frattini said G-8 ministers — the U.S., Britain, Italy, France, Germany, Canada, Japan and Russia — also agreed that “concerning links” were emerging between Iran and North Korea.
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev opened the door Wednesday to backing potential sanctions. He moved in that direction after President Barack Obama scrapped plans for a U.S. missile shield in Eastern Europe.
While U.S. and Russian officials denied a quid pro quo, Medvedev told the U.N. General Assembly that Obama’s roll-back on the missile defense plan “deserves a positive response.” Obama himself has said his missile decision may have spurred Russian good will as a “bonus.”
Ahmadinejad has taken a softer tone on many matters since arriving in New York for the U.N. meetings, emphasizing his interest in improving relations with the United States and expressing an openness to include nuclear matters on the negotiations agenda.
He has given no sign, however, that his country is willing to bargain away its nuclear program.
A member of the Russian delegation, speaking on condition of anonymity under ground rules set by the Russians, said Moscow’s final position on the question of imposing further sanctions would be determined, to a large extent, by Medvedev’s consultations here.
The U.S. and Russia are among six countries that will hold talks in Europe next week with Iran over its nuclear ambitions. Obama wants to reserve the possibility of pursuing tougher sanctions if those meetings lead to no restraint by Iran in the weeks ahead. Russia, which has strong economic ties with Tehran, has stood in the way of stronger action against Iran in the past
But China signalled unease over the UN ultimatum. Foreign ministry spokesman Jiang Yu said: “We believe that sanctions and exerting pressure are not the way to solve problems and are not conducive for diplomatic efforts on the Iran nuclear issue.”
obama said ‘ ‘Now is the time for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges’
Mr. Obama’s speech, however, was clearly designed to tell world leaders the United States is breaking with Mr. Bush’s era of unilateralism, and it follows on a stream of calls for rebuilding U.S. diplomacy.
Mr. Obama opened by listing some of his administration’s breaks with the past, such as his decree ordering the closing of Guantanamo Bay and his prohibition on U.S. government agents using torture, as well as his willingness to take action on climate change and to seek reductions of nuclear weapons and a treaty banning nuclear tests.
He outlined four pillars of international co-operation: preventing nuclear proliferation and working toward nuclear disarmament; promoting peace and combatting terrorism; preserving the planet; and building an equitable and growing global economy.
The speech has been accompanied by an unparalleled week of multilateralism by a U.S. president.
Mr. Obama spoke to a UN summit on climate change on Tuesday, addressed the UN General Assembly Wednesday, and will Thursday become the first U.S. president to personally chair the UN Security Council – for a meeting on nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament. Members are expected to approve a resolution toughening non-proliferation rules. Then Mr. Obama heads to Pittsburgh to host a summit of G20 leaders.
Mr. Obama, engaged in bruising domestic debates on issues such as health care, is now more popular abroad than at home. But many countries – the potential partners he seeks – are still uncertain whether he is outlining a lasting direction for the United States, or whether the country will revert to unilateralism.
Mr. Jones, the influential scholar, suggested Mr. Obama needs some domestic wins, such as getting Senate backing on a nuclear-test-ban treaty, to persuade doubters in foreign capitals.
“Globe and Mail – Campbell Clark – 13 hours ago
Ina clear and dramatic break with the Bush doctrine of unilateral action, US President Barack Obama pledged a “new era of engagement” with the world …
Video: UN Security Council Agrees Resolution to Ban Nuclear Weapons EUX.TV
Obama addresses the UN; more or less makes sense National Post
Obama plays same role as Bush Toronto Star
Bloomberg – BBC News
Hu said China would “keep our nuclear capabilities at the minimum level required for national security.” China, he said, “does not participate in any form of nuclear arms race.”
http://news.google.ca/news?hl=en&resnum=0&q=Iran+ahmadinejad&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ei=cx28SpHOHczk8QaG0qWSDg&sa=X&oi=news_group&ct=title&resnum=1
Whatever the lofty initial intent to found the UN, in the years since it’s membership has swelled enormously to circa 153 nations.
Only about 30, at the most, are democratic = NATO + Honduras + Isreal + Australia and New Zealand + Japan and India….maybe Pakistan…
The rest are ruled by despots and dictators……
I was watching Ahmadinejad speech in UN.
Camera showed many delegates leaving, empty places, some delegates listening. Suddenly it showed Palestinian delegation: one lady was listening with boring expression, the second one was picking her nose.
Ahmadi Nejad thinks he is a great leader, in reality he is everything but.
map of israel and Paletine does not make sense
both need moutain river excess and contact to neighborhood to big seas and to resources and place to live in city and farms and security borders and link all region to gether
gaza stand alone like you put mother seperated from children
this map of more abusive toward Palstine
Israel tactic is tactic usecd
from English when they arive over aboriginal in USA then when English entered in CANADA and austriaia over queen name power and profit of family business then when english enter in Arabic country like pasltine and so on
they made them mentally and finacialy abused using discrimination then when they got frustrated to defend themselve they call them name like terrorist or etc…
look at map of Israel and Palstine you know what i mean this map must go to 1947 and give more land to palstin and cut and past some area to give to isreal and give in return some to palstine in top since counties or state can l ink and not involve other person security as well.
nuclear plan for all counties creat any more nuclear weapn must be stop to all and only use nuclear for power and medical purpose not for any other purpose.
economic relatioship of all counties must link
government interfer and private seperation need to have freedom in border that government can not made private businss and stop their innovation get stoped or go under table broker bit money to government. this is also new way of goverment made money and cut businss private sector too
this method hapend in Iran and nobody can gain over it freely as well. growth of busines among both governmetn and priavte with consider of constituion right of freedom of speech need it.
this should stay in consider security for all too
“Firebrand” leader? Firebrand – that’s a GOOD guy, right? Harriet Tubman was a firebrand – the drooling shitwit loony freak Nazi Fascist pig bastard president of Iran – he’s one too! Toronto Star = useful idiots.
By contrast, you should hear Israeli PM Netanyahu’s eloquent, impassioned speech to the UN, available in three approx. 10 minute segments at Youtube. Powerful!
What gives with the “post held for moderator” nonsense? Because of the inserted hyperlink?
Second or third time in recent days AND my post NEVER appears.:-(
Netanyahu’s powerful speech to the UN, available in three Youtube segments.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOkHZgh1Dbc&feature=related